近年來隨著國際間多起捷運與地下鐵系統之火災事故，造成極大的人員傷亡，歸納其事件造成重大傷亡之主要原因在於煙控系統之操作失效或緊急運轉策略不健全。因此，本研究希望可建立一捷運車站性能式煙控與避難系統設計之標準模式，以期簡化煙控系統之操作與加強緊急運轉模式之不足。
於第三章，介紹新舊型捷運車站之差異比較與一般捷運車站之硬體系統設計標準，進而瞭解新型捷運車站之優點與必要性。於第四章，介紹月台層煙控系統之設計分析，說明定址式排煙之優點，並利用美國國家標準局(National Institute of Standards and Technology)建築物與火災研究實驗室(Building and Fire Research Laboratory) 研發之火災成長預測程式—CFAST與FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator)火災模擬軟體做為輔助工具，預測火災之煙沈積速度，模擬捷運車站月台層發生火災時，捷運車站月台層之濃煙煙層高度沈降速率及煙層溫度分佈。
於第五章中針對捷運車站避難系統設計進行分析，運用美國NFPA130之規定並配合日本建築中心對捷運系統避難逃生時間進行討論與計算。最後，利用動態避難模擬分析（SIMULEX）針對新捷運車站月台層與大廳層之乘客避難進行模擬分析，觀察人群避難的狀況及計算乘客離開月台層之避難時間，並與NFPA 130之規定避難時間比對，評估各避難路徑之安全性。
本研究最終整合煙控與避難系統，完成最新型之捷運地下車站之緊急運轉模式，可作為日後實際系統設計之重要參考。

Recently, several major incidents occurred in worldwide metro and subway systems due to inadequate or inappropriate emergency procedures.
In this study, the traditional and innovative metro underground stations were analyzed utilizity the CFAST and FDS computer program. A comparative study has been conducted to evaluate the smoke descending rate, and temperature distribution, etc with addressable zoned smoke control system.
Dynamic egress analysis was followed to validate the NFPA 130 which was taken as the design guidelines to evaluate the evacuation time using SIMULEX program.
Finally, the smoke management design and egress system was integrated, which warrants its qpplication in actual engineering designs.

目錄 I
圖目錄 III
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1-1研究動機與目的 1
1.2研究範圍與流程 5
1-3 研究方法與限制 7
1.4文獻回顧 9
第二章 研究方法 10
2-1 區域模式（Zone Model） 10
2-2 場模式（Field Model） 12
2-3 格點配置 15
2-4 SIMULEX動態模擬避難分析 18
第三章 新舊捷運車站差異與車站硬體系統設計標準 21
3-1 舊有捷運車站月台層之煙控系統設計 21
3-2 月台屏門之設計原理 23
3-3 捷運車站設置月台屏門之優點 25
3-4 硬體系統設計與設置標準 26
第四章 新型捷運車站性能式煙控系統設計 37
4-1 防煙區劃規劃 37
4-2火源熱釋放率（Heat Release Rate - HRR）之決定 40
4-3排煙量之決定 43
4-4 CFAST區劃模式預測理論與模擬結果 44
4-5 FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator)火災模擬 60
第五章 新型捷運車站避難系統設計分析 66
5-1 捷運車站避難動線規劃原則 67
5-2避難人數之估算 69
5-3美國NFPA130對於捷運系統避難逃生系統設計標準 70
5-4日本建築中心之避難各項所需時間分析 73
5-5動態避難模式分析（SIMULEX） 77
第六章 結論 88
參考文獻 91

參考文獻
[1] B.McCaffrey , ” Flame Height “ , The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , Section 2: Fire Dynamics , 1995.
[2] Chow W. K., W. K. Wong, “On the Simulation of Atrium Fire Environment in Hong Kong Using Zone Models”, Journal of Fire Science, Vol. 11, 1993, pp. 3~51
[3] Chow, W. K., Lo, Anthony C. W., “Scale Modelling Studies on Atrium Smoke Movement and the Smoke Filling Process”, Journal of Fire Prot. Engr. Vol. 7, No. 2, 1995, pp. 55~64.
[4] E.G. Butcher , A.C. Parnell , “ Smoke Control in Fire Safety Design ” , London , E. & F. N. Spon , 1979.
[5] Fruin, J.J., Pedestrian Planning and Design, Metropoltan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Inc., New York, 1971.
[6] G.Heskestad , ” Fire Plumes “ , The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , Section 2: Fire Dynamics , 1995.
[7] Hankin, B.D. and Wright, R.A., Passenger Flows in subways, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 9, pp 81-88, 1958.
[8] J.H. Klote “ Prediction of Smoke Movement in Atria: Part I –Physical Concepts “ , ASHRAE Transactions 103(2) ,1997.
[9] J.H. Klote “ Prediction of Smoke Movement in Atria: Part II –Application to Smoke Management. “, ASHRAE Transactions 103(2) , 1997.
[10] J.H. Klote, “Fire and Smoke Control: An Historical Perspective. ” ASHRAE Journal , July ,1994.
[11] McGrattan, K. B., Baum, H. R., Rehm, R. G., “Large Eddy Simulation of Smoke Movement”, Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 30, 1998, pp. 161~178.
[12] Michael J. Ferreira, “ Emergency Smoke Control System Design for Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities: Is Property Protection Achievable? “, Interflam 99 .
[13] Morgan, H. P., “Smoke Control Methods in Enclosed Shopping Complexes of One or More Storeys: A Design Summary”, Building Research Establishment Report, 1979.
[14] Nelson, H.E., and MacLennan, H.A., Emergency Movement, in The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA., pp2-106-2-115, 1988.
[15] NFPA and SFPE, The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd Edition, 1995.
[16] NFPA, “NFPA 204M Guide for Smoke and Heat Venting”, National Fire Protection Association, , 1995.
[17] NFPA, Capacity of Means of Egress,Section5-3 in NFPA 101 – Code For safety to Life, National Fire Codes, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.,1991.
[18] NFPA 92B, “ Guide for Smoke Management systems in Malls, Atria, and Large areas “, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy , MA, 1995.
[19] P.I.A.R.C., “Technical Committee on Road Tunnels Report, Permanent International Association of Road Congresses Report No 5”, XVIIIth World Road Congress, Brussels, 13-19 September , 1987.
[20] Predtechenskii, V.M., Millinskii, A.I., Planning for Foot Traffic Flow in Buildings, Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1978.
[21] Richard D. Peacock ,” CFAST, the Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport “, National Institute of Standards and Technology , 1993.
[22] Vytenis Babrauskas, “Burning Rates”, The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , Society of Fire Protection Engineering, 1995.
[23] 內政部，”各類場所消防安全設備設置標準”，1996.
[24]沈子勝，避難設計與專題，鼎茂圖書出版公司，1996，第16頁。
[25]建設省住宅局建築指導課，新、建築防災計畫指針－建築物ソ防火、避難計畫ソ解說書，日本建築Й⑦У，1995，pp128~130。