Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0720107-182301 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0720107-182301
論文名稱
Title
組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向與組織的「民主化程度」 及「公民營特質」對組織成員政治知覺之影響
The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and machiavellianism, the degree of democracy, and the characteristics of public and privacy organization.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-07-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-07-20
關鍵字
Keywords
馬基維利人格傾向、民主化程度、公民營特質、組織政治知覺
The characteristics of public and privacy organization, Perceptions of organizational politics, Machiavellianism, The degree of democracy
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5669 次,被下載 27
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5669 times, has been downloaded 27 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的在於依循Ferris et al.(1989)模型探討組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向與組織的民主化程度及公民營特質對組織成員政治知覺之影響。
本研究對象包括十三個公營機構七百五十四份問卷,及十七個民營機構八百五十九份問卷,共計發出2356份問卷,回收1745份,回收率達74.07﹪,剔除無效問卷132份,有效問卷為1613份,有效問卷回收率68.46%。調查資料分別使用描述性統計、信度分析、相關分析、探索性因素分析、層級線性模型等分析方法。
本研究結果發現:
1.組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對組織成員的政治知覺
有顯著之影響。
2.組織的民主化程度對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著之影
響。
3.組織的公民營特質對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著之影
響。
4.組織的民主化程度對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向
對組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
5.組織的公民營特質對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對
組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
英文文獻
Cropanzano, R., John C. Howes, & Alicia A. Grandey, 1997,The Relationship of Organizational
Politics & Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes, & Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior,
Vol.18, 159-180.
Cropanzano R., Kacmar K.M., & Bozeman, 1995,The social setting of work organizations, Westport.
Daft, R.L.,1989, Organization theory & design(3rd ed.), St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
Farrell D., & Petersen J. C., 1982, Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations, Academy of
Management Review, Vol.7, No.3, 403-412.
Ferris., Fedor., Chachere., & Pondy, 1989, Myths & politics in organizational contexts, Group &
Organizational Studies, Vol.14, 88-103.
Ferris., Frink.,Gilmore.,& Kacmar., 1994, Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional
Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor, Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
24,13,1204-1220.
Ferris G.R., 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris G.R., & Judge.T.A., 1991, Personnel/Human Resources Management: A Political Influence
Perspective, Journal of Management, Vol.17,No.2, 447-488.
Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1991, Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale(POPS): Development
& Construct Validation, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.51,No.1, 193-205.
Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of Management,
Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.
Ferris, G.R., 1994,Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational
Politics as a Stressor , Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24, 13, 1204-1220.
Ferris, G.R., 1996,Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, 1996, Reactions of Diverse Groups to Politics in the Workplace,
Journal of Management, Vol.22, No.1, 23-44.
Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, Maria Carment Galang, Jing Zhou, K. Michele Kacmar, & Jack L.
Howard, 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris, G.R., & K.Michele Kacmar, 1992,Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of
Management, Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.
Abstract
This research goal lies in relies on Ferris et the al. (1989) model discussion to organize member's Machiavellianism advantage personality tendency and the organization “the democratized degree”and “the male privately operated special characteristic” to organizes influence the member politics consciousness.
This object of study including 13 public-operated organization 754 questionnaire, and 17 privately operated organization 859 questionnaire, total sends out 2356 questionnaire, recycles 1745, the returns-ratio reaches 74.07 ﹪, rejection invalid questionnaire 132, the effective questionnaire is 1613, effective questionnaire returns-ratio 68.46%. The investigation material uses the descriptive to count, analysis methods separately and so on letter analysis, correlation analysis, exploring factor analysis, level linear model.
