Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0715113-102108 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0715113-102108
論文名稱
Title
以資本資產定價模型為基礎驗證台灣上市公司個股期望報酬與實際報酬之關係
On the expected and actual return of Taiwan listed companies based on CAPM
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
88
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-07-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-08-15
關鍵字
Keywords
股市趨勢、週轉率效應、規模效應、資本資產定價模型
Turnover rate, Trend, CAPM, Size effect
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5795 次,被下載 430
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5795 times, has been downloaded 430 times.
中文摘要
摘 要
本研究主要以資本資產定價模型(Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM)衡量股票的預期報酬,以及探討在CAPM 模型中所定義的三個參數無風險利率(risk-free rate)、beta(系統風險係數)及風險溢酬(risk premium)要如何選取才能使 CAPM 對股票預期報酬達到最佳的解釋力。同時也探討除了系統性風險會影響股票預期報酬外,是否也有其它因素對股票預期報酬同樣也具有影響及解釋力。研究中將探討總體經濟因素如:股市趨勢、原油價格對股票預期報酬的影響。另外也將驗證如:週轉率效應(Turnover Rate)、股利政策(Payout Policy)、規模效應(Size Effect)及動能效應(Momentum)對股票預期報酬有何種程度的影響以及探討這些現象是否也存在台灣股市中。

本研究將以上所提因子設計成模型實證後得到以下結論:

1.CAPM參數的選擇,其中的風險溢酬參數若採用前期大盤報酬為資料則會造成CAPM 解釋力不佳的情況。

2.台灣股市預期報酬與股市趨勢呈負相關,具有週轉率效應、規模效應及動能效應。

3.銀行業股票報酬與股市趨勢呈負相關,具有週轉率效應、規模效應,與原油價格為正相關與動能效應呈現負相關。

4.科技業股票報酬與股市趨勢呈負相關,具有週轉率效應及規模效應,與原油價格為負相關與動能效應呈現負相關。

5.傳統產業股票報酬與股市趨勢呈負相關,具有週轉率效應及規模效應,與原油價格與動能效應皆呈現正相關。與股利發放率則為負相關。
Abstract
Abstract
This study applies capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to evaluate expected returns of stocks and investigates how to choose the three parameters defined in the CPAM – risk-free rate, beta, and risk premium – to make the CPAM achieve the highest explanatory power for the stock expected return. This study also investigates, besides the systematic risk that can have an impact on stock expected return, if there are any other factors that have an impact on and explanatory power for the stock expected return. Some macroeconomic factors, such as stock market trends and the crude oil price, are studied to find out their impacts on the stock expected return. Other factors, including turnover rate, payout policy, size effect, and momentum, are also discussed in this study to examine their levels of impact on the stock expected return and to investigate if these anomalies exist in Taiwan’s stock market.

This study designs an empirical model with the above factors and concludes the following results:

1. As for the choice of the CAPM factors, if the previous period of the Taiwan Stock Exchange is used as the data source, the explanatory power of the CAPM will be low.

2. The expected return of the Taiwan Stock Exchange market has a negative correlation with the stock trends, and the expected return is influenced by the turnover rate, size effect, and momentum.




3. The expected return of the bank stocks has a negative correlation with the stock trends, the expected return is influenced by the turnover rate as well as size effect, and it has a positive correlation with the crude oil price and a negative correlation with the momentum.

4. The expected return of the technology industry stocks has a negative correlation with the stock trends, the expected return is influenced by the turnover rate as well as size effect, and it has a negative correlation with the crude oil price and a negative correlation with the momentum.


5. The expected return of the traditional industry stocks has a negative correlation with the stock trends, the expected return is influenced by the turnover rate as well as size effect, it has a positive correlation with the crude oil price as well as the momentum and a negative correlation with the dividend payout ratio.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
論文審定書 i
致 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 vi
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究架構與流程 3
第貳章 理論基礎與文獻探討 5
第一節 資本資產定價模型 5
第二節 規模效應 11
第三節 價量關係 17
第四節 總體經濟因素 22
第五節 價格動能 28
第六節 股利政策 30
第參章 研究設計 33
第一節 樣本選擇與資料來源 33
第二節 變數定義 34
第三節 研究方法 41
第肆章 實證結果 42
第一節 敘述統計 42
第二節 CAPM 參數實證結果 46
第三節 CAPM 與台灣股市趨勢實證結果 48
第四節 CAPM 與動能效應實證結果 49
第五節 CAPM 與研究模型實證結果 50
第伍章 結論與建議 66
第一節 研究結論 66
第二節 研究限制 68
第三節 後續研究建議 68
參考文獻 69
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文文獻

1. 王宗裕,2005,股票長期超額報酬之基準模型分析,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班。

