Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0710112-005341 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0710112-005341
論文名稱
Title
人力資源實務、組織創新能力與組織績效之研究
The Study of the Relationships between Human Resource Management Practices, Innovation Capabilities and Organizational Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
88
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-06-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-07-10
關鍵字
Keywords
經營策略、組織績效、開發式創新、探索式創新、人力資源實務
Business Strategy, Organizational Performance, Exploitative Innovation, Human Resource Management Practices, Exploratory Innovation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5732 次,被下載 345
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5732 times, has been downloaded 345 times.
中文摘要
在現今競爭激烈的環境下,「創新」似乎已成為企業不可避免的挑戰,企業內的員工,便扮演著關鍵的角色。而企業的人力資源實務要如何幫助企業提升創新的能力?故本研究由人力資源管理的角度為出發點,探討組織的人力資源實務、組織創新能力、與組織績效之間的關係。此外,組織的經營策略是否會對創新能力與組織績效之間的關係產生干擾,亦為本研究探討之課題。

本研究採用問卷調查法來尋求解答,以製造業的研發部門主管為調查對象。一共發放180份問卷,有效問卷為86份。經統計分析後獲得以下研究結果:

1.注重訓練與團隊工作能顯著正向影響探索式創新

2.招募甄選、職涯管理與員工參與能顯著正向影響探索式創新

3.績效報酬能顯著正向影響開發式創新,績效評估則無顯著關係

4.招募甄選、職涯管理與員工參與能顯著正向影響開發式創新

5.探索式創新與開發式創新能顯著正向影響組織績效

6.經營策略對創新能力與組織績效並無顯著干擾效果
Abstract
In this highly competitive environment, innovation seems to be the inevitable challenge to every company. The employees within the companies have become the key point for the companies to be innovative. So how do these companies use human resource management practices to promote innovation capabilities? In this thesis, the study will explore the relationship between human resource management practices and innovation capabilities and as well as the relationship between innovation capabilities and organizational performance. In addition, the business strategy as the moderator is also discussed.

This thesis is conducted through opinion survey. This study gathered 86 valid questionnaires replied by the directors of research and development department in each company and the findings of this thesis can be summarized as follows:

1.Training and teamwork impact the exploratory innovation positively.

2.Recruitment, career system and employee participation impact the exploratory innovation positively.

3.Performance reward impacts the exploitative innovation positively. Performance appraisal does not have evident impact on exploitative innovation.

4.Recruitment, career system and employee participation impact the exploitative innovation positively.

5.Exploratory and exploitative innovations impact the organizational performance positively.

6.Business strategy does not have evident moderating effect.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論…………………………………...….....…. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………. 1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………. 3
第三節 研究流程………………………………………. 4
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………. 5
第一節 創新能力………………………………………. 5
第二節 人力資源實務與創新能力……………………. 9
第三節 創新能力與組織績效…………………..…. 18
第四節 經營策略的干擾效果……………………. 24
第三章 研究方法…………………………………. 31
第一節 研究架構與研究假設……………………. 31
第二節 研究變項之操作型定義與衡量………… 33
第三節 資料蒐集方法與樣本特性分析…………. 41
第四節 資料分析方法……………………………. 45
第四章 實證資料分析……………………………. 47
第一節 研究變項間之相關性……………………. 47
第二節 有助創新之人力資源實務對組織創新能力之影響.. 49
第三節 組織創新能力對組織績效之影響………. 59
第四節 經營策略對創新能力與組織績效之影響. 61
第五節 實證研究結果整理…………....………. 64
第五章 結論與建議………………………………. 65
第一節 研究結果與管理意涵……………………. 65
第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議………………. 68
參考文獻 ………………………………………. 69
研究問卷 ……………………………………. 77
參考文獻 References
大前研一,1984,策略家的智慧,台北:長河出版社。

王湧水、黃同圳、呂傳吉,2005,「事業策略、人力資源管理策略與組織績效關係之探討」,人力資源管理學報,5(2): 1-18。

尤恩尹,2007,人力資源管理角色與組織績效關係之長期性研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

