論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
馬婁里騎士的罪與悔-藍撒洛和高隱 Sin and Repentance of Malory's Knights: Lancelot and Gawain |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
98 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2008-07-02 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2008-07-07 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
悔、阿奎納斯、高隱、馬婁里、罪、騎士精神 Aquinas, Lancelot, sin, repentance, ideal knight, Gawain |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5750 次,被下載 3522 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5750 times, has been downloaded 3522 times. |
中文摘要 |
本論文嘗試探討湯姆斯•馬婁里的《亞瑟王之死》裡所呈現藍撒洛和高隱兩位騎士的罪與悔。傳統觀點大多以這兩位騎士的性情和品德切入分析,結論普遍認為藍撒洛是一完美騎士,而高隱是衝動魯莽的。本文以這兩位騎士的罪過和懺悔來觀察他們的差異,並借用湯姆斯.阿奎納斯對罪與悔的觀念作一詮釋。第一章探討藍撒洛不應被視為完美,而是一位有缺陷騎士;他在《亞瑟王之死》中不斷的得到同伴的讚美卻最終無法一窺聖杯,這表示馬婁里認同藍撒洛的好卻也深知他的罪。第二章處理高隱爵士的罪,雖然他失去手足的悲痛令人同情,但因他的衝動性情和驕傲自大使得亞瑟宮廷最終因他尋求報復藍撒洛而瓦解,本章節提出馬婁里一方面不贊同高隱的報復心裡,更重要的是另一方面譴責高隱不願把握贖罪的機會,屢次視懺悔在他追求聖杯之旅中微不足道。前兩個章節可看出馬婁里呈視兩位騎士的手法上有明顯的不同,而第三章舉證在這兩位騎士以不同態度面對自身過錯後,馬婁里最後原諒了藍撒洛,卻沒有原諒高隱,這可從馬婁里描寫他們的懺悔裡看出端倪。本文探討的結論是馬婁里的理想騎士並非是完美無缺,而是他知道自身的過錯及不足,有一顆謙卑的心和面對錯誤的意願,也希望能夠補償,這才是馬婁里的理想騎士。過去研究推斷馬婁里應是在監獄服刑時完成《亞瑟王之死》,因此不難想像作者本身對於罪與悔即有獨特的見解。本文以罪與悔的觀念檢視這二位騎士在騎士精神裡有著不同的地位和影響,為馬婁里的騎士精神注入另一解釋層面。 |
Abstract |
This thesis aims to analyze the notions of sin and repentance of Lancelot and Gawain in Malory’s Morte Darthur so as to unveil what Malory’s ideal knight is to be like. While the traditional view takes Lancelot as a perfect knight and Gawain a reckless one because of their different dispositions, I approach these two characters from their breach of the chivalric code and their sequential penitence. Chapter I and Chapter II will study respectively how Lancelot and Gawain sin in the world of chivalry because of their wrongdoings. Although these two knights have both sinned, yet, in Malory’s hands, these two knights are portrayed in divergent degrees with obviously contrastive narrative context and their repentance takes a different hue as well. Chapter III examines the repentance of Lancelot and Gawain and takes note that although both knights repent for their sins, forgiveness is granted to the former exclusively whereas the latter is denied such a treatment. Chapter IV concludes that such difference or prejudice is indicative of Malory’s evaluation of Lancelot and Gawain in accordance with how the two knights handle their misdeeds and this implies the author’s conception of what a perfect knight should be. Of particular interest is that Chapters I through IV trace the traditional theological view by looking at St. Thomas Aquinas’ concept of sin and repentance. Aquinas’ doctrinal view allows us to analyze Lancelot and Gawain’s sin and repentance within a chivalric as well as theological domain and provides us a better base with which to understand these two concepts. This research strives to bring about a different perspective in evaluating Malory’s knights. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Introduction ………………………………… 1 Chapter I …………………………………. 19 Sin of Lancelot Chapter II ………………………………… 41 Sin of Gawain Chapter III .........………………………… 69 Repentance of Lancelot and Gawain Conclusion ……......................................... 86 Works Cited ……………………………… 90 |
參考文獻 References |
Ackerman, Felicia Nimue. “’I May Do No Penaunce’: Spiritual Sloth in Malory’s Morte.” Arthuriana 16.1(2006):47-53. Aquinas, St. Thomas. Summa Theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 5 vols. Westminster: Christian Classics, 1981. Augustine, St. On Chrstian Teaching. Trans. R.P.H. Green. New York:Oxford UP, 1999. Bartholomew, Barbara Gray. “The Thematic Function of Malory’s Gawain” College English 24.4(1963):262-267. Barber, Richard. “Chivalry and the Morte Darthur” A Companion to Malory. Ed. Elizabeth Archibald and A.S.G.. Edwards, eds. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000. 19-35 Benson, C. David. “Gawain’s Defence of Lancelot in Malory’s ‘Death of Arthur’” The Modern Language Review 78.2(1983):267-272. ---. “The Ending of the Morte Darthur” A Companion to Malory. Ed. Elizabeth Archibald and A.S.G.. Edwards, eds. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000. 221-236. Benson, Larry D. Malory’s Morte Darthur. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1977. Brewer, D.S, ed. “Malory’s ‘Proving’ of Sir Lancelot.” The Changing Face of Arthurian Literature: Essays on Arthurian Prose Romances in memory of Cedric E. Pickford. Ed. Alison Adams et al. Woodbridge: Boydell P, 1986. 123-36. ---. The Morte Darthur: Parts Seven and Eight. London: Edward Arnold, 1968. Companion Encyclopedia of Theology. Ed. Peter Byrne and Leslie Houldon. London: Routledge, 1995. Davies, R.T. “Malory’s Launcelot and the Noble Way of the World” The Review of English Studies. 