處於動態的知識潮流時代，組織需要不斷地強化現有能力，或是發展新能力來適應多變的環境，運用組織核心能力來維持長期優勢。知識整合就為了讓每個成員所具備的知識可以有效率地被充分運用，而「不應讓所有的人去學習所有的事」。因此，存於個人中的特有知識可藉由設計適當的組織結構、善用權授、溝通或是決策的各種機制使知識整合成為組織能力，而能發揮長期競爭優勢。
　　由於Internet、Web等資訊潮流科技之快速發展，除為帶來許多便利外，亦是形成了一個e化的競爭環境，組織是否能提高自己的潛在競爭優勢，資訊科技能力提供極大的貢獻。因此，企業之資訊部門是否能有效發揮其核心能力成為競爭關鍵。
　　本研究以知識基礎觀點的公司理論為發展基礎，並以根據超文件式組織中，運用不同層級的結構來協助組織管理之觀念，配合相關文獻中蒐集有助於知識整合的各式結構設計，將重點置於組織結構和知識管理的互相配合，分析影響知識整合的結構設計，藉由這些探討以達到有效率的知識創造、利用及移轉來創造價值。
　　本研究使用調查研究法來蒐集相關資料，並使用路徑分析法來檢驗研究模式及假說。研究發現在知識整合的績效對於企業資訊部門之能力有顯著助益，對於知識整合績效部份，影響最大的組織結構為專案結構協調度，另外，企業結構設計及知識編碼亦有顯著貢獻。本研究提出的七個假說中，有六個獲得支持。

　　In the dynamic knowledge-oriented age, organizations need continuously develop existing capabilities and new capabilities to adapt changeable environment and maintain their competitive competence. Not trying to make all staff learn all things, organizations need knowledge integration to coordinate knowledge held in different individuals. Specified knowledge in separate individuals could be integrated into organizational capabilities, the basis of competitive competence, through designing of appropriate organizational structure, authority, communication, decisions making and mechanism.
　　Because of the business environment full of Internet and Web, IT capability has become a critical factor in building potential competitive competence.
　　In the view of Knowledge-Based Theory of Firm and Hyper-Text Organization, this research emphasizes the coordination of organizational structure and knowledge management. Applying organizational structure and different integration mechanisms collected from related literature, exam the relation between the factors of knowledge integration and core capability of MIS department. Try to achieve efficient knowledge creation, utility and transfer through the discussion.
　　An empirical survey methodology is applied to test the research model and hypotheses proposed in this study. Six out of seven hypotheses are validated in our research model with Path Analysis. The research result reveals that knowledge integration has significant impact on MIS department capability. Organizational structure design, including business structure design, project structure design and knowledge codification, has critical contribution to knowledge integration.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節　研究背景及動機 1
第二節　研究目的 2
第三節　研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節　企業資訊管理能力與競爭優勢 4
第二節　知識整合與能力 9
第三節　組織結構與知識整合 13
第三章　研究模式與研究方法 20
第一節　研究模式 20
第二節　研究假說 22
第三節　研究變數定義 27
第四節　研究設計方法 35
第四章　資料分析結果 38
第一節　問卷回收與樣本特徵 38
第二節　信度與效度分析 42
第三節　研究假說檢定 57
第四節　資訊部門核心能力之驗證 66
第五節　研究發現 72
第六節　組織變數與路徑分析 74
第七節　組織變數統計與分析 83
第五章 結論與建議 84
第一節　結論 84
第二節　研究貢獻及限制 88
第三節　建議 90

1.林東清，知識管理，初版，台北，智勝文化，2003。
2.吳明隆，SPSS統計應用實務，第六版，台北，松崗電腦圖書資料公司，2004。
3.張紹勳、林秀娟，SPSS For Windows統計分析：初等統計與高等統計（上，下冊），第三版，台北，松崗電腦圖書資料公司，1994。
4.黃俊英，多變量分析，第四版，台北，中國經濟企業研究所，1991。
5.陳景堂，統計分析SPSS For Windows，第四版，台北，儒林圖書有限公司，2003。
6.陳謝裕，企業競爭的核心：IT Capability－構面的探討與衡量尺度的建立，中山大學資管系碩士論文，1991。
7.Bharadwaj, A. S., “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,”MIS Quarterly, March 2000, pp. 169-196.
8.Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P., “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practices: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation,”Organization Science, Vol.2, 1991, pp. 40-57.
9.Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P., “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments” Strategic Management Journal (10), 1989, pp.75-87.
10.Carliss Y. B. and Kim B. C., “The Value, Cost and Organizational Consequences of Modularity,”London business school, 2003.
11.Cuieford, J. P., Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
12.Durbin, J. & Watson, G.S., “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, Ⅱ“ Biometrika （30）, 1951, pp.159-178.
13.Frans A.J. van den Bosch and Raymond van Wijk, “Creation of Managerial Capabilities through Managerial Knowledge Integration: A Competence-Based Perspective,” Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence Edited by Ron Sanchez, 2000, pp. 159-176.
14.Grant, R. M., “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,”California Management Review, Spring 1991, pp. 114-135.
15.Grant, R. M., “A knowledge-Based Theory of the Inter-firm collaboration,”Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 1995, pp. 17-21.
16.Grant, R. M., Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Blackwell Publishers Inc., Oxford, UK, 1995.
17.Grant, R. M., “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal（17）, Winter 1996, pp. 109-122.
18.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis: with readings, Prentic Hall, 1995.
19.Jones, G. R., Organizational Theory: Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Addison Wesley, 1994.
20.Keller, G. & Warrack, B., Statistics for Management and Economics, 6th Ed., Duxbury Press, 1999.
21.Kaiser, H.F.,”An Index of Factorial Simplicity,”Psychometrika （39）,1974, pp.31-36.
22.Keller, G. & Warrack, B., Statistics for Management and Economics, 6th Ed., Duxbury Press, 1999.
23.Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W.L., Barney, J. B., “Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis,”（19:4）, December 1995, pp. 487-505.
24.Matusik, S.F., and Hill, C.W., “The Utilization of Contingent Work, Jnowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage,”The Academy of Management Review, （23:4）, 1998, pp. 680-697.
25.Nonaka, I. And Takeuchi, H., “The Knowledge Crating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
26.Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
27.Reed, R., and DeFillippi, R. J., “Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Limitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage,”Academy of Management Review, （15:1）, 1990, pp. 88-102.
28.Ross, J.W., Beath, C.M., Goodhue, D.L., “Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets,”Sloan Management Review, Fall 1996.
29.Simon, H.A., “The architecture of complexity,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 1962, pp. 467-482.
30.Simon, H.A., The Sciences of the Artificial, 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
31.Spender, J. C., “Knowledge, Uncertainty, and an Emergency Theory of the firm,” in C. W. Choo and N. Bontis （eds.）, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
32.Steffen P. Raub, “Towards A Knowledge-based Framework of Competence Development,” Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence Edited by Ron Sanchez, 1998, pp. 97-113.
33.Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, pp56.
34.Von Krogh, G. and Grand, S., “From Economic Theory Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm: Conceptual Building Blocks,” in C. W. Choo and N. Bontis （eds.）, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
35.Weill, P. and Broadbent, M., “Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology,”Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
36.Weill, P., Broadbent, M., and Butler, C., “Exploring How Firms View IT Infrastructure,”Working Paper, The University of Melbourne, 1996.
37.Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies, Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.