Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0711105-092754 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0711105-092754
論文名稱
Title
高中英文教師對作文教學的實行與信念之研究
A Study of Senior High School English Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs about Writing Instruction
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
116
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2004-06-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-07-11
關鍵字
Keywords
教學實行、教師信念、作文
English composition, pedagogical practices, teachers' beliefs
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5718 次,被下載 3442
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5718 times, has been downloaded 3442 times.
中文摘要
摘要
根據李氏(1992)的研究,大部份的高中學生的確都認為英文作文是他們最費力的一門科目。經過了十年,英文作文對台灣大部份的高中生來說,似乎仍然還是一件很困難的事情,這樣的情況可以從2001年大考中心所統計的結果看來—作文分數得分超過12分的考生比例不到百分之八。這個令人不滿的事實不僅造成了困擾,對學生與老師來說,也都是個挫折。
在做完三方面—作文教學研究、台灣的作文實證教學研究、英語教師對於教學的施行與信念—的文獻回顧後,我使用了質性研究的方法來撰寫這個論文。質性方法裡面包括了作為問卷調查內容基礎的面談與問卷調查。
在此研究中的結論是作文老師的先前學習經驗對於他們目前的教學實習有所影響。此外,關於他們為什麼會採取不同的教學方式的原因,有許多可以能的解釋,比如時間的限制、學生的人數或者是考試導向的教育等。教師的信念與實行也可能會因為學生的不同背景與需要而有很大的不同。再者,老師所面臨的困難的確是很嚴重的問題,這些是有關單位應該要去解決的,而一些相關的建議也應提出。最後還有很重要的一點,這個研究的結果已經顯示出一些老師們對於他們作文教學上的信念,包括他們對於編輯寫作教材的原則意見與他們所強調的教學重點。因此,有關單位和其他研究者在執行語言教育改格或進行相關研究時,參考本研究的結果。希望這個研究可以使大家對於高中英文作文教師的信念有更全面性的了解並且引起大家多注意他們的需要與困難。
Abstract
According to Li’s (1992) study, the majority of high school students in Taiwan consider English writing their most taxing subject. After ten years, it seems still a difficult task for most of them, which is shown by the results from CEEC in 2001—the percentage of examinees who have scored higher than 12 points in writing is below 8%. This undesirable fact causes trouble and frustration not only to students but also to teachers. After a literature review of three dimensions—research on English composition, empirical studies in Taiwan, and English teachers’ beliefs and their pedagogical practices, the researcher adopted a qualitative methodology to do the research. The methodology is composed of an interview and a questionnaire.
In this study, it is concluded that writing teachers’ prior learning experiences had an influence on their current teaching practices. What’s more, as for the explanation of why writing instructors have adopted these different methods, there are many possible reasons to give, such as time limit, students’ numbers or a test-oriented trend in education. Teachers’ beliefs and practices may also differ significantly due to their students’ different backgrounds and needs. Moreover, the difficulties that teachers face are indeed serious problems the authorities concerned have to fix and some relevant suggestions should be proposed. Last but not least, the results of this study have shown some of teachers’ beliefs about their writing instruction, including the opinions on principles of compiling writing materials and the teaching points they stress. Therefore, the relevant authorities and other researchers can refer to these results in this study when they implement language education reforms or conduct related studies. It is hoped that such a study would help people have a thorough comprehension of senior high school writing instructors’ beliefs and draw much more attention to the importance of their needs, and difficulties.
目次 Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract (English)………...……………………………………………………………i
Abstract (Chinese)…………..…………………………………………………………ii
Acknowledgements…………...………………………………………………………iii
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………..iv
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………..x

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION…………………………………………….1
1.1 Motivation…………………………………………………….……………..1
1.2 Research Background ……………………………………………………….2
1.3 Purpose of the Study………………………………………………………...6
1.4 Research Questions……………………………………………….................7
1.5 Significance of the Study……………………………………………………8

CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………...9
2.1 Research on English Composition………………………………………….9
2.2 Theoretical Development of Writing Instructions…………………………10
2.3 Traditional Approaches of Teaching Writing……………………………...10
2.3.1 Controlled Composition…………………………………………………...11
2.3.2 Free Writing…………………………. ……………………………………12
2.4 Current Approaches of Teaching Writing………………………………….13
2.4.1 Process Approach…………………………. ……………………………...13
2.4.2 The Language Experience Approach……………………………………...14
2.4.3 Contrastive Rhetoric Approach……………………………………………15
2.4.4 Content-based Approach…………………………. ……..………………..16
2.4.5 Computer-assisted Approach………………………………………………17
2.5 Empirical Studies on Writing Instructions………………………………...18
2.5.1 Error Analysis and English Composition Teaching………………………..19
2.5.2 Sentence Combination…………………………. …………………………19
2.5.3 Strategies Towards EFL Writing…………………………………………..20
2.5.4 Process Writing…………………………. ………………………………..20
2.5.5 Reading and Writing in English Writing Instruction………………………22
2.5.6 Dialogue Journal…………………………. ………………………………22
2.5.7 Internet-based Approach…………………………. ………………………23
2.5.8 Writing Evaluation…………………………. …………………………….24
2.6 English Teachers’ Beliefs and Their Pedagogical Practices………………25
2.6.1 The Nature of Teachers’ Beliefs…………………………. ………………25
2.6.2 The Relationships Between Writing Teachers’ Beliefs and Pedagogical Practices…………………………. ……………………………………….26
2.6.3 Research on the Beliefs of English Writing Instructors…………………..27

CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY………………………………………..30
3.1 Subjects……………………. …………………………. …………………30
3.2 Instruments………. …………………………. …………………………..30
3.2.1 Interview………. …………………………. ……………………………..31
3.2.2 Questionnaire………. …………………………. ………………………...33
3.2.3 Pilot Study………. …………………………. ……………………………34
3.3 Data Collection………. …………………………….. ..………………….35
3.3.1 Collection of the Interview Data………. …………………………. ……..36
3.3.2 Collection of the Questionnaire Data……………………. ……………….36
3.4 Data Analysis………. …………………………. …………………………37
3.4.1 Analysis of the Interview Data………. …………………………. ……….37
3.4.2 Analysis of the Questionnaire Data……………………. …………………40
3.5 Validity………. …………………………. ……………………………….40

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS……………………………………………………42
4.1 Demographic Information of the Respondents…………………. ………..42
4.2 Responses to Closed-ended Questions…………………. ………………..45
4.3 Responses to Ranking Questions…………………. ……………………...51
4.4 The Analysis of Open-ended Questions…………………. ………………54

CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………..54
5.1 Discussion of Research Questions…………………. ……………………..55
5.2 Pedagogical Implications…………………. ………………………………71
5.3 Limitations of the Study…………………. ………………………………..75
5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies…………………. ………………………..76

REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………...78

APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………88
Appendix A Interview Guide (Chinese)………………………………………........88
Appendix B Interview Guide (English)…………………………………………….99
Appendix C Questionnaire (Chinese)………………………………………………92
Appendix D Questionnaire (English) ……………………………………………...96
Appendix E Permit Form…………………. ……………………………………..101

LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………...102
Table 3-1 Demographic information of the interviewees…………………………102
Table 4-1 Demographic information of respondents ………….………………….103
Table 4-2 Learning experiences of English writing ……………………………...104
Table 4-3 Current practices of English writing instruction ………………………105
Table 4-4 Difficulties that teachers face…………………. ………………………106
Table 4-5 Principles of compiling English writing materials…………………. …107
Table 4-6 Teaching points that teachers emphasize…………………. …………..108
參考文獻 References
REFERENCES

Abrioux, D. A. M. X. (1989). Computer-assisted language learning and distance
education. CADE: Journal of Distance Education. http://cade.athabascau.ca/
vol4.1/7_abrioux.html
Ahlstrom, A. D. (1991). Reflects actions: Theory and practice in teaching writing
(writing instruction, reflective practice). Abstract from: UMI ProQuest
Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 9131280.
Barbier, S. I. (2001). Using free-writing to help students better understand
assignments and assessment. NADE Selected Conference Papers [On-line].
Available: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Dickson-Freewriting.html
Bartholomae, D. (1995) Writing with Teachers: A Conversation with Peter Elbow.; College Composition and Communication, 46, 62-71.
Beach, R., & Birdwell, L.S. (Eds). (1984). New directions in composition research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Bello, T. (1997). Improving ESL learners’ writing skills. ERIC Digest [On- line]. Available: http://ericir.syr.edu/plweb-cgi/obtain.pi
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.
Borg, M. (2001). Teachers' beliefs. ELT journal, 55, 186-188.
Bowie, R. L. (1996). Future teachers’ perceptions of themselves as writers and
teachers of writing: Implications for teacher education programs. Abstract from:
UMI ProQuest Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 9705677.
Broz, W. J. (1996). Growing reflective practitioners. Metaphor, symbol and ritual:
Knowledge for teacher change in a summer writing project. Abstract from: UMI
ProQuest Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 9715117.
Burniske, R. W. (1994). Creating dialogue: Teacher response to journal writing.
English Journal, 83, 4, 74-88.
Calderhead, J., & Shorrock, S. B. (1997). Understanding teacher education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer Press.
Chang, P. C. (2003). The effects of the process writing instruction on Taiwanese high school students’ overall English writing ability. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.



Chang, Y. C. (2003). A study of senior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs in
methodological decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
Chang, Y. L. (2002). The study of theories and strategies for writing instruction in senior high school. In The Proceedings of the 18th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in theRepublic of China. Taipei: Crane.
Chen, B. C. (1996). A case study on developing writing ability and cultural
understanding through Internet. NSC86-2411-H-006-003
Chen, B. C. (1999). Synthesis of designs and practices on English composition syllabus. The Proceedings of the Eighth international symposium and book fair on English teaching. Taipei: Crane.
Chen, B. J. (2002). A corpus-based study of the collocational errors in the writings of the EFL Learners in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chen, Ching-i. (2003). Reading instruction in Junior high School: How do junior
high school English teachers instruct reading? Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Chen, Chen-ting. (2002). Textbook selection for senior high school students in
greater Taipei area. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Chen, D. W. (1997). The state of college EFL composition instruction—A survey of
college EFL composition instructors’ professional background and views. In The
Proceedings of the 14th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the
Republic of China. Taipei: Crane.
Chen, D. W. (2001).The identity crisis of EFL composition instruction in Taiwan. In
The Proceedings of the 18th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane.
Chen, H. W. (2003). Investigating senior high school literature teaching by
analyzing the literary texts in different new versions of English textbooks.
Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Chen P. C. (2002). A corpus-based study of the collocational errors in the
writings of the EFL learners in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.