6.24(1955):356-364. Field, P.J.C. Malory: Texts and Sources. Cambridge: Edmundsbury P, 1998. Guerin, Wilfred L. “’The Tale of the Death of Arthur’: Catastrophe and Resolution.” Malory’s Originality: A Critical Study of Le Morte Darthur. Ed. R.M. Lumiansky. New York: Arno P, 1979. Halfond, Gregory, rev. of Eschatology and Pain in Gregory, by Kevin Hester, The Medieval Review 08.5.13, 26 May 2008 <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/t/tmr/>. Hastings, James, ed. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. New York: Scribner, 1924-1927. Hester, Kevin. Eschatology and Pain in St. Gregory the Great. Milton Keynes: Paternoster P, 2007. Heng, Geraldine. “Enchanted Ground: The Feminine Subtext in Malory” Arthurian Women: A Casebook. Ed. Lacy J. Norris. New York: Garland, 1996. Hopkins, Andrea. The Sinful Knights: A Study of Middle English Penitential Romance. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1990. 32-69. Kennedy, Beverly. Knighthood in the Morte Darthur. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1992. Kurath, Hans, ed. Middle English Dictionary: Plan and Bibliography. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1954. Lambert, Mark. Malory: Style and Vision in Le Morte Darthur. London: Yale UP, 1975. Luminasky, R. M. “Sir Thomas Malory’s Morte Darthur: 1947-1987: Author, Title and Text.” Speculum. 62.4 (1987): 878-897. Lull, Ramon. The Book of the ordre of Chyualry. London: Oxford UP, 1926. Matthews, William. “A Question of Texts” The Malory Debate: Essays on the Texts of Le Morte Darthur. Ed. Boonie Wheeler et al. Cambridge: D.S.Brewer, 2000. 65-107. McCarthy, Terence. Reading the Morte Darthur. Cambridge: D.S.Brewer, 1988. ---. “Caxton and the text of Malory’s Book 2.” Modern Philology. 11.2 (1973): 144-152 McGrath, Alister E. Christian Theology: an introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996. McNeill, John and Helena M. Gamer, trans. Medieval Handbooks of Penance: A Translation of the Principal Libri Poenitentiales. New York:Columbia UP, 1990. Moorman, Charles. “’The Tale of the Sankgreal’: Human Frailty” Malory’s Originality: A Critical Study of Le Morte Darthur. Ed. R.M. Lumiansky. New York: Arno P, 1979. ---. “Malory’s Treatment of the Sankgreall” PMLA. 71.3(1956):496-509. Ness, Sandra Ihle. Malory’s Grail Quest: Invention and Adaptation in Medieval Prose Romance. London: U of Wisconsin P, 1983. 127-160 Newhauser, Richard, ed. The seven deadly sins: from communities to individuals. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Noguchi, Shunichi. “The Winchester Malory” The Malory Debate: Essays on the Texts of Le Morte Darthur. Ed. Boonie Wheeler et al. Cambridge: D.S.Brewer, 2000. 117-126 Norris, Ralph. “Lucius’s Exhortation in Winchester and the Caxton” Arthurian Studies in Hounour of P.J.C. Field. Ed. Bonnie Wheeler. New York: D.S.Brwer, 2004. 253-259 Oxford English Dictionary. Ed. R. W. Burchfield. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1989. Radulescu, L. Raluca. “’now I take uppon me the adventures to seke of holy thynges’: Lancelot and the Crisis of Arthurian Knighthood” Arthurian Studies in Honour of P.J.C. Field. Ed. Bonnie Wheeler. New York: D.S.Brewer, 2004. 285-295 Robeson, Lisa. “Women’s Worship: Female Versions of Chivalric Honour” Reviewing Le Morte Darthur:Texts and Context. Characters and Themes. Ed. K.S. Whetter and Raluca L. Radulescu. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2005. 107-118. Rosenfeld, Jessica, rev. of The seven deadly sins: from communities to individuals, The Medieval Review 08.6.12, 11 June 2008 <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/t/tmr/>. Shichtman, Martin B. “Malory’s Gawain Reconsidered” Essays in English Literature 11.2(1984):159-176. Tentler, Thomas. Sin and Confession on the Eve of the Reformation. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977. “The New Testament.” Romans 12. The New American Bible. 1991, 1986, 1970. Online. Internet. Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Inc., Washington, D.C. 24 May 2008. <http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/index.htm>. Tolhurst, Fiona. “Why Every Knight Needs His Lady: Re-viewing Questions of Genre and ‘Cohesion’ in Malory’s Le Morte Darthur’” Reviewing Le Morte Darthur:Texts and Context. Characters and Themes. Ed. K.S. Whetter and Raluca L. Radulescu. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2005. 133-148. Tucker, P.E. “The Place of the ‘Quest of the Holy Grail’ in the Morte Darthur” The Modern Language Review. 48.4(1953):391-397. Vinaver, Eugene, ed. Malory. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1971. Wang, Hui-hua. “Penitential Politics and Poetics: Catholic Auricular Confession and Reformed Church Repentance as Techniques of Government in Shakespeare.” Diss. NTU, Taipei, 2006. Whitehead, F. “Lancelot’s Penance” Essays on Malory. Ed. J. A. W. Bennet. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1965. 104-113. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |