Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0707111-232100 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0707111-232100
論文名稱
Title
台灣上市公司不動產管理策略對其股票報酬及風險關聯性之研究
An Analysis of Corporate Real Estate Strategies to the Return and Risk of Shareholders: Taiwan’s Case
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
40
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-06-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-07-07
關鍵字
Keywords
不動產管理策略、部份調整模型、股價表現、市場風險、兩階段最小平方法、全產業
CRE strategies, overall industry, two-stage least squares procedure, firm performance, systematic risk, partial adjustment model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5684 次,被下載 6
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5684 times, has been downloaded 6 times.
中文摘要
這篇論文的目的是為不同的不動產管理策略在不同的產業間是否會影響公司的股票報酬及市場風險。本研究以2000年至2010年間的全產業443家上市公司為研究對象,我們運用部份調整模型將所有公司分類至四種不同類型的不動產管理策略並且實證檢驗比較綜合序列及純事業序列的異常報酬和市場風險,另外我們也運用兩階段最小平方法試著去證實,在衡量公司價值時,四種不動產管理策略是否都可視為分散風險的因子。
研究結果發現,並沒有證據顯示執行某一特定的不動產管理策略會增加股票的報酬,然而採行穩定專業、穩定調整的策略下可以減輕市場性風險,積極調整策略則沒有分散風險的效果。此外,研究也發現採行積極調整策略的公司可以利用擴大資產規模來減輕市場性風險,但如果增加舉債的程度將會讓市場風險提高,就採行穩定專業策略的公司,若讓帳面價值/市價的比率增加將會讓公司承受較高的市場風險。因此這篇論文結果證實不同的不動產管理策略會影響公司的市場風險。
Abstract
This study examines whether different corporate real estate (CRE) strategies affect the stock outperformance and systemic risk of various companies. The sample of 443 listed companies of 17 industries in Taiwan during 2000 to 2010 was divided into four groups for the different corporate real estate strategies. The pairwise abnormal return and systemic risk of composite and business (without the affect from real estate market) series were empirically examined and compared using a partial adjustment model. This study also conducts the two-stage least squares procedure to determine whether four CRE strategies were considered diversifiable factors when evaluating the firm’s value
The results do not indicate an increasingly abnormal return performance associated with the company implementing a certain CRE strategy, but companies with a stable profession and consistent adjustment strategies are considered a good diversifier by stock investors. Aggressive adjustment strategies do not diversify the systematic risk to overall industry, otherwise the scale of total assets would be considered a diversification in companies with aggressive strategies. The companies using an aggressive profession strategy to increase leverage are regarded as risky phenomen for stock investors, and companies with stable profession strategies face higher systemic risk if their book value is greater than their market value. Therefore, this study determines that CRE strategies affect companies’ systematical risk.
目次 Table of Contents
封面………………………………………………………………………….................i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………….…………………..iii
Abstract………………………………………..……………………………………...iv
List of Figures……………………………...………………………………………....vi
List of Tables……………………………...………………………………………….vii
1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………… ...1
2. Review of Previous Work……………………………….………………..… 4
3. Research Sample and Data Characteristics………………………………………...7
4. Research Methodology…………………………………………………………….11
4.1 Research Structure…………………………………………………………..11
4.2 Partial Adjustment Method……………………………...………………..…13
4.3 Single Index Model………………………………………...………….……15
4.4 Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure……………..…………………………16
5. Empirical Results………………………………………………………………...18
5.1 Fundamental Statistics of CRE Behavior Variances……………………….18
5.2 Whether a certain CRE Strategy improve the stock market performance….19
5.3 Whether a certain CRE strategy was considered as diversified factor…..….24
6. Conclusion and Implication……………………………………………………….29
6.1 Conclusion………………………………………………………….………29
6.2. Implication………………………………………………………………....30
Reference………………………………………………………………….………31
參考文獻 References
Ambrose, B. W. (1990), “Corporate Real Estate's Impact on the Takeover Market,” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 3(4): 307-22.