Chen, S. J. (2003). Bridging the gap between reading and writing in English
writing instruction for senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chen, Y. M. (1998). Reviews on and future development of Taiwan’s English composition instruction. In The Papers from the 15th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane.
Cheng, Y. S. (1998). Examination of two anxiety constructs: Second
language class anxiety and second language writing anxiety. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Chiang, P. J. (1993). How to improve English composition teaching in Taiwan's high schools: A study of error analysis and learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chin, Y. M. (2003). The effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL writing: A case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Christensen, L. M. (1991). Teaching standard English. Whose Standard English
Journal, 79, 36-40.
Chung, Mei-chen. (2003). A study of the senior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs
in materials compilation, selection, and use. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C.
Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd. New York: Macmillan.
Clarke, M. A. & Silberstein, S. (1988). Problems, prescriptions, and paradoxes in
second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 4, 685-700.
Conner, A. M. (2000). Motivating Middle School Students to Revise and Edit.
English Journal, 90, 72-79.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlow, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
Cunningham, K. (2000). Integrating CALL into the writing curriculum. http://
www.sanynet.ne.jp/~gromit/cunningham_home.html
Dickson, K. J. (2001). Freewriting: Prompts and feedback. The Internet TESL
Journal [On-line], 7. Available:http://www.nade.net/documents/SCP01/Barbier,﹪20Stuart.doc
Dobson, R. L., & Dobson, J. E. (1983). Teacher beliefs-practice congruency.
Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 59, 1, 20-27.
Dolly, M. R. (1990). Integrating ESL reading and writing through authentic discourse. Journal of Reading, 33, 5, 360-365.


Doughty, C. & Pica, T. (1986). Information Gap tasks: Do they facilitate second
language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 2, 305-325.
Egbert, J. L. (1993). Analytic and systemic analyses of computer-supported language learning environment. http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej06/ al.html
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL:
National Council of Teachers of English. Imes, A.
Eng, J. (2002). Teacher as writers and students as writers, publishing, and
Monday-morning agendas. The writing instructor (Online). Available:
http://www.writinginstructor.com/essays/eng.html
Fan, Li-ling. (1999). Searching for an application of linguistics to the teaching of EFL writing in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University.
Fang, F. S. (1987). A survey of the needs of English among the students in the
medical school. Papers presented at the Fourth Conference on English
Teaching and Learning in the R. O. C. Taipei: Crane.
Farris, C. R. (1987). Constructing a theory of composition in the first year: An
Ethnographic study of four new teaching assistants in English. Abstract from:
UMI ProQuest Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 8810528.
Fedderholdt, K. (2001). An email exchange project between non-native speakers of English. ELT Journal, 55, 273-280.
Fletcher, D. C. (2001). Tutors’ Ideals and Practices. Journal of Basic Writing, 20, 1, 21-28.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the
Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 229-224.
Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher-research: From inquiry to understanding. Pacific Grove: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Frizler, K. (1995). The Internet as an educational tool in ESOL writing
instruction. Master’s thesis, San Francisco State University.
Fulton, K. L. (1999). How teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning are reflected
in their use of technology: Case studies from urban middle schools. 
http://www.learn.umd.edu/fulton-thesis.html
Gillham, B. (2000). Developing a questionnaire. New York, NY: Continuum.
Graves, Donald H. (1983). Writing: Teachers & children at work. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann Education Books.


Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A
case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 1, 46-70.
Grossman, P. L. (1992). Teaching to learn. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The changing
contexts of teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hadley, A. O. (1993). Teaching language in context: Proficiency- oriented instruction. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Hairston, M. (1981). Using nonfiction literature in the composition classroom. In B. Petersen (ED.), Convergence: Transactions in reading and writing. Urban, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hanson, L. K. (1994). Directing a basic writing program: Encouraging diversity
among students and instructors. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the
National Council of Teachers of English Conference on College Composition
and Communication. (EDRS Document Reproduction Service No. ED 369 085)
Holmes, V. L. & Moulton, M. R. (1997). Dialogue journals as an ESL learning strategy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 8, 316-321.
Hsueh, S. C. (2003). An analysis of lexical collocational errors in the English compositions of senior high school EFL students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Huang, A. H. (2003). The effects of on-line peer-evaluation on English writing for students in senior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohuiung Normal University.
Huang, C. J. (2003). The effects of teaching organizing strategies inthe pre-writing phase on Chinese students’ English writing proficiency. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Huang, H. H. (2004). A study of senior high students’ responses to peer and teacher feedback on EFL composition. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Huang, L. M. (1996). A case study on using writing conference and peer-group
review. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University.
Huang, Y. L. (1995) The effect of sentence combining practice on Chinese students’ English writing instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Isenberg, J. P. (1990). Teachers’ thinking and beliefs and classroom practice.
Childhood Education, 66, 5, 322-327.



