Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0706110-232348 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0706110-232348
論文名稱
Title
幼教老師科技學科教學知識發展與師資培育課程教師之教育科技學習楷模示範之相關研究
A study of the relationship between the teacher educators’ educational technology role modeling and the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) of preschool teachers in Taiwan.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
121
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-07-06
關鍵字
Keywords
師資培育、角色楷模示範、幼教老師、科技學科教學知識
Role Modeling, Teacher Education, Preschool Teachers, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK)
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5627 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5627 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在瞭解幼教老師知覺其師資培育課程教師之教育科技學習楷模示範與其自身科技學科教學知識發展的概況,進而探討教育科技學習楷模示範與科技學科教學知識的關係。研究者採自編「教育科技學習楷模示範問卷」與改編Schimdt 等人(2009)的「科技學科教學知識問卷」為研究工具,採立意抽樣方式選擇台灣南部五大縣市的335位公私立在職幼教老師為研究對象,以描述性統計、皮爾森積差相關、MANOVA等方式進行量化資料分析,並訪談五位具使用資訊科技工具經驗的幼教老師以瞭解其知覺師資培育課程教師楷模示範情形之質性資料,補充說明量化數據結果。
研究發現:(1)在科技學科教學知識等七項要素中,幼教老師的教學法知識、學科教學知識以及學科內容知識的發展最好;(2)幼教老師的教學經驗與教學法知識、學科內容知識以及學科教學知識具顯著正相關,而與科技知識呈顯著負相關;具有十年以上教學經驗的幼教老師,其教學法知識、學科內容知識與學科教學知識的發展較好,科技知識發展則較差;(3)幼教老師的年齡與教學法知識、學科教學知識達顯著正相關,與科技知識則呈顯著負相關;年長教師較能掌握在教學情境中採用的教學法,故其教學法知識佳,而年輕教師的科技知識能力發展則較年長教師好;(4)幼教老師的資訊科技工具使用頻率與教學法知識、科技知識、學科內容知識、科技內容知識、科技教學知識呈顯著正相關;每週使用資訊科技工具頻率達20小時以上的幼教老師,其在科技知識與科技內容知識發展上比每週使用5小時以下的幼教老師好;(5)畢業於科技大學、普通大學以及師範院校等學校類型的幼教老師在科技學科教學知識發展上無顯著差異存在;(6)教育科技學習楷模示範與科技學科教學知識的發展呈顯著正相關;(7)「數位教學策略」的教育科技學習楷模示範最能預測科技學科教學知識核心要素的發展。
研究者從教師專業成長輔導制度、幼教專業課程內容分析、資訊科技能力素養課程規劃與設立、師資培育者楷模示範及幼教資訊教育政策等方向提供具體建議,以供師資培育機構與政府機關作為未來分析與規劃幼教專業領域課程、教師專業成長研習設計與實行方式及教育政策重點規劃之參考。未來研究宜擴充研究樣本與場域、納入幼教專家學者意見以持續發展研究工具,並可從質性研究角度切入,蒐集幼教老師與師資培育者的訪談資料、課程觀察劄記等資料進行交叉分析,以瞭解師資培育者的楷模示範對教師個人專業成長歷程影響之全貌與脈絡。

Abstract
This study aimed to realize the relationship between the teacher educators’ educational technology role modeling impact and the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) of preschool teachers in Taiwan.
