本文以新制度主義角度角度出發，試圖找出是否有絕對的中國威脅論或中國機會論。利用歷史結構分析法探討冷戰後東協與中國之互動，試圖歸納出雙方的政經互動過程。最後，本文從歷史結構看待東協與中國的互動關係。可以發現，無論是從經濟或是政治安全的角度看來雙方關係可以說是從「緊密、分離、再緊密」。隨著全球化和區域化的潮流，雙方也體會到合作的重要性。制度合作過程只在乎國家是否獲益或節省交易成本，而不會考量自我獲益是否比他國多或寡。所以從新制度的角度看來，並沒有所謂絕對的中國威脅論或中國機會論。此外，透過制度的建立，可以幫助降低欺騙行為使合作互動更加有效，進而將降低彼此不信任感。此論點得以在本文中獲得驗證。

This paper is tried to find out by neo-institutional view if there is China Threat theory or China Opportunity theory. And, it‟s researched interaction of ASEAN and China after Cold War by historic structure analysis, and tried to sum up the Political Economy interaction of ASEAN and China.

Researching by historic structure analysis, the Political Economy of ASEAN-China Relations is from "close, separation, and then close." With the trend of globalization and regionalization, both sides understand the importance of cooperation. Besides, the process of institutional cooperation to benefit only care about whether transaction costs are saved, but not consider about self-benefit is more than others countries. Hence, from the point of the neo-institutionalism, there is no absolute China Threat theory or China Opportunity theory. Finally, it could help reduce fraud by the establishment of the system to make cooperation more effective, and reduce sense of mutual distrust. This argument is verified t in this paper.

致謝…………………………………..…………………..…...i
中文摘要……………………………………………………..ii
英文摘要…………………………………………………….iii
圖次…………………………………………………………..v
表次………………………………………………………….vi
第壹章緒論……………………………………………….....1
第一節、研究動機與目的……………………….....………1
第二節、文獻回顧………………………………….………6
第三節、研究途徑…………………………….....………..14
第四節、研究方法………………………………….....…..32
第五節、研究問題與架構…………………………….......34
第六節、研究範圍與限制…………………………….......36
第七節、章節安排…………………………………….…..37
第貳章東協組織型態……………………………………...39
第一節、東協的組織背景…………………………….......39
第二節、東協制度結構…………………………………...43
第三節、組織領域之探討………………………………...57
第四節、小結………………………………………...........65
第叁章東協與中國自由貿易協定………………………...67
第一節、東協與中國的政經轉變…………………….......67
第二節、東協-中國自由貿易區…………………………..81
第三節、東協主要六國的競爭策略………………….......98
第四節、小結………………………………………….....105
第肆章東協區域論壇-東協與中國...……....……………106
第一節、論「談」模式抉擇…..………………………..106
第二節、中國參與論壇層次..…………………………..112
第三節、論壇制度化合作..……………………………..117
第四節、中國之政治意圖………………………………120
第五節、小結……………………………………………128
第伍章結論………………………………………………129
參考文獻…………………………………………………133

中文專書

1. Commons, John R.著，于檞生譯，1962年。《制度經濟學》（Institutional Economic: Iis Place in Political Economy）。北京：商務印書館。
2. Jan-Erik Lane and Svante Ersson著，何景榮譯，2002年。《新制度主義政治學》（THE NEW INTITUTIONAL POLITICS: Performance and Outcomes）台北：韋伯文化。
3. 王躍生，1997年。《新制度主義》。台北：揚智文化。
4. 宋承先，1999年。《西方經濟學名著提要》。台北：昭明。
5. 宋鎮照，1996年。《東協國家之政經發展》。台北：五南圖書。
6. 宋鎮照、林若雩、洪敬富、張心怡、陳佩修、楊昊、詹環華、趙文志、戴萬平，2010年。《中國與東協的新政治經濟---建構主義的觀點》。台北：五南圖書。
7. 李靜旻，2007年。《一個中國，兩種威脅 : 美國與日本知識界的文化策略》。台北：國立臺灣大學政治學系中國大陸曁兩岸關係教學與硏究中心。
8. 林德昌，2009年。《廣東省與四川省的國有企業改革：國家與社會關係的新詮釋》。台北：成文。
9. 陳鴻瑜，1994年。《東南亞國家協會之發展》。南投：國立暨南大學。
10. 鄧小平，1993年。《鄧小平文選》。北京：人民出版社。
11. 顧長永，1993年。《印尼：政治經濟與社會》。高雄：高雄復文。
12. 顧長永，2000年。《東南亞政府與政治》。台北：五南圖書。
13. 臺灣經濟研究院，2003年12月。《我國因應中共與東協建立自由貿易區之研究》RDEC-RES-092-003。台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會編印。
 