Issacs, E. J. (1996). Constructing pedagogies: A feminist study of three college
writing teachers. Abstract from: UMI ProQuest Dissertation: Publication Number:
AAT 9709610.
Issaca, E. J. (1998). Turning the researcher Gaze inward: Where does my pedagogy
come from? Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of
Teachers of English Conference on College Composition and Communication.
(EDRS Document Reproduction Service No. ED 430211)
James, M. O. (1993). L2 writing fluency: A pilot study. (Eric document Reproduction Service No. 335874)
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
Kann, C. L. (2001). Writing instruction for senior high school students: The
effects of gender on Internet-assisted English. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Keller, M.A. (1992). Responding to students’ writing: A pilot study. (Eric
Document Reproduction Service No. 335874)
Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of pre-writing strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 327-342.
Kitao, S. K. (1998). Interaction and on-line synchronous communication in
English language learning. CALL-EJ. http://www.lerc.ritsumei.ac.jp/callej/ index.html
Kroll, B. (1991). Teaching writing in the ESL context. New York: Newbury House.
Lai, Y. J. (2004). A study of college English writing teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chang-hua University of Education.
Lai, S. J. (2004). High school English teachers’ beliefs on grammar instruction
in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Leki, I. (1991). The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level
writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 3, 203-218.
Li, C. C. (1992). A review of the problems of English composition as encountered
by senior high school students: From the perspectives of the Joint College
Entrance Examination. English Teaching and Learning, 7, 1, 7-14.
Liang, T. L. (1996). Cooperative learning on the Internet: The intercultural e- mail
classroom connection. The Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on
English Teaching, 233-242. Taipei: Crane.
Liao, C. C. (1999). E-mailing to improve EFL learner’s reading and writing abilities:
Taiwan Experience. The Internet Journal, 5, 3, 18-24.
http://www.aitech.ac.jp/~iteslj/Articles/Liao-Emailing.html

Liao, C. C. (2001). English email discourse analysis: Taiwan versus Czech students.
The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Multimedia Language
Education. Taipei: Crane.
Liao, Wan-wen. (2003). Senior high school English teachers’ beliefs towards
communicative language teaching and their classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousands
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Macrorie, K. (1970). Telling writing (3rd ed.). NJ: Hayden Book.
Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse, analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Munby, H. (1983). A qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs and principles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 228 215).
Murray, D. M. (1987). Write to learn. Holt. The Dryden Press.
Nien, Y. H. (2002). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice: A
case study of a senior high school English teacher. Unpublished master’s thesis,
National Changhua University of Education.
Newell, G.E. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/
protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 265-287.
Nunan, David. (2000). Language Teaching Methodology. London: Longman.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a
messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
Pan, S. X. (2002). A study of the effects of summary writing with structure guidelines on the writing of EFL beginning writers. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Peng, T. L. (2001). Curriculum and instruction of second language writing. In The
selected papers from the 10th international symposium on English teaching
565-571. Taipei: Crane.

