Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0708111-114611 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0708111-114611
論文名稱
Title
智慧型手機品牌權益對購買意願影響之研究
The Effect of Smartphone’s Brand Equity on Purchase Intention
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
115
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-05-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-07-08
關鍵字
Keywords
品牌權益、產品涉入、知覺風險、購買意願、智慧型手機
perceived risk, smartphone, brand equity, purchase intention, product involvement
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5707 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5707 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
為了避免被全球化經濟浪潮吞噬,企業無不竭盡心思企圖創造產品或服務的附加價值來提升企業獲利能力。品牌原來只被用來區別銷售者的產品與服務,而當品牌與消費者接觸時,會因為消費者的決策行為與其回應讓品牌開始具備獨特的屬性、差異性,因為品牌特殊的屬性讓消費者對品牌有了認知,逐漸累積形成消費者觀點的品牌權益。
由於網際網路的發達,消費者對智慧型手機產品的知識隨處可及,也因此產品涉入程度也逐漸加深,加上市場競爭激烈,相似的產品充斥市場,因此欲研究消費者在眾多品牌中如何進行決策過程,於是利用品牌權益、產品涉入、知覺風險等變數探討對消費者購買智慧型手機意願之影響,以普羅大眾為研究對象,了解對智慧型手機品牌的認知。
本研究以便利抽樣問卷方式進行調查,總計發放347份問卷,回收342份,扣除無效問卷37份,有效問卷總計305份。經分析結果發現:
一、 品牌權益對產品涉入有直接影響。高品牌權益會引起消費者對產品的注意力,並且提高其關切程度 (涉入)。
二、 品牌權益對購買意願有直接影響。本研究對象進行購買決策時,容易受到品牌權益構面中的知覺品質、品牌知名度與差異化特質 (品牌聯想) 所影響。
三、 「知覺風險」對於「品牌權益」、「產品涉入」與「購買意願」不具有中介變數影響效果。消費者不預期購買手機行為會造成任何損失或具不確定性。
四、 「產品涉入」是「品牌權益」與「購買意願」中介變項,高品牌權益能有效誘發消費者對產品的需求與興趣,進而提升消費對產品的購買意願。
關鍵字:品牌權益、產品涉入、知覺風險、購買意願、智慧型手機
Abstract
Firms constantly try their best to build up added value for products or services in order to raise their profitability in the wave of the global economy in 21th century. Originally, brands are simply used to distinguish the sellers of products or services, but once brand contacts with consumers, the interaction between firms marketing strategy and consumers’ response begins. Hence the unique brand attributes and differentiation are developed based on product and brand positioning. The uniqueness and differentiation of brand attributes can attract consumers’ recognition of brand, and it will gradually accumulate to become consumer based brand equity.
Smartphone product knowledge is widely open and only one click away from consumers on internet, thus product involvement is gradually getting high. Moreover, the market is flooded with similar products since fierce industrial competition environment. For this reason, consumers’ complex decision-making process among the numerous varieties of products interests me. After relevant literature review, the influence on brand equity, product involvement, perceived risk on smartphone is chosen to be the subject, in order to understand consumers’ perceptions of brand recognition of smartphone.
The study employs questionnaires with anonymous and convenience sampling. Total distribution of questionnaires was 347pcs, 342 were received, after deduction of invalid 37pcs, the valid questionnaires reached a total of 305. The empirical study conclusions are:
1. Brand equity affects consumers’ perceived level of product involvement. High brand equity will bring out consumers’ attention and importance of product.
2. Brand equity has direct influence on purchase intention. The objectives of this study are easily influenced by the constructs-perceived quality, brand awareness and different attributes-of brand equity when the decision-making process occurs.
3. Perceived risk does not have mediating effects among brand equity, product involvement and purchase intention. Consumers have no expectation of risk or uncertainty that would cause any loss of smartphone purchase behavior.
4. Product involvement is the mediating variable of brand equity and purchase intention. Strong brand equity can effectively seduce consumers’ needs and interests and go a step further to raise their purchase intention indirectly.

