Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0707108-165447 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0707108-165447
論文名稱
Title
預算控制制度下反功能行為之研究
A study of the dysfunctional behavior in budgetary control system
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
85
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-06-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-07
關鍵字
Keywords
知覺環境不確定性、過去績效、預算強調、管理者短期導向、工作相關壓力、反功能行為、預算寬列
budgetary slack, job-related tension, managerial short-term orientation, past performance, perceived environment uncertainty, dysfunctional behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5655 次,被下載 4
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5655 times, has been downloaded 4 times.
中文摘要
先前的研究大多著重預算強調對預算寬列或其他反功能行為單一結果的影響。然而,對於這些反功能行為間的關係卻少有探討。本研究探索性地建構一個關於過去績效、關懷領導型態、知覺環境不確定性、預算強調和三個反功能行為(預算寬列、工作相關壓力與管理者短期導向)的結構模式,以便了解在預算控制制度下反功能行為間的關係。資料收集來自台灣上市櫃製造業公司的175位生產部經理(工廠廠長)。
實證結果顯示:
(一)在一個並不以預算達成與否作為績效評估的企業中,並無誘因驅使管理者進行預算寬列。因此雖然過去績效與預算寬列存在顯著正相關,但並不存在顯著的直接效果而是透過預算強調的間接作用。同樣的,知覺環境不確定、關懷領導型態皆是透過預算強調的間接作用影響預算寬列。
(二)預算寬列與管理者短期導向、預算寬列與工作相關壓力間可能存在一個外溢效果。當管理者無法進行預算寬列時,將導致管理者的短期導向行為以及工作相關壓力的提高。
(三)過去績效的好壞,會直接影響管理者所感受到的壓力,不管其是否以預算達成來作為績效的評估。過去績效不佳的管理者,通常會有較大的工作相關壓力。
(四)由於產業特性的不同,影響組織實行預算控制制度的因素也不同,在傳統產業中,過去績效是影響預算控制實行及產生反功能行為之重要因素,在電子資訊產業受到知覺環境不確定的影響較高。
Abstract
Most previous studies emphasized on the single consequence with respect to the effect of budgetary emphasis on budgetary slack or other dysfunctional behaviors, however, the relationships among these dysfunctional behaviors are seldom investigated. In order to understand the relationships among those dysfunctional behaviors, this study attempted to explore a structure model of past performance, perceived environment uncertainty, consideration leadership style, budgetary emphasis and three dysfunctional behaviors including budgetary slack, job-related tension and managerial short-term orientation. The empirical data was randomly drawn from 175 manufacturing managers in Taiwan Security Exchange. The empirical evidence of this research revealed as follows:
1. Managers have no incentive to create budgetary slack in a business which does not evaluate manager’s performance with budgetary goal achievement. There is a significant positive relationship between past performance and budgetary slack, but the direct effect does not exist. The effect of past performance on budgetary slack is indirectly through budgetary emphasis. Similarly, perceived environment uncertainty and consideration leadership style affecting budgetary slack isn’t directly but indirectly by budgetary emphasis.
2. Between budgetary slack and managerial short-term orientation, budgetary slack and job-related tension may exist a spillover effect. While reducing the propensity to build budgetary slack might induce managerial short-term orientation and job-related tension.
3. Weather no matter budget achievement evaluates performance, past performance directly influences the job-related tension. The manager whose performance is poor could have the higher job-related tension.
4. In different industry, the factor that influencing the organization to practice the budget control system is also different. In traditional industry, past performance is the important factor that affecting organization to implement the budget control system and induce the dysfunction behaviors, but perceived environment uncertainty is the important factor in the electronic information industry.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
謝詞 ……………………………………………………………………… 一
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… 二
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… 三
目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… 五
表次 ……………………………………………………………………… 七
圖次 ……………………………………………………………………… 八

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的 …………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題 …………………………………………………… 3
第三節 研究流程 …………………………………………………… 4
第四節 論文架構 …………………………………………………… 6
第二章 文獻探討與假設之建立
第一節 預算強調與其反功能行為之關係 ………………………… 7
第二節 過去績效的影響 …..………………………………………. 13
第三節 關懷的領導型態的影 ……………………………………….. 17
第四節 知覺環境不確定性的影響 ………………………………..… 21
第三章 研究設計
第一節 研究架構 …………………………………………………. 25
第二節 研究對象及資料來源 ……………………………………. 28
第三節 變數衡量 …………………………………………………. 29
第四節 資料分析方法 ……………………………………………. 33
第四章 資料分析與研究結果
第一節 敘述統計量的描述 ………………………………………. 38
第二節 確認性因素分析及信度分析 ……………..…………..… 39
第三節 相關分析結果 ..……….……………………….………… 41
第四節 整體結構模式分析 …….………………………...……… 44
第五節 結構模式之分類比較 ..………………….………………. 49
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 …………………..…………..………………………. 58
第二節 對學術界的貢獻 ………………..………………………. 60
第三節 對實務界的建議 ………………………..………………. 61
第四節 研究限制與對未來研究的建議 ……….………………. 62
參考文獻 ……………………………………………….………………. 63
附錄一 ……………………………………………….………………... 70
附錄二 …………………………………….…………………………... 74
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
吳明隆,2006,結構方程模式SIMPLIS的應用,初版,台北:五南圖書公司。
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411- 423.
Blalack, R. O., and Davis, H.J. (1975). Role ambiguity, job-related tension and job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 1,31-37.
Bourgeois, L. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29-39.
Brownell, P. (1981). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. Accounting Review, 56, 844-860
Brownell, P. (1982). The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 12-27.
