Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0720108-142238 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0720108-142238
論文名稱
Title
組織文化、知識循環過程與工作績效關係之研究
Organizational Culture, Knowledge Circulation Processes, and Job Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
114
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-06-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-20
關鍵字
Keywords
知識循環過程、組織文化、知識管理績效指標、組織結構、工作績效、知識管理促動因素
Knowledge management enablers, job performance, Knowledge management performance index, Knowledge circulation process, organizational structure, organizational culture
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5843 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5843 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
自從1996年經濟合作發展組織(OECD)發表「以知識為基礎的經濟」後,知識將改變全球經濟的發展,成為最重要的生產因素。而隨著網際網路與資訊科技的融入,使得知識管理真正有了可以實際驗證的機會。
知識管理促動因素並不是全新的議題,在許多的文獻中都曾提及知識管理促動因素對知識管理的影響,但知識管理到底是如何影響知識管理程序的運作一直未曾有深入的探討。且知識管理發展了數年,我們卻一直無法評估知識管理成效是否顯著,雖已有不少學者發展出衡量知識管理的績效指標,但是卻未見有較收斂的知識管理績效指標。
本研究的目的在於建立知識管理促動因素、知識管理程序、組織績效,三個構面所形成的一整合模式,知識管理促動因素會經由知識管理程序的運作進而能影響組織的績效。並希望可為企業提供一個衡量知識管理績效之方式,透過績效產生回饋,以使組織可瞭解策略執行之成效,方向是否正確。
本研究採用問卷調查法,研究對象為台灣地區北部和南部企業有採用並使用知識管理系統的員工。在資料分析上,本研究以多元迴歸及部份最小平方法(Partial Least Squares,PLS)作為分析方法,以驗證研究假設是否成立,所使用的軟體是SPSS12.0 for Windows 與Visual PLS 1.04b1。研究結果發現,組織的知識循環過程會受到組織文化中的協同合作、信賴、學習、創新及專業素養影響,也會受到組織結構中的正式化影響。而知識循環過程對於員工的任務績效及情境亦有顯著的正向影響。本研究依據研究結果,期望能提供未來企業在採用知識管理時的參考建議。
Abstract
Since 1996 “the Knowledge-Based Economy” was published by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), knowledge is going to change the growth of global economy and becomes the important Factor of Production. With the development of the Internet and information technology, researchers have the opportunities to implement Knowledge Management.
Knowledge Management Enablers are not brand new research issues. Many researchers have mentioned KM Enablers affect KM, but how KM Enablers affect KM processes hasn’t been deeply discussed. In addition, KM has been developed so many years; we still can’t evaluate performance of KM. There are many researchers develop performance indexes of Knowledge Management, but those indexes are not refined.
This study attempts to develop an integrated model for KM Enablers, KM processes and organizational performance because KM Enablers affect organizational performance through knowledge processes. For the purpose of supplying a method for enterprises to realize the performance of KM through KMPI (Knowledge Management Performance Index) and feedbacks from performance, we attempt to understand the efforts of the strategies that have been executed, and decide the direction of the strategies is correct or not.
This study uses questionnaire investigation. The samples are the employees who adopt and use knowledge management systems in the north and south of Taiwan. In the analysis, this study use multi regression and Partial Least Squares (PLS) to test all hypotheses. In tools, this study used SPSS12.0 for Windows and Visual PLS 1.04b1. Based on statistical analysis, we obtain the conclusions of this study as follows: we
find that collaboration, trust, learning, innovation and expertise in organizational culture have positive impacts on Knowledge Circulation Processes (KCP). The formalization of organizational structure also has a positive impact on KCP. Additionally, KCP has a positive impact on task performance and contextual performance.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 知識管理(KM) 5
2.1.1知識的本質 5
2.1.2知識的分類 6
2.1.3知識管理架構 9
2.2 知識管理促動因素(KM Enablers) 11
2.3 知識管理程序(KM Process) 16
2.4 知識管理促動因素與知識管理程序 22
2.4.1 組織文化與知識管理程序 22
2.4.2 組織架構與知識管理程序 27
2.5 知識管理程序與組織績效 31
2.5.1 知識管理程序與組織績效 31
2.5.2 組織績效的衡量 31
第三章 研究架構與研究方法 34
3.1 研究架構 34
3.2 研究假說 36
3.3 研究變數與操作型定義 41
3.4 研究設計方法 51
第四章 資料分析與研究結果 54
4.1 問卷回收及樣本特徵 54
4.2 效度與信度檢驗 57
4.2.1 信度檢驗 58
4.2.2 效度檢驗 59
4.3研究假說檢定 68
4.3.1知識管理促動因素對於知識循環過程的影響 68
4.3.2知識循環過程對於工作績效的影響 74
4.4研究假說再驗證與結構模型檢定 79
4.5 研究結果 82
4.5.1知識管理促動因素對於知識循環過程的影響 82
4.5.2知識循環過程對於工作績效的影響 86
第五章 研究結論與建議 87
5.1 研究結論 87
5.2 研究貢獻 89
5.2.1 學術貢獻 89
5.2.2 實務貢獻 89
5.3 研究限制 91
5.4 未來研究方向 91
參考文獻 93
附錄:本研究問卷 101
參考文獻 References
1. 田維國. (2005). 知識管理推動力、流程與組織績效關係之研究, 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.