Key words: brand equity, product involvement, perceived risk, purchase intention and smartphone.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
誌 謝 v
目 錄 vi
表 目 錄 viii
圖 目 錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第四節 研究範圍和對象 3
第五節 研究流程 4
第六節 論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 智慧型手機 7
第二節 品牌權益 14
第三節 產品涉入 24
第四節 知覺風險 30
第五節 購買意願 33
第三章 研究設計 36
第一節 研究架構與假設 36
第二節 研究變數與操作性定義 39
第三節 量表設計 43
第四節 正式問卷發放與整理 46
第五節 資料分析方法 47
第四章 實證分析 50
第一節 樣本特性分析 50
第二節 量表信度分析 58
第三節 品牌權益、產品涉入與知覺風險構面效度分析 60
第四節 品牌權益、產品涉入、知覺風險與購買意願相關分析 68
第五節 影響智慧型手機購買意願分析 72
第六節 人口統計變項對品牌權益與產品涉入差異分析 77
第五章 結論與建議 81
第一節 結論 81
第二節 管理意涵 87
參考文獻 91
附錄 101
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、 中文部分
王占魁(2009)。智慧型手機網路使用意願及相關因素探討。樹德科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,高雄縣。
朱延智(2010)。品牌管理。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
池文海、唐資文、林怡安(2010,5)。消費者購買涉入、品牌權益、知覺風險與顧客忠誠度之關係。中華管理評論國際學報,2,1-22。
何雍慶、劉明哲、李瞱淳消費者生活型態、消費者購買涉入程度與廣告訴求對廣告效果影響之研究-以行動電話為例。1,61-78。
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析應用統計。台北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。
吳長生、連佳儀(2009)。體驗行銷與品牌權益關係之探討--涉入與產品屬性的干擾角色。商學學報. 空大,17,111-129。
呂錦婷(2004)。涉入、知覺風險與降低風險策略關連性之研究-以台北市行動電話消費者為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士班碩士論文,台北市。
李月華、丁學敏(2006)。以顧客為基礎的品牌權益之探討。台北科技大學學報,39-1,103-118。
林怡安(2004)。運用線性結構模式探討化妝水購買涉入、品牌權益、知覺風險、顧客忠誠度與消費者生活型態關係之研究。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,花蓮市。
邱皓政(2009)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 (第三版)。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
侯嘉政(Jia-Jeng Hou), & 傅柏霖(Po-Lin Fu). (2008). 產品涉入與品牌涉入對品牌忠誠度之影響-以數位相機為例. 行銷評論, 5(1), 27-56.
莊惠婷(2003)。知覺風險對線上購物之影響-以女性消費者為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北市。
許桂菊(2010)。品牌權益指標之建構:以某醫院為例。中華大學科技管理學系博士論文,新竹市。
陳建翰(2003)。產品涉入、品牌形象、品牌權益與顧客回應間之關係探討。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,花蓮市。
黃俊英、賴文彬(1990)。涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報,1,15-29。
黃顯閔(2003)。新產品功能需求分析-智慧型手機之探討。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,台北縣。
賴協軍(2008)。NIKE運動產品消費者對品牌形象與購買意願模式之研究-線性結構方程式之驗證。台北市立教育大學體育系碩士論文,台北市。
戴國良(2007)。品牌行銷與管理。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
謝天生(2009)。英國、日本、德國品牌權益模型實證分析與台灣品牌權益模型之建構-以台灣電腦產業為例。台灣科技大學管理學院碩士論文,台北市。

 
二、 英文部分
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New Yourk: The Free Press.
Aaker, D. A. (1995). Building strong brands. Brandweek, 36(37), 28.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
Andrews, J. C., Durvasula, S., & Akhter, S. H. (1990). A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 19(4), 27-40.
Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 203-209.
Atilgan, E., Akinci, S., Aksoy, S., & Kaynak, E. (2009). Customer-based brand equity for global brands: A multinational approach. Journal of Euromarketing, 18(2), 115-132.
Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 230-243.
Baker, W. E., & Lutz, R. J. (2000). An empirical test of an updated relevance-accessibility model of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 1-14.
Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1983). Operationalizing involvement as depth and quality of cognitive response. Advances in Consumer Research, 10(1), 309-313.
Bauer, R. A. (1960), Consumer behavior as risk taking. In D. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 23-33.
Bennett, P. D., & Harrell, G. D. (1975). The role of confidence in understanding and predicting buyers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(2), 110-117.
Biel, A. L. (1992). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), RC-6; RC-12.
Blackston, M. (1995). The qualitative dimension of brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 76-76.
Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 69.
Bowen, L. and Chaffee, S.H. (1974). Product involvement and pertinent advertising appeals. Journalism Quarterly, 51 (Winter), 613-621, 644.
Brasco, T. C. (1988). How brand name is valued for acquisition Cambridge MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.
Chaudhuri, A. (2000). A macro analysis of the relationship of product involvement and information search: The role of risk. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1.
Christodoulides, G., & de Chernatony, L. (2010). Consumer-based brand equity conceptualisation and measurement. International Journal of Market Research, 52(1), 43-66.
Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1964). Perceived risk and consumer decision-making - the case of the telephone shopping. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 1(4), 32-39.
Cox, D.F. (1967), “Risk handling in consumer behavior-An intensive study of two cases,” In Cox, D.F. (Ed.), Risk-Taking and Information-Handle in Consumer Behavior, pp.34-81, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Cunningham, S. M. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. In D. F. Cox. (ed.), Risk-taking and information handling in consumer behavior (82-108). Boston: Harvard University Press.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 28(3), 307-319.
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119-134.
Doyle, P. (1989). Building successful brands: The strategic options. Journal of Marketing Management, 5(1), 77-95.
