Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0705104-155101 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0705104-155101
論文名稱
Title
影響組織掌握創業契機能力之研究 — 以社會資本理論來探討
Affecting Factors of the Abilities of Organization Entrepreneurship — Based on Social Capital Theory
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
86
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2004-06-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2004-07-05
關鍵字
Keywords
智慧資本、社會資本、知識管理、創業契機
Intellectual Capital, Entrepreneurship Opportunity, Social Capital, Knowledge Management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5855 次,被下載 3522
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5855 times, has been downloaded 3522 times.
中文摘要
「社會資本」是繼傳統的三種智慧資本(包括人力資本、組織資本與顧客資本)後,所被提出並被認為是在網路經濟下對組織而言非常重要的另一種新的智慧資本。因為21世紀是講求團隊合作、策略聯盟的競爭時代,任何組織很難靠單打獨鬥或獨善其身來與對手集團抗衡,因此企業除了強化本身的核心競爭能力外,更要廣泛、快速、有效地與顧客、策略夥伴、供應商、學術研究單位甚至競爭對手共同營造出一個觸角廣、合夥關係好、知識充分交流的關係網路,才能在變遷快速的產業環境中存活。而了解組織之社會資本如何影響其創業契機的掌握能力,應是21世紀組織競爭中最重要的課題。
本研究主要藉由Nahapiet & Ghoshal(1998)所提出之組織社會資本架構,從三個不同構面來探討組織所擁有的社會資本架構如何影響其創業契機的發現、創造、評估和利用,這三個構面包括(1)結構構面:包含網路連結度與網路組態 (2)認知構面:包含共享的語言、符號與故事 (3)關係構面:包含信任、規範、義務感與認同感。另外本研究認為組織除了經由廣大的人脈關係網路可快速有效的擷取新資訊與知識外,其本身對於新知識的學習能力,以及過去所累積的相關知識基礎,亦會影響其精確掌握契機的能力,因此本研究在模式中加入吸收能力理論(Cohen & Levinthal, 1990)及現有知識基礎兩個變數,以便共同探討影響組織契機掌握能力之不同因子。
本研究使用問卷調查法來收集國內企業之社會資本等相關資料,並採用路徑分析法對研究架構進行檢驗。研究結果發現,影響組織創業契機掌握能力最重要之社會資本構面為結構構面,而組織知識的吸收能力則受到社會資本結構構面及關係構面的影響;另外,組織之創業契機掌握能力及知識吸收能力皆具有非常顯著的路徑相依性。本研究共提出九項假說,其中有五項假說獲實證結果支持。
Abstract
Besides the three traditional ICs(Intellectual Capital) including Human Capital, Structural Capital and Customer Capital, Social Capital(SC) has been recognized as a forth critical IC of an organization in the network economy. In the 21st century, various kinds of collaborations among organizations such as strategic alliance or virtual organization play a major role in the global competition marketplace; no one can do their business alone. Therefore, only an inter-organizational collaborative team with strong relationships and network ties among the members can more efficiently and effectively discover, evaluate and exploit the emerging entrepreneurial opportunities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a firm’s social capital on its capabilities to discover, evaluate and exploit the entrepreneurial opportunities.
Three dimensions of a firm’s social capital are canalized. (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998) (1)structural dimension: includes network ties and network configurations (2)cognitive dimension: includes shared codes, languages and narratives (3)relational dimension: includes trust, norm, obligations, and identifications. Moreover, since a firm’s absorptive capability of new knowledge and its past related knowledge base also influence the effectiveness of its exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunity, Absorptive Capability Theory (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990) and current knowledge base of a firm are also used as two variables in the research model to increase the integrity of the model.
An empirical survey methodology is applied to test the research model and hypotheses proposed in this study. Five out of nine hypotheses are validated in our research model with Path Analysis. The research result reveals that the structural dimension of a firm’s social capital has the most impact on its abilities of entrepreneurial opportunities; on the other hand, a firm’s absorptive capability of knowledge is affected by the structural and relational dimensions of social capital. Furthermore, the result validates that both absorptive capability and the abilities of entrepreneurial opportunities of a firm exhibit significant path dependency. This result will be useful to both the academic and business particularly in its advocacy of the cultivation of the structural dimension of a firm’s social capital.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 研究流程