Quantitative Data was collected from a sample of 335 in-service preschool teachers who teach in either public schools or private schools in southern Taiwan. Follow-up interviews were also conducted with five survey respondents. The instrument was translated and adapted from Schmidt et al. (2009) TPCK survey instrument. The five modeling technology uses by teacher educators were identified from the related literature. Data analysis methods included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and MANOVA. In addition, a multiple regression was conducted with the preschool teachers’ self-assessed TPCK as the dependent variable, and the five modeling technology uses by the teacher educators the potential predictors. Findings from the study summarized as follows: (a)The development of preschool teachers’ pedagogical knowledge(PK), content knowledge(CK) and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) are the best among the seven knowledge sub domains in TPCK.(b)The number of years of teaching experience is significantly positively correlated with preschool teachers’ pedagogical knowledge (PK), content knowledge (
CK)and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK). Besides, preschool teachers with over ten years of teaching experience have better self-assessed pedagogical knowledge(PK), content knowledge(CK)and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) are better than those teachers with less than ten years of teaching experience.(c)A significant positive correlation was found between pedagogical knowledge(PK),and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) and age; however, a significant negative correlation existed with technology knowledge(TK) and age. Older preschool teachers’ self-assessed pedagogical knowledge(PK) is better than younger teachers while the young preschool teachers have a better self-assessed technology knowledge(TK).(d)The frequency of using information technology is significantly positively correlated with pedagogical knowledge(PK), technology knowledge(TK), content knowledge(CK), technological content knowledge(TCK) and technological pedagogical knowledge(TPK).Preschool teachers with a frequency of using information technology above 20 hours a week have better self-assessed technology knowledge(TK) and technological content knowledge(TCK) than those with a frequency under 5 hours a week.(e)There are no significant differences between responding preschool teachers’ different college teacher education program types and the development of their self-assessed TPCK. (f) A significant positive correlation was found between teacher educators’ educational technology role modeling and the respondents’ self-assessed TPCK. (g) Digital teaching strategy is the most significant predictor to development of core element- technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPCK).
Recommendations were also provided based on the findings from this study. It’s recommended that the teacher education programs should incorporate technology components in their teacher preparation programs for preschool teachers and integrate technology across the curriculum instead of a stand-alone technology course. Besides, the design of mentoring program into the professional development should be incorporated to include both the older and younger generations for reciprocal mentoring to promote preschool teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與目的………………………………………………………01
第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………………08
第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………………………09
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 教師角色楷模示範與教師應用教育科技於教學之專業成長……… 11
第二節 科技學科教學知識(TPCK)及其相關研究……………………………20
第三節 綜合討論……………………………………………………………… 31
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構與流程……………………………………………………… 35
第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………………… 40
第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………………… 43
第四節 資料處理與分析……………………………………………………… 56
第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 幼教老師基本資料…………………………………………………… 59
第二節 幼教老師科技學科教學知識與教育科技學習楷模示範之整體發展現
況……………………………………………………………………… 63
第三節 人口背景變項與幼教老師科技學科教學知識發展之分析………… 66
第四節 教育科技學習楷模示範與幼教老師自身科技學科教學知識之關係.77
第五章 研究結論與建議