This findings discovered that,1.organizes member's Machiavellianism advantage personality tendency to organize member's political consciousness to have the remarkable sound.2.organization's democratized degrees to organize member's political consciousness not remarkable influence.3.organization's male privately operated special characteristics to organize member's political consciousness to have the remarkable influence.4.organization's democratized degrees to “organize member's Machiavellianism advantage personality tendency to organize the member politics consciousness the influence” not to have the disturbance effect.5.Organization's male privately operated special characteristic to “organizes member's Machiavellianism advantage personality tendency to organize the member politics consciousness the influence” not to have the disturbance effect.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機..........................................1
第二節 研究目的......................................................3
第三節 研究流程......................................................4
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 組織政治與組織政治知覺..........................5
第二節 馬基維利人格傾向與組織政治知覺........13
第三節 組織民主化與組織政治知覺....................18
第四節 公民營組織與組織政治知覺....................22
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構....................................................26
第二節 研究假設....................................................27
第三節 研究對象及資料分析方法........................27
第四節 研究變項操作性定義與衡量工具............32
第五節 量表之因素及信度分析............................35
第四章 資料分析結果
第一節 樣本描述....................................................37
第二節 前因變項與組織政治知覺之相關分析....38
第三節 層級線性模型............................................39
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論....................................................49
第二節 管理實務建議............................................51
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議........................53
中文參考文獻............................................................54
英文參考文獻............................................................55
附錄—研究問卷........................................................59
參考文獻 References
古永嘉譯,1996,企業研究方法,台北:華泰書局。
朱建平,2002,組織成員的政治知覺對離職傾向之
影 響:工作滿足的中介效果,國立中山大學人力資
源管理研究所碩士論文。
李安民,2001,組織政治知覺對員工態度之影響—某
大學的實證分析,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究
所碩士論文。
何金銘,2001,統計法輯要,台南:台灣復文興業股
份有限公司。
何金銘,2003,組織政治知覺研究現況的缺撼,國立
中山大學人力資源管理研究所授課講義。
吳孝慈,2001,組織政治知覺及其對組織承諾之影響
—某大學的實證分析,國立中山大學人力資源管理
研究所碩士論文。
黃素貞,2001,員工組織政治知覺與工作投入及工作
績效關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究
所碩士論文。
陳安瀅,2002,組織政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾
因素-以工作滿足為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理
研究所碩士論文。
陳義勝、蘇明琪、劉仲矩,1997,「組織政治知覺與
組織承諾關係之研究」,企銀季刊,22卷2期15~27。
陳義勝,1981,企業主持人人格、組織結構與組織效
果關係之研究,國立政治大學企業研究所博士論文。
陳黃煌,1996,組織結構、工作特性對組織政治知覺
與組織承諾關係之研究,文化大學國際企業管理研
究所碩士論文。
張紹勳等,2000,SPSS For Windows統計分析-初等
統計與高等統計,台北:松崗公司。
黃英忠,2001,現代管理學,第四版,台北:華泰書
局。
黃俊英,2000,多變量分析,台北:華泰書局。
黃俊英、林震岩,1994,企業研究方法,台北:華泰
書局。
彭彥綺,2006,馬基維利主義傾向與向上影響行為之關聯研究,國立中山大學人
力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
曾淑雯,2002,個人、組織、環境因素在組織政治知覺形成過程中所扮演的角色,
國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
趙必孝,2000,國際化管理-人力資源觀點,台北:華泰書局。
楊思琪,2002,組織政治知覺的類型與各類型組織政治知覺的形成因素,國立中
山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
劉仲矩,1994,馬基維利傾向與工作成效及工作滿足關係之研究,淡江大學國際
企業學研究所碩士論文。
魏秀花,1997,本國與外籍勞工個人特質、工作特性、工作壓力、工作滿意度與
勞動生產力關係之研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇明琪,1994,組織政治知覺對組織承諾之影響研究,淡江大學國際企業研究所
碩士論文。
蘇麗美,2002,組織政治知覺的類型及各類型中組織政治知覺對組織承諾與工作
績效的影響,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
Cropanzano, R., John C. Howes, & Alicia A. Grandey, 1997,The Relationship of Organizational
Politics & Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes, & Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior,
Vol.18, 159-180.