Brownell, P. (1985). Budgetary Systems and the Control of Functionally Differentiated Organizational Activities. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 502-512.
Brownell, P. and Hirst, M. (1986). Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation, and task uncertainty: Tests of a three-way interaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 241-249.
Brownell, P. and Dunk, A. S. (1991). Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: Some methodological issues and empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16, 693-703.
Buchko, A. A. (1994). Conceptualization and measurement of environmental uncertainty: An assessment of the miles and snow perceived environmental uncertainty scale. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 410-425.
DeCoster, D. and Fertakis, J. (1968). Budget-induced pressure and its relationship to supervisory behavior. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 237-246.
Downey, H. K., Hellriegel, D. and Slocum, J. (1975). Environmental uncertainty: The construct and its applications. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 613-629.
Downey, H. K. and Slocum, J. W. (1975). Uncertainty: Measures, research and sources of variations,” Academy of Management Journal, 18, 562-578.
Dunk, A. S. (1993a). The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. The Accounting Review, 68, 400-10.
Dunk, A. S., (1993b). The effects of job-related tension on managerial performance in participative budgetary settings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 575-85.
Emsley, D. (2001). Budegt-emphasis in performance evaluation and managers’ job related tension: The moderating effect of information completeness. The British Accounting Review, 33, 399-419.
Fleishman, E. A. and Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43-56.
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13-47.
Gordon, L. A. and Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 33-47.
Govindarajan, V. (1984). Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluations: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 125-159.
Harrison, G. L. (1992). The cross-cultural generalizability of the relation between participation, budget emphasis and job-related attitudes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 1-15.
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior, 3rd(ed.), Englewood Cliffs. N.J.; Prentice-Hall.
Hirst, M. (1983). Reliance on accounting performance measures, task uncertainty, and dysfunctional behavior: Some extensions. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 596-604.
Hill, C. W. L. (1988). Internal capital market controls and financial performance in multidivisional firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, 67-83.
Hopwood, A. G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 156-182.
Hopwood, A. G. (1974). Leadership climate and the use of accounting data in performance evaluation. 49, 3, 485-495.
Hugh C., Kirkland, J. and Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66-79.
Jamal, M. (1990). Relationship of job stress and Type-A behavior to employees’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychosomatic health problems, and turnover motivation. Human Relations, 43, 727-738.
Jaeger, A. M. and Baliga, B. R. (1985). Control systems and strategic adaptation: Lessons from the Japanese experience. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 115-134
Kahn, R. D., Wolfe, Q. R., Snoek, J. D. and Rosenthal, R. (1964) Organisational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity, Wiley, New York.
Kaiser, H. F. and Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement,34, 111-117.
Kaplan, R. S. and Johnson, H. T. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Kenis, I. (1979). Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review, 54, 707-721.
Klores, M. (1966). Rater bias in forced-distribution performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 19, 411-421
Lau, C. M., Low, L. C. and Eggleton, R. C. (1995). The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 359-381.
Linn, G., Casey, K. M., Johnson, G. H. and Ellis, T. S. (2001). Do broad scope managerial accounting systems moderate the effects of budget emphasis, budget participation and perceived environmental uncertainty on the propensity to create budgetary slack?. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 90-96.
Lukka, K. (1988). Budgetary biasing in organizations: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 281-301.
Mann, G. J. (1988). Focus on industry. Journal of Accountancy, 166, 118-22.
March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Merchant, K. A. (1985a). Budgeting and the propensity to create budgetary slack. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 201-10.
Merchant, K. A. (1985b). Organizational controls and discretionary program decision-making: A field study. Accounting Organizations and Society, 10, 67-85.
Merchant, K.A. (1990). The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management myopia. Accounting Organizations and Society, 15, 297-313
Merchant, K. A. and Bruns, W. J. (1986). Measurements to cure management myopia. Business Horizons, 29, 56-64.
Merchant, K. A., and Manzoni, J. F. (1989). The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: A field study. The Accounting Review, 64, 539-558.
Miles, E., and Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nouri, H. (1994). Using organizational commitment and job involvement to predict budgetary slack: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 289-295.
Nohria, N., and Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation?. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1245-64.
Nunnally, J. C., and Bemstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Otley, D. T. (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 16, 122-49.
Otley, D. T. and Pierce, B. J. (1995). The control problem in public accounting firms: An empirical study of the impact of leadership style. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 405-420.
Onsi, M. (1973). Factor analysis of behavioral variables affecting budgetary slack. The Accounting Review, 48, 535-48.
Parasuraman, S., and Alutto, J.A. (1984). Sources of outcomes of stress in organization settings: Toward the development of a structural model. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 330-350.
Rebele, J. E. and Michaels, R. E. (1990). Independent auditors' role stress: Antecedent, outcome, and moderating variables. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2, 124-153
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structure, design, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Sheridan, J. E. and Vredenburgh, D. J. (1979). Structural model of leadership influence in a hospital organization. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 6-21.
Shields, M. D., Deng, F. J. and Kato, Y. (2000). The design and effects of control systems: Tests of direct and indirect-effects models. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 185-202.
Subramaniam, N. and Ashkanasy, N. M. (2000). The effect of organizational culture perceptions on the relationship between budget participation and managerial job-related outcomes. Australian Journal of Management, 26, 35-54.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Van der Stede, W. A. (2000). The relationship between two consequence of budgetary control: Budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation. Accounting Organizations and Society, 25, 609-22.
Venkatraman, N., and Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 801-14.
Williams, L. J. and Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A meta-analysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219-231
Young, S. M. (1985). Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 829-842
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 13.58.169.178
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 13.58.169.178
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code