第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………… 89
第二節 研究建議……………………………………………………………… 92
參考文獻
一、中文部分…………………………………………………………………… 97
二、英文部分…………………………………………………………………… 100
附錄
一、附錄一……………………………………………………………………… 107

參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
王文科(1991)。學習心理學:學習理論導論。臺北:五南。
王文裕(2002)。新竹縣國民小學教師進行資訊科技融入教學的現況、意願及相關因素研究。國立新竹教育大學輔導教學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
王寀蕙(2001)。國小教師電腦融入教學素養及其專業成長活動之研究。國立臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
王嘉德(2001)。影響臺北市國小教師使用教室電腦意願暨相關因素之探討。國立臺北市立教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
白亦方(2010)。美國優質師資培育的底蘊分析。教育研究與發展期刊,6(1),
  21-38。
朱耀明(2004)。科技教育與教育科技之關係。生活科技教育月刊,37(6),2-8。
江羽慈(2002)。影響國小教師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究。國立交通大
  學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
吳育蓓、邱淑惠(2009)。由幼稚園教師應具備的資訊素養看大學師培機構資訊
  科技相關課程之妥適性。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,2(2),39-58。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北:五南。
吳武典(2006)。師資培育的正思與迷思。臺灣教育,638,2-6。
吳聲毅、李春雄(2004)。提升教師製作數位教材意願以展現教學創新行為。載於香港中文大學舉辦之「第八屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會(GCCCE 2004)」會議論文集(頁362-368),香港。
吳麗花(2001)。臺北縣國民小學教師資訊素養與教學專業能力關係之研究。國立臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李文政、周淑惠(1999)。電腦於幼兒教育之應用。教學科技與媒體,44,47-56。

周曉虹(譯)(1995)。A. Bandura。社會學習理論(Social learning theory)。臺北:
  桂冠。
林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀(2007)。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展
  望。教育研究與發展,3(1),57-80。
林慧芬(1998)。從幼教老師電腦網路使用現況與需求探討幼教老師專業成長的管道。幼兒教育年刊,10,91-106。
邱方晞、陳儒晰、邱錦昌(2008)。幼教人員的幼兒數位媒體教學應用態度之調
查研究(上)。幼兒教育季刊,291,69-80。
邱淑惠、莊孟珊(2004)。台中地區幼教人員電腦整合教學信念與應用現況之調
  查研究。師大學報,49(2),35-60。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。
  臺北:五南。
徐新逸、吳佩謹(2002)。資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體,59,63-73。
高傳正(1996)。幼稚園教師運用教學媒體之調查研究。教學科技與媒體,30,43-47。
高熏芳、陳美娟(2002)。國小專家教師專業知能形成歷程要素之研究。國北師
  院學報,15,527-556。
張文嘉(2002)。學校環境與教師個人背景對資訊融入教學之影響研究-以南投
  縣國中為例。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄
  市。
張鈿富(2009,11月)。評估「獎勵教學卓越計畫」之教學品質。論文發表於2009年第五屆海峽兩岸高等教育論壇。元智大學:中壢。
張鈿富、吳京玲、陳清溪、羅婉綺(2007)。歐盟教育政策的趨勢與啟示。教與研究與發展,3(3),99-126。

教育部(2000)。89學年度在職教師資訊應用培訓計畫。2009年06月13日, 取自教育部資訊教育:http://www.edu.tw/information/teatra/infotech.htm
教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育推動現況與展望。2009年06月13日,取自教育部電子計算機中心資訊教育園地:http://www.edu.tw/moecc/index.htm
教育部(2002)。資訊教育基礎建設-擴大內需方案。2009年06月13日,取自教育部:http://www.edu.tw/information/expand/expand.html
教育部(2009)。建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。2009年11月30日,取自教育部當前教育重大政策:
http://www.edu.tw/secretary/itemize_list.aspx?pages=1&site_content_sn=19512
梁珀華、王靖宜(2005)。我的教室有一部電腦:幼稚園教師資訊科技融入教學
  之研究。九十三年度國科會「資訊教育」學門專題研究計畫成果討論會。台
  南大學。(NSC 93-2520-S-324-001)。
許紋華(2002)。教師知識與行動的轉化:以一位國小教師資訊融入自然科教學為例。國立高雄中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳秋吟(2004)。國小低年級教師實施資訊科技融入教學歷程之研究。國立嘉義
  大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
陳美玉(1996)教師專業實踐理論及其應用之研究。教育研究資訊雙月刊,4(3),
120-147。
陳國泰(2000)。國小初任教師實際知識的發展之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育
研究所博士學位論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳國泰(2007)。學科教學知識的內含與發展歷程:以三位國小自然與生活科技
  資深專家教師為例。新竹教育大學教育學報,24(1),29-60。
陳惠珍(2004)。幼教老師對幼兒使用電腦的觀點探討。國民教育研究,9,34-60。
郭順利(1998)。班杜拉的社會學習理論及其在國中生活教育上的應用。教育研
究,6,375-386。

郭詩屏(2003)。國小教師實施電腦科技融入藝術教學之個案研究。屏東教育大學視覺藝術教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
陳儒昕、黃金花(2006)。幼兒園教師運用網路社群實踐專業發展之探討。幼兒保育學刊,4,123-139。
楊昭景、邱文彬(2006)。技術課程教師對大學生學習型態與職業刻板印象的影
響:示範有利性的角色。教育心理學報,38(2),131-150。
劉君毅(2007)。數位學習的現況與發展。研習資訊,24(4),115-124。
蕭瑞琪(2000)。電腦在幼兒教育的角色。師友,391,76-77。
薛雅雲、張瓊穗(2008)。幼稚園教師資訊素養與其教學效能關係之探討。論文
  發表於2008南台灣幼兒保育學術研討會。屏東:美和技術學院。
謝靜慧(2000)。國民中小學教師電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素養之相關研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
鍾樹椽、程璟滋(2005)。資訊科技應用於數學科教學之探討。教育資料與圖書
  館學,43(2),249-266。
二、英文部分
Albion, P. R., Jamineson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2010). Auditing the TPACK Confidence of Australian Pre-Service Teachers: The TPACK Confidence Survey(TCS). Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego, California, USA.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in
technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education
52 , 154–168.
