Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0629105-153510 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0629105-153510
論文名稱
Title
菲律賓的第二次人民力量革命:寡頭政治再現
The Second People’s Power Revolution in the Philippines: The Re-emergence of Oligarchy
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
209
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-06-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-06-29
關鍵字
Keywords
菲律賓、民主化、第二次人民力量革命(二次乙莎革命)、寡頭政治、政治暴力
the Philippines, the Second People’s Power Revolution(EDSA II), democratization, political violence, oligarchy
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5835 次,被下載 4891
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5835 times, has been downloaded 4891 times.
中文摘要
摘 要
2001年1月的「第二次人民力量革命」(二次乙莎革命)是菲律賓自1946年獨立以來,首次發生總統在任期內被迫下台的政治暴力事件。但是該事件既非「社會革命」,也不是純然的「軍事政變」;相反地,該事件似乎是「軍事政變」和「群眾運動」的綜合體,不過確切的說法應該是「揭舉民主旗幟」的菁英競爭。雖然,該事件或許只是菲律賓境內諸多暴亂事件之一,不過該事件卻招致外界諸多關注,特別是關於「寡頭政治是否再現?」的爭議。
為了解決上述爭議,本文試圖從「寡頭民主的歷史脈絡」、「民主轉型後的寡頭政治型態」、「二次乙莎革命之根源」及「二次乙莎革命之探討」等面向進行探討。首先,本文重新剖析菲律賓的歷史淵源,藉此追溯「寡頭政治」的根源。其次,本文針對「教會干政」、「軍事政變」、「憲政爭議」和「群眾運動」等現象進行論述,藉此彰顯民主轉型後的菲律賓,其民主政體的脆弱性。再者,本文分別從「革命原委」、「革命的爭議與探究」和「革命的迷思與檢討」等面向,深入釐清「二次乙莎革命」的相關爭議。最後,則是對「寡頭政治是否再現?」等相關爭議,進行評析和論證。
誠然,本文發現「寡頭政治」的型態始終都沒有在菲律賓消失;至於,「二次乙莎革命」只是政治菁英們彼此為爭奪權益,所進行的「競爭」遊戲。在此,本文必須重申「二次乙莎革命」之後的菲律賓政局,依然是寡頭政治當道。
Abstract
Abstract
The event that the Second People’s Power Revolution (EDSA II) forced President Estrada to resign from his presidency in January, 2001, was the first political violence after 1946, the year of the Independence of the Philippines. EDSA II, however, was neither a social revolution nor a military coup, but the combination of the two. The connotation of the event was actually a wrestle among a group of so-called pursuing democracy elite. The event, although, was probably considered as one of the domestic riots in the Philippines, it still became a controversial one which was specifically related to the issue of “the re-emergence of oligarchy”.
The study aimed to find out whether oligarchy re-emerged in the Philippine or not in terms of the context of oligarchy history, the oligarchy style of democracy transition, the source of EDSA II and the argument of EDSA II. The research, firstly, reanalyzed the history of the Philippines in order to trace back oligarchy in the Philippines, and then discussed the phenomena of “church involvement”, “military coup”, “constitutional conflict” and “people movement”, to show the fragile democracy in post-Marcos era. More than that, this study tried to clarify the myth of EDSA II, in terms of “ the cause and effect of the revolution”, “the argument and examination of the revolution” and “the myth and discussion of the revolution”. Finally, the issue of “the re-emergence of oligarchy” was discussed and concluded.
To sum up, the oligarchy did appear in the Philippines. With respect to EDSA II, it was by all means a competition game played by elite. Oligarchy, therefore, was still the main stream in this country.
目次 Table of Contents
目次

第一章 導論……………...………………………………………………………………...1
第一節 研究緣起………………………………………………………………………1
第二節 文獻探討………………………………………………………………………5
第三節 研究假設、議題與名詞定義………………………………………………..36
第四節 研究方法……………………………………………………………………..40
第五節 論文章節安排………………………………………………………………..45
第二章 寡頭政治的歷史脈絡…………………………………………………………47
第一節 殖民時期:寡頭政治萌芽…………………………………………………..47
