Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0629115-195638 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0629115-195638
論文名稱
Title
台灣醫療持續性與糖尿病足之相關性
The Correlation with Continuity Of Care and Diabetes Foot in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
79
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-07-29
關鍵字
Keywords
醫療持續性、截肢、醫療資源利用、醫療機構層級、糖尿病足
medical organization type, medical utilization, amputation, diabetic foot, Continuity of Care
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5748 次,被下載 852
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5748 times, has been downloaded 852 times.
中文摘要
目的: 2013年全民健康保險局統計糖尿病及相關合併症占醫療費用支出第4位。糖尿病合併症包括大小血管病變(心肌梗塞、失明),腎臟病變(腎衰竭),以及足部潰瘍感染、截肢等。2001年全民健康保險局推出糖尿病共同照護網專案,提供整合性持續性團隊服務,以改善糖尿病醫療品質。本研究以醫療持續性(COC)評價2003~2007年糖尿病群體醫療品質成效。
方法:以全民健康保險資料庫百萬歸人檔,滿18歲以上, 2001/01/01 ~2002/12/31門診就醫紀錄有4次以上,ICD-9 CM前三碼為250為收案標準,得20,070位個案,追蹤期間為2003/01/01至2007/12/31,探討COC (COCI、MMCI)、 糖尿病合併症、醫療資源利用、醫療機構層級,與下肢截肢、再截肢發生之相關性。
結果:每人每年平均門診次數9.29±5.23次, 糖尿病合併症盛行率57.64±0.54%(p< 0.01),五年內再截肢發生率為23.26%,1/3截肢個案發生3次以上的截肢,周邊血管病變導致截肢發生風險高達22倍(p < 0.01)。高COC勝過低COC,有1.26倍(p < 0.01)、1.62倍(p < 0.01)發生截肢與再截肢風險;低COC看診醫師數量最多,神經病變(41.31%)及周邊血管病變(19.54%)發生比他組COC高,但下肢相關性檢查率卻最低。基層醫療機構與區域醫院並列截肢風險最高(p < 0.01);基層醫療機構再截肢風險最高(p < 0.01),但特定糖尿病相關疾病死亡風險,卻比區域醫院、地區醫院就醫者低(p < 0.01)。
結論:經COC與截肢風險得知,COC無法避免再截肢的發生;就醫機構層級越高,不代表急診及住院風險越低、截肢與再截肢風險越低,推論糖尿病醫療政策與就醫機構層級無法證明糖尿病醫療品質可獲得改善。
Abstract
Objective: The expense of treating Diabetes Mellitus and its complication is the 4th largest part of all in Taiwan Health insurance system. Since continuously multidiscipline team service is the best strategy for Diabetic care. This study is aimed to investigate the relationship between COC (continuity of care) and risk of diabetic foot in Taiwan.
Method: We used Taiwan National Health Insurance database to make a longitudinal study during 2001 to 2007. Only adult diabetes patients who had more than 4 times ambulatory records in 2001-2002 were enrolled. The outcomes from 2003 to 2007 were analyzed as following: risk of amputation, re-amputation, and death. COC and medical expense and organization of care were counted as independent variables.
Result: Re-amputation rate is 23.26%, 1/3 amputated diabetes have been received ≧ 3 times amputation. The highest risk of amputation and re-amputation is high COC, which are 1.26 times (p <0.001) and 1.62 times (p <0.001). Amputated diabetes patient had 3 times (p <0.001) risk of specific diabetes associated death. Different medical organization type was not related to the risk of amputation. Low COC was related to poorer vascular and neurological outcome.
Conclusion: We believed that diabetic foot care was a missing circle of the chain of multidiscipline diabetes care chain.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書………..……………………………………………………………………………..i
致謝………………………………………………………………………………………………ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………....iii
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………iv
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………….……1-2
第一節 研究背景與研究動機……………………………………………………………...1
第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………………………...2
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………………..…..3-27
第一節 糖尿病………………………………………………………………………..…..3-12
流行病學……………………………………………………………………………….3
醫療耗費……………………………………………………………………………….5
糖尿病足預防措施…………………………………………………………………….8
小結……………………………………………………………………………………11
第二節 全民健康保險之糖尿病醫療給付改善專案…………………………………..….13-15
小結………………………………………………………………………………………14.