中文期刊

1. 王啟明，2010年7月。〈國際體制與霸權體系的維繫：以產品生命週期理論分析〉，《亞太研究通訊》。第8期，頁135-167。
2. 吳玲君，2005年9-10月。〈中國與東亞區域經貿合作：區域主義與霸權之間的關係〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷第5期。頁1-27。
3. 吳德美和曾聖文，2005年5-6月。〈中國大陸經濟崛起對東協經濟發展影響〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷第3期。頁57-92。
4. 宋鎮照，2004/10。〈從全球化與區域化分析東協臺海兩岸發展策略選擇〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第5卷第4期。頁151-187。
5. 李瓊莉，2010年。〈東協區域衝突管理機制與角色探討〉，《台灣東南亞學刊》，第7卷，第2期，頁8-10。
6. 金榮勇，1997年3月。〈緬甸軍人政府的未來發展---加入東協後之展望〉，《問題與研究》，第36卷第3期，頁81-90。
7. 胡琬玲，2001年12月。〈制度主義的制度變遷理論〉，《新世紀智庫論壇》，第16期。頁86-95。
8. 陳欣之，1996年。〈東協諸國對中國威脅論的看法與回應〉，《問題與研究》，第35卷第3期。頁15-33。
9. 趙文衡，2002年11-12月。〈區域貿易協定與東亞國際政經體系之重組〉，《問題與研究》，第41卷第6期。頁81-107。
10. 蔡學儀，2003年3-4月。〈亞洲經貿區域化與台灣因應之道〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷第2期。頁39-50。
11. 謝豫立，何錦昌，2001年7月。〈資訊社會中主權國家的角色發展〉，《資訊社會研究》，第1卷，頁 211-218。
12. 金榮勇，1997年。〈緬甸軍人政府的未來發展---加入東協後之展望〉，《問題與研究》，第36卷第3期，頁81-90。
13. 李瓊莉，2010年。〈東協區域衝突管理機制與角色探討〉，《台灣東南亞學刊》，第7卷第2期，頁3-20。
14. 謝豫立，何錦昌，2001年。〈資訊社會中主權國家的角色發展〉，《資訊社會研究》，第1卷，頁 201-228。
15. 謝尚伯，2006年。〈貪汙研究與印尼的反貪污運動〉，《台灣東南亞學刊》，第3卷第2期，頁73-104。
16. 沈銘輝，2010年。〈加強參與東盟區域經濟合作---應對「亞洲麵條碗效應」〉，《東協瞭望 002》，頁45-51
17. 黃仁德，林進煌，2007年。〈亞洲金融危機與國際貨幣基金的角色〉，《問題與研究》，第46卷第1期，頁101-145。
18. 洪財隆，2004年。〈中國與東協簽署自由貿易協定（FTA）的進程內容與效應〉，《當代中國研究》，頁13-17。
19. 吳瑟致，2010年。〈邁向開放？抑或走向封閉？東協主義與十加三的發展〉，《亞太研究通訊》，第8期，頁33-67。
20. 林隆生，2006年。〈以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合：從區域主義到全球化？〉，《亞太研究論壇》，第33期，頁101-124。
21. 王崑義，2007年。〈中國的「合諧外交」與對南太平洋的擴展〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，第3期第3卷，頁63-109。