第二節 獨立建國時期:寡頭政治發展…………………………………………......61
第三節 馬可仕獨裁時期:寡頭政治轉變…………………………………………..70
第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………………..76
第三章 民主轉型後的寡頭政治型態………………………..……………………...79
第一節 後馬可仕時期的政局…………………………………….………………..79
第二節 民主轉型後的寡頭政治特質…………………………………….………..93
第三節 民主轉型後的寡頭政治型態…………………………………….………..98
第四節 小結…………………………………….…………………………………110
第四章 二次乙莎革命之根源…………………………...…..…….……..…………..113
第一節 「革命」的原委…………………………………………....….……………113
第二節 「革命」的爭議與探究……………………………………….……………124
第三節 「革命」的迷思與檢討……………………………………………………131
第四節 小結………………………..………………………………………………138
第五章 二次乙莎革命之探討…...…...…..…………………………………….…….141
第一節 「革命」的本質:寡頭菁英競爭……………………………………………141
第二節 「革命」的模式:寡頭政治的惡性循環………………..…………………145
第三節 「革命」的省思:寡頭政治再現…………………………………………152
第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………………165
第六章 結論……………………………………………………………………….…...169
參考書目………………………………………………………………………………….179
附錄…………………………………………………………………………………….…..201

圖表目次

圖目次
圖1-1:精英政治與政治穩定之關係……………………………………………………….27
圖1-2:本論文架構圖……………………………………………………………………….38

表目次
表1-1:參與訪談的國會議員和政黨代表………………………………………………….44
表2-1:美國駐菲律賓總督(1901-1935年)一覽表………………………………………60
表2-2:獨立建國時期(1946-1972年),菲律賓總統一覽表……………………………68
表2-3:菲律賓歷屆(1946-1969年)眾議員選舉、黨派別議席統計……………………69
表2-4:菲律賓歷屆(1946-1969年)參議員選舉、黨派別議席統計……………………69
表2-5:1984年菲律賓國會大選議席統計………………………………………………….72
表2-6:1986年菲律賓全國大選的計票結果……………………………………………….72
表3-1:後馬可仕時期(1986-2001年),菲律賓總統一覽表…………………………...80
表3-2:艾奎諾政府的內閣名單…………………………………………………………….83
表3-3:1992年菲律賓全國大選成果統計………………………………………………….85
表3-4:羅慕斯政府的內閣名單…………………………………………………………….87
表3-5:1998年菲律賓全國大選成果統計………………………………………………….89
表3-6:艾斯特拉達政府的內閣名單……………………………………………………….91
表3-7:1996-1999年菲律賓的經濟指標……………………………………………………92
表3-8:菲律賓近十年來(1992-2001)的總體經濟指標…………………………………93
表3-9:艾奎諾總統(1986-1992年)之施政滿意度評比…………………………………95
表3-10:艾斯特拉達總統的廚房內閣名單……………………………………………..….98
表3-11:艾奎諾總統任內的軍事政變……………..………………………………………107
表4-1:艾斯特拉達貪瀆調查(2000年),眾議院之檢控官成員………………………..117
表4-2:參議院調查法庭(2001年)之重要證人…………………………………………119
表4-3:參議院調查法庭(2001年)之表決結果統計……………………………………120
表4-4:1986-2000年,菲律賓的總體經濟表現…………………………………………..128
表5-1:艾斯特拉達總統的緋聞名單………………………………………………………149
表5-2:菲律賓歷屆總統(1935-1969年)階級背景統計………………………………..154
表5-3:1950-2000年,菲律賓各主要地區的菁英家族…………………………………...157
表5-4:二次乙莎革命前(第四至八屆)之參議員名單…………………………………..159
表5-5:二次乙莎革命後(第九至十二屆)之參議員名單………………………………..160
表6-1:菲律賓歷屆總統(1946-1972年)階級族群身分…………………………………170
表6-2:菲律賓歷屆總統(1986-2001年)階級族群身分………………………………172
參考文獻 References
參考書目
◎ 中文部分
一、專書
B. Guy Peters著,陳永芳譯,2003,比較政治的理論與方法。台北:韋伯文化。
David Potter(et al.)著,王謙 等譯,2000,民主化的歷程。台北:韋伯文化。
Georg Sørensen著,李酉潭、陳志瑋譯,1998,民主與民主化。台北:韋伯文化。
Howard J. Wiarda著,李培元譯,2000,比較政治的新趨向。台北:韋伯文化。
Jan-Erik Lane and Svante Ersson著,何景榮譯,2003,新制度主義政治學。台北:韋伯文化。
Rod Hague, Martin Harrop and Shaun Breslin著,侍建宇譯,2001,比較政府與政治。台北:五南。
Samuel P. Huntington著,劉軍寧譯,1994,第三波:二十世紀末的民主化浪潮。台北:五南。
Todd Landman著,周至杰譯,2003,比較政治的議題與途徑。台北:韋伯文化。
William Doyle著,蔡百銓譯,1995,法國大革命的起源。台北:國立編譯館。
加塔諾•莫斯卡著,賈鶴鵬譯,2002,統治階級(政治科學原理)。中國南京:譯林出版社。
尼古拉斯•塔林主編,王士祿等譯,2002,劍橋東南亞史(第二卷)。中國雲南:雲南人民出版社。
江炳倫,1973,政治發展的理論,台北:台灣商務。
-1989,亞洲政治文化個案研究。台北:五南。
米爾斯(C. Wright Mills)著,王逸舟譯,1994,權力菁英。台北:桂冠。
何曉東編,1976,菲律賓古代近史,台北:三民。
吳釗燮編譯,1998,菲律賓選舉法規彙編。台北:中央選舉委員會。
呂亞力、吳乃德編譯,2000,民主理論選讀。台北:風雲論壇。
宋鎮照,1995,發展政治經濟學:理論與實踐。台北:五南。
李帕特(Arend Lijphart)著,高德源譯,民主類型:三十六個現代民主國家的政府類型與表現。台北:桂冠。
李毓中,2000,「菲律賓近代經濟的肇始:荷西巴斯克總督及其經濟發展計劃(1778-1787)」,收錄於蕭新煌編,東南亞的變貌。台北:中研院東南亞區域研究計劃。
-2003,菲律賓簡史。南投:暨大東南亞研究中心。
沈紅芳編,1985,菲律賓。中國上海:上海辭書。
帕累扥著,劉北成、許虹編譯,1993,菁英的興衰。台北:桂冠。
易君博,1993,政治理論與研究方法。台北:三民。
金應熙 等編,1990,菲律賓史。中國河南:河南大學出版社。
約瑟夫•阿洛伊•熊彼得(Joseph A. Schumpeter)著,吳良健譯,2003,資本主義、社會主義與民主。台北:左岸文化。
查爾斯•林布隆(Charles E. Lindblom)著,王逸舟譯,1994,政治與市場:世界的政治經濟制度。台北:桂冠。
張錫鎮,1999,東南亞政府與政治。台北:揚智文化。
陳烈甫,1960,菲律賓的歷史與中菲關係的過去與現在。台北:正中。
-1969,菲律賓民治制度的理論與實際。台北:正中。
-1983,馬可仕治下的菲律賓。台北:台灣商務。
-1988,東南亞第一位女總統:柯拉蓉艾奎諾。台北:台灣商務。
陳劍秋,1988,菲律賓華僑概況。台北:正中。
陳鴻瑜,1980,菲律賓的政治發展。台北:台灣商務。
-2001,東南亞政治論衡。台北:翰蘆圖書。
-2003,菲律賓史:東西文明交會的島國。台北:三民。
傅恆德,2001,政治暴力與革命:理論與研究。台北:韋伯文化。
斯科克波(Theda Skocpol)著,劉北成譯,1998,國家與社會革命。台北:桂冠。
普沃斯基(Adam Przeworski)著,張光、馬俊峰譯,1998,民主與市場。台北:桂冠。
賀凌虛撰述,陳鴻瑜校定,1996,「菲律賓共和國憲法」,新編世界各國憲法大全。台北:國民大會秘書處資料組。
賀聖達、王文良、何平,1995,戰後東南亞歷史發展(1945-1994)。中國雲南:雲南大學出版社。
奧斯丁•倫尼著,倪達仁譯,1995,政治學。台北:雙葉。
道爾(Robert A. Dahl)著,張明貴譯,1989,多元政治:參與和反對。台北:唐山。
摩爾(Barrington Moore, Jr.)著,蕭純美譯,1992,民主與獨裁的社會起源。台北:遠流。
戴維•賈里和朱莉婭•賈里著,周業謙和周光淦譯,2000,社會學辭典。台 北:貓頭鷹。
韓培爾,1998,社會科學方法論:量化與質化Q&A。台北:風雲論壇。
薩扥利(Giovanni Sartori )著,淦克超譯,1971,民主原理。台北:幼獅。
薩德賽(D. R. SarDesai)著,蔡百銓譯,2001,東南亞史。台北:麥田。
顧長永,2000,東南亞政府與政治。台北:五南。
二、期刊論文與學位論文
刁曼蓬•李瑟,1998,「新菲律賓啟示錄:羅慕斯領導力的傳奇」,天下雜誌,第202期,頁36-51。
中研院亞太區域研究中心,2002,「菲律賓大事紀」,亞太研究通訊,第16期,頁136-165。
亢 升,1998,「埃斯特拉達上台伊始的菲律賓」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第6期,頁11-14。
孔 建,2001,「菲律賓的監察專員制度管窺」,世界縱橫,第12期,頁20-22。
王子昌,2001,「權力的合法性:菲律賓政權更佚的政治學分析」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第3期,頁20-23。
尼爾•泰特著,黃語生譯,1998,「法院與菲律賓民主的瓦解和重建:得自最高法院議程的證據」,國際社會科學雜誌,第2期,頁151-165。
朱仁顯,1997,「菲律賓修憲運動透視」,東南亞,第4期,頁47-50。
-1999,「90年代菲律賓正黨的變化及其特點」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第5期,頁 74-78。
江俊霆,1999,菲律賓柯拉蓉政權崛起之研究(1983-1986):民粹主義觀點之個案分析。國立台灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
吳杰偉,2000,「菲律賓總統彈劾事件及其影響」,東南亞,第3-4期,頁41-44。
-2001,「菲律賓政治文化的發展過程及其特點」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第3期,頁24-32。
宋鎮照,1996,「菲律賓國家機關與外來投資之政經關係」,台灣經濟,第232期,頁1-15。
李 翌,1998,「從電影明星到國家總統:98年菲律賓大選透析」,東南亞縱橫,第3期,頁1-4。
李毓中,2002,「遺落在東亞的美洲島嶼:西屬菲律賓殖民地的形成與變遷」,歷史月刊,第179期,頁60-68。
李路曲,2004,「菲律賓多黨政治面臨的挑戰與民主的發展」,國際政治研究,第1期,頁109-115。
沈紅芳,1997,「菲律賓拉莫斯政府的經濟改革及其成效」,世界經濟與政治,第12期,頁70-74。
-2001,「埃斯特拉達:菲律賓特色民主的產物與替罪羊」,南洋問題研究,第2期,頁28-36。
林 江,2002,「菲律賓和印度實行西方式民主制的必然性」,當代亞太,第4期,頁33-40。
林文程,1997,「民主政治與菲律賓的社會改革」,國立中山大學社會科學季刊,第1卷第1期,頁253-282。
洪松輝,1996,「論菲律賓文武關係之演變」,東亞季刊,第27卷第5期,頁123-140。
胡?痟I、崔運武,1998,「論菲律賓的政黨政治」,思想戰線,第9期,頁10-15。
翁俊桔、顧長永,2004,「斷裂的文明衝突:菲南分離運動之個案分析」,問題與研究,第43卷第6期,頁103-128。
張明德,1986,「舉世矚目的菲律賓政局」,問題與研究,第25卷第6期,頁1-10。
張耀秋,1983,「菲律賓的政治、經濟及外交動向」,問題與研究,第22卷第12期,頁23-35。
莊禮偉,1997,「奎松與菲律賓獨立運動」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第6期,頁56-59。
陳 康,1997,「美國獨霸菲律賓的國際環境探析」,焦作工學院學報,第16卷第6期,頁90-93。
陳明華,1999,「菲律賓進口替代戰略的實施及其不利影響」,東南亞,第2期,頁22-27。
陳鴻瑜,1983,「菲律賓與美國關係的新展望」,問題與研究,第22卷第2期,頁24-36。
-1985,「菲律賓共產主義運動之發展」,問題與研究,第24卷第10期,頁66-84。
-1986,「菲律賓軍人與政治發展」,問題與研究,第25卷第10期,頁39-50。
-1987,「菲律賓新舊憲法之比較」,問題與研究,第26卷第6期,頁1-11。
-1993,「美國自菲律賓撤軍及其與東南亞之安全關係」,美國月刊,第8卷第3期,頁37-42。
-1998,「一九九八年菲律賓總統大選」,問題與研究,第37卷第9期,頁 31-44。
-1999,「菲律賓的政黨政治:從兩黨政治到多黨政治之轉變」,問題與研 究,第38卷第5期,頁31-58。
曾怡禎,1999,「走出失樂園的菲律賓」,台灣經濟研究月刊,第22卷第8期,頁59-64。
馮 雷,2000,「菲律賓天主教會同馬科斯政權的關係」,東南亞研究(中國廣州暨南大學),第4期,頁53-57。
楊宏雲,2000,「從〈巴黎條約〉到〈泰丁斯-麥克杜菲法〉:美統時期美國對菲律賓關稅和貿易政策的演變及其影響」,南洋問題研究,第4期,頁75-83。
楊俊雄,1999,「菲律賓政經情勢」,輸出入金融雙月刊,第80期,頁10-18。
楊衛民、祁可前,2001,「馬可仕獨裁下的菲律賓土地改革(1972-1986)」,史學月刊,第5期,頁105-109。
楊聰榮,2001,「菲律賓獨立革命與西美戰爭:論東南亞自主歷史史觀下國族歷史論述的成就與侷限」,新史學,第12卷第1期,頁187-232。
翟 坤,2001,「菲律賓艾斯特拉達彈劾案」,國際資料信息,第2期,頁20-22。
趙建中,2002,「2001年菲律賓與印尼政權移轉經驗對民主憲政的意義」,黃埔學報,第42輯,頁79-95。
蔣細定,2000,「菲律賓社會經濟:進展與問題」,南洋問題研究,第101期,頁13-18。
羅石圃,1984,「艾奎諾遇害對馬可仕政權的震撼」,問題與研究,第23卷第1期,頁14-22。
-1984,「菲國會改選結果與影響」,問題與研究,第23卷第9期,頁29-38。
-1987,「菲律賓『八二八』兵變及其影響」,問題與研究,第27卷第2期,頁57-64。
顧長永,1990,「論由盛而衰的菲律賓糖業」,問題與研究,第29卷第8期,頁42-54。
-1995,「美軍撤離菲律賓事件的決策分析」,歐美研究,第25卷第1期,頁37-64。
◎報章雜誌
Biz News Asia, Vol.2, No.40(December 13-20, 2004)
Far Eastern Economic Review(October, 2000-May, 2001)
亞洲週刊(2000年5月-2001年5月)
◎ 網站資訊
http://www.senate.gov.ph(菲律賓參議院網站);
http://www.congress.gov.ph(菲律賓眾議院網站);
http://www.up.edu.ph(菲律賓大學網站);
http://www.worldnews.com.ph(菲律賓世界日報網站);
http://straitstimes.asial.com.sg(新加坡海峽時報網站);
http://www.cia.gov/(美國中情局網站)。
◎ 英文部分
一、專書
Abueva, Jose V. and Emerlinda R. Roman(eds.), 1993, Corazon C. Aquino: Early Assessments of Her Presidential Leadership and Administration and Her Place in History. Manila: University of the Philippines Press.
Abueva, Jose V.(et al.)(eds.), 1998, The Ramos Presidency and Administration: Record and Legacy(1992-1998). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
--1998, The Philippines into the 21st Century: Future Scenarios for Governance, Democracy and Development, 1998-2025. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Agoncillo, Teodoro A. and Milagros C. Cuerrero, 1983, History of the Filipino People. Quezon City: R.P. Garcia Pub.
Agpalo, Remigio E., 1972, The Political Elite and the People: A Study of Politics in Occidental Mindoro. Manila: College of Public Administration, University of the Philippines.
--1973, The Organic-Hierarchical Paradigm and Politics in the Philippines. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba, 1965, The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aquino, Belinda A., 1987, Politics of Plunder: The Philippines under Marcos. Quezon City: Great Books Trading.
Barreveld, Drs. Dirk J., 2001, ERAP OUSTED, People Power versus Chinese Conspiracy. Philippines, Cebu: Arcilla Travel Guides Incorporated.
Bello, Walden ,David Kinley and Elaine Elinson, 1982, Development Debacle: The World Bank in the Philippines. San Francisco: Food First Books.
Bernas, Joaquin G., S. J.(ed.), 2002, A Living Constitution: The Abbreviated Estrada Presidency. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Bolongaita, Emil P. Jr., 1999, “The Philippines: Consolidating Democracy in Difficult Times” in Chia Siow Yue(et al.)(eds.) Southeast Asian Affairs 1999. Singapore: ISEAS.
Boudreau, Vincent, 2000, Grass roots and Cadre in the Protest Movement. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Bresnan, John, 1986, Crisis in the Philippines: The Marcos era and Beyond. New York: Princeton University Press.
Broad, Robin, 1988, Unequal Alliance: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buss, Claude A., 1987, Cory Aquino and The People of the Philippines. California, Stanford: Stanford Alumni Association.
Caoili, Olivia C., 1993, The Philippine Congress: Executive-Legislative Relations and The Restoration of Democracy. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Cariño, Ledivina V., 1988, Bureaucracy for A Democracy: The Struggle of the Philippine Political Leadership and the Civil Service in the Post-Marcos Period. Quezon City: Publications Office, College of Public Administration in University of the Philippines.
Celoza, Albert F., 1998, Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Singapore: Toppan Company (S) Pte Ltd.
