Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0715110-223844 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0715110-223844
論文名稱
Title
領導者—部屬之交換關係與組織正義對員工行為之研究:以矯正機關之戒護人員為例
A Study of Impact of Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Justice on Employee’s Behavior- A case study of officers of correction institution
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
127
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-05
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-07-15
關鍵字
Keywords
工作尋找行為、組織公民行為、組織正義、領導者-成員交換理論
Organizational Justice, Leader-Member Exchange, Job Search Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5664 次,被下載 1886
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5664 times, has been downloaded 1886 times.
中文摘要
論文摘要
論文名稱:領導者—部屬之交換關係與組織正義對員工行為之研究:以矯正機關之戒護人員為例
院校系所:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所
研究生:張家菁
指導教授:溫金豐博士
自上個世紀開始,我國獄政管理已隨著人權、人本教育潮流,逐漸由懲罰報復的模式進入矯正教育的倡導,今年(99年)矯正司吳司長憲璋傳達其願景:「打造文化監獄,開啓希望之門,型塑監獄文化,再創矯正新猶」,積極培訓各階層管教人員,希以尊重與關懷來「經營人本監獄,愛從高牆出發」。而管理犯罪人之戒護管理人員,除監控的角色外,也期使兼容愛與尊重,扮演新世代的人性工程師,因為他們是最接近收容人的第一線。因此,戒護管理人員不僅要面臨特殊的工作環境,除被要求能符合社會期待外,更要擔任人性再教育之大責,所面臨的責任已數倍於昔,而其剛柔並存又敵對的角色,是值得探究之對象。
筆者擔任科員時期,有鑑於不同科員的領導方式,造就出不同的團隊及職場氛圍,相對其團隊績效也隨之不同。在戒護同仁責任日漸繁重的今日,科員若能保持與同仁一個良善的關係,不僅能使同仁善盡其職責,更能提高其組織公民行為,而矯正機關首重之囚情也相對會穩定,如此良善的循環關係,對以愛出發、經營人本監獄之願景,才能有實現的一天。
本研究以領導者-成員交換理論,分別探討對組織正義及同仁的工作行為之影響性,以12所矯正機關之戒護管理同仁為研究對象,抽取6所機關進行前測,期能提高問卷適用性,共發出正式問卷1281份,回收951份,有效問卷716份,有效回覆率為75%。
以統計軟體SPSS驗證所提出之假設,實證結果如下:矯正機關的科員與部屬之交換關係對組織正義有正面影響;對同仁的公民行為有正面影響;矯正機關的組織正義對同仁公民行為有部分影響;組織正義在科員與部屬之交換關係與同仁的公民行為僅有部分中介影響。本文最後依實證結果,提出管理意涵與建議,期能對實務單位有所助益。
關鍵詞彙:領導者-成員交換理論、組織正義、組織公民行為、工作尋找行為
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Title: A Study of Impact of Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Justice on Employee’s Behavior- A case study of officers of correction institution
Affiliation: Institute of Human Resource Management of National Sun Yat-sen University
Student: Chia Ching Chang
Advisor: Jin Feng Uen
Jail management in Taiwan has changed into correctional education from punishment-oriented system with the development of human rights and humanistic education since last century. This year (2010), Chairperson of Department of Correction, Xian-Zhange Wu, conveyed his vision of “building and shaping prison culture to open gate of new hope and set examples of correction work” having been active in cultivating correction officers of all levels in an attempt to “manage prison with a human face” on the basis of respect and care. Correction offices, in addition to monitoring, are expected show love and respect because they are in the front line of managing inmates. In such a unique working environment, they are expected to not only fulfill social expectation but re-educate the inmates. Their increased responsibility and hostile but caring role are worthy of investigation.
Different leadership styles give rise to various team and workplace climates which result in distinct team performances. With growing responsibility, maintaining positive relationship with colleagues encourages officers to carry out duties more faithfully and improves organizational citizenship behavior as well. Besides, inmates’ emotion, the priority of correction institution, will be relatively stable. This virtuous cycle, based on love and the vision of humanistic prison, will be realized.
This study investigated the impact of leader-member exchange theory on organizational justice and employees’ behavior. Subjects were drawn from 12 correction institutions. Pre-test was conducted in 6 institutions to examine the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. 1281 copies were delivered and 951 retrieved with valid 716 copies. The valid response rate was 75%.
We used SPSS to test proposed hypotheses. Results are as follow: leader-member exchange is positive to organizational justice and to citizenship behavior; organizational justice in correction institution has partial influence on citizenship behavior; organizational justice has only intervening effect on leader-member exchange and on citizenship behavior. Recommendations and management implication of the study hopefully will benefit the intended institution.