第三節 轉診制度、醫療機構層級與就醫行為……………………………………..……..15-17
第四節 醫療持續性指標…………………………………………………………..………18-27
定義…………………………………………………………………………………….....18
醫療持續性用於糖尿病………………………………………………………………… 19
醫療持續性之運用(非糖尿病研究)……………….…………………………………… 24
醫療持續性測量方法…………………………………………………………………… 26
小結……………………………………………………………………………………… 27
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………..……….. 28-34
第一節 研究設計與架構…………………………………………………………………....28
第二節 研究問題與假設……………………………………………………………………28
第三節 研究樣本與資料來源………………………………………………………………29
第四節 研究變項之操作型定義……………………………………………………………29
第五節 資料處理與分析方法……………………………………………………………..33
第四章 研究分析與結果………………………………………………………………………35-59
第一節 研究樣本基本資料描述……………………………………………………………35
第二節 多重線性迴歸分析…………………………………………………………………44
第三節 多重邏輯迴歸分析…………………………………………………………………50
第四節 假設驗證……………………………………………………………………………59
第五章 研究討論……………………………………………………………………………… 60-63
第一節 人口學資料…………………………………………………………………………60
第二節醫療資源利用………………………………………………………………………..61
第三節糖尿病醫療品質指標………………………………………………………………..62
第六章 研究結論與建議…………………………………………………………………………64
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………………………….64-66
第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………………………64
第三節 研究建議……………………………………………………………………………66
第四節 研究貢獻……………………………………………………………………………66
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………67-70
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
1.中央健康保險局(2011)全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案第八版。取自: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/search/search.aspx
2.中央健康保險局 (2012). "糖尿病醫療給付改善方案101.10.01停止適用."
3.王志堅、陳美筵、侯紀君、黃鈴婷、陳秋鶯 (2006). " 是否加入糖尿病共同照護網個人認知與健康行為之探討"秀傳醫學雜誌 6(3-4): 8.
4.邱淑媞, 賴美淑. (2002). "糖尿病共同照護之概念與內涵Concet and Content of Diaetes Shared Care." 台灣醫誌 6(4): 561-568.
5.洪維河、鄭守夏、張睿詒、江東亮 (1998). "台灣醫療區跨區就醫比例之變遷,1985-1999."中華衛誌 17(5): 388-394.
6.陳珮青, et al. (2003). "病人跨區住院與醫療區資源分佈之探討." 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 22(1): 27-32.
7.劉棻 (2006). "台灣糖尿病共同照護網推行現況與挑戰"護理導航 7(2): 28-34.
8.蕭慧雯, 李. 陳. (2004). "糖尿病足潰瘍治療模式之費用分析." 健康保險雜誌.
9.衛生福利部衛生福利統計資料。取自: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOS/DisplayStatisticFile.aspx?d=15617&s=1
http://health99.hpa.gov.tw/TXT/HealthyHeadlineZone/HealthyHeadlineDetai.aspx?TopIcNo=6866


二、英文文獻
1.Bice, T. W. and S. B. Boxerman (1977). "A quantitative measure of continuity of care." Medical Care: 347-349.
2.Boulton, A. J. M., Vileikyte, L., Ragnarson-Tennvall, G., Apelqvist, J. (2005). "The global burden of diabetic foot disease." The Lancet 366(9498): 1719-1724.
3.Chan, J. C. N., Malik, V., Jia, W., Kadowaki, T., Yajnik, C. S., Yoon, KH., & Hu, F. B. (2009). "Diabetes in Asia." JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 301(20): 2129-2140.
4.Chang, C. H., Shau, W. Y., Jiang, Y. D., Li, H. Y., Chang, T. J., Sheu, W. H.-H., Kwok, C. F., Ho, L. T., & Chuang, L. M. (2010). "Type 2 diabetes prevalence and incidence among adults in Taiwan during 1999–2004: a national health insurance data set study." Diabetic Medicine 27(6): 636-643.
5.Chang, RE., Lin, SP., & Aron, D. C. (2012). "A Pay-For-Performance Program In Taiwan Improved Care For Some Diabetes Patients, But Doctors May Have Excluded Sicker Ones." Health Affairs 31(1): 93-102.
6.Chen, C. C. and Cheng, S. H. (2011). "Better continuity of care reduces costs for diabetic patients." The American Journal of Managed Care 17(6): 420-427.
7.Cheng, S. H., Hou, Y.-F., & Chen, C.-C. (2011). "Does continuity of care matter in a health care system that lacks referral arrangements?" Health Policy and Planning 26(2): 157-162.
8.Cheng, S. H., Lee, T. T., & Chen, CC. (2012). "A longitudinal examination of a pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: evidence from a natural experiment." Medical Care 50(2): 109.
