作為一個國際關係學者，米特蘭尼有其「幸」與「不幸」；說其「幸」，是只要人們談起當今歐盟建構的早期論述時，不能忽略之。但被歸類為一個理想主義者，米特蘭尼卻有其不幸之處：後人討論其功能主義時，大多將功能主義範圍簡化，而誤解為一種單純著重「經濟層面」的整合理論，而忽略了米特蘭尼的思想核心。本文的目的，在於將米特蘭尼及其功能主義作通盤的討論，同時對一些學者對功能主義的「部分描述」下所做出的帶有「偏差」的批判，作檢視的工作。 並且以米特蘭尼對國際關係理論的兩次大辯論的看法更深入的探討功能主義的理論位置。

Being a scholar of International Politics, David Mitrany has both the fortune and misfortune. It is his fortune that we can not ignore his thought when talking about the early construction of European Union. It is his misfortune that his functionalism is simplified to be a theory of economic integration by some scholars without probing into his core of thought. The purposes of this article are to make a complete discussion of David Mitrany and his functionalism and to review some critics with bias made by some scholars. Besides, we can know functionalism deeper by reviewing Mitrany’s attitude toward the two Great Debates in theory of International Relations.

第一章 緒論..............................................1
第一節、研究動機................................................1
第二節、研究目的................................................2
第三節、文獻回顧................................................5
第四節、研究方法...............................................10
第五節、研究架構與章節安排.....................................11
第六節、研究限制...............................................13

第二章 米特蘭尼的生平與功能主義的內涵....................15
第一節、生平...................................................15
第二節、功能主義的內涵.........................................23

第三章 功能主義與國際關係理論第一次大辯論................41
第一節、自由主義、理想主義與功能主義............................43
第二節、現實主義對功能主義的對話................................52
第三節、小結....................................................57

第四章 功能主義與國際關係理論第二次大辯論................61
第一節、科學主義與功能主義.....................................61
第二節、新功能主義對功能主義的修正.............................74
第三節、小結...................................................82

第五章 功能主義的批判與結論..............................83
第一節、 整體批判..............................................83
第二節、 心得..................................................87

參考文獻.............................. ..................93
一、 中文部分..................................................93
二、 英文部分..................................................96

圖表位置
圖1...............................................................77
圖2...............................................................80
圖3...............................................................83

一、中文資料：
（一） 書籍
王逸舟。1999。國際政治學---歷史與理論。台北：五南圖書。
江宜樺。2001。自由民主的理路。台北市 : 聯經。
李永久譯。1969。政府二論。台北市 : 帕米爾。初版。
亞當斯密著。謝宗林譯。2005。國富論。台北：先覺。
林碧炤。1997。國際政治與外交政策。台北：五南。二版。
周劭彥譯。John M. Hobson著。2003。國家與國際關係。台北：弘智文化。
哈維爾著，貝嶺編。2004。政治，再見。台北：左岸文化。
洪丁福。1996。國際政治的理論與實際。台北：啟英文化。
徐火炎。1976。多元主義與民主政治：被俘虜的政府與民眾。台北：中研院社科所。
陳勁。1999。歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作。台北：五南。初版
秦治來譯。James Der Derian編。2003。國際關係理論批判。
張亞中。1999。歐洲整合：政府間主義與超國家主義的互動。台北：生智文化事業有限公司。
康德著，何兆武譯。1990。歷史理性批判文集。北京 : 商務出版。
鄭又平與黃烈修譯，Stefano Guzzini著。2000。國際關係與國際政治經濟學。 台北：韋伯文化。
鈕先鍾譯，L. Savigear著。1978。國際關係中的學派與理論。台北：商務書局。
彭淮棟譯。J. S. McClelland著。2000。西洋政治思想史。台北：城邦。杭州：浙江人民出版社
詹姆斯著，陳羽綸､孫瑞禾譯，1981。實用主義。北京：商務印書館。
蕭高彥，蘇文流主編。1976。多元主義。台北：中研院社科所。