中文期刊專書

1. 吳玲君，2009年。〈中國大陸與東南亞區域整合：「霸權崛起」的外在環境〉，江啟成，洪隆財編，東亞經濟整合趨勢論叢。臺北：臺經院。

國科會報告

1. 楊永明，1998年8月至1999年7月。〈亞太安全區域組織之架構與發展〉，國科會研究報告，87-2414-H-002-008。

研討會論文

1. 林若雩，2009年。〈建構主義下東協安全思維的轉變---國際政治經濟學的觀點〉，發表於「東亞政經論壇-中國與東協的新政治經濟」。台南：新世紀東亞與台灣政經發展教學研究計畫、成功大學政治系暨政治經濟學研究所。
2. 張樹德和翁照琪，2010年。〈兩岸毒品犯罪型態與防治作為之實證研究〉，發表於「非傳統安全---反洗錢、不正常人口移動、毒品、擴散」學術研討會（外交部外交領事人員講習所二樓國際會議廳：中華警政研究學會、中央警察大學恐怖主義研究中心和中華國土安全研究協會。

英文專書

1. Acharya, Amitav, 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.
2. ASEAN Secretariat, 2004. ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2004. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
3. ASEAN Secretariat, 2005. Report of the ASEAN-China Eminent persons Group. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
4. ASEAN Secretariat, 2008. ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2008. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
5. ASEAN Secretariat, 2009. ASEAN Economic Community Chartbook 2009. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
6. ASEAN, 2008. ASEAN Charter. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
7. Beeson, Mark, 2007. Regionalism Globalization and East Asia: Politics, Security and Economic Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
8. Beeson, Mark, 2009. Institutions of the Asia Pacific : ASEAN, APEC and beyond. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York : Routledge.
9. Bergsten, C. Fred, Gill, Bates, Lardy, Nicholas R.,Mitchell, Derek, 2006. China: The Balance Sheet. New York: Public Affairs.
10. Commons, John R., 1961. Institutional economics: its place in political economy, News Brunswick : Transaction Publishers.
11. Das, Dilip K., 2004. Regionalism in Global Trade, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton. MA : Edward Elgar.


12. Dent, Christopher M., 2003. “Networking the Region? The Emergence and Impact of Menon, Jayant, 1996. Adjusting Towards AFTA: The Dynamics of Trade in ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
13. Gilpin, Robert, 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. USA, Princeton University: Princeton University Press.
14. Gilpin, Robert, 1994. The political Economy of International Relation. New Jersey : The Princeton University Press.
15. Gilpin, Robert, 2001. Global Political Economy Understanding The Institutional Economic Order. New Jersey: Princeton University.
16. Gomez, Edward T., 2002. “Introduction: Political Business in East Asia” Political Business in East Asia, Edward T. Gomez ed. London: Routledge.
17. Haacke, Jurgen, 2003. ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects. London: Routledge Curzon.
18. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, J. S., Slocum, Jr., 2002. Management: A Competency-Based Approach. California: South-Western College.
19. Hernandez, Carolina G., 2003. “The ASEAN-ISIS and CSCAP Experience,” in Sharon Siddique and Shree Kumar eds., The 2nd ASEAN Reader. Singapore: ISGEAS.
20. Hill, C. and Jones, C., 2004. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co..
21. Macridis, R.C., 1955. The study of Comparative Government. New York: Random House.
22. McMahon, Robert, 1999. The Limits of Empire: The United States and Southeast Asia Since World War II . New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Mely, Caballero Anthony, 2005. Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyound the ASEAN Way . Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asain Studies.
24. Menon, Jayant,1996. Adjusting Towards AFTA: The Dynamics of Trade in ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
25. Nesadurai, Helen E., 2003. Globalization, Domestic Politics and Regionalism: The ASEAN Free Trade Area. London: Routledge.
26. Percival, Bronson, 2007. The dragon looks south : China and Southeast Asia in the new century. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Security International.
27. Peters, B. Guy,1999. Institutional theory in political science : the new institutionalism, London: Pinter.

28. Powell, Walter W.. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 1999. The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
29. Qadri, Tahir, 2001. Fire, Smoke and Haze : the ASEAN Response Strategy. Manila : Asian Development Bank.
30. Severino, C. Rodolfo, 2006. Southeast in Search of An ASEAN Community. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
31. Sverino, C. Rodolfo, 2009. “ASEAN: New Charter, New Optimism,” Regional Outlook Southeast Asia 2009-2010. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
32. Thambipollai, Pushpa,1992. “Negotiating Styles,” The ASEAN Reader. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies.
33. Tong, Sarah Y. and Keng, Catherine Chong Siew, 2010. China-ASEAN free trade area in 2010 : a regional perspective.Singapore : East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore.
34. UNCTAD, 2010. World Investment Report 2010. Switzerland: United Nations.
35. Veblen, Thorstein, 1994. The Theory of The Leisure Class. New York : Dover Publications.
36. Weatherbee, Donald E.. 2005. International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy. Lanham, Md : Rowman and Littlefiled.