Dyson, P., Farr, A., & Hollis, N. S. (1996). Understanding, measuring, and using brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(6), 9-21.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. and Miniard, P. W. (2006). Consumer behaviour (10th ed. ed.) OH: The Thomas Corporation.
Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing brand equity. Marketing Research, 1(3), 24-33.
Farquhar, P. H. (1990). Managing brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), RC-7; RC-12.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gardner, M. P., Mitchell, A. A., & Russo, J. E. (1985). Low involvement strategies for processing advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 4-56.
Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(1), 59-72.
Hassan, A. M., Kunz, M. B., Pearson, A. W., & Mohamed, F. A. (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of perceived risk in online shopping. Marketing Management Journal, 16(1), 138-147.
Houston, Michael J. and Michael L. Rothschild (1978), "Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives in Involvement," in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, S. Jain, ed., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 184-187.
Jae-Eun Chung, Pysarchik, D. T., & Sun-Jin Hwang. (2009). Effects of country-of-manufacture and brand image on korean consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Global Marketing, 22(1), 21-41.
Kamakura, W. A. and Russel, G. (1990), A Scanner-Based on Measure of Brand Equity, in MSI Workshop on Brand Equity. Cambridge, MA
Kang, M., & Yang, S. (2010). Comparing effects of country reputation and the overall corporate reputations of a country on international consumers’ product attitudes and purchase intentions. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 52-62.
Kapferer, J. N. (1992). Strategic brand management: New approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity. New York: The Free Press.
Kapferer, J., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumer involvement profiles: A new practical approach to consumer involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(6), 48-56.
Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 287-291.
Keller, K. L. (1991). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity Stanford Business School.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity. (cover story). Marketing Management, 10(2), 14-19.
Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic brand management : Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (3rd ed. ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kim, P. (1990). A perspective on brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 63-67.
Kotler, P. and Keller K.L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.
Laczniak, R. N., Muehling, D. D., & Grossbart, S. (1989). Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 28-38.
Lakshmi, P. V., & Murugan, M. S. (2008). Socioeconomic characteristics and consumers' purchasing involvement. ICFAI Journal of Consumer Behavior, 3(4), 69-79.
Lars Witell, M. L. (2007). Classification of quality attributes. Managing Service Quality, 17(1), 54-73.
Lassar, W., Mittal, B. and Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
Lastovicka, J. L. and Gardner, D. M. (1979), "Components of Involvement," in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, John C. Maloney and Bernard Silverman, eds., Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 53-73.
Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 22(1), 41-53.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Munson, J. M. (1987). The zaichkowsky personal involvement inventory: Modification and extension. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 36-40.
Miller, G. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343-52.
Mitchell, A. A. (1981). The dimensions of advertising involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1), 25-30.
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(3), 318-332.
Montana, J., Guzman, F., & Moll, I. (2007). Branding and design management: A brand design management model. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(9), 829-840.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr., L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decisions strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29-37.
Roselius, R. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 216-217.
Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie Lazar Kanuk. (2000). Consumer behavior (7th ed. ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Shocker, A.D. and B. Weitz. (1988). A perspective on brand equity principles and issues. Marketing Science and Institute, , 88-104.
Simon, C. J., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach. Marketing Science, 12(1), 28.
Slama, M. E., & Tashchian, A. (1985). Selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 72-82.
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
Sridhar, G. (2007). Consumer involvement in product choice: Role of perceived risk. Decision (0304-0941), 34(2), 51-66.
Stone, R. N. and Gronhaug K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39-50.
Stum, D. L., & Thiry, A. (1991). Building customer loyalty. Training & Development Journal, 45(4), 34.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
Tauber, E. M. (1988). Brand leverage: Strategy for growth in a cost-control world. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 26-30.
Teas, R. K., & Grapentine, e. H. (1996). Demystifying brand equity. Marketing Research, 8(2), 24-29.
Tsiotsou, R. (2006). The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 207-217.
Washburn, J. H., & Plank, R. E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 10(1), 46.
Wei-ping Wu, Chan, T. S., & Heng, H. L. (2008). Does consumers' personal reciprocity affect future purchase intentions? Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3), 345-360.
Wright, P. L. (1973). The cognitive processes mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 10(1), 53-62.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4-34.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). Research notes: The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
 
三、 網站部分
Gartner Inc. http://www.gartner.com/technology/home.jsp
Interbrand : http://www.interbrand.com/en/Default.aspx
International Data Corporation (IDC) : http://www.idc.com/home.jsp
iThome: http://www.ithome.com.tw/
TrendForce Corp. : http://www.trendforce.com/
拓墣產業研究所http://www.topology.com.tw/tri/
財團法人資訊工業策進會 http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx
經濟部技術處 產業技術知識服務計畫 (ITIS) http://www.itis.org.tw/
資策會產業情報研究所 (MIC) http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/
鉅亨網 http://www.cnyes.com/
聯合新聞網http://udn.com/NEWS/main.html
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 52.15.63.145
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 52.15.63.145
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code