Chapman, William, 1987, Inside the Philippine Revolution: The New People’s Army and Its Struggle for Power. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Chee, Chan Heng, 1993, “ Democracy: Evolution and Implementation- An Asian Perspective” in Robert L. Bartley (et al.) (eds.), Democracy and Capitalism: Asian and American Perspectives. Singapore: ISEAS.
Collier, Ruth B. and David Collier, 1991, Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Collins, Joseph, 1989, The Philippines: Fire on the Rim. CA, San Francisco: A Food First Book.
Congress of the Philippines, 1998, The Estrada Presidency: A Prersidency fir the People. Manila: Congress of the Philippines Press.
Constantino, Renato, 1976, Dissent in Philippine Society: The Filipino Elite. Quezon City: Malaya Books, Inc.
Coronel, Sheila S., 2000, Investigating Estrada: Millions, Mansions and Mistresses. Quezon City: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.
Corpuz, Onofre D., 1969, “ Cultural Foundations”, in Jose V. Abueva and Raul P. de Guzman (eds.), Foundations and Dynamics of Filipino Government and Politics. Manila: The Bookmark Inc.
Cortes, Irene R., 1966, The Philippine Presidency: A Study of Executive Power. Quezon City: Law Center in University of the Philippines.
Coser, Lewis A. (ed.), 1977, Masters of Sociological thought ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Dahl, Robert A., 1956, A Preface to Democratic theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Davis, Leonard, 1989, Revolutionary Struggle in the Philippines. London: The Camelt Press.
De Guzman, Raul and Mila A. Reforma, 1988, Government and Politics of the Philippines. New York: Oxford University Press.
Doronila, Amando, 1992, The State, Economic Transformation, and Political Change in the Philippines (1946-1972). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
--2001, Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis. Makati City: Philippine Daily Inquirer, Inc.
--2002, Investigating Estrada: Millions, Mansions and Mistresses: A Compilation of Investigative Reports. Manila: Inquirer Books.
--2002, The Fall of Joseph Estrada: The Inside Story. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.
Emerson, Rupert, 1955, Representative Government in Southeast Asia. Mass., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Federation of Filipino-Chinese, 1995, Ruby Anniversary 1994: Commemorative Album. Philippine, Manila: Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Inc.
Ferrer, Miriam Coronel, 2000, “The Philippines: Governance Issues come to the Fore” in Southeast Asian Affairs, 2001. Singapore: ISEAS.
-- 2004, Elections and the Zigzag Path to Democratic Consolidation In the Philippines. Paper presented at the Philippine Political Science Association Conference, 22-23 Oct. in Manila.
Gleeck, Lewis E. Jr, 1987, President Marcos and The Philippine Political Culture. Manila: Loyal Printing.
Golay, Frank H.(et al.), 1969, Underdevelopment and Economic Nationalism in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gonzalez, Joaquin L. III, 2001, “Philippines Continuing People Power” in John Funston(ed.), Government and Politics in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS.
Grunder, Garel A. and William E. Livezey, 1997, The Philippines and the United States. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Hawes, Gary, 1987, The Philippine State and the Marcos Regime: The Politics of Export. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Hayden, Joseph Ralston, 1950, The Philippines: A Study in National Development. New York: Macmillan.
Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, 2001, Exploration of The Middle Classes in Southeast Asia. Taipei: PROSEA.
Jones, Gregg R., 1989, Red Revolution: Inside the Philippine Guerrilla Movement. Boulder: West-view Press.
Juan, Linz, and Alfred Stepan, 1996, Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kang, David C., 2002, Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. UK: The Cambridge University Press.
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. Tria, 1990, Everyday Politics in the Philippines: Class and Status Relations in a Central Luzon Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kessler, Richard J., 1989, Rebellion and Repression in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lande, Carl B., 1973, “Leadership and Follower-ship in a Philippines’ Village” in John T. McAlister, Jr. (ed.), Southeast Asia, The Politics of National Integration. New York: Random House.
Lande, Carl H., 1965, Leaders, Factions and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Politics. New York: Yale University, the Center of Southeast Asia Studies Press.
-- 1996, Post-Marcos Politics: A Geographical and Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Presidential Election. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Laothamatas, Anek(ed.),1999, Democratization in Southeast Asia and East Asia. Singapore, ISEAS.
Laquian, Aprodicio A. and Eleanor R. Laquian, 2002, The Erap Tragedy: Tales from The Snake Pit. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
Lasch, Christopher, 1995, The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lasswell, Harold, 1936, Politics: Who gets What, When, How? New York: McGraw-Hill.
Liang, Dapen, 1939, The Development of Philippine Political Parties. Hong Kong: South China Morning Post.
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan, 1996, Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, Martin S., 1959, Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press,
Majul, Cesar Adib, 1996, The Political and Constitutional ideas of the Philippine Revolution. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Mangahas, Mahar, 1994, The Philippine Social Climate. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
Maramba, Asuncion David(et al.)(eds.), 2000, Seven in the Eye of History. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
Martinez, Manuel Festin, 1999, A Political of Our Time: Presidential Policies from Aquino to Estrada. Paranaque City: MFM Enterprise.
May, R. J. and Francisco Nemenzo(eds.), 1985, The Philippines After Marcos. London: Croom Helm.
McCoy, Alfred W., 1993, “ An Anarchy of Families: The Historiography of State and Family in the Philippines”, in Alfred W. McCoy (ed.), An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines. Madison: Center for Southeast Asian Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison.
McGeveran, William A., Jr. (eds.)(et al.) , 2003, The World Almanac and Book of Facts 2002. New York: World Almanac Books.
Michels, Robert, 1959, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Dover.
Moore, Brington, 1966, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mosca, Gaetano, 1939, The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Neher, Clark D. and Ross Marlay, 1995, “ The Philippines” in Democracy and Development in Southeast Asia: The Winds of Change. UK: West-view Press.