英文論文專書

1. Daljit, 2000. “Evolution of the Security Dialogue Process in The Asia-Pacific Region,” Derek da Cunha, ed, Southeast Asian Perspectives on Security. Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
2. Frost, Frank,1990. “Introduction: ASEAN Since 1967-Orgins, Evolution and Recent Developments,” in Alison Broinowski ed., ASEAN Into 1990s. London: Macmillan.
3. Haacke, Jurgen, 2005. “The Significance of Beijing’s Bilateral Relations: Looking ‘Below’ the Regional Level in China-ASEAN Ties,” China and Southeast Asia, Global Changes and Regional Challenges. Ho Khai Leong and Samuel C.Y. Ku., eds, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
4. Hernandez, Carolina G.. 2003. “The ASEAN-ISIS and CSCAP Experience,” in Sharon Siddique and Shree Kumar eds., The 2nd ASEAN Reader .Singapore: ISGEAS.
5. Liu Yanhua, 2009. “ASEAN and China Managing Competition and Exploring Complementarities,” Southeast Asia in The Global Economy: Securing Competitiveness and Social Protection, Helen E. S. Nesadurai and J. Soedradjad Djiwandono, eds..Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
6. Mondejar, Reuben and Chu, Mal Lung, 2005. “ASEAN-China relations: Legacies and Future Directions,” in Ho Khai Leong and Samuel C. Y. Ku, eds., China and Southeast Asia : global changes and regional challenges. Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC : Center for Southeast Asian Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University. pp. 211-217.
7. Nesadurai, Helen E.S. and Stone, Diane, 2000. “Southeast Asian Research Institutes and Regional Cooperation,” in Diane Stone ed., Banking on Knowledge, London: Routledge.
8. Pangestu, Mari, Gooptu, Sudarshan, 2003. “New Regionlaism: Options For East Asia,” East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, Kathie Krumm and Homi Kharas, eds. Washington: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
9. Scott, W. R.,1994. “Conceptualizing Organizational Fields: Linking Organizations and Societal Systems,” in H. Derlien, U. Gerhardt and F. Scharpf, eds., Systemrationalitat und Partialinteresse, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
10. Shambaugh, David, 2005. “Return to the Middle Kingdom? China and Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century,” Power Shift, China and Asia’s New Dynamics, David Shambaugh, ed,. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Sheng Lijun, 2003. China-ASEAN Free Trade Area: Origins, Developments and Strategic Motivation. Singapore: ISEAS.
12. Shi Xueqin and Keooudone, Sengmanivong, 2009. “China-ASEAN Economic Engagement: Building Mutual Confidence,” Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh, Chen Sok Gee, Wendy Chen-chen Yong and Joanne Hoi-Lee Loh, eds., China-ASEAN Relation Economic Engagement and Policy Reform. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur : University of Malaya, Institute of China Studies
13. Sivalingam, G., 2005. “International Competitiveness, Liberalization and Competition Policy in Singapore,” G. Sivalingam, ed, Competition Policy in The ASEAN Countries. Singapore : Thomson.
14. Solingen, E., 2008. “From ‘threat’ to ‘opportunity’? ASEAN, China and triangulation” in Evelyn Goh and W. Simon eds., China, the United States, and Southeast Asia: contending perspectives on politics, security, and economics. New York: Routledge.
15. World Bank, 2003. East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, Krumm, Kathie and Kharas Homi, eds..Washington, DC: The World Bank.
16. Yeoh, Emile Kok-Kheng, Chen Sok Gee, Yong,Wendy Chen-chen and Loh Joanne Hoi-Lee, 2009. “China-ASEAN Relation in the Regional Economy,” Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh, Chen Sok Gee, Wendy Chen-chen Yong and Joanne Hoi-Lee Loh eds, China-ASEAN Relation Economic Engagement and Policy Reform. Malaysia, Lumpur: University of Malaya, Institute of China Studies.
17. Yong Siew Peng and Sivalingam, G., 2005. “International Competitiveness, Liberalization and Competition Policy in Singapore,” G. Sivalingam, ed, Competition Policy in The ASEAN Countries. Singapore : Thomson.

