本研究探討威權與仁慈領導與家長關係認定及其效果，當領導者展現不同程度地威權與仁慈時，部屬對其家長式關係認定的高低程度，以及其效果。
本研究以敘述式實驗法及問卷調查法，分析台灣250位，來自不同產業員工回應。分析結果發現: (1)仁慈和威權同時等量增加時，家長式關係認定程度隨之提高; (2) 仁慈和威權同時等量增加時，組織公民行為隨之成長; (3)高仁慈低威權情境下，家長式關係認定及組織公民行為程度最高; (4)家長式領導與家長式關係認定和組織公民行為有正向關係。

This research focuses on the level of paternalistic relational identification and subordinate response when leaders demonstrating different level of leader authoritarianism and leader benevolence.
This research analyzes cross-sectional data (N=250) from employees of various industries, by using experimental methodology. The results showed that when leader authoritarianism and leader benevolence equivalently increase at the same time, the level of paternalistic relational identification increase; as leader authoritarianism and leader benevolence equivalently increase at the same time, organizational citizenship behavior increase; in condition of pure leader benevolence paternalistic relational identification and organizational citizenship behavior had the highest score. Last, under the condition of paternalistic leadership (high-authoritarianism and high-benevolence has positive relate to paternalistic relational identity and organizational citizenship behavior.

審定書………………………………………………………………………..……….i
摘要..............................................................................................................................ii
Abstract.....................................................................................................................iii
Table of Contents………………………………..…………………….………....iv
Figure………………………………………….………………………………….....v
Table……..………..………………………………………………………………...vi
Chapter 1 Introduction…………………….…………………………………..P1
1.1 Research background……………………...………………………..….P1
1.2 The purpose of the research………………………………….……….P2
Chapter 2 Literature Review……………………………………….……...…P5
2.1 Paternalistic leadership………………………………….……………..P5
2.2 Paternalistic Relational Identity………………………...……………P7
2.3 Organizational Citizenship Behavior………………………………P11
2.4 Hypotheses………………………………………………..……………P12
Chapter 3 Research Method……………………….………..……………P15
Chapter 4 Results…………………………………………………..………….P26
Chapter 5 Discussion…………………………………………………………P34
5.1 Theoretical contribution…………………….……………………….P35
5.2 Practical implications………………..……………………………….P35
5.3 Limitations and future research…………………………………….P36
Reference…………………………………………………...……………………P38
Appendix –An English Version of Scenarios Used in Questionnaire…P48

Reference

Chinese reference

吳宗祐, 徐瑋伶, & 鄭伯壎. (2002). 怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲: 華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應. 本土心理學研究, (18), 3-49.

吳宗祐. (2008). 由不當督導到情緒耗竭: 部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果. 中華心理學刊, 50(2), 201-221.

姜定宇, 丁捷, & 林伶瑾. (2012). 家長式領導與部屬效能: 信任主管與不信任主管的中介效果. 中華心理學刊, 54(3), 269-291.

趙安安, & 高尚仁. (2005). 台灣地區華人企業家長式領導風格與員工壓力之關聯. 應用心理研究, (27), 111-131.

謝婉柔 (2014)。恩威並濟的家長式領導:機制探討與模式修正(未出版之碩士論
文)。中原大學心理學研究所，桃園

鄭伯壎. (1995). 差序格局與華人組織行為. 本土心理學研究, (3), 142-219.

鄭伯壎, 謝佩鴛, & 周麗芳. (2002). 校長領導作風, 上下關係品質及教師角色外行為: 轉型式與家長式領導的效果. 本土心理學研究, (17), 105-161.

鄭伯壎. (2003). 台灣的組織行爲研究: 過去, 現在, 及未來. 應用心理研究, (19), 35-87.
English reference

Ashforth, B. E., Johnson, S. A., Hogg, M., & Terry, D. (2001). Which hat to wear. Social identity processes in organizational contexts, 32-48.

Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Mikiewicz, O. (2002). Relationships between cognitive and behavioral measures of executive function in children with brain disease. Child Neuropsychology, 8(4), 231-240.

Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7), 1083-1119.

Aycan, Z. 2006. Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization . In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions: 445-466. London: Sage Ltd

Bandura, A. (1965). Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 1-55.

Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.

Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92.

Baldwin, M. W., S. E. Carrell, and D. F. Lopez(1990). My advisor and pope are
watching me from the back of my mind. J

Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social
information.Psychological Bulletin,112(3), 461-484.

Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. (1987). Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society.

Cheng, B. S., Shieh, P. Y., & Chou, L. F. (2002). The principal’s leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher’s extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17(105161), 1983.

Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.

Netemeyer, R. G., Maxham III, J. G., & Pullig, C. (2005). Conflicts in the work–family interface: Links to job stress, customer service employee performance, and customer purchase intent. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 130-143.

Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.

Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796-819.

Cheng, B. S., Boer, D., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., Yoneyama, S., Shim, D., ... & Tsai, C. Y. (2014). Paternalistic leadership in four East Asian societies: Generalizability and cultural differences of the triad model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 82-90.

Deluga, R. J. (1995). The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology, 7(1), 1.

Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological issues.

Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577-1613.

Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative science quarterly, 421-444.

Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Farh, J. L., Cheng, B., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. (2004). Authority and benevolence: Employee’s Responses to Paternalistic Leadership in China. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 6-11, New Orleans.

Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex.
UK:Psychology Press.

Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165-1185.

Huang, X., Xu, E., Chiu, W., Lam, C., & Farh, J. L. (2015). When authoritarian leaders outperform transformational leaders: Firm performance in a harsh economic environment. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(2), 180-200.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The Sociology of Organisations.

Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2003). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Psychology Press.

Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.

Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of management, 34(3), 566-593.

Redding, S. G.(1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: Walterde Gruyter.

Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises (No. 62). Harvard Univ Asia Center.

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of applied psychology, 68(4), 653.

Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of applied psychology, 69(3), 428.

Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32.

Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554.

Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of management, 29(2), 187-206.

Whitley, R. D. (1991). The social construction of business systems in East Asia. Organization Studies, 12(1), 1-28.

Westwood, R. I. & Chan, A.(1992). Headship and Leadership, In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational Behaviour ： A Southeast Asian Perspective, Hong Kong: Longman Group

Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for'paternalistic headship'among the overseas Chinese. Organization studies, 18(3), 445-480.

Wu, M. (2012). Moral leadership and work performance: Testing the mediating and interaction effects in China. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 284-299.

Wu, M., Huang, X.,& Chan, S. C. H.(2012). The influencing mechanisms of paternalistic leadership in Mainland China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4).

Wu, M. & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership:From here to where? In X. Huang & M. H. Bond (Eds.), Handbook od Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory,research and practice (pp. 449-466). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.