第貳章 文獻探討
第一節 組織掌握創業契機的能力
第二節 社會資本理論
第三節 吸收能力理論與路徑相依

第參章 研究模式與研究方法
第一節 研究模式
第二節 研究假說
第三節 研究變數定義
第四節 研究設計方法

第肆章 資料分析結果
第一節 問卷回收與樣本特徵
第二節 效度與信度檢驗
第三節 研究假說檢定
第四節 組織變數之統計分析
第五節 總結:研究發現

第伍章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 建議
第三節 研究貢獻與研究限制

參考文獻

附錄一:問卷
附錄二:殘差分佈圖、直方圖
附錄三:問卷的收斂效度
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
1. 邱皓正,《社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析》,台北,五南,民國九十一年。
2. 林東清,《知識管理》,初版,台北,智勝文化,民國九十二年七月。
3. 林東清,許孟祥,資訊管理調查研究方法探討,資訊管理學報(4:1),民國八十六年,pp.21-23。
4. 周文賢,《多變量統計分析—SAS/STAT使用方法》,初版,台北,智勝文化,民九十一年。
5. 孫思源,由社會交換理論探討資訊系統委外合夥關係之影響因素,中山大學博士論文,民國九十年六月。
6. 黃俊英,多變量分析,四版,台北,中國經濟企業研究所,民國八十年。
7. 楊國樞等,《社會及行為科學研究法》,十三版,台北,東華書局,民國七十八年。