英文期刊

1. Acharya, Amitav, 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 239-275
2. Asia-Pacific Bilateral Free Trade Agreement Projects,” The Pacific Review, Vol.16, No. 1, pp.1-28.
3. Baker, James A., 1991. “America in Asia: Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Comunty,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 1-18.
4. Bates, R.H., 1988. “Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism, ” Political and Society, Vol.16, No.2-3, pp. 387-401.
5. Boudreau, Vince, 2009/5. “Elections, repression and authoritarian survival in post-transition Indonesia and the Philippines,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.233–253.
6. Bresser, Rudi K. F. and Millonig, Klemens, 2003/7 “Institutional Capital: Competitive Advantage in Light of The New Institutionalism in Organization Theory,” Schmalenbach Business Review, Vol. 55, pp. 220-241.
7. Charrier, Philip, 2001. “ASEAN's inheritance: The regionalization of Southeast. Asia,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 313–338
8. CHIA ,Siow Yue and SUSSANGKARN, Chalongphob, 2006. “The Economic Rise of China: Challenges and Opportunities for ASEAN,” Asian Economic Policy Review, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp.102-128.
9. Collins, Alan, 2007. “Forming a Security Community: Lessons From ASEAN,” International Relations of The Asia Pacific, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 203-225.
10. Coming, Peter A., 1995 “Synergy and Self-Organization in The Evolution of Complex Systems,” System Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 89-121.
11. Cotton, James, 1999. “The Haze’ Over Southeast Asia: Challenging the ASEAN Mode of Regional Engagement,” Pacific Affair, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 331-351.
12. David Martin Jones, 2008. “Security and democracy: the ASEAN charter and the dilemmas of regionalism in South-East Asia,” International Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 735-756.
13. Dent, Christopher M. 2003. “Networking the Region? The Emergence and Impact of Asia-Pacific Bilateral Free Trade Agreement Projects,” The Pacific Review, Vol.16, No. 1, pp.1-28.
14. Dewitt, David B., 1994. “Common, Comprehensive and Cooperative Security,” Pacific Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-15.
15. DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, 1983/4. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, pp. 147-160.
16. Emmerson, Donald, 1984. “South Asia: What’s in a name?” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 1-21.
17. Evans, Paul, “The Emergence of Eastern Asia: Implications for Canada,” International Journal, Vol. 47, 1992, pp. 504-528.
18. Foot, Rosemary, 1998. “China in the ASEAN Regional Forum,” Asian Survey, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 425-440.
19. Forestiere, Carolyn, 2008. “New Institutionalism and Minority Protection in the National Legislatures of Finland and Denmark,” Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 448-468.
20. Funston, John, 1998. “ASEAN: Out of its Depth?” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 22-38.
21. Goldmann, Kjell, 2005. “Appropriateness and Consequences: The Logic of Neo-Institutionalism,” Governance, Vol.18, Issue 1, pp. 35-52.
22. Haacke, Jurgen, 2003. “ ASEAN's Diplomatic and Security Culture: a Constructivist Assessment,” International Relation of the Asia Pacific, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 57-87.
23. Harries, Stuart, 2000. “ Asian Multilateral Intuitions and their Response to The Asian Economic Crisis: The Regional and Global Implications,” Pacific Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 495-516
24. Heller, Dominik, 2005. “The Relevance of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) for Regional Security in the Asia-Pacific,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 123-145.
25. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, J. S. and Slocum, Jr., 2002. Management: A Competency-Based Approach. USA, California: South-Western College.
26. Henderson, Stewart, 1992-3. “Zone of Uncertainty: Canada and the Security Architecture of Asia Pacific,” Canadian Foreign Policy, Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 102-120.
27. Jones, David Martin and Smith, Michael L . 2001 “The Changing Security Agenda in Southeast Asia: Globalization, New Terror, and the Delusion of Regionalism,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 271-288.