O’Donnell, Guillermo A.、 Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead(eds.), 1991, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Office of the President, 1992, The Aquino Administration: Record and Legacy(1986-1992). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Pangilinan, Noel T., Eric U. Gutierrez and Ildefonso C. Torrente(eds.),1992 , All in the Family: A study of elites and Power relations in the Philippines. Quezon City: Institute for Popular Democracy.
Paredes, Ruby R.(ed.),1988, Philippine Colonial Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Phelan, John Leddy, 1967, The Hispanization of the Philippines: Spanish Aims and Filipino Response 1565-1700. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Pomeroy, William J., 1992, Colonialism, Collaboration, and Resistance. New York: International Publishers.
Porter, Gareth, and Delfin J. Ganopin, Jr., 1988, Resource, Population and the Philippines. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
Putnam, Robert D., 1976, The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Putzel, James, 1992, A Captive Land: the Politics of Agranian Reform in the Philippines. Manila: Catholic Institute for International Relations Monthly Review Press and Ateneo University Press.
Rama, Napoleon G. (ed.), 1998, Manila Bulletin: The Nation’s Leading Newspaper. Quezon City: Manila Bulletin Publishing Corporation.
Rho, Byeongil, 1992, State Capability and Third World Politics: A Comparative Analysis of South Korean and Philippine cases. A Dissertation submitted to the State University of New York at Albany.
Riedinger, Jeffrey, 1995, Agrarian Reform in the Philippine: Democratic Transitions and Re-distributive Reform. California: Stanford University press.
Riggs, Fred W., 1975, The Ecology of Public Administration. London: Asia Publishing House.
Roces, Mina, 2001, Kinship Politics in Postwar Philippines: The Lopez Family, 1946-2000. Manila: De La Salle University Press, Inc.
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, E. Stephens and J. Stephens, 1992, Capitalist Development And Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Solon, Orville Jose C., Raul V. Fabella and Joseph J. Capuno, 2001, “ Is Local Development Good Politics? Local Development Expenditures and the Reelection of Governors in the Philippines for 1992, 1995 and 1998.” UPSE Discussion Papers in Quezon City, Manila.
Tatad, Francisco S., 2002, A Nation on Fire: The Unmaking of Joseph Ejercito Estrada and the Remaking of Democracy in the Philippines. Quezon City: Icon Press Inc.
Taylor, George. E., 1974, The Philippines and the United States: Problems of Partnership. New York: Praeger.
Thompson, Mark R., 1996, The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thompson, W. Scott, 1992, The Philippines in Crisis: Development and Security in The Aquino era(1986-1992). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Tigno, Jorge V., 2005, “Economic Viability and Local Governance: The Political Economy of Decentralization in the Philippines” in Yasutami Shimomura(ed.), The Role of Governance in Asia. Singapore: ISEAS.
Timberman, David G., 1991, A Changeless Land: Continuity and Change in Philippine Politics. Singapore: ISEAS.
Tolentino, Rolando B., 2001, National / Transnational: Subject Formation and Media In and On the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Torbjorn, Tannsjo, 1997, Populist Democracy: A Defence. New York: Routledge.
Tordesillas, Ellen and Greg Hutchinson, 2001, Hot Money and Warm Bodies: The Downfall of Philippine President Joseph Estrada. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
Turner, Mark, 1987, Regime Change in the Philippines: The Legitimation of the Aquino Government. Canberra: Australian National University.
UST Social Research Center, 1996, The Philippine Revolution and The Involvement of The Church. Manila: Social Research Center University of Santo Thomas.
Velasco, Rheno A.(ed.), 2001, The President in Republic of the Philippines. Quezon City: Loacan Publishing House.
Wingspread, Racine, 1986, The Philippines and the United States. New York: The Asia Society.
Wolters, Willem, 1983, Politics, Patronage and Class Conflict in Central Luzon. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
Wurfel, David, 1969, “ Individuals and Groups in the Philippine Policy” in Jose V. Abueva and Raul P. de Guzman (eds.), Foundations and Dynamics of Filipino Government and Politics. Quezon City: The Bookmark Inc.
--1988, Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Wynne, Alison, 1980, No Time for Crying: Stories of Philippine Women. Hong Kong: Resource Center for Philippine Concerns.
二、期刊論文與學位論文
Abueva, Jose V., 1964, “Bridging the Gap Between the Elite and the People in the Philippines” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.8, No.4: 325-347.
Adriano, F. D., 1984, “A Critique of the ‘ Bureaucratic Authoritarian State’ Thesis: The Case of the Philippines” Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol.14, No.4: 459-484.
Agpalo, Remigio E., 1971, “The Philippine Political System in the Perspective of History” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.15, No.3-4: 239-258.
Alatas, Syed Farid, 1993, “Theoretical Perspectives on the Role of State Elites in Southeast Asian Development” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.14, No.4: 368-395.
Ando, Hirofumi, 1971, Elections in the Philippines: Mass-Elite Interaction through the Electoral Process. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan.
Bankoff, Greg, 1999, “A History of Poverty: The Politics of natural disasters in the Philippines, 1985-95” The Pacific Review. Vol.12, No.3: 381-420.
Bastiaan van de Loo, 2004, “ The Failure of the Philippine Presidential System” Asia Europe Journal. Vol.2, No.2: 257-269.
Bauzon, Kenneth E., 1990, “The Multilateral Assistance Initiative and Democratization in the Philippines” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.12, No.2: 120-133.
Bello, W., 1984, “Benigno Aquino: Between Dictatorship and Revolution in the Philippines” Third World Quarterly. Vol.6, No.2: 283-309.
Bertrand, Jacques, 2000, “Peace and conflict in the Southern Philippines: Why the 1996 Peace Agreement is fragile.” Pacific Affairs, Vol.73, No.1: 37-54.
Blume, Francine Barbara, 1993, The Process of Nonviolent Politics: Lessons from the Philippines. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Hawaii.
Brillantes, Alex B. Jr., 1993, “ The Philippines in 1992: Ready for Take Off?” Asian Survey. Vol.33, No.2: 224-230.
Bryant, Raymond L., 2002, “Non-governmental Organizations and Governmentality: ‘Consuming‘ Biodiversity and Indigenous People in the Philippines” Political Studies. Vol.50: 268-292.
Buendia, Rizal G., 1993, “Colonialism and Elitism in Philippine Political Development: Assessing the Roots of Underdevelopment” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.37, No.2 :141-174.
Case, William, 1999, “ The Philippine Election in 1998: A Question of Quality” Asian Survey. Vol.39, No.3: 468-485.
Choi, Jungug, 2001, “Philippines Democracies Old and New: Election, Term Limits, And Party Systems” Asian Survey. Vol.41, No.3: 488-501.
Corning, Gregory P., 1990, “ The Philippine Bases and U.S. Pacific Strategy” Pacific Affairs. Vol.63, No.1: 6-23.
Corpuz, Onofre D.,1985, “Filipino Political Parties and Politics” Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review. Vol.23, No.2-4: 141-157.
Crone, Donald K., 1988, “ State, Social elites and Government capacity in Southeast Asia” World Politics. Vol.40, No.2: 252-268.
Doronila, Amando, 1985, “ The Transformation of Patron-Client Relations and Its Political Consequences in Post-War Philippines” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.16, No.1: 99-116.
Eaton, Kent, 2003, “Restoration or Transformation? Trapos versus NGOs in the Democratization of the Philippines” The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol.62, No.2: 469-496.
Fontaine, Roger W., 1993, “The Philippines: After Aquino” Asian Affairs. No.42: 170-190.
Frantzich, Steve, 1968, “ Party Switching in the Philippine Context” Philippine Studies. Vol.16, No.4: 750-768.
Green, Justin J., 1973, “Social Backgrounds, Attitudes and Political Behavior: A Study of a Philippine Elite” Southeast Asia. Vol.2, No.3: 301-336.
Hawes, Gary, 1989, “Aquino and Her Administration: A View from the Countryside”, Pacific Affairs. Vol.62, No.1: 9-28.
--1990, “Theories of Peasant Revolution: A Critique and Contribution From the Philippines” World Politics. Vol.42, No.2: 261-298.
Hernandez, Carolina G., 1988, “The Philippines in 1987: Challenges of Re-democratization” Asian Survey. Vol.28, No.2: 229-241.
--1997, “The Philippines in 1996: A House Finally in Order?” Asian Survey. Vol.37, No.2: 204-211.
Hill, Hal, 1988, “The Philippine Economy Under Aquino: New Hopes, Old Problem” Asian Survey. Vol.28, No.3: 261-285.
Hutchcroft, Paul D., 1991, “ Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State: The Politics of Patrimonial Plunder” World Politics. Vol.43, No.3: 414-450.
Iglesias, Soi, 2003, “ Colonial and Indigenous influences on Local power structure in The Philippines” Asia Europe Journal. Vol.1, No.4: 541-549.
Kang, David C., 2003, “ Transaction Costs and Crony Capitalism in East Asia” Comparative Politics. Vol.35, No.4: 439-458.
Kimura, Masataka, 1989, “The Revolution and Realignment of Political Parties in the Philippines (December 1985-January 1988): With a Case in the Province of Batangas” Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.27, No.3: 352-379.
--1998, “Changing Patterns of Leadership Recruitment and the Emergence of the Professional Politician in Philippine Local Politics Re-examined: An Aspect of Political Development and Decay” Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.36, No.2: 206-229.
Kroef, Justus M. van der, 1988, “The Philippines: Day of the Vigilantes” Asian Survey. Vol.28, No.6: 630-649.
--1990, “Populist Praetorians in the Philippines” A Journal of Chinese Studies and International Affairs. Vol.26, No.9: 84-110.
Labrador, Mel C., 2002, “The Philippines in 2001: High drama, a new President, and Setting the stage for Recovery” Asian Survey. Vol.42, No.1: 141-149.
Lallana, Emmanuel C., 1986, “From Burlesque to Popular Participation: Realities and Prospects of Philippine Elections” Diliman Review. Iss.5-6: 4-8.
Landé, Carl H., 2001, “The Return of ‘ People Power’ in the Philippines” Journal of Democracy. Vol.12, No.2: 88-102.
Lapitan, A.E., 1989, “ The Re-Democratization of the Philippines: Old Wine in a New Bottle”, Asian Profile, Vol.17, No.3: 235-242.
Linantud, John L., 1998, “ Whither Guns, Goons, and Gold? The Decline of Factional Election Violence in the Philippines” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.20, No.3: 298-319.
Magno, Alexander R., 2001, “ Philippines: Trauma of a failed Presidency” Southeast Asian Affairs.Vol.36, No.25: 251-263.
McCoy, Alfred W., 1995, “ ‘Same Banana’: Hazing and Honor at the Philippine Military Academy” The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol.54, No.3: 689-726.
McCulloch, Lesley and Lara Stancich, 1998, “Women and (in)security: the case of the Philippines” The Pacific Reviw. Vol.11,No.3: 416-443.
Meadows, Martin, 1971, “Colonialism, Social Structure and Nationalism: the Philippine Case” Pacific Affairs. Vol.44, No.3: 337-352.