Cropanzano R., Kacmar K.M., & Bozeman, 1995,The social setting of work organizations, Westport.
Daft, R.L.,1989, Organization theory & design(3rd ed.), St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
Farrell D., & Petersen J. C., 1982, Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations, Academy of
Management Review, Vol.7, No.3, 403-412.
Ferris., Fedor., Chachere., & Pondy, 1989, Myths & politics in organizational contexts, Group &
Organizational Studies, Vol.14, 88-103.
Ferris., Frink.,Gilmore.,& Kacmar., 1994, Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional
Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor, Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
24,13,1204-1220.
Ferris G.R., 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris G.R., & Judge.T.A., 1991, Personnel/Human Resources Management: A Political Influence
Perspective, Journal of Management, Vol.17,No.2, 447-488.
Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1991, Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale(POPS): Development
& Construct Validation, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.51,No.1, 193-205.
Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of Management,
Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.
Ferris, G.R., 1994,Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational
Politics as a Stressor , Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24, 13, 1204-1220.
Ferris, G.R., 1996,Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, 1996, Reactions of Diverse Groups to Politics in the Workplace,
Journal of Management, Vol.22, No.1, 23-44.
Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, Maria Carment Galang, Jing Zhou, K. Michele Kacmar, & Jack L.
Howard, 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &
Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
Ferris, G.R., & K.Michele Kacmar, 1992,Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of
Management, Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.Ferris, Harrell-Cook, & Dulebohn, 1999, Political Behaviors as Moderators of the Perceptions of
Organizational Politics -- Work Outcomes Relationships, Journal of Organizational Behavior,
Vol.20, 1093-1105.
Ferris, Kiewitz, Christian, Gerald R., Hochwarter, & Wayne A., 2002, The role of psychological
climate in Neutralizing the effects of organizational politics on work outcomes, Journal of
Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32, No.6, 1189.
Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989, Politics in organizations, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gandz J., & Murray V., 1980, The Experience of Workplace Politics, Academy of Management
Journal, Vol.23, No.2, 237-251.
Hackman, & Oldham, 1980, Work redesign, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hochwarter, Perrewe, Ferris, & Guercio, 1999, Commitment as an Antidote to the Tension & Turnover
Consequences of Organizational Politics, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.55, 277-297.
Ing-Chung Huang, Chih-Hsun Jason Chuang, & Hao-Chieh Lin, 2003, The Role of Burnout in the
Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics & Turnover Intentions, Public
Personnel Management, Vol.32, No.4, 519.
Jabin, F. M.,1981, An exploratory study of subordinates’ perceptions of supervisory politics,
Communication Quarterly, Fall, 269-275.
Jex, Beehr, 1991, Emerging theoretical issues in the study of work-related stress, Greenwich, CT.
Kacmar, & Dawn s. Carlson, 1997,Further Validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (POPS): A
Multiple Sample Investigation, Journal of Management, Vol.23, No.5, 627-658.
Kacmar, K.M., 1999, An Examination of Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication &
Extension, Human Relations, Vol.52, No.3, 384-415.
Kacmar, K.M., Dennis P. Bozeman, Dawn S. Carison, & William P. Anthony, 1999, An Examination of
Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication & Extension, Human Relations,
Vol.135, No.3, 301-312.
Katz, Kahn,1978, The social psychology of organizations(2nd ed.), New York.
Larwood, Laurie., Thomas A Wright, Stephan Desrochers, & Veronica Dahir, 1998, Extending latent
role & psychological contract theories to predict intent to turnover & politics in business
organizations, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 23, 100-123.
Madison D. L., 1980, Organizational Politics: An Exploration of Managers' Perceptions, Human
Relations, Vol.33, No.2, 79-100.