28. Jones, David Martin and Smith, Michael L. 1997. “ASEAN, Asian values and Southeast Asian Security in the New World Order,” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.126-156.
29. Jones, David Martin, Smith, Michael L ., 1997. “ASEAN, Asian values and Southeast Asian Security in the New World Order,” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 126-156.
30. Jones, David Mrtin and Smith, Micheal L. R., 2007. “Marking Process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian Regional Order,” International Security, Vol.32, No.1, 2007, pp. 148-184.
31. Kivimaki,Timo, 2001. “The Long Peace of ASEAN,” Journal of Peace Research, No.38, No.1, pp.5-25.
32. KUIK CHENG-CHWEEM, 2005. “Multilateralism in China’s ASEAN Policy Its Evolution, Characteristics, and Aspiration,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 102-122.
33. Lijun, Sheng, 2003. “China-ASEAN Free Trade Area: Origins, Developments and Strategic Motivations,” International Politics & Security Issues Series No. 1. pp.1-33.
34. March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., 1984/9. "The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life," The American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 734-749.
35. Moravcsik, Andrew, 2004. “Is there a “Democratic Deficit” in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 333-363.
36. Morrison, Charles E., 2004. “Track1/ Track2 symbiosis in Asia-Pacific regionalism,” Pacific Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 547-565.
37. North, Douglass C., 1986/6. “Government and the Cost of Exchange in History,” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 255-264.
38. Park, Donghyun, 2007/11. “The Prospects of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA): A Qualitative Assessment,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 485-503.
39. Philip, Charrier, 2001. “ASEAN's inheritance: The regionalization of Southeast. Asia,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 313–338.
40. Ravenhall, John, 2006/9-10.“Is China an Economic Threat to Southeast Asia?,” Asian Survey, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp.653-674.
41. Schmidt, Vivien A., 2006. “Give Peace A Chance: Reconciling Four (Not Three) “New Institutionalisms,” paper present at the Annual Meetings of the American
42. Simon, Herbert A., 1995. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 99-118.
43. Stromberg, Joseph R., Fall 2002. “Douglass C. North And Non-Marxist Institutional Determinism,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol.16, No. 4 , pp. 101-137.
44. Tongzon, J., 2005. “ASEAN-China Free Trade Area: A Bane or Boon for ASEAN Country?,” World Economy, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 191-210.
45. Waltz, Kenneth N., Spring/Summer 1990. “Realist Thought And Neorealist Theory, ”Journal of International Affairs, , Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp.21-37.
46. Wesley, Michael 1999. “The Asian Crisis and the adequacy of Regional Institutions,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 54-73.
47. Williamson, Oliver E., 1979/10. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance Of Contractual Relation,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 233-261.
48. Wong, John and Chan, Sarah, 2003/5-6. “China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Shaping Future Economic Relations,” Asian Survey. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.507-526.
49. Wu, Friedrich, Siaw, Poa Tiong, Sia, Yeo Han, Keong, Puah Kok, 2002. “Foreign Direct Investments to China and Southeast and Southeast Asia: Has ASEAN Been Losing Out?,” Economic Survey of Singapore, pp. 96-115.
50. YEUNG, Henry WAI-CHUNG, 1999. “The Internationalization of Ethnic Chinese Business Firms from Southeast Asia: Strategies, and Competitive Advantage,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, pp.103-127.
51. Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka and Trinidad, Dennis D., 2010. “Development Assistance, Strategic Interests, and the China Factor in Japan’s Role in ASEAN Integration,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.199-219.
52. Zainal Aznam Yosof, 2003. “Malaysia’s Response to the China Challenge,” Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 2, pp. 46-73.