9.Christakis, D. A., Koepsell, T. D., Zimmerman, F. J., & Connell, F. A. (2001). "Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children." Pediatrics 107(3): 524-529. DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.3.524
10.Christakis, D. A., Wright, J. A., Koepsell, T. D., Emerson, S., & Connell, F. A. (1999). "Is greater continuity of care associated with less emergency department utilization?" Pediatrics 103(4): 738-742.
11.Chu, H.-Y., Chen, C.-C., & Cheng, S.-H. (2012). "Continuity of Care, Potentially Inappropriate Medication, and Health Care Outcomes Among the Elderly: Evidence From a Longitudinal Analysis in Taiwan." Medical Care 50(11): 1002-1009.
12.Dail, T. M., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. J., Quick, W. W., Yang, W. G., & Fogli, J. (2010). "The economic burden of diabetes." Health Affairs 29(2): 297-303. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0155
13.Dorresteijn, J. A. N., Kriegsman, D. M. W., & Valk, G. D. (2010). Complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1), CD007610.
14.Dorresteijn, J. A. and G. D. Valk (2012). "Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration." Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 28(S1): 101-106.
15.Elftman, N. and Conlan, J. E. (2012). Management of the Neuropathic Foot. Philadelphia, USA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business.
16.Gill, J. M., Mainous III, A. G., Diamond, J. K. & Lenbard, M. J. (2003). "Impact of provider continuity on quality of care for persons with diabetes mellitus." The Annals of Family Medicine 1(3): 162-170.DOI: 100,1370/afm.22
17.Guariguata, L., Whiting, D., Weil, C., & Unwin, N. (2011). "The International Diabetes Federation diabetes atlas methodology for estimating global and national prevalence of diabetes in adults." Diabetes research and clinical practice.
18.Heckhausen, J. and Dweck, C. S. (1998). Motivation and self-regulation across the life span, Cambridge University Press.
19.Heijink, R., Koolman, X., & Westert, G. P. (2012). "Spending more money, saving more lives? The relationship between avoidable mortality and healthcare spending in 14 countries." The European Journal of Health Economics: 1-12.
20.Huang, E.S., Basu, A., O’Grady, M., & Capertta, J. C. (2009). "Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the US." Diabetes Care 32(12): 2225-2229. DOI:10.2337/dc09-0459
21.International Diabetes Federation. (2012) Diabetes atlas 5ed. Online: http://www.idf..org/diabetesatlas/5e/diabetes
22.Hong, J. S., Kang, H. C., & Kim, J. (2010). Continuity of Care for Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Korea. The Korean academy of Medical Sciences 25: 1259-1271
23.Lin, W., Huang, I.-C., Wang, S.-L, Yang, M.-C., & Yaung, C.-L. (2010). "Continuity of diabetes care is associated with avoidable hospitalizations: evidence from Taiwan's National Health Insurance scheme." International Journal for Quality in Health Care 22(1): 3-8.
24.Mohan, V. (2003). "Age-and sex-specific prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 11 Asian cohorts." Diabetes Care 26(6): 1770-1780.
25.Nather, A., Bee, C. S., Huak, C. Y., Chew, L. L., Lin, B., Neo, S., & Sim, Y. (2008). "Epidemiology of diabetic foot problems and predictive factors for limb loss." Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications 22(2): 77-82.
26.Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., & Lavery, L. A. (2007). "Risk Factors for Recurrent Diabetic Foot Ulcers Site matters." Diabetes Care 30(8): 2077-2079.
27.Pinzur, M. S., Slovenkai, M. P., & Trepman, E. (1999). "Guidelines for diabetic foot care." Foot & ankle international 20(11): 695-702.
28.Rogers, J. and P. Curtis (1980). "The concept and measurement of continuity in primary care." American journal of public health 70(2): 122-127.
29.Saultz, J. W., (2003). Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care. Annals .of Family Medicine 1(3): 134-143.
30.Shortell, S. M. (1976). "Continuity of medical care: conceptualization and measurement." Medical Care: 377-391.
31.Singh, N., Armstrong, D. G., Lipsky, B. (2005). "Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes." JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 293(2): 217-228.
32.Starfield, B., Shi, L., & Macinko, J. (2005). "Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health." The Milbank Quarterly 83(3): 457-502.
33.van Houtum, W. H. (2005). "Barriers to the delivery of diabetic foot care." The Lancet 366(9498): 1678-1679.
34.Wang, M.-J. and Lin S.-P. (2010). "Study on doctor shopping behavior: insight from patients with upper respiratory tract infection in Taiwan." Health Policy 94(1): 61-67.
35.Zhang, P., Zhang, X., Brown, J., Vistisen, D., Sicress, R., Shaw, J., & Nichols, G. (2010). "Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030." Diabetes research and clinical practice 87(3): 293.DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.026
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code