（二） 期刊與研討會
丁啟玉。2004。「新功能主義對發展中國家區域一體化的適用性」。河南社會科學，12卷4期，頁42-46。
石之瑜。2000。「現實主義國際政治學的知識脈絡」。問題與研究，39卷七期，頁37-53。
李政鴻。2005。「亞歐會議發展及內涵」，二００五年台灣的東南亞區域研究年度論文研討會，南投國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所。
辛翠玲，吳重禮合著，「從合作到整合：論歐洲政治合作的發展」，中山人文社會科學期刊，十卷一期(1999年12月)，頁28-29。
汪波。2004。「新-新功能主義：對功能主義理論的重新審視」，武漢大學學報，第57卷3期，頁328-332。
周雷。2001。「歐洲一體化的理論發展及現實困境」，理論學習，第8期，頁60-62。
許嘉。2000。「漢斯摩根索權力政治的影響」，理論研討，第6期，頁28-35。
郇慶治。1999。「聯邦主義與功能主義之爭：歐洲早期政治一體化理論」，歐洲，第6期，頁4-12。
房樂憲。2000。「歐洲一體化理論中的功能主義」，教學與研究，第10期，頁34-38。
郭蹈杰。1990。「戰後一體化理論」，現代國際關係，第10期，頁40-43。
陳玉剛。2005。「歐洲一體化的歷史與觀念」，史學月刊，第6期，頁22-43。
陳穎怡。2004。「國際一體化理論中的功能主義與新功能主義的比較分析」，溫州職業技術學院學報，第4卷4期，頁76-78。
耿曙、林瑞華合著。2004。「兩岸經濟整合的影響：分析兩岸整合的理論架構」。東亞區域整合對台灣安全與發展的影響，南華大學亞太研究所。
秦亞青。2004。「現代國際關係理論的沿革」，教學與研究，第7期，頁165-176。
張亞中。2004。「『基進和平』的一種論述：開放政治市場」，兩岸之間的基進和平研討會，5月22日。
張維克。2002。「漫漫征程50年，史無前例創奇蹟-歐洲一體化發展歷程評析」，世界經濟與政治論壇，第1期，頁8-11。
張勝軍。2000。「國際政治的新功能主義-世界銀行案例」，理論研討，第2期，頁19-24。
曾怡仁、張惠玲合著。2000。「區域整合理論的發展」，問題與研究，第39卷8期，頁53-71。
曾怡仁。2004。「區域主義研究與國際關係理論」，全球政治評論，第8期，頁25-48。
黃偉峰。2004。「歐盟整合模式與兩岸主權爭議之分析」，歐美研究，第31卷1期，頁129 -173。
楊澤偉。2005。「論國際法的政治基礎」，法律科學-西北政法學院學報，第23卷3期，頁62-71。
趙英。2006。「摩根索的均勢理論及其現實指導意涵」，山西大學學報，第5卷4期，頁375-378。
劉華。2004。「歐洲一體化理論研究」，國際關係學院學報，第1期，頁8-12。
劉豔。2005。「讓•莫內歐洲一體化思想探源」，湖洲師範學院學報，第27卷5期，頁69-72。
潘忠岐。2003。「新功能主義擴溢理論及其批判」，上海交通大學學報，11卷5期，頁8-13。
蘇宏達。2001。「以『憲政主權建造』概念解釋歐洲統合之發展」，歐美研究，第31卷四期，頁629-687。

（三） 學位論文
李佳霏。2002。「從整合理論看兩岸關係」。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
吳怡德。1997。「辯證功能主義與歐洲整合經驗」。中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
周雷。2002。「戰後歐洲一體化中的超國家向度評析」。山東師範大學碩士論文。
陳志雄。2002。「一九七九年以來海峽兩岸對「一個中國」的爭議」，國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文。
張惠玲。2002。「歐盟『共同外交暨安全政策』之整合談判過程與臺海兩岸協商經驗之比較」。國立中山大學大陸研究所博士論文。
鄭樟雄。2003。「臺海兩岸統合關係研究—以歐洲聯盟經驗為例」。南華大學公共行政與政策研究所碩士論文。
藍玉春。1992。「法德關係與歐洲統合」。國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。