英文研討會論文

1. Chantasassawat, Busakorn, Fung, K. C., Iizaka, Hitomi, and Siu, Alan, 2004. “Foreign Direct Investment in China and East Asia,” paper presented at the Third Annual Conference on China Economic Policy Reform, Stanford University: Stanford Center for International Developmen.
2. Guo Longlong, 2003 “Relationship between China and Regional Institutions and Multilateral Organizations: Its Status in China's International Strategy,” paper presented at Theory and Practice of China's International Strategy of the Conference. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute for International Studies.
3. Wang, Vincent Wei-cheng, 2007. “The Logic of China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Economic Statecraft of “Peaceful Rise”,” paper presented on Implications of Transforming China: Domestic, Regional and Global Impact of the Conference. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya.
4. Yeoh, Emile Kok-Kheng, Ooi, Shuat-Mei, 2007. “China-ASEAN Free Trade Area: Prospects and Challenges for Malaysia,” paper presented at Made in China vs. Made by Chinese: Global Identities of Chinese Business of the International Conference United Kingdom: Collingwood College, Durham University.

網站

1. ASEAN, 2002/11. FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIAN NATIONS
<http://ditjenkpi.depdag.go.id/Website_tr/Preferential%20Tariff/ASEANCHINA/FRAMEWORK%20OF%20AGREEMENT.pdf>.
2. ASEAN Secretariat, 2006/11. Declaration of ASEAN Concord II.
3. ASEAN Secretariat, Declaration of ASEAN Concord II, 2006/11, pp. 1-27.< http://www.aseansec.org/publ-bali-concord.pdf>.
4. ASEAN, 1976/8. ASEAN Declaration, < http://www.aseansec.org/1212.htm >.
5. ASEAN, 2004/11/29-30. Vientiane Action Program, < http://www.aseansec.org/VAP-10th%20ASEAN%20Summit.pdf >.
6. ASEAN, 2007/7/28. “Combating Haze In ASEAN: Frequently Asked Questions,” Fact Sheet, < http://www.aseansec.org/Fact%20Sheet/ASCC/2007-ASCC-001.pdf>
7. ASEAN, 2011/03/08. < http://www.aseansec.org/20100.htm >.
8. ASEAN, ASEAN Charter, PP. 10-11, ＜http://www.aseansec.org/21861.htm＞
9. ASEAN,2010. “Overview”.＜http://www.aseansec.org/about_ASEAN.html＞
10. ASEAN-China Expert Group on Economic Cooperation, 2001. “Forging Closer ASEAN-China Economic Relation the Twenty-First Century,” < http://www.aseansec.org/newdata/asean_chi.pdf > .
11. Chairman’s Statement, Report of ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conferences Senior Officials Meeting, 1993, < http://www.aseansec.org/3666.htm >.
12. Editorial “South-east Asia’s Toothless Charter,” Financial Times, 2007/11/19, < http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b76c2806-96c5-11dc-b2da-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1Ji5KYzKl >.
13. Google學術，＜http://scholar.google.com.tw/schhp?hl=zh-TW＞。
14. Jane Skanderup, 2005/11/23. “APEC 2005: economics takes center stage,” PacNet, ,< http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/pac0550.pdf> .
15. The Economist, 2005/10/25.“South-East Asia’s Economies, In Search of Elusive Domestic Demand.,” < http://www.economist.com/node/5025883?story_id=5025883 >.
16. The Economist, 2006/1/28. “Taksin Helps Himself,”, < http://www.economist.com/node/5444898 >.
17. The Economist, 2006/11/30. “A fork in the road,”,< http://www.economist.com/node/8361634 >.
18. UNCTADSTAT, 2011/04/12. Foreign direct investment stocks and flows, <http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx>.
19. 中華經濟研究院，瀏覽日期：2011/3/29，台灣WTO中心，<http://taiwan.wtocenter.org.tw/WTOintro.asp>.
20. 天下雜誌，2007/10。〈翁山蘇姬 恐懼才是腐敗的根源〉，第382期，<http://www.cw.com.tw/article/index.jsp?id=3400>。
21. 世界貿易組織，＜http://www.wto.org/＞。
22. 世界銀行，＜http://www.worldbank.org/＞。
23. 亞洲開發銀行，＜http://www.adb.org/＞。
24. 陳鴻瑜，2002年。〈中國與東協對自由貿易區各有盤算〉，《Peace Forum Essay》，ME0308001，《Peace Forum》，＜http://www.peaceforum.org.tw/filectrl/ME0308001.pdf＞。
25. 蔡翼擎，2004年7月5日。〈品德管理企業新競爭優勢〉，《經濟日報》，版36。< http://www.subapower.com.cn/blog/po/UploadFile/2010-07/201007282128191151.pdf>