司徒達賢,1995,策略管理,台北:遠流出版社。

何金銘,2006,統計分析方法,台南:台灣復文興業。

何明城,2003,人力資源管理,台北:台灣培生。

邱皓政,2002,量化研究與統計分析,台北:五南圖書。

邱皓政,2005,量化研究法(二)-統計原理與分析技術,台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。

吳思華,2000,策略九說,台北:臉譜出版社。

吳秉恩,2008,領導學,台北:智勝。

吳玲玲,2004,組織行為,台北:智勝。

李期容,2010,新產品開發之研究-探索、開發與雙軌並行之觀點,國立東華大學企業管理學系博士論文。

李惠美,2000,經營型態、經營策略與經營績效相關之實證研究-以我國中藥業為例,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。

林清山,1992,心理與教育統計學,台北:東華書局。

周文賢,2002,多變量統計分析,台北:智勝。

陳梧桐,2002,經營策略之創新管理-以IC產業為例,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。

陳順宇,1998,多變量分析,台北:華泰文化。

陳群聰,2005,影響R&D人員創新行為之因素探討,國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

統計學教學研究會譯,Andrew F. Siegel著,2001,實用統計學,台北:前程企業管理。

張雅菁,2006,事業策略類型、行銷組織架構、策略性行為與組織績效之研究-以台灣製造產業為例,東海大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。

梁正學,2007,多角化、事業部組織、人力資源管理與組織績效之關聯,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

黃志豪,2004,新興公司人力資源政策與組織績效之關聯,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽,2006,「管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試與補救」,管理學報,23(1): 77-98。

遠見雜誌,2010,283期。

溫心盈,2006,經營策略對高階主管支持教育訓練與組織績效關係之影響,國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

溫金豐,2009,組織理論與管理,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。

趙必孝、王喻平,2007,人力資源管理,台中:滄海書局。

趙芝瑩,2010,組織學習導向的人力資源實務與組織績效關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

趙珮伃,2006,人力資源管理效能與組織績效之關聯性探討-以策略性人力資源角色為干擾變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

盧業雯,2008,人力資源實務與組織創新績效關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

簡俊成,2007,探索與利用之間的平衡-雙元或中斷均衡模式,南台科技大學企業管理學系國科會專案。

Aaker, D. A. 1998. Strategic Market Management 5th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521-543.

Arthur, J. B. 1994. Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 670-687.

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2010. Managing innovation paradoxes: ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43: 104-122.

Afuah, A. 1998. Innovation management strategies, implementation and profits. New York: Oxford University Press.

Auh, S., & Menguc, B. 2005. Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensify. Journal of Business Research, 58: 1652-1661.

Bird, A. & Beechler, S. 1995. Links between Business Strategy and Human Resource Management Strategy in U.S.-based Japanese Subsidiaries: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1): 23-46.

Becker, B.E., & Gerhart, B. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 779-801.

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256

Becker, K., & Matthews, J. 2008. Linking hrm and innovation: formulating the research agenda. The 22nd anzam conference: managing in the pacific century.

Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2: 40-57.

Becker, B.E., & Huselid, M.A. 1998. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53-101.

Burgelman, R. A. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lockin. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 325-357.

Banker, R.D., Lee, S., Potter, G., & Srinivason, D. 1996. Contextual analysis of performance impacts of outcome-based incentive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 920-948.

Cotton, J.L. 1996. Employee involvement, in CL. Cooper and LT. Roberton (eds). International Revieiv of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11: 219-242.

Conant, J. S. , Mokwo, M. P., & Varadarian, P. R. 1990. Strategic types distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5): 356-383.

Cumming, B. S. 1998. Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1):21-29.

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 1999. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture; based on the competing values framework. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.

Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. New York: North-Holland.

Dessler, G. 2001. A framework for human resource management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Heinemann, London

Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-969.

Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contigency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-835.

Gersick, C. J. G. 1991. Revolutionary change theories: A multi-level exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36.

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 4(49): 693-706.

Gupta, A. K., & Singhal, A. 1993. Managing human resources for innovation and creativity. Research Technology Management, 36(3): 41-48.

Grandori, A. & Soda, G. 1995. Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16: 184-214.

Garcia-Morales, V. J., Llorens-Montes, F. J., & Verdu-Jover, A. J. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106:21-42.