Montinola, Gabriella, 1999, “Parties and Accountability in the Philippines” Journal of Democracy. Vol.10, No.1: 126-140.
--1999, “ The Philippines in 1998: Opportunity amid Crisis” Asian Survey. Vol.39, No.1: 64-71.
Noble, L. G., 1976, “ Philippines 1975: Consolidating the Regime” Asian Survey. Vol.16, No.2: 178-185.
Noland, Marcus, 2000, “ The Philippines in the Asian Financial Crisis” Asian Survey. Vol.40, No.3: 401-412.
Nowak, T. C., 1977, “The Philippines before Martial Law: A Study in Politics and Administration” American Political Science Review. Vol.71, No.2: 522-539.
Overholt, W. H., 1976, “ Land Reform in the Philippines” Asian Survey. Vol.16, No.5: 427-451.
Parreňas, Julius Caesar, 1993, “Leadership Succession and Security in the Philippines” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.15, No.1: 64-76.
Putzel, James, 1999, “Survival of an Imperfect Democracy in the Philippines” Democratization. Vol.6, No.1: 198-223.
Ramos, Fidel V., “Democratic control of the armed forces: Lessons from East Asia” Asia-Pacific Review. Vol.8, No.1: 1-9.
Reid, Ben, 2000, “Crisis in the Philippines Left: Implications for the Asia Pacific” Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol.30, No.2: 181-199.
--2001, “The Philippine Democratic Uprising and the Contradictions of Neo-liberalism: EDSA II” Third World Quarterly. Vol.22, No.5: 777-793.
Rho, Byeongil, 1992, State Capability and Third World Politics: A Comparative Analysis of South Korean and Philippine Cases. Ph. D. Dissertation, The State University of. New York at Albany.
Riedinger, Jeffrey, 1994, “The Philippines in 1993: Halting Steps Toward Liberalization” Asian Survey. Vol.34, No.2: 139-146.
--1995, “The Philippines in 1994: Renewed Growth and Contested Reforms” Asian Survey. Vol.35, No.2: 209-216.
Ringuet, Daniel Joseph and Elsa Estrada, 2003, “Understanding the Philippines’ Economy and Politics since the Return of Democracy in 1986” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.25, No.2: 233-250.
Rivera, Temario C.,1994, “The State, Civil Society, and Foreign Actors: The Politics of Philippine Industrialization” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.16, No.2: 157-177.
-- 2002, “Transition Pathways and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Marcos Philippines” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.24, No.3: 466-483.
Rogers, Steven, 2004, “Philippine Politics and The Rule of Law” Journal of Democracy. Vol.15, No.4: 111-127.
Romero, Segundo E., 1998, “The Philippines in 1997: Weathering Political and Economic Turmoil” Asian Survey. Vol.38, No.2: 196-202.
Roth, David F., 1969, “Towards a Theory of Philippine Presidential Election Politics” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.13, No.1: 27-43.
Roxas, Gerardo M., 1963, “The Pork Barrel System” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.7 No.4: 254-257.
Rüland, Jürgen, 2003, “Constitutional Debates in the Philippines: From Presidentialism to Parliamentarianism” Asian Survey. Vol.43, No.3: 461-484.
Rustow, D., 1970, “Transitions to Democracy” Comparative Politics, Vol.2: 340-419.
Samuel C. Y. Ku, 2004, “Political Reforms in the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective” Asian Profile. Vol.32, No.4: 319-333.
Schedler, Andreas, 1998, “What is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy. Vol.9, No2: 91-107.
Scott, James C., 1972, “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia” The American Political Science Review. Vol.66, No.2: 91-116.
Sidel, John, 1997, “Philippine Politics in Town, District, and Province: Bossism in Cavite and Cebu” The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol.56, No.4: 947-966.
Sours, Martin H., 1970, “Philippine Political Parties: A Background Analysis in Political Development” Philippine Journal of Public Administration. Vol.14, No.4: 384-396.
Suhrke, Astri, 1971, “Political Rituals in Developing Nations: The Case of the Philippines” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.2, No.2: 126-141.
Stauffer, Robert B., 1966, “Philippine Legislators and Their Changing Universe” The Journal of Politics. Vol.28, No.3: 556-597.
Thompson, Mark R., 1996, “ Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective” Comparative Politics. Vol.28, No.2: 179-206.
Timberman, David G.., 1989, “Leadership Change and National Security in the Philippines: 1983-1988” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.11, No.2: 186-213.
Tornquist, Olle, 1993, “Democratic ‘Empowerment’ and Democratization of Politics: Radical Popular Movements and the May 1992 Philippines Elections” Third World Quarterly. Vol.14, Iss.3: 485-515.
Villacorta, Wilfrido V., 1994, “ The Curse of the Weak States: Leadership Imperatives for the Ramos Government” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.16, No.1: 67-92.
Villanueva, A.B., 1971, “The Philippine Congress and the Barrio Electoral Process” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. Vol.2, No.2: 115-125.
--1992, “Post-Marcos: The State of Philippine Politics and Democracy during the Aquino Regime, 1986-92” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.14, No.2: 174-187.
--1996, “ Parties and Elections in Philippine Politics” Contemporary Southeast Asia. Vol.18, No.2: 175-193.
Villegas, Bernardo M., 1987, “The Philippines in 1986: Democratic Reconstruction in The Post-Marcos Era” Asian Survey. Vol.27, No.2: 194-205.
Youngblood, Robert L., 1987, “ The Corazon Aquino ‘Miracle’ and the Philippine Churches” Asian Survey. Vol.27, No.12: 1240-1255.
-- 1998, “ President Ramos, the Church, and Population Policy in the Philippines” Asian Affairs: An American Review. Vol.25, Iss.1: 3-17.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code