Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0705110-152755 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0705110-152755
論文名稱
Title
台灣準備好邁向後現代主義了嗎? 瑞典和台灣的比較研究
Is Taiwan Ready for Post-modernism? A Comparative Study between Sweden and Taiwan.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
93
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-07-05
關鍵字
Keywords
後現代、現代
post-modernism, postmodernism, post-modern, personal values, postmodern, postmodernity, postmaterialist, postmodernization, values, Taiwan, Sweden, world values survey, modern, modernization, materialist
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5777 次,被下載 1539
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5777 times, has been downloaded 1539 times.
中文摘要
此研究嘗試檢視台灣在文化、經濟以及政治這三方面的改變。Ronald Inglehart的研究中提到這三個面向中,經過時間不斷地變遷,事實上是會互相關連以及相互影響的。而Richard Florida提出,背後影響這社會的各型生活方式、世界觀以及不同的價值,是因為人類有不斷衍伸的創造力。為了更深了解其中的變化,Inglehart以及他的同事已為此收集不同國家相關的調查問卷,也稱「世界價值觀問卷」。基於Inglehart的研究後,本篇將專注於了解以及解釋在台灣這個區域相關的變化。經過一連串問卷的設計以及收集分析後,此相關資料展示相當有價值的結果以及研究價值。而此篇內容將也從資料的分析結果後,對各個世代中的改變做更完整的詮釋。此外,也延展此篇內容到與瑞典區域做跨文化的比較與分析。從比較中,可以因此了解台灣區域屬於走向後現代主義階段。而且,年輕一輩的年輕人較老一輩的人更能有容忍的心態在面對所謂的少數族群。
Abstract
This study examines changes in culture, economics and politics in Taiwan. Ronald Inglehart suggests that culture, economics and politics are mutually connected and these dynamics shape each other over time. Richard Florida argues that the driving force behind the transformation of a society’s lifestyles, worldview and values is the rise of human creativity. In order to observe the changes over time, Inglehart and his colleagues have been collecting data through questionnaires (World Values Survey) in countries around the world. The purpose of this study is to measure and interpret the recent changes in Taiwan. Data collected from Taiwan is compiled in a unique database for analysis. This paper discusses the findings from this analysis and interprets the direction of change brought by intergenerational change. In addition, a cross-cultural analysis between Sweden and Taiwan is performed using the latest data collected from the two countries. Results suggest that Taiwan’s shift is in the direction of Postmodernity. In addition, younger people are found to be more tolerant against different groups of people compared to the older generation.
目次 Table of Contents
Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………... IV
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………… V
List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………… IX
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………….. X

1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 1
1.1. Preamble……………………………………………………………………………… 1
1.2. Research Motives…………………………………………………………………….. 1
1.3. Research Questions…………………………………………………………………… 2
1.4. Structure of the Thesis………………………………………………………………… 2

2. Literature Review……………………………………………………………………… 4
2.1. Modernization Theories……………………………………………………… 4
2.2. Postmodernization and Existential Security…………………………………. 5
2.3. Predicting Cultural Change………………………………………………….. 6
2.4. Socio-economic Changes and Culture………………………………………. 6
2.5. Modernization and Postmodernization……………………………………… 9
2.6. Measuring Materialist and Postmaterialist Values…………………………… 10
2.7. The Shift Toward Postmaterial Values………………………………………. 11
2.8. Democracy and Economic Growth………………………………………….. 12
2.9. Postmaterialist Values and Democracy………………………………………. 14
2.10. Culture and Economic Growth……………………………………………… 15
2.10.1. Motivational Factors and Economic Growth……………………… 15
2.10.2. Social Capital and Economic Growth…………………………….. 16
2.11. Predicted and Observed Changes…………………………………………… 17
2.11.1. Norms concerning Abortion, Divorce and Homosexuality………. 17
2.11.2. Religious Norms…………………………………………………... 19
2.12. The Creative Class………………………………………………………….. 21
2.13. Economic Development: Technology, Talent and Tolerance………………. 22
2.14. Economic Development: Immigrants, Gay Index and Bohemian Index…… 22
2.15. Criticization on Florida’s Findings…………………………………………. 24
2.16. Criticization on Inglehart’s Findings……………………………………….. 25

3. Youth Values in Taiwan……………………………………………………………….. 26
3.1. Sample and Data Collection…………………………………………………. 26
3.2. Respondents’ Background…………………………………………………… 27
3.3. Future Employment………………………………………………………….. 30
3.4. Lifestyle and Values…………………………………………………………. 31
3.5. Politics and Society………………………………………………………….. 37
3.6. Views on Housing, Environment and Culture………………………………. 39
3.7. Views on Housing Environment in Taiwan…………………………………. 41
3.8. Views on Taiwan - China Relations………………………………………… 42