（四） 其它
社論。「法國人為什麼說不？」。中國時報，2005年06月05日，第15版。

二、英文資料：
（一）、書籍
Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Totalitarianism, Part Three of The Origins of Totalitarianism New York: Harcourt, Brace &World, Inc.
Booth, Ken & Smith, Steve (eds.). 1995. International Relations Theory Today, U.S.A.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Carr, E. H. 1939. The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan.
Carr, E.H. 1942. Conditions of Peace. London: Macmillan.
Carr, E.H. 1990. What is history?. London: Penguin Books.
Claude, Inis L.. 1971. Swords into Ploshares. New York: Randon House.
Cosgrove, C. A. and Twitchett, K. J.(eds.). 1970. The New International Actors: The UN and the EEC. London: Macmillan.
Dinan, Desmond. 1994. Ever Closer Union?: An Introduction to the European Community. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. New York : Longman.
Doyle, Michael. 1997. Ways of war and peace : realism, liberalism, and socialism. New York : Norton.
Dunne, Tim. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Groom, A.J.R. And Taylor, Paul. 1969. Functionalism: Final Report of the Conference. London : Frances Pinter Ltd.
Groom, A.J.R. And Taylor, Paul(eds.). 1975. Functionalism: Theory and Practice In International Relations. New York: Crane, Russak & Company, Inc.
Eastby, John Hiatt. 1985. David Mitrany's approach to politics : functionalism in theory and practice. Lanham: University Press of America.
Eastby, John Hiatt. 1985. Functionalism and Interdependence. Lanham: University Press of America.
Ferguson, Yale H. 2002. The Elusive Quest Continues- Theory and Global Politics. N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Hammarlund, Per A. 2005. Liberal Internationalism and Decline of the State. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Haas, Ernst. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economical Forces 1950-1957. London: Steven of the London Institute of World Affairs.
Hass, Ernst. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State. Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press.
Haas, Ernst. 1975. The Obsolescence of regional Integration Theory. Berkley: Institute of International Studies.
Holbraad, Carsten. 2003. Internationalism and Nationalism in European Political Thought. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Kegley, Charles W.(ed.) 1995. Controverseries in International Relations Theory: Realism and Neo-liberalism. New York: St. Martin’s.
Kegley, Charles W. 2006. World politics : trend and transformation. Belmont, CA : Thomson Higher Education.
Kuntsen, T. L. 1992. A history of International Relations Theory, an introduction. Manchester and London：Manchester University Press.
Lindberg, L. N. and Scheingold, S. A.(eds.) 1971. Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
Long, David and Wilson, Peter. (eds.) 1995. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis : inter-war idealism reassessed. New York : Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Michelmann, Hans J. and Soldatos, Panayotis(eds.) 1994. European Integration: Theories and Approaches. Lanham: University Press of America.
Mitrany, David. 1933. The Progress of International Government. London: Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., and Allen& Unwin.
Mitrany, David. 1961. Marx against the peasant : a study in social dogmatism. New York : Collier Books.
Mitrany, David. 1966. A Working Peace System .Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
Mitrany, David. 1975. The Functional Theory of Politics. London School of Economics and Political Science. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1961. Politics among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1974. Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nye, Joseph S. 1971. Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston: Little Brown.
Hans Morgenthau, 1970. Truth and Power: Essays of a Decade, 1960-70. New York: Praeger.
Parinson, F. 1977. The Philosophy of International Relations: A Study in the History of Thought. California: Sage Publications.
Porter, Brian(ed.). 1972. The Aberystwyth Papers. London: Oxford University Press.
Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. New York : St. Martin’s Press ; Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan.
Sewell, James P. 1966. Functionalism and World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Schmitter, Philippe. 2000. How to Democratize the Emerging Euro-Polity: Citizenship, Representation, Decision-Making. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.
Thompson, Kenneth W.(ed.). 1985. The Credibility of Institutions, Policies and Leadership. Lanham: University Press of America.
Thompson, Kenneth W. 1979. Ethics, Functionalism, and Power in International Politics: The Crisis in Values. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Taylor, Paul. 2000. Theories of European Integration. New York : St. Martin's Press ; Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan
Taylor, Paul(ed.). 1983. The Limits of European Integration. London/Canberra: Croom Helm.
Vasquez, John A.(ed.) 1990. Classics of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
Wight, Martin and Butterfield, H.(eds.). 1966. Diplomatic Investigation. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Woolf, L. S. 1916. International Government. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Wright, Quincy & Zimmern, Alfred E.(eds.) 1936. Neutrality and collective security. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, Peter. 2000. E. H. Carr: the revolutionist's realist. London: LSE.

（二）、期刊與研討會
A., D. K. 1944. “A Working Peace System. An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization.” International Affairs, Vol. 20, No.1 :109.
Anderson, Dorthy. 1988. “David Mitrany(1888-1975): an appreciation of his life and work.” Review of International Studies, Vol.24 :577-592.
Angell, Robert C.. 1965. “An Analysis of Trends in International Organizations,” Peace Research Society, No.3 :184-195.
Booth, Ken. 1991. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice.” International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3 :pp. 527-545.
Bull, Hedley. 1966. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach.” World Politics. Vol.18, No.3 :361-377.
Caporaso, James A. 1971. “Theory and Method in the Study of International Integration.” International Organization, Vol. 25, No. 2 :228-253.
Claude, Inis L.. 1965. “Review: Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization by Ernst Haas.” The American Political Science Review Vol. 59, No.4 :1011-1013.
Cox, Robert . 1976. "On Thinking About Future World Order," World Politics, Vol. 28 :175-196.
Gould, Lawrence V. Jr. 1986. “Review of functionalism and Interdependence”, The Journal of Politics. Vol. 48, No. 4 :1090-1092.
Harrison, R. J. 1975. “Testing Functionalism”, in A. J. R. Groom & Paul Taylor ed., Functionalism: Theory and Practice In International Relations. New York: Crane, Russak & Company, Inc..
Haas, Ernst. 1970. “The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pre-theorizing.” International Organization, Vol. 24, No. 4 :606-646.
Hoffman, Stanley. 1959. “International Relations: The Long Road to Theory.” World Politics Vol. 18, No.3 : 347-377.
Gloud Jr., Lawrence V.. 1986. “Review: Functionalism and Interdependence.” The Journal of Politics Vol. 48, No.4 :1090-1092.
Guetzkow, Halrod. 1950. “The Science of International Relations.” The American Perspective. Vol.4 :424-440
Kaiser, Ronald. 1972. "Toward the Copernican Phase of Regional Integration Theory." Journal of Common Market Studies, March :207-232.
Keohane, Robert. 1978. ”Book Review: The functional theory of Politics.” The American Political Science Review Vol. 72, No. 2 :805-806.
Kihl, Young W. 1971. “Performance and Member-State Behavior in an International Organization: Test and Evaluation.” the Journal of Politics Vol. 33, No. 2
Kihl, Young W. 2000. “A Working Peace System and KEDO Experiment: Problems and Prospects.” Promoting International Scientific, Technological and Economic Cooperation in the Korean Peninsula, Istituto Diplomatico Mario Toscano
Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, June 1-2, 2000.
Levitt, Malcolm. 1967. “Review: Functionalism and World Politics: A Study Based on United Nations Programs Financing Economic Development. by James Patrick Sewell.” International Affairs, Vol. 43, No. 1 :133-134.
Lodge, Juliet. 1980. “Review: Beyond Functionalism: Attitudes toward International Organization in Norway and the United States by Robert E. Riggs.” Canadian Journal of Political Science Vol. 13, No. 2 :442-443.
Macmullen, Andrew. 2004. “Intergovernmental Functionalism? The Council of Europe in European Integration.” European Integration Vol. 26, No. 4 : 405-429.
Malamud, Andres. 2001. “Spillover in European and South American Integration: An Assessment.” meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington D.C., September 6-8.
Mearsheimer, John. 2005. “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On.” International Relations, Vol. 19(2): 139–152.
Miller, A. J. 1971. “Consensus and Conflict in Functionalism: Implications for the Study of International Integration.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 4, No. 2 :178-190.
Mitrany, David. 1970. “The Functional Approach to World Organization,” in C. A. Cosgrove and K. J. Twitchett(eds.). The New International Actors: The UN and the EEC ,London: Macmillan: pp. 65-75.
Mitrany, David. 1971. “The Functional Approach in Historical Perspective,” International Affairs, Vol. 47, No. 3 :532-543.
Navari, Cornelia. 1995. “David Mitrany and International Functionalism", in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds.), Thinkers of the Twenty Years' Crisis, Inter-War Idealism Reassessed(Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Nye, Joseph. 1965. “Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration.” International Organization Vol. 19, No.4 :870-884.
Nye, Joseph. 1968. “Comparative Regional Integration - Concept and Measurement.” International Organization Vol. 22, No.4 :855-880.
Nye, Joseph. 1970. “Comparing Common Markets- A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model.” International Organization Vol. 24, No.4 :796-835.
Rainey, Gene Edward. 1967. “Book review: A Working Peace System.” The Journal of Politics Vol. 29, No.3 :690-691.
Riggs, Robert E. 1977. “One Small Step for functionalism: UN Participation and Congressional Attitude Change.” International Organization, Vol. 31, No. 3 :515-539
Riggs, Robert E. 1980. “The FAO and the USDA: Implication for Functionalist Learning.” The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 33 :315-345.
Rubin, Ronald. 1967. “Review of Functionalism and World Politics: A Study Based on United Nations Programs financing Economic Development.” The Western Political Quarterly Vol. 20, No. 1 :245-246.
Smith, Steve. 1987. “Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relation as a Social Science.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol.16 :135-179.
Tanter, Raymond. 1969. “A Working Functionalism?” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 13, No.3 :398-401.
Thompson, Kenneth. 1978. “Review: [Untitled]” Higher Education, Vol. 7, No. 4 :471-474.
Wolf, Peter. 1973. “International Organization and Attitude Change: A Re-Examination of the Functionalist Approach.” International Organization, Vol. 27, No. 3 :347-371.

（三）、其他
Immanuel Wallerstein, “The Ambiguous French 'No' to the European Constitution”, http://fbc.binghamton.edu/163en.htm, 2005.06
Gerhard Michael Ambrosi, “Some Literature relating to David Mitrany, Functionalism, and European Integration”, http://www.uni-trier.de/ambrosi/files/publik/ambrosi/mitrany.html, 2007.05
Gerhard Michael Ambrosi，” Some Literature relating to David Mitrany, Functionalism, and European Integration”，http://www.uni-trier.de/ambrosi/files/publik/ambrosi/mitrany.html，原作者未列日期。
Peter Wilson, “E. H. Carr: The Revolutionist’s realist” http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/press/012wilson.pdf , 2000.
Will Banyan, “Outflanking the nation-state” http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/outflanking.html, 2005.10
Woodrow Wilson, “First Inaguaral Adderss”, http://usinfo.org/PUBS/LivingDoc_gb/wwilson1.htm , 1918.
Woodrow Wilson, “War Message”, http://www.wretch.cc/blog/jblur
Woodrow Wilson,”What is Progress”, http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=942