Keyword: Leader-member Exchange Theory, Organizational Justice, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Job Search Behavior
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
第一章 緒論---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究背景--------------------------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究動機--------------------------------------------------------------------5
第三節 研究目的--------------------------------------------------------------------7
第四節 研究範圍與流程-----------------------------------------------------------9
第二章 文獻探討--------------------------------------------------------------------------11
第一節 領導理論-------------------------------------------------------------------11
第二節 領導者成員交換理論----------------------------------------------------17
第三節 組織正義-------------------------------------------------------------------23
第四節 組織公民行為-------------------------------------------------------------37
第五節 工作尋找行為-------------------------------------------------------------53
第三章 研究方法--------------------------------------------------------------------------57
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 --------------------------------------------------57
第二節 研究變項的操作型定義------------------------------------------------61
第三節 研究對象與資料蒐集---------------------------------------------------70
第四節 資料分析方法------------------------------------------------------------74
第四章 研究結果-------------------------------------------------------------------------77
第一節 描述性統計及相關分析------------------------------------------------77
第二節 領導者與部屬之交換關係與組織正義之探討---------------------79
第三節 領導者與部屬之交換關係與工作行為之探討---------------------82
第四節 組織正義對工作行為之探討------------------------------------------86
第五節 組織正義之中介效果---------------------------------------------------90
第五章 結論與建議----------------------------------------------------------------------93
第一節 研究結論------------------------------------------------------------------93
第二節 管理意涵與建議---------------------------------------------------------96
第三節 研究限制及未來研究建議--------------------------------------------100
參考文獻---------------------------------------------------------------------------------102
附錄一 原始量表---------------------------------------------------------------------110
附錄二 問卷調查---------------------------------------------------------------------114
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、中文部分
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬合譯,2006,Stephen Robbins著,組織行為學,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
何金銘,2006,統計分析方法,台南:台灣復文興業股份有限司。
吳秉恩,2006,Shriberg, David L.Shriberg, and Richa Kumari,領導學-原理與實踐,智勝文化。
吳華春,2002,由正義知覺與關係品質的觀點探討領導者權力對員工工作投入影響之實證研究,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
高明彥,2007,組織正義知覺對員工工作態度的影響-以在台外商公司為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理學系碩士論文。
馬秀蘭、吳德邦編著,2002,統計學-以SPSS for Windows 為例,新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
陳文清譯,2007,Earl Babbie著,社會科學研究方法,雙葉書廊有限公司。
陳進江,2004,組織正義、信任與知識分享行為關係之研究-以台灣高科技產業研發部門為例,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
陳帥堯,2009,組織正義與組織氣候對知識分享意圖之影響-以社會交換理論觀點,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳偉光,2006,呂氏春秋,香港中文大學。
許道然,2001,公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
溫金豐,2009,組織理論與管理二版,台北:華泰書局。
張嘉芷,2006,加油站主管領導型態對加油員顧客導向行為影響:以組織正義為干擾變項,逢甲大學高階經營管理研究所碩士論文。
廖佳君,2007,組織正義對組織承諾影響之研究-以組織信任為中介及干擾變項,國立臺南大學教育經營與管理系碩士論文。
蔡居隆,2002,領導型態與主管效能之研究-以台灣南區郵政管理局為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理學系碩士論文。
羅雅萱譯,2002,Jim Shalfer著,成功領導配方,台北:麥格羅希爾。
奇摩部落格:tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!6Z2yxa6LRE_MoGsopcJl.w--/article?mid=1128
二、英文部分
Adams, J.S. 1963. Wage inequities, productivity, and work quality, industrial relations, 3:9-16.
Adams, J.S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 2:267-299, New York:Academic Press.
Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bass, Bernard M. & Avolio, Bruce J. 1994. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, ISBN:0-8039-5236-8.
Bateman T. S., & Organ D. W. 1983. Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The relationship between affect and employee 'Citizenship'. Academy of Management Journal, 26( 4): 587-595.
Behery, Mohamed H. 2008. Leadership behaviors that really count in an organization’s performance in the Middle East - The case of Dubai. Journal of Leadership of Leadership studies, 2(2):6-21
Bies, R.J. & Moag, J.S. 1986. International justice: Communication criteria for fairness In B. Sheppard (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 289-319, Greenwich, DT:JAI Press.
Blau, P.M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.
Blau, G. 1993. Further exploring the relationship between job search and voluntary individual turnover, personnelpPsychology. Human Resource Administration Department Temple University , 46: 313-329.
Blodgett, Jeffery C. Hill, Donna J. & Tax, Stephen S. 1997. The effects of distributive procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2):185-210.
Chiaburu, Dan S. & Lim, Audrey S. 2008. Manager trustworthiness or interactional justice? Predicting organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 83:453–467.
Crosby, P. 1984. Quality Without Tears: The Art of Hassle-Free Management., McGraw-Hill.
Deutsch, M. 1975. Equity, equity and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3):137-149.
Dyne, Linn Van, Graham, Jill W. & Diensch, Validation Richard M. 1994. Organizational citizenship behavior:Construct redefinition, measurement. Academy of Management Journal, 37( 4):765-802.
