中文摘要
《崔士強．山帝》這本小說長久以來一直被認為很怪異，而且受到很多的攻擊與批評。我這本論文探討的是這本小說混亂的外表之下其實是有內部合諧的存在。由三大主題切入，分別為書的架構、書與讀者的互動、以及書的內容。

Abstract
As a novel always deemed eccentric and chaotic, Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy has constantly drawn attention of the reading public but has also incurred multitudinous attacks by the critics for its apparent disorderliness. Exteriorly, the novel indeed exhibits chaotic features, whether by its digressions or interludes; however, after a close and meticulous analysis we could actually find harmony and unity within all the confusions and irregularities. Since the author utilizes the eccentricity of the novel to camouflage harmony within, we could assume that a force of some kind is surreptitiously in motion to conduct all the exterior chaos into harmony. Thus my objective in this thesis is to indicate and analyze the “force” which can trample down all the external irrationalities and enables harmony and order to reveal themselves once again. The thesis will analyze the novel in three main aspects. Formally, the digressions of the novel will be mainly investigated. All the seemingly irrelevant opinionative and explanative digressions will be discussed and examined in close analysis. In dealing with digressions, the ideas of the Russian Formalist Victor Shklovsky will be referred to. Reciprocally, Sterne’s demand for his reader’s participation (interaction) is another distinguishing feature of the work. This part of the thesis will examine the balancing force while it exhibits itself when readers act as active agents bestowing meanings through interaction and Wolfgang Iser’s Reader-Response theory will applied. The closing section of the thesis endeavors to analyze the content of the novel by inspecting the discrepancies and exemplify how Sterne attempts to liberate his reader’s imagination. The thesis will end with the analysis of the author’s philosophical attitude towards life as I realign the novel in strict time-order and trace the causality of the events within.

Key words: Laurence Sterne, Tristram Shandy, Russian Formalism, reader response, interaction, digressions, harmony, chaos, discrepancy, causality

Chapter One: Introduction: Eccentric or Revolutionary? 1

Chapter Two: The Internal Equilibrium within the External Chaos 10

Chapter Three: The Reciprocation of the Text Revealed by External Chaos 40

Chapter Four: The Intention Camouflaged in the External Chaos 57

Chapter Five: Conclusion 74

Works Cited 79

Works Cited
Anderson, Howard, ed. Laurence Sterne: Tristram Shandy. New York: Norton, 1980.
---. “Tristram Shandy and the Reader’s Imagination.” PMLA 86.5 (1971): 966-73.
Baird, Theodore. “The Time-Scheme of Tristram Shandy and a Source.” PMLA 51.3 (1936): 803-20.
Baker, Earnest A. The History of English Novel, IV. London: Methuen, 1978.
Hill, George B., and L. F. Powell, eds. Boswell’s Life of Johnson. Oxford: Clarendon, 1934.
Howes, Alan B., ed. Sterne: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1974.
Iser, Wolfgang. Laurence Sterne: Tristram Shandy. Trans. David Henry Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.
---. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.
Loveridge, Mark. Laurence Sterne and the Argument about Design. London: Macmillan, 1982.
Lemon, Lee T., and Marion J. Reis, trans. Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. 1878. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.
Parker, Jo Alyson. “Spiraling Down ‘the Gutter of Time’: Tristram Shandy and the Strange Attractor of Death.” Weber Studies 14.1 (1997). 22 Feb 2008 <http://www.altx.com/ebr/w(ebr)/essays/parker.html>.
Pierce, David., and Peter de Voogd, eds. Laurence
Sterne in Modernism and Postmodernism. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996.
Piper, William Bowman. “Tristram Shandy’s Digressive Artistry.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 1.3 (1961): 65-76.
Shklovsky, Victor. Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: Stylistic Commentary. Lemon and Reis, 25-57.
Williams, Jeffrey. “Narrative of Narrative (Tristram Shandy).” MLN 105.5 (1990): 1032-45.