Martha C. Adnres, L.A. Witt & K. Michele Kacmar, 2001, The interactive effect of organizational
politics & exchange ideology manager ratings of retention, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62,357-369.
Matthew,Valle., K. Michele Kacmar, Suzanne Zivnuska, 2003, Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations &
Organizational Politics Perceptions. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, Vol.5,
No.1, 13.
Matthew, Valle., L.A.Witt, 2001, The Moderating Effect of Teamwork Perceptions on the
Organizational Politics -- Job Satisfaction Relationship. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141,
No.2, 379-388.
Mayes, B. T., & Allen Robert W., 1977, Toward A Definition of Organizational Politics, Academy of
Management Review, October, 672-678.
McGrath, J. E., 1976, Stress & behavior in organizations, Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Nye, Lendell G., & Wittl.Alan, 1993, Dimensionality & Construct Validity of The POPS. Educational
& Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No.3, 821.
Parker, Dipboye, 1995,Perceptions of Organizational Politics : An Investigation of Antecedents &
Consequences, Journal of Management,Vol.21, No.5, 891-912.
Pfeffer, J., 1992, Managing with power, Boston.Politics: A Confirmatory Analysis, Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, Vol.25, No.19, 1747-1764.
Poon, June, M.L., 2003, Situational antecedents & outcomes of organizational politics perceptions,
Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.18, (Iss 1/2), 138.
Randall, Marjorie L., Russell Cropanzano, Carol A. Bormann, & Andrej Birjulin, 1999, Organizational
Politics & Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance, &
Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, 159-174.
Sutton, Kahn, 1986, Prediction, understanding, & control as antidotes to organizational stress, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Taylor, Ashford, 1990, Adptation to work transitions: An integrative approach. Greenwich, CT.
Tetrick L. E., & LaRocco J. M.,1987, Understanding, Prediction, & Control as Moderators of the
Relationships Between Perceived Stress, Satisfaction, & Psychological Well-Being, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol.72,No.4, 538-543.
Vigoda, Eran., 2002, Stress-Related Aftermaths to Workplace Politics: the Relationships Among
Politics, Job Distress, & Aggressive Behavior in Organizations, Journal of Organizational
Behavior, Vol.23, 571-591.
Wayne A. Hochwarter, Charles Kacmar, Pamela L. Perrewe & Diane Johnson, 2003, Perceived
organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions & work
outcomes, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.63, 438-456.
Wayne A. Hochwarter, K. Michele Kacmar, 2000, Research Reports Perceptions of Organizational
Politics as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Conscientiousness & Job Performance,
Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.85,No.4, 472-478.
Wendy E. O'Connor, 2001, A Comparison of Situational & Dispositional Predictors of Perceptions of
Organizational Politics, The Journal of Psychology, Vol.135 , No.3, 301-312.
Witt L. A, Andrews Martha C, & Kacmar K Michele, 2000, The Role of Participation in
Decision-Making in the Organizational Politics-Job Satisfaction Relationship, Human Relations,
Vol.53,No.3, 341-358.
Witt, L. A., K Michele Kacmar, Dawn S Carlson, & Suzanne Zivnuska, 2002, Interactive effects of
personality & organizational politics on contextual performance, Journal of Organizational
Behavior, Vol.23, No.8, 911.
Witt, L.A., Patti, Anthony L., Farmer, & William L., 2002, Organizational politics & work identity as
predictors of organizational commitment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32, No.3,
486.
Valle, Matthew, 1997, Perceptions of Organizational Politics An Subsequent Behaviors, Psychological
Reports, Vol.81, 945-946.
Zaleznik, Howard, 1977, Stress reactions in organizations: Syndromes, causes, & consequences,
Behavior Science, Vol.22, 151-162.
Zhou J., & Gerald R. Ferris, 1995,The Dimensions & Consequences of Organizational Politics: A
Confirmatory Analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.25, No.19, 1747-1764.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.238.79.169
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.238.79.169
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code