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive model. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3-11.
Bell, A. P.(1970). Role modelship and interaction in adolescence and young adulthood. Developmental Psychology ,2, 123-128.
Carr, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., Litzinger, M. E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good ideas to
foment educational revolution: The role of systematic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, 38(1), 5-14.
Carter, K. (1992). Creating cases for the development of teacher knowledge, in: T. Russell & H.Munby (Eds.) Teachers and Teaching: from classroom to reflection ( pp. 109-121 ). London:Falmer Press.
Chen, J.-Q., & Chang, C. (2006). Testing the whole teacher approach to professional development: A study of enhancing early childhood teachers’ technology proficiency. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 8(1), 1-18.
Chuang, H.-H., Thompson, A., & Schmidt, D. (2003). Faculty technology mentoring
program: Major trends in the literature. Journal of Computing in Teacher
Education,19(4), 101-106.
Cochran, K. F., King, R. A., & DeRuiter, J. A. (1991). Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Cooley, C. H. (1982). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
Copple, C. (2005). Developmentally appropriate practice in 2005: Updates from the
field. Young Children, 60(4), 10-11.
Côté, L., & Leclère, H. (2000). How clinical teachers perceive the doctor-patient relationship and themselves as role models. Academic Medicine, 75(11), 1117-1124.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Target time toward teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 20(2), 31-36.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ertmer, P. (2003). Transforming teacher education: Visions and strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 124-128.
Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 14-21.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., & Borup, J. (2010). The Decision-making Processes of Preservice Teachers as They Integrate Technology. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego, California, USA.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M.C. Reynolds(Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. (pp.23-36). New-York: Pergamon Press.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). The narrative nature of pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Chicago, IL.
Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-Based technology integration assessment rubric. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego, California, USA.
Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming
technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,13(2), 277-302.
Jelfs, A., & Colbourn, C. (2002). Virtual seminars and their impact on the role of the
teaching staff. Computers &Education, 38, 127–136.
Kagan, J. (1958). The concept of identification. Psychological Review, 65, 296-305.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization. New York:
Wiley.
Kelley, M., Wetzel, K., Padgett, H., Williams, M., & Odom, M. (2004). Early childhood teacher preparation and technology integration: the Arizona state university west experience. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2004(1), 245-260.
King, K. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative
learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39(3), 283-297.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teacher design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE committee on innovation and technology. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.
Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral development and identification. In H. W. Stevenson (Ed.), Child psychology: The sixty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Educatio n(Part 1) (pp.277-332). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.
Loughran, J. & Berry A. (2005). Modelling by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 193-203.
Loughran, J. (1996). An essay-review of developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modeling. London: Falmer Press.
Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F. & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586-601.
Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modify conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College
Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
Nikolopoulou, K. (2007). Early childhood educational software: specific features and issues of localization. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 173-179.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-35.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
Shah, K. & Lee, M.(2010). Building an interactive one room school xxperience in second life: An xxample of TPACK at work. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego, California, USA.
Shin, T., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., & Thompson, A. (2009). Changing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Course Experiences. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009, Charleston, SC, USA, AACE.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Slater, P. (1961). Toward a dualistic theory of identification. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 7, 113-126.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Wideen, M. F., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: the study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review ,14(3), 331-351.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361-384.
Wright, M. S. & Carrese, A. J. (2002). Excellence in role modeling: insight and perspectives from the pros. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 167(6), 638-643.
Wright, M. S., Kern, E. D. , Kolodner, K., Howard, M. D. & Brancati, L. F. (1998). Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339(27), 1986-1993.
Wright, M. S., Wong, A., & Newill C. (1997). The impact of role models on medical students. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(1), 53-56.
Zhao, Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.


電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.191.22
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.145.191.22
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code