二、英文文獻
1. Aiken, A.A.(1980)“Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires” Educational and Psychological Measurement(40), pp.955-959.
2. Aiken, A.A.(1985)”Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings” Educational and Psychological Measurement(45), pp.131-142.
3. Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C.(1986) Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks in D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The Art And Science of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.3-23.
4. Allen, T.J.(1977)Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Anderson, J.C. & Narus, J.A.(1990)”A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships” Journal of Marketing(54), pp.42-58.
6. Angle, H. & Perry, J.(1981) “An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly(26), pp.1-14.
7. Baker, W.(1990)“Market Networks and Corporate Behavior” American Journal of Sociology (96), pp.589-625.
8. Barney, J.(1991)“Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage” Journal of Management (17), pp.99-120.
9. Barringer, B.R. & Bluedorn, A.C.(1999)“The Relationship Between Corporate Entrepreneurship And Strategic Management” Strategic Management Journal(20:5), pp.421-444.
10. Bateson, B.(1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine Books.
11. Bentler, P.M.(1995)EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
12. Bettis, R.A. & Prahalad, C.K.(1995)“The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension” Strategic Management Journal (16), pp.5-14.
13. Blau, P.M.(1964)Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Boland, R.J. & Tenkasi, R.V.(1995)“Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing” Organization Science (6), pp.350-372.
15. Bontis, N.(1996)“There’s A Price on Your Head: Managing Intellectual Capital Strategically” Ivey Business Quarterly (60:4), pp.40-47.
16. Bourdieu, P.(1977)Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bourdieu, P.(1986)The Forms of Capital in J.G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp.241-258, New York: Greenwood.
18. Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., & Ziegler, R.(1992)“Survival chances of newly founded business organizations” American Sociological Review(57), pp. 227-242.
19. Buckley, J.W., Buckley, M.H. & Chiang, H.F.(1976) Research Methodology and Business Decision in The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.
20. Burt, R.S.(1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Carolis, D.M.(2002)The Role of Social Capital and Organizational Knowledge in Enhancing Entrepreneurial Opportunities in High-Technology Environments in Choo, C.W. & Bontis, N.(eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, pp.699-710.
22. Casson, M.(1982)The Entrepreneur, Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Nobles Books.
23. Cheal, D.(1988)The Gift Economy, London: Routledge.
24. Clark, B.R.(1972)“The Occupational Saga in Higher Education” Administrative Science Quarterly (17), pp.178-184.
25. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A.(1990)“Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation” Administrative Science Quarterly (35), pp.1128-1152.
26. Coleman, J.S.(1988)“Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital” American Journal of Sociology (94), S95-S120.
27. Coleman, J.S.(1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
28. Cooper, A., Woo, C., & Dunkelberg, W.(1988)“Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Chances for Success” Journal of Business Venturing (3), pp.97-108.
29. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P.(1989)“Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments” Strategic Management Journal (10), pp.75-87.
30. Droege & Hoobler(2003)”Employee Turnover and Tacit knowledge Diffusion: a Network Perspective” Journal of Managerial Issues(15:1)pp.50-64.
31. Drucker, P.F.(1993)The Post-Capitalist Society, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
32. Durbin, J. & Watson, G.S.(1951)“Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, Ⅱ“ Biometrika(30), pp.159-178.
33. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S.(1997)Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding It’s Hidden Brainpower, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
34. Fukuyama, F.(1995) Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Management Publications Trust.
35. Gambetta, D.(1988)Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Oxford, New York, Basil Blackwell.
36. Giddens, A.(1990)The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
37. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C.(1995) Multivariate Data Analysis: with readings, Prentic Hall.
38. Hansen, M.(1996)“Using the Wisdom of Others: Searching for and Transferring Knowledge” Presentation at the London Business School.
39. Heide, J.B. & John, G.(1992)”Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?” Journal of Marketing(56), pp.32-44.
40. Henderson, J.C.(1990)”Plugging into Strategic Partnerships: The Critical IS Connection” Sloan Management Review(31:3), pp.7-18.
41. Jacobs, J.(1965)The Death and Life of Great American Cities, London: Penguin Books.
42. Kaiser, H.F.(1958) “The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis” Psychometrika(23), pp.187-200
43. Kaiser, H.F.(1960) “The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis” Educational and Psychological Measurement(20), pp.141-151.
44. Kaiser, H.F.(1974)”An Index of Factorial Simplicity” Psychometrika(39), pp.31-36.
45. Kaish, S., & Gilad, B.(1991)“Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs Versus Executives: Sources, Interests, and General Alertness” Journal of Business Venturing (6), pp.45-61.
46. Keller, G. & Warrack, B.(1999) Statistics for Management and Economics, 6th Ed., Duxbury Press.
47. Kettinger et al.(1994)“SIS Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance” MIS Quarterly (18:1), pp.31-58.
48. Kirzner, I.M. (1973)“Competition and Entrepreneurship” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Kirzner, I.M.(1997)”Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach” Journal of Economic Literature(35), pp.60-85.
50. Klepper, R.(1995)”The Management of Partnering Development in I/S Outsourcing” Journal of Information Technology(10), pp.249-258.
51. Kramer, R.M., Brewer, M.B. & Hanna, B.A.(1996)“Collective Trust and Collective Action: the Decision to Trust as a Social Decision” in R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organization Frontiers of Theory Resea4rch, pp.357-389, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Kramer, R., & Tyler, T.(1996)Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