Glueck, & Willian F. 1976. Business policy:strategy formation & management action. New York:McGraw- Hill.

Guzzo, R.A. & Bondy, J.S. 1983. A Guide to Worker Productivity Experiments in the United States, 1976-1981, NY: Pergamon.

Guzzo, R.A., Jette, J.D. & Katzell, R.A. 1985. The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology,38(2): 275-292.

Huselid, M.A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.

Hambrick, & Donald, C. 1983. High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: a contigency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 687-707.

Holmqvist, M. 2004. Experimental learning processes of exploitation and exploration. An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1): 70-81.

He, Z.L., & Wong, P.K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481-494.

Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. 1992. Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. Oxford: Lackwell,

Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11): 1661-1674.

Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2005. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity:the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schemalenbach Business Review, 57: 351-363.

Kuhn, R. L. 1985. Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management, Cambridg: Ballinger.

Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y. 2004. The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation. International Business Review, 13: 685-703.

Laursen, K. 2002. The importance of sectoral differences in the application of complementary HRM practices for innovation performance. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9(1): 139-156.

Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14:319-340.

Leede, J., de Looise, J. C., & Alders, B. C. M. 2002. Innovation, improvement and operations: an exploration of the management of alignment. International Journal of Technology Management, 23: 353–368.

Miles, R. E. & Snow, C.C. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure a Process. New York:McGraw-Hills.

March, J. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1):71-87.

MacDuffie, J.P. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible productions systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197-221.

MacDuffie, J.P. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible productions systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197-221.

Oczkowski, E. & Farrell M. A., 1998. Discriminating Between Measurement Scales Using Non-Nested Tests and Two-Stage Least Squares Estimators: The Case of Market Orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15:349-366.

Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. 2006. Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5): 499-515.

Pirola-Merlo, A., Hartel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. 2002. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13: 561–581.

Pelham, A. M. 2000. Market Orientation and other Potential Influences on Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 38:48-67.

Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press

Panayotopoulou, L., & Papalexandris, N. 2004. Examining the link between human resourcemanagement orientation and firm performance. Personnel Review, 33(5/6):499.

Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C. & Roering, K. J. 1985. The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance. Journal of Marketing, 49:13-25.

Roberts, E. B. 1988. Managing invention and innovation. Research Technology Management, 31(1):11.

Searle, R. H., & Ball, K. S. 2003. Supporting innovation through HR policy: evidence from the UK. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12(1): 50-62.
Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. 2005. Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2): 118-128.

Scarbrough, H., 2003, Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process. International Journal of Manpower, 24(5): 501 – 516.

Shipton, H., West, M. A., Dawson, J., Birdi, K. & Patterson, M. 2006. HRM as a predictor of innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16: 3–27.

Scarbrough, H. 2003. Knowledge management, hrm and the innovation process. International Journal of Manpower, 24(5): 501-516.

Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. 1980. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 317-336.

Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 907-934.

Sparkes, J. R., & Miyake, M. 2000. Knowledge transfer and human resource development practices: japanese firms in brazil and mexico. International Business Review, 9(5): 599-612.

Teece, D. J., Pisano G. & Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

Tushman, M.L., & O’Reilly, C.A. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8-30.

Tushman M. & Anderson P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31:439-465.

Thompson, V. A. 1965. Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10:1-20.

Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. 2001. Managing Innovation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Udwadia, F. E. 1990. Creativity and innovation in organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 38(1): 66.

Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. 1986. Measurement of BusinessPerformance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 801-814.

Volberda, H. W. 1996. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4):359-374.

Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., & Allen, M. R. 2005. The relationship between hr practices and firm performance: examining causal order. Personnel Psychology, 58: 409-446.

Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. 1987. Marketing’s role in the implementation of business strategies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing, 51: 15-33.

Walker, O. C. J., & Ruekert, R. W. 1987. Marketing's role in the implementation of business strategies: a critical review and conceptual framwork. Journal of Marketing, 51: 25.

Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. 2007. An examination of exploration and exploitative capabilities: implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4): 63-93.

Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W., & Lepak, D.P. 1996. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and form performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 836-866.

Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. 1993. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance.Strategic Management Journal, 14: 451-478.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code