Antti, L. (2006) “Corporate real estate disposal impacts on corporate performance,“ Phd Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Avis, M., Gibson, V. and Watts, J. (1989), “Managing Operational Property Assets,” University of Reading Dept. of Land Management and Development, United Kingdom.
Avis , M. (1990) "Managing operational property assets," Facilities, 8(5): 11-16
Brounen, D. & Eichholtz, P. (2005), "Corporate real estate ownership implications: International performance evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(4): 429-445.
Cheong, K. & Kim, C. S. ( 1997), “Corporate Real Estate Holdings and the Value of the Firm in Korea,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 13(3): 273-295.
Chaney, T., Sraer, D. and Thesmar, D. (2010), "The Collateral Channel: How Real Estate Shocks Affect Corporate Investment," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 16060.
Deng, Y., & Gyourko, J. (1999), “Real Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: An Estimate of the Impact on Firm Returns,” Zell/Lurie Center Working Papers, 321.
Farragher, E. J. (1984), “Corporate Real Estate Asset Decision-Making,” Real Estate Review, 13-17.
Gibson, V. A & Barkham, R. (2001), “Corporate Real Estate Management in the Retail Sector: Investigation of Current Strategy and Structure,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(1): 107-128.
Hite, G. L., Owers, J. E. and Rogers, R. C. (1984), "The Separation of Real Estate Operations By Spin-Off," Real Estate Economics 12(3): 318-332.
Kim, S. & Seo, B. (2010), "Asymmetric dividend smoothing in the aggregate stock market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor and Francis Journals 10(4): 349-355.
Laposa, S. & Charlton, M. (2002), "European versus US corporations: A comparison of property holdings," Journal of Corporate Real Estate 4: 34-47.
Lintner, J. (1956), "Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes," The American Economic Review 46(2): 97-113.
Liow, K. H. (2004), "Corporate Real Estate and Stock Market Performance," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 29(1): 119-140.
Ling, D. C., Ryngaert, M. and Naranjo, A. (2006), “Do Real Estate Ownership and Leasing Decisions Affect a Retail Firm's Stock Market Risk and Return?,” Journal of Shopping Center Research, 13(1).
Manning , C. A. (1991), "Leasing Versus Purchase of Corporate Real Property: Leases with Residual Equity Interests," Journal of Real Estate Research, 6(1): 79-86.
Miles, M., Pringle, J. and Webb, B. (1989), “Modeling the Corporate Real Estate Decision,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(3): 47-66.
Nourse, H. & Roulac, S. (1993), "Linking Real Estate Decisions to Corporate Strategy," Journal of Real Estate Research, 8(4): 475-494.
Pottinger, G., Dixon, T. and Marston, A. (2002) "Occupational futures? Divesting real estate and corporate PFI," Property Management, 20(1): 31 - 48.
Rutherford, R. C. & Stone, R. W. (1989), “Corporate Real Estate Unit Formation: Rational, Industry and Type of Unit,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(3): 121-129
Sing, T. F. and Sirmans, C. F. (2008), “Does Real Estate Ownership Matter in Corporate Governance?,” Journal of Property Research, 25(1):23-43
Seiler, M. J., Chatrath, A. and Webb, J. R. (2001), “Real Asset Ownership and the Risk and Return to Stockholders,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(1): 199-212.
Tuzel, S. (2010), “Corporate Real Estate Holdings and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns,” Review of Financial Studies, 23(6): 2268-2302.
Veale, P. R. (1989), “Managing Corporate Real Estate Assets: Current Executive Attitudes and Prospects for an Emergent Management Discipline,” Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(3): 1-22.
Deng , Y., Morck, R., Wu, J., and Yeung, B. (2011), "Monetary and Fiscal Stimuli, Ownership Structure, and China's Housing Market," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 16871.
Lin, Y. H. (2008), “Management Style of Fixed Assets and Performance in Taiwan's Technology Firms,” Master thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
Zeckhauser, S., & Silverman, R. (1983), “Rediscovering Your Company's Real Estate,” Harvard Business Review, 61(1): 111-117.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.15.5.183
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.15.5.183
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code