Erdogan & Liden, Robert C. 2006. Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27:1–17.
Eskew, Done E. 1993. The role of organizational justice in organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3):185-194
Farh, Jiing-Lih, Podsakoff, Philip M. & Organ, Dennis W. 1990. Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16(4): 705-721.
Felps, Will, Mitchell, Terence R., Hekman, David R., Lee, Thomas W., Holtom, Brooks C. & Harman, Wendy S. 2009. Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3):545-561.
George, Graen, Fred, Dansereau Jr.& James, C. 1973a. Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among manager. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 10 (2):184-200.
Graen, George B., Scandura, Terri A.& Novak, Michael A. 1986. When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An invesitgation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 203-207.
Graen, George B. & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2):219-247.
Graen, G., Cashnnan, J., Ginsburg, F. S. & Schiemann, W. 1997. Effects of linking-pin quality on the quality of working use of lower participants. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22:491-503.
Greenberg, J. 1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1):9-22.
Greenberg, J. & McCarty, C. L. Aug. 1990. The interpersonal aspects of procedural justice: A new perspective on pay fairness, Labor Law Journal, 580-586
Greenberg J. 1990a. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75:561-568.
Greenberg, J. 1990b. Organization justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16:399-432
Greenberg, J. 2006. Losing Sleep over Organizational Injustice: Attenuating Insomniac Reactions to Underpayment Inequity with Supervisory Training in Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1):58-69.
Homan, G. C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York:Harcourt, and Brace.
Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S. & White, C. D. 2007. Control and exchange:The impact of work environment on the work effort of low relationship quality employees. The Leadership Quarterly, 18:69-84.
Kanfer, R. & Hulin , C. L. 1985. Individual differences in successful job searches following LAY-OFF. Personnel Psychology, 38:835-847.
Lerner, M.J. 1982. The justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man: A radical analysis of facts and fictions. In V.J. Derlega and J. Grezlak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping Behavior: Theories and Research. New York: Academic Press.
Leventhal, G.S. 1976. Fairness in Social Relationships, In Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Edited by J.W., Thibant, J.T., Spence & Carson, R.C., General Learning Press, Morristown, N.T., 211-239.
Leung, Alica S. M. 2008. Matching ethical work climate to in-role and extra-role behaviors in a collectivist work setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 79:43-55.
Lind, E. A. & Tayler, T. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York Plenum Press.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, Sandy J. & Sparrowe, Raymond T. 2006. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior J. Organiz. Behav., 27:723–746.
Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. 1979. Participation in decision making: One more look. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Flesearch in orgonizafionai behavior , 1:265-339, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
MacKenzie, Scott B., Podsakoff , Phillip M. & Fetter, R. 1993. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 57:70-80.
Masterson, Suzanne S., Lewis, Kyle, Goldman, Barry M. & Taylor, M. S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships., Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 736-748.
Mardanov, I. T., Maertz, C. P. & Strrett, J. L. 2008. Leader-member exchange and job satisfacton: Cross-industry comparisons and predicted employee mover. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(2):6-19.
Martin, J. 1981. Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive in justice for an era of shrinking resource. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3(1):53- 56.
Mikula G. 1980. On the role of justice in allocation decision. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction : Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychology, 20: 133-149.
Morrison , D. E. 1994. Psychological contracts and change. Human Resource Management, 33(3): 353-372.
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L. & Niehoff, B. P. 1998. Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship Behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41(3): 351-357.
Niehoff, B. P. & Moorman, R. H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and methods organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 527-556.
Organ, D. W. 1988a. A rstatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14(4): 547-557.
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Solider Syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W. 1990. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research I Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT:JAI Press, 12:43-72.
Robert, D., Bretz JR., Boudreau, J. W. & Judge, T. A. 1994. Job search behavior of employed managers. Personnel Psychology, 47: 275-298.
Robinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. 1995. Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 289-298.
Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B. & Novak, M. A. 1986. When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An invesitgation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 2:203-207.
Schnake, M. E. & Dumler, M. P. 2003. Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behavior research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76: 283-301.
Schappe, S. P. 1998. Understanding employee job satisfaction: The importance of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(4):493-503.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W. & Near J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653-663.
Sparr, Jennifer L. & Sonnentag, S. 2008. Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17:198-225.
Taylor, M. S., Tekleab, A. G. & Takeuchi, R. 2005. Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1):146-157.
Thompson, E. R. & Phua, F. T. 2005. Reliability among senior managers of the marlowe-crowne short-form social desirability scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19( 4):541-554.
Truckenbrodt, Y. B. 2000. The relationship between leader-member exchange and commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Acquisition Review Quarterly, 233-242.

Wayne, S. J., Shore, Lynn M. & Liden, R. C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: Social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 82-111.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H. & Tetrick, L. E. 2002. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3):590-598.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3):601-617.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code