Peyton, J. K. & Staton, J. (1993). Dialogue Journals in the Multilingual Classroom:
Building Language Skills Through Written Interaction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Peyton, J. K. (1990). Dialogue journal writing and the acquisition of English of English grammatical morphology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Pianko, S. (1979). A description of the composing process of college freshman
writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5-22.
Punch, M. (1986). The politics and ethics of field work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Raimes, A. (1991). Out of Woods: Emerging Traditions in the Teaching of Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407-430.
Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. New Jersey: Regents/Prentice Hall.
Richard-Amato, P. A. (1996). Making it happen: Interaction in the second language
classroom: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Addison- Wesley.
Robins, B. (1992). It’s not that simple. English Journal, 81, 72-74.
Ross, J, & Dereshiwsky, M. (1993). An overview of identifying a community college
English department’s beliefs about writing. Paper Presented at the Annual
Conference of the Arizona Educational Research Organization (EDRS Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 377 497)
Spanos, A. (1992). Discovery writing: How to explore it, map it and cultivate it well. Hispania, 75, 2, 441-444.
Scarcella, R., & Oxford, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual
in the communicative classroom.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness raising in second language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 129-158.
Scott, V.M. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Seymour, C. L. (1998). Use of instructional texts in college writing courses as a
reflection of teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Abstract from: UMI ProQuest
Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 9824615.
Shen, H. L. (2004). Improving Coherence in High School Students' English Compositions Through Instruction of Topical Development. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Shi, ling, & Cumming, A. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of second language writing
instruction: Five case studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 2, 87-111.


Shih, May. (1986) Content-Based Approaches to Teaching Academic Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 4, 617-648.
Silva, T. (1990). Second Language Composition Instruction: Developments,
Issues, and Directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing. New
Singhal, M. (1999). Reading and computer assisted instruction: Applications and
implications. http://www.kerc.ritsumei.ac.jp/callej/index.html
Soderlund, M. D. (1993). Classroom memos, creating purposeful dialogue. English
Journal, 82, 7, 55-57.
Spack, R.&Sadow, C. (1983). Student-teacher working journals in ESL
freshman composition. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 575-593.
Stallard, C. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student
writers. Research in the Teaching English, 8, 206-218.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques
and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swales, J. (1987). The Writing of Research Article Introductions.; Written Communication, 4, 2, 175-191.
Tan, J. J. & Gao, S. M. (1998). Development and Application of Internet on the
Enhancement of Writing Conference in Senior High School NSC87-2411-H218-001.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Travis, P & Slocumb, L. (1997). Language experience approach [On-line]. Available:Http://www.med.ufl.edu/mdpt/resources/LnaguageExperienceQpproach.
htm
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes.
Language Learning, 46, 2, 327-369.
Tse, J. K. (1985). A survey of the use of English in Taiwan, the Republic of China.
Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 11, 115-125,
Tse, J. K. (1995). The teaching of writing in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Pacific
Communication, 6, 1, 117-123.
Tso, W. W. (2002). The effectiveness of peer evaluation on EFL writing.
Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Tung, C. T. (1995). Can dialogue journal writing help ESL students develop
writing skills? Unpublished master’s thesis, Arizon State University, Arizon.
Tung, Hsing-cheng. (2000). The effects of using memorization as an EFL learning strategy. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.

Wall, S., & Petrovsky, A. (1981). Freshman writers and revision: Results from
a survey. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 3, 109-122.
Wang, Bonnie. (2004). A study of the effects of student-teacher dialogue journals on
EFL writing in high schools in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National
Taiwan Normal University.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). New starts and different kinds of failure. In A. Freedman,
Pringle, & J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to Writing: first language/ Second
language. London and New York: Longman.
Woolard, G. (2000). Collocation: Encouraging Learner Independence. London: Language Teaching Publications.
Wu, C. P. (2002). The study on high school trainees’ theoretical
orientations toward reading instruction and reading instructional practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Wu, C. P. (2003). A study on the use of feedback in senior high school
English composition: Students’ preferences and teachers’ practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Wu, S. J. (2003). A comparison of learners; beliefs about writing in their first and
second language: Taiwanese junior college business-major students studying English. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Yan, S. C. (1998). The World Wide Web as an EFL writing tool. The Proceeding of
the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, 897-903. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Yang, C. C. (2003). A study of the effects of guided reading and writing directions on Taiwanese senior high school students’ English writing. Unpublished
master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
Yao, S. F. (2004). A study of integrating reading and writing in a senior high
school claaroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.
Yao, S. F. (2004) A Study of Integrating Reading and Writing in a Senior High
School Classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.
Zamel, V. (1983). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code