2. 方文碩、張富豪及林治邦,1998,臺灣地區貨幣數量、通貨膨脹與股票市場活動,臺灣銀行季刊 49:2 民87.06 頁37-57。

3. 王天賜,2005,原油價格、台灣股價指數與總體經濟的關聯性,國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。

4. 王智鈴,2004,台灣股市規模效應之再驗證,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。

5. 王瑪如,1994,股票、債券、外匯、黃金報酬率之因果關係與經濟變數關係之研究,台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。

6. 王錦瑩,2003,台灣上市公司盈餘分配行為對股價影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。

7. 余招賢,1997,台灣股票市場風險、規模、淨值/市價比、成交量週轉率與報酬之關係,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
8. 吳怡慧,2011,臺灣加權股價指數與總體經濟變數之關聯性研究,國立中正大學經濟學系國際經濟學碩士論文。

9. 吳貞宜,2007,以 Hansen 門檻迴歸探討台灣股票市場異常報酬之研究,國立成功大學統計學研究所碩士論文。

10.李政翰,1991,台灣證券市場規模效果和股利政策對股價報酬影響之探討,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

11.李春安、羅進水及蘇永裕,2006,動能策略報酬、投資人情緒與景氣循環之研究,Journal of Financial Studies Vol.14 No.2 June 2006。

12.李春旺,1988,股票行為與規模效應:台灣股票市場實證研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。

13.林大偉,2010,台灣市場小型股與成交量之實證關係,國立政治大學金融學系碩士班碩士論文。

14.林幸君、蘇漢邦及徐世勳,2005,”An economy-wide analysis of impacts on Taiwan of oil price increase using the technology bundle approach?”,國立台北大學經濟學系第九屆經濟發展學術研討會,5 月 21 日。
15.林秋炭,1991,經濟因素、公司規模與股票報酬關係之研究,東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

16.林楚雄、劉維琪及吳欽杉,1997,台灣股票市場報酬的期望值與條件波動之關係,交大管理學報,第十七卷第三期,第 103-124 頁。
17.洪倩華,1997,股票報酬率與週轉率變動關係之探討-以電子股為例,國立中興大學(台北) 企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
18.張升寶,1989,股價震盪幅度的衡量與分析,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

19.張銘輝,2001,新上市首次股利宣告與股價關連性研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

20.梁發進,1989,台灣之貨幣供給、股票價格與通貨膨脹,臺灣銀行季刊,第 40 卷第 4 期,民國七十八年十二月,1-27。

21.許振明、蔡佳珍,1993,股價與經濟因素之關聯性分析與預測:MTV及主成份迴歸分析,台大管理論叢,第 4 卷第 1 期,民國八十二年五月,79-104。
22.郭明錫,1991,套利理論應用於規模效應之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。

23.陳怡靜,2001,台灣地區總體經濟因素與股票和債券報酬關係之實證研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。


24.陳東明,1990,台灣股票市場價量關係之實證研究,台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。

25.陳建良,1994,我國股票市場異常現象之實證研究,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

26.陳榮昌,2002,台灣股票報酬之結構分析,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班。

27.曾奕傑,2006,台灣上市公司股票報酬率與成交量間動態關係之研究,國立臺北大學合作經濟學系研究所碩士論文。

28.黃文芳,1995,台灣股市價量線性與非線性關係之研究,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

29.黃昭祥,2005,法人投資行為、成交量、與報酬可預測性-台灣股市動能效應或反轉現象之再探,國立雲林科技大學管理研究所博士班博士論文。
30.楊踐為、王章誠,1999,台灣股價指數與融資、融券及成交量間資訊傳遞結構之研究證券櫃檯,第四十一期,第 1-14 頁。

31.楊錕銘,2004,以縱橫門檻迴歸再次檢試台灣股票市場之規模效應,逢甲大學經營管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。

32.葉銀華,1991,台灣股票市場成交量與股價關係之實證研究-轉換函數模式,台北市銀月刊第22卷第11期,57-70。

33.葉銘龍,1996,台灣股票店頭市場價量關係之實證研究,朝陽技術學院財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。

34.詹家昌,1991,台灣股市過度反應之實證研究,東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

35.鄒孟文,1993,台灣股價指數與貨幣供給之因果關係檢定,台灣經金融月刊,第 29 卷第 12 期,民國八十二年十二月,26-34。

36.雷雅淇,2000,公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票超常報酬關係之實證研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
37.劉亞秋、黃理哲及劉維琪,1994,台灣股市報酬率決定因素實證分析,證券暨金融市場之理論與實務研討會論文集,中山大學管理學院財務管理系所編印,頁32-45。