53. Kuhn, T.S.(1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Lawshe, C.H.(1975) “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity” Personnel Psychology(28), pp.563-575.
55. Lee, J. & Kim, Y.(1999)”Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation” Journal of Management Information Systems(15:4), pp.29-61.
56. Lewicki, R.J. & Bunker, B.B.(1996)“Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships” in R.M. Kramer & T.M. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp.114-139, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Loury, G.(1987)“Why Should We Care About Group Inequality? ”Social Philosophy and Policy (5), pp.249-271.
58. March, J.G., & Herbert A.S.(1958) Organizations, New York: Wiley.
59. Masoulas, V.(1998) “Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital management” International Journal of Technology Management (16: 1/2/3), pp.126-143.
60. Mauss, M.(1954)The Gift, New York: Free Press.
61. Misztal, B.(1996) Trust in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
62. Mohr, J. & Spekman, R.(1994)”Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnerships Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques” Strategic Management Journal(15), pp.135-152.
63. Moon, M.J.(1999)“The Pursuit of Managerial Entrepreneurship: Does the Organization Matter?” Public Administration Review (59:1), pp.33-43.
64. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R.(1992)”Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations” Journal of Marketing Research(29), pp.314-329.
65. Morgan, R.M. & Hunt, S.D.(1994)”The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing” Journal of Marketing(58), pp.20-38.
66. Mowery, D.C.(1983)“The Relationship Between Intrafirm and Contractual Forms of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing, 1900-1940”Explorations in Economic History (20), pp.351-374.
67. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S.(1998)“Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and The Organizational Advantage” Academy of Management Review (23:2), pp.242-266.
68. Neter, J., Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., & Wasserman, W.(1996)Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th Ed., Chicago: Irwin.
69. Nisbet, R.A.(1969) Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development, London: Oxford University Press.
70. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H.(1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Nunnally, J.C.(1978) Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw Hill.
72. Orr, J.(1990)“Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity: Community Memory in a Service Culture” in D. Middleton & D. Edwards (eds.), Collective Remembering, pp.169-189, London: Sage.
73. Ouchi, W.G.(1981)Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
74. Pascale, R.(1990)Managing on the Edge: How the Smartest Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead, New York: Simon and Schuster.
75. Petrash, G.(1997)“Dow’s Journey to a Knowledge Value Management Culture” European Management Journal (14), pp.365-373.
76. Petty, R. and Guthrie, J.(1999)“Managing Intellectual Capital: From Theory to Practice” Australia CPA (69:7), pp.18-21.
77. Pondy, L.R. & Mitroff, I.I.(1979)“Beyond Open Systems Models of Organizations” Research in Organization Behavior (1), pp.3-39.
78. Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G.(1990) “The Core Competence of the Organization,” Harvard Business Review, pp.79-93.
79. Pruitt, D.G.(1981)Negotiation Behavior, New York: Academic Press, Inc..
80. Putnam, R.D.(1993)“The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life” American Prospect (13), pp.35-42.
81. Putnam, R.D.(1995)”Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital” The Journal of Democracy(6:1), pp.65-78.
82. Ring, P.S. & Van De Ven, A.H.(1992)"Structuring Cooperative Relationships Between Organizations" Strategic Management Journal (13), pp.483-498.
83. Ring, P.S. & Van De Ven, A.H.(1994)”Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships” Academy of Management Review(19), pp.90-118.
84. Roos, J.(1998) “Exploring the Concept of Intellectual Capital(IC)”Long Range Planning (Feb:31),pp.150-153.
85. Rosenberg, N.(1994)Uncertainty and Technological Change in Conference on Growth and Development: The Economics of the 21st Century, Standford, CA: Standford University, Center for Economic Policy Research.
86. Sako, M.(1992)Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.
87. Schumpeter, J.(1934) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.
88. Sekaran, U.(2003), Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
89. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S.(2000)“The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research” Academy of Management Review (25:1), pp.217-226.
90. Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J.(1999)“Toward a Reconciliation of Definitional Issues In The Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (23:3), pp.11-27.
91. Steier, L. & Greenwood, R.(2000)”Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks” Organization Studies(21:1), pp.163-192.
92. Steward, T. A.(1994)“Your Company's Most Valuable Asset:Intellectual Capital” Fortune (Oct) 3, pp.28-33.
93. Steward, T. A.(1997) Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organization, New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc..
94. Sveiby, K.E.(1998)“Intellectual Capital: Thinking Ahead” Australian CPA (68:5), pp.18-22.
95. Szulanski, G.(1996)”Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm” Strategic Management Journal(17:S2), pp.27-44.
96. Teece, D.(1998)“Capturing Value From Knowledge Assets: the New Economy, Markets for Knowledge and Intangible Assets” California Management Review (40:3), pp.55-79.
97. Tilton, J.E.(1971)International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
98. Treacy, M. & Wiersema, F.(1993)”Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines” Harvard Business Review(Jan/Feb), pp.84-93.
99. Venkataraman, S.(1997)”The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective” in Katz, J. & Brockhaus, R. (eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (3), pp.119-138, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
100. Vesper, K.(1990) New Venture Strategies, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
101. Von Hippel, E.(1986) “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts” Management Science (32), pp.791-805.
102. Zahra, S.A. & George, G. (2002)“Absorptive Capability: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension” Academy of Management Review (27:2), pp.185-203.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code