4. A Cross-cultural Analysis: Sweden vs. Taiwan……………………………………….. 43
4.1. Background Information……………………………………………………. 43
4.2. Tolerance Levels……………………………………………………………. 44
4.3. Occupational Structure……………………………………………………… 47
4.4. Occupational Preferences and Tolerance Levels……………………………. 50
4.5. Future Work and Life……………………………………………………….. 51
4.5.1. Current Priorities………………………………………………….. 51
4.5.2. Priorities in 15 years……………………………………………… 51
4.6. Life Priorities and Tolerance Levels……………………………………….. 53
4.7. Housing Preferences……………………………………………………….. 54
4.8. Concluding Remarks………………………………………………………. 55

References……………………………………………………………………………. 57

Appendices

Appendix A. Survey used in this study, in English and in Chinese………… 59
Appendix B. Ranking of cultural activities…………………………………. 80
Appendix C. Job preferences in Sweden and Taiwan………………………. 81
Appendix D. What is most important in life today…………………………. 82
參考文獻 References
Andersson, David, and Holmberg, Ingvar (2010) Öresundsregionens framtid: En ungdomsgenerations värderingar, Expected publication in 2010.

Andrews, Frank, and Stephen Withey (1976) Social Indicators of Well-Being in America, New York: Plenum.

Bell, Daniel (1973) The Coming of Postindustrial Society, New York: Basic Books.

Bollen, Kenneth A. (1993) Liberal Democracy: Validity and Source Biases in Cross-National Measures, American Journal of Political Science 37:1207-30.

Bollen, Kenneth A., and Robert Jackman (1985) Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income, American Sociological Review 48:468-79.

Bollen, Kenneth A. (1980) Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy, American Sociological Review 45:370-90.

Bollen, Kenneth A. (1979) Political Democracy and the Timing of Development, American Sociological Review 44:572-87.

Brugger, Bill, and Hannan, Kate (1983) Modernization and Revolution, London : Croom Helm.

Brunk, Gregory R., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck (1987) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy: An Empirical Inquiry, European Journal of Political Research 15:459-70.

Burkhart, Ross E., and Michael S. Lewis-Beck (1994) Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis, American Political Science Review 88:903-10.

Derrida, Jacques (1981) Positions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Derrida, Jacques (1979) Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Florida, Richard (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York: Perseus Book Group.

Frey, William, and DeVol, Ross (2000) America’s Demography in the New Century: Aging Baby Boomers and New Immigrants as Major Players, Miken Institute.

Glaeser, E. (2003) The New Economics of Urban and Regional Growth, in G. Clark,
M. Feldman and M. Gertler, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83-98.

Glaeser, Edward (1998) Are Cities Dying?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 1998, pp.139-160.

Glaeser, E. (1994) Cities, Information and Economic Growth, Cityscape 1(1): 9-47.

Hung, Li-Ching, and Smith, Cary Stacy (2006) Chinese Females in America and Taiwan Pondering Divorce: Counseling Methods, Mississippi State University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. (2000) World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys,
1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor,
MI: Institute for Social Research.

Inglehart, Ronald (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic
and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies, Princeton:
Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles
Among Western Publics, Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald (1971) The Silent Revolution in Post-Industrial Societies, American Political Science Review 65: 991-1017.

Inkeles, Alex and David Smith (1974) Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Jacobs, Jane (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.

Lerner, Daniel (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East, New York: Free Press.

Lipset, Seymour Martin (1960) Political Man, New York: Doubleday.

Lucas, Robert Jr. (1988) On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1988, pp.1-42.

McClelland, David C., et al. (1961) The Achieving Society, Princeton: Van Nostrand.

McClelland, David C., et al. (1953) The Achievement Motive, New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.

Olson, Mancur (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Putnam, Robert D., with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Nanetti (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, Robert D., with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Nanetti (1987) Subnational Politics in the 1980s: Organization, Reorganization and Economic Development, New York: Praeger.

Quigley, John M. (1998) Urban Diversity and Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), Spring 1998, pp.127-138.

Sho, David Chao Hung (2004) Abortion Rights in the United States and Taiwan, 4 CHI.- KENT J. INT’L & COMP. L. 1 (comparing the abortion laws in the U.S. and Taiwan)

Tocqueville, Alexis (1835/1840) Democracy in America, trans. and eds., Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop, University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Zachary, Pascal G., (2000) The Global Me, New Cosmopolitans and the Competitive Edge: Picking Globalism’s Winners and Losers, New York: Perseus Books Group.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code