38.劉映興、陳家彬,2002,臺灣股票市場交易值、交易量與發行量加權股價指數關係之實證研究--光譜分析之應用,農業經濟半年刊,第七十二卷,第 65-87 頁。
39.劉緯宸,2006,台灣股票市場規模效應與外資效應實證,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。

40.潘威豪,2000,台灣股市類股週轉率與報酬率及報酬波動之關係研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

41.蔡明章,2009,影響台灣股市波動因素之探討,國立台北大學國際財務金融系碩士論文。

42.蔡瑋哲,2005,股價與股利間的非線性探討,逢甲大學經濟學系碩士班碩士論文。

43.蕭翠玥,1990,台灣地區上市公司股票報酬規模效應之實證研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

44.謝朝顯,1994,追漲殺跌投資策略之實証研究-台灣股市效率性之再檢定,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。

45.顏佳欣,2006,總體經濟指標預測股價指數報酬率之實證研究-STAR 模型之應用,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。








英文文獻

1. Bacmann, J. F., M. Dubois, and D. Isakov, 2001 , Industries, business cycle and profitability of momentum strategies: An international perspectives,EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings.

2. Banz, Rolf W., 1981, The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stock, Journal of Financial Economics,9 ,3-18.

3. Barry, C.B. and Brown, S.J., 1984, Differential information and the small firm effect, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.13, pp.283- 295.

4. Baskin, J, 1989, An Empirical Investigation of the Pecking Order Hypothesis, Financial Management, spring 1989.

5. Basu, S, 1983, The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence , Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 129-156.

6. Berk, J., 1997, Does Size Really Matter?, Financial analyssts Journal, Vol. 53, No. 5.
7.
8. Blume, L., D. Easley, and M. O’Hara, 1994, Market-statistics and technical analysis: the role of volume, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, 153- 181.

9. Bodie, Z., 1976, COMMON STOCKS AS A HEDGE AGAINST INFLATION, Journal of Finance,Volume 31, Issue 2, pages 459–470,May 1976.

10. Brennan, M. J. and Subrahmanyam, A., 1996, Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 41,441-464.

11. Campbell J. Y., S. J. Grossman, and J. Wang, 1993, Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108,905-939.

12. Ciner, C., 2002, The Stock Price-Volume Linkage on the Toronto Stock Exchange:Before and After Automation, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol.19,No.4, 335–349.

13. Chan, K,C., Chen, N. F., 1991, Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms,Journal of Finance 46,1467-1484.

14. Chan, Louis. K.C., Jegadeesh, N., and Lakonishok,J., 1996, Momentum strategies, Journal of Finance 51,p 1681-1713.

15. Charest,G., 1978, Dividend Information, Stock Returns and Market Efficiency---II,Journal of Financial Economics,6,297-330.

16. Chordia, T., and L. Shivakumar, 2002, Momentum, business cycle and time-varying expected return, Journal of Finance 57, 985-1019.

17. Chui, C. W. A. and Wei, K. C. J., 1997, Book-to-market, firm size, and turn-of-the-year effect: Evidence from pacific-basin emerging market, Working Paper, Hong Kong University.

18. Clark, P. K., 1973, A Subordinate Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices, Econometrica, 41, 135–155.

19. Close,N., 1975, Price Reaction to Large Transaction in the Canadian Equity Market,Financial Analyst Journal, Vol.31, pp.50-57.

20. Comiskey, E. E., Walkling , and M. A. Weeks , 1984, Dispersion of Expectation and Trading Volume, working paper, GA Inst.of Tech.

21. Conrad, Jennifer, S.,Hameed, A.,and Niden, C., 1994, Volume and autocovariancesin short-horizon individual security returns, Journal of Finance 49,1305-1330.

22. Copeland, T. E, 1976 , A Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival, Journal of Finance, 31, 1149-1168.

23. Cornell, B., 1981, The Relationship between Volume and Price Variability in Futures Markets,Journal of Futures Markets ,Vol.1, 1981, pp.303-316.


24. Datar, V., N. Naik, and R. Radcliffe, 1998, Liquidity and asset returns: an alternative test, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 1, 203-220.

25. Elton, E. and Gruber M., 1970, Marginal stockholder tax rates and the clientele effect, Review of Economics and Statistics 52, Feb 1970, 68-74.

26. Epps, T. W., 1975, Security Price Changes and Transaction Volume, American Economic Review, Vol.65, 1975, pp.586-597.

27. Epps, T., and Epps, M. , 1976, The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture of distributions hypothesis, Econometrica 44, 305-321.

28. Fama, E.F., 1975, Shrot-Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation, American Economic Review, p269-282, June 1975.

29. Fama, E.F., 1981, Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation and Money, American Economic Review 71,1981,545-565.

30. Fama, E.F., and Kenneth R. French, 1992, The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns Journal of Finance,June,427-465.

