Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0717112-100836 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0717112-100836
論文名稱
Title
新實證醫學證據對第一線醫療行為的影響-以糖尿病用藥rosiglitazone為例
How doctors practiced the new evidence
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
26
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-04-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-07-17
關鍵字
Keywords
醫療行為、醫師、心肌梗塞、糖尿病、實證醫學
rosiglitazone, diabetes mellitus, practice, doctors, Evidence-based medicine, myocardial infarction
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5740 次,被下載 997
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5740 times, has been downloaded 997 times.
中文摘要
實證醫學愈來愈受重視的此時,已有許多研究透過問卷的方式,討論實證醫學的結論無法轉化為臨床行為的因素。然而,在本研究初發表於國外期刊之前,尚未有研究探討當一個實證醫學證據發生後,是哪些特性的醫師實行了該實證,又需花多少時間才能落實。本研究即是透過健保資料庫,回溯性地探討,當2007年rosiglitazone一藥物被以最高等級的實證醫學證據的統合分析方法,發現使用的病患會有較高的心肌梗塞機率後的一年半內,此藥物被終止使用的情形。
使用資料庫研究的缺點之ㄧ為無法探知個案醫師的主觀實證醫學看法,故本研究設計了兩個模式來探討終止處方醫師的特性。在模式A下,期能最敏感地收案終止開立rosiglitazone藥物的醫師;而在模式B下,期能最特異地收案。本研究假設,母群體醫師的特性表現,當在此兩模式呈現的醫師特性之間。
本研究發現,內科專科醫師及專科醫師年資在十年以上的醫師,顯著有較多的比例終止處方。在不同的醫院層級工作的醫師間,則無顯著的差異。對於在診所執業的醫師來說,執業縣市的社會化程度及經濟狀況則非決定其實證醫學表現的因素。亦即病患仍無足夠力量影響該地區的診所醫師表現得更符合實證醫學。而醫師實行實證醫學所需的時間,平均在兩季以上,較英美要來的長。
本研究發現,在臺灣,實證醫學的實行,仍有很大的改善空間,而成立一個權威的機構做實證醫學即時的分析與建議,有其必要性。
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) receives significant attention worldwide. Many studies have used questionnaires to discuss the factors obstructing the practice of EBM. There has however been no large-scale data analysis on who and when to practice EBM. This study aims to fill this gap in research by applying nationally representative data to analyze EBM practice after the provision of new evidence regarding rosiglitazone prescription.
Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Database in Taiwan to analyze the changes in the prescription of rosiglitazone after meta-analysis found the drug to increase the risk of myocardial infarction. The study period was 18 months from the second quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter in 2008. Two models of doctors’ prescription behaviors were analyzed in the study. We conducted univariate analyses to distinguish significant differences in the variable and applied multivariate logistic analyses to predict the probability of physicians ceasing to prescribe rosiglitazone.
Results: We found a significant improvement in EBM practice from specialists and experienced physicians. When compared to other specialists, endocrinologists were four times more likely to change rosiglitazone prescription (OR: 4.129, 95% CI: 2.484-6.863). Doctors with more than 10 years of specialist experience performed better in EBM practice than younger doctors. The hospital level that a physician worked at was not a significant factor. Local urbanization and economic status did not affect the practice of EBM by physicians in clinics either.
Conclusions: Our study found that the EBM was still not well practiced among doctors in Taiwan. The practice of new evidence depended on the specialty or professional experience. Younger doctors and doctors working in medical centers seemed not to practice EBM well. In clinics, patients did not have enough influence to modify the doctor’s prescription behavior. There was a significant time lag between the EBM emergence and EBM practice. This suggests that setting up an authoritative organization to provide timely EBM recommendations is very important. Further improvements to the practice of EBM are still urgently needed within the medical community.
目次 Table of Contents
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
Introduction 1
Method 3
Statistical analysis........................................................................... ..............................6
Results………………........................................................................................6
Discussion…………………………………………………………………………..10
Conclusion. 15
Reference………………………………………..………………………………… .. 16
Content of Tables
Table 1……………………………………………………………………………8
Table 2……………………………………………………………………………9
Table 3…………………………………………………………………………..11
Table 4…………………………………………………………………………..12
參考文獻 References
1. Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powwe, N. R. (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1458-1465.
2. Dijk, N. V., Hooft, L., Waard, M. W. (2010) What are the barriers to residents’ practicing evidence-based medicine? A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 85, 1163-1170.
3. Oliveri, R., S., Gluud, C., Wille-Jorensen, P., A. Hospital doctors’ self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine- a questionnaire survey (2004) Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10, 219-226.
4. Poolman, R., W., Sierevelt, I., N., Farrokhyar, F., Mazel, J., A., Blankevoort, L., Bhandari, M. (2007) Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: are surgeons getting better? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89, 206-215.
5. Glaab, T., Banik, N., Rutschmann, O., T., Wencher, W. (2006) National survey of guideline-compliant COPD management among pneumologists and primary care physicians. COPD, 3, 141-148.
6. Olomu, A., B., Grzybowski, M., Ramanath, V., S., Rogers, A., M., Vautaw, B., M., Chen, B., Roychoudhury, C., Jackson, E., A., Eagle, K., A. (2010) Evidence of disparity in the application of quality improvement efforts for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Initiative in Michigan. American Heart Journal, 159, 377-384.
7. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H. (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes. Diabetes care, 27, 1047-1053.
8. Israili, Z., H. (2011) Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Therapeutics, 18, 117-152.
9. Nissen, S., E., Wolski, K. (2007) Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 2457-2471.
10. Singh, S., Loke, Y., K., Furberg, C., D. (2007) Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1189-1195.
11. American diabetes association (2007) Standards of medical care in diabetes-2007. Diabetes care, 30 (Suppl 1), 4-41.
12. American diabetes association (2008) Standards of medical care in diabetes-2008. Diabetes care, 31 (Suppl 1), 12-54.
13. Woodcock, J. Food and Drug Administration (2010). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM226959.pdf (last accessed 26 May 2011).
14. Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Available at:
http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=661&WD_ID=689&webdata_id=3108 (last accessed 26 May 2011).
15. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Available at: http://srh.dgbas.gov.tw/hysearch/cgi/redirect.exe?url=http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs1/handbook/bs2/p2-6.xls&group=AA&title=p2-6%20%20
http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15408&CtNode=4594 (last accessed 26 May 2011).
16. Luhn, H. (1976) Better educated consumer will demand accuracy, honesty in advertising. Communication: Journalism Education Today, 10, 10-11.
17. Bjorn, F., Takao, E. (2009) Economic influences on perceived value, quality expectations and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Consumer Study, 33, 72-82.
18. National Health Research Institute. Available at:
http://w3.nhri.org.tw/nhird/en/Data_Subsets.html#S2 (last accessed 26 May 2011).
19. Ministry of the Interior, Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Available at: http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/m1-07.xls (last accessed 26 May 2011).
20. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Available at: http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp# (last accessed 26 May 2011).
21. Jacob, G., Stuart, H., V., Clim, C., L. (2009) Thiazolidinediones and the influence of media adverse reporting on prescribing attitudes in PraCTice study. Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 27, 83-88.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code