31. Fama, E.F., and MacBeth, J. D., 1973, Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, Journal of Political Economy May - Jun., Vol. 81, No. 3 , pp. 607-636.

32. Fant, L.F., Peterson, D.R, 1995, The effect of size, book-to-market equity, prior returns, and beta on stock returns:January versus the remainder of the year, Journal of Finance Research,18,129-142.


33. Fisher, I., 1930, THE THEORY OF INTEREST, AS DETERMINED BY IMPATIENCE TO SPEND INCOME AND OPPORTUNITY TO INVEST IT, published by Liberty Fund, Inc.,

34. Gervais S., Kaniel R. and Mingelgrin D.H., 2001, The High-Volume Return Premium,Journal of Finance, vol. LVI, pp.878-919.

35. Gordon, M. J., 1963, Management of Corporate Capital-Optimal Investment and Financing Policy, Journal of Finance, May, Vol.18, 264-272.

36. Hamilton, James D., 1983, Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II,, Journal Politic Economy, 91, No.2, 228-248.

37. Huang, Y.S., 1997, The size anomaly on the Taiwan Stock Exchange,Applied Financial Letters, Vol.4,7-12.

38. Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman, 1993, Return to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance ,48,65-91.

39. James, C., S.Koreisha,M.Partch, 1985, A VARMA Analysis of the Causal Relations among Stock Returns,Real Output and Nominal Interest Rates , Journal of Finance ,40, 1985, 1375-1384.


40. Karpoff, J. M., 1987, The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 109-126.

41. Kaul,G., 1987, Stock Returns and Inflation-The Role of the Monetary Sector , Journal of Financial Economics ,18,1987,253-276.

42. Keim, Donald B., 1983, Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality : Further Empirical Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, June,13-32.


43. Lee,Bong-Soo, 1992, Causal Relations among Stock Returns, Interest Rates, Real Activity and Inflation , Journal of Finance ,47,1992,1591-1604.

44. Lintner, J., 1965, The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47:1, pp. 13–37.

45. Lo, A. and Mackinlay, A.C., 1990. When are contrarian profits due to stock market overreaction?, The Review of Financial studies, pp. 175-208.

46. Long, D.Michael., 2007, An Examination of the Price-Volume Relationship in the Option Markets , International Research Journal of Finance and Economics ,Issue 10 ,47-56.


47. Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1. Mar, pp. 77-91.

48. Martikainen, T., V. Puttonen, M. Luoma, and T. Rothovious, 1994, The Linear and Non-linear Dependence of Stock Returns and Trading Volume in the Financial Stock Market,Applied Financial Economics,Vol.4, 1994, pp.159-169.

49. Miller,M.H. and F. Modigliani, 1961, Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares, the Journal of Business,34(4),411-433.

50. Moskowitz, T.J. and Grinblatt, M., 1999, Do Industries explain momentum, Journal of Finance ,54,p 1249-1290.


51. Neumann, John J., Kenny, Peppi M., 2007, Does Mad Money Make the Market Go Mad? Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance 47, (5): 602-15.

52. Osborne, M. F. M., 1959, Brownian Motion in the Stock Market Operations Research, 7,145-173.

53. Reinganum, Marc R., 1981, Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies Based on Earnings’ Yield and Market Values, Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, March, vol. 9(1), pages 19-46,.

54. Roll, R., 1981, A possible explanation of small firm effect, Journal of Financial,36,879-888.

55. Rouwenhorst, K. G., 1998, International momentum strategies, Journal of Finance ,53, 267-284.

56. Schwert, G. W., 1989, Why Does Stock Market Volatility, Change overTime?, Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, p1115-1154.

57. Sharpe, W.F., 1964, Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3. (Sep., 1964), pp. 425-442.

58. Spence,M., 1973, Job Market Signaling, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3),355-374.

59. Stoll, H.R. and Whaley, R.E., 1983, Transaction costs and the small firm effect, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.12, pp.57-79.

60. Ted, L. L. and DeBondt, W. F. M.,1996,Hedging behavior and stock returns: An exploratory investigation, Working Paper, UCLA.

61. Titman S. and A. Warga, 1989, Stock Returns as Predictors of Interest Rates and Inflation , Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis ,24,1989,47-58.


62. Tseng, K.C., 1988, Low Price, Price-earnings Ratio, Market Value, and Abnormal Stock Returns The Financial Review,23,333-343.

63. Watts,R., 1973, The Information Content of Dividends, the Journal of Business,191-211.

64. Xavier Garza-Gómez , Jiro Hodoshima and Michio Kunimura, 1998, Does Size Really Matter in Japan Financial Analyst Journal,NOV,22-34.

65. Ying, C. C., 1966, Stock Market Prices and Volumes of Sales. Econometrica, 34,676-686.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code