2. 林東清. (2007). 知識管理(再版). 台北市: 智勝文化事業有限公司.
3. 林雯雯. (2001). 組織內部知識管理促動因素分析之研究, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
4. 林澄貴. (2001). 知識管理, 工程專業人員核心能力與工作績效關係之研究-以中鋼公司為例, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
5. 邱繼智. (2004). 建構學習型組織. 台北: 華立出版公司.
6. 洪憶如. (2006). 以組織學習觀點探討知識管理系統應用之績效, 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文.
7. 炬見工作室. (2005). 知識管理. 台北縣汐止市: 博碩文化股份有限公司.
8. 彭舒瑜. (2007). 知識導向文化對於合作學習影響之研究, 中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文.
9. 曾智顯. (2001). 我國企業知識管理與組織創新之相關性研究, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
10. 黃俊英. (1979). 國營事業投資計畫評估方法與作業之研究, 行政院研究發展考核委員會. 6.
11. 楊政學. (2004). 知識管理理論、實務與個案: 新文京開發出版股份有份公司.
12. 蔡啟通. (1997). 組織因素, 組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係, 國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版博士論文.
13. 賴麗秋. (2001). 促進知識管理的人力資源管理及策略, 國立台灣大學商學研究所.
14. Alavi, M., Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2006). An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 191-224.
15. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(2).
16. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management AND Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations AND Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
17. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(123), 167.
18. Ames, B. C., & Hlavacek, J. D. (1989). Market Driven Management: Prescriptions for Survival in a Turbulent World: Dow Jones-Irwin.
19. Andersen, A., & APQC. (1996). the American Productivity and Quality Center: The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version: Winter.
20. Andersson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications: Freeman, New York, NY.
21. Appleyard, M. M. (1996). How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(10), 137-154.
22. Barney, J. B., & Baysinger, B. (1990). The organization of Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management in High Technology Firms, JAI Press Inc, 3-14.
23. Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2001). Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 23-55.
24. Beckman, T. (1997). A Methodology for Knowledge Management. Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on AI and Soft Computing.
25. Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (1999). Organizational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(3), 212-225.
26. Blacker, F., Reed, M., & Whitaker, A. (1993). Editorial: Knowledge workers and contemporary organization. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 851-862.
27. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life J: Wiley, New York.
28. Bock, G., Zmud, R., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation IN Knowledge Sharing: Examining THE Roles OF Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, AND Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
29. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 7, 1-98.
30. Brooking, A. (1999). Corporate Memory: Strategies for Knowledge Management: Thomson Learning.
31. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
32. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London:Tavistock.
33. Carneiro, A. (2001). The role of intelligent resources in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 358-367.
34. Chait, L. P. (1999). Creating a successful knowledge management system. Journal of Business Strategy, 20(2), 23-26.
35. Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring Strategic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 437-458.
36. Chang, L. K., Lee, S., & Won Kang, I. (2005). KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Information Management, 42(3), 469–482.
37. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 336.
38. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effect: results from a Monto Carlo simulations study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
39. Cohen, D. (1996). Knowing the Drill: Virtual Teamwork at BP. Center for Business Innovation Journal.
40. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1).
41. Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., & Berman, J. J. (1998). A Multi-Dimensional Study of Trust in Organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3).
42. Daft, R. L. (1998). Essentials of Organization Theory and Design: Southwestern ISBN 0-324-02097-X.
43. Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
44. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management. Sloan Manage. Rev, 39, 43-57.
45. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know: Harvard Business School Press.
46. De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113-127.
47. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Culture. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
48. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
49. Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 321-384.
50. DiBella, A. J., & Nevis, E. C. (1998). How Organizations Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability: Jossey-Bass.
51. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375.
52. Donoghue, L. P., Harris, J. G., & Weitzman, B. A. (1999). Knowledge management strategies that create value. Outlook, 1, 48-53.
53. Drucker Peter, F. (1993). Post Capitalist Society: Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
54. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Peter Drucker on the Profession of Management: Harvard Business School Press.
55. Duffy, J. (2000). The KM technology infrastructure. Information Management Journal, 34(2), 62-66.
56. Duncan, R., & Weiss, A. (1979). Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design, Research in Organizational Behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 75-123.
57. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
58. Ekvall, G., Arvonen, J., & Nystrom, H. (1987). Organisation och innovation: en studie av fyra divisioner vid EKA Kemi i Bohus: Studentlitteratur.
59. Fernandez, I. B., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 23-55.
60. Fernandez-Breis, J. T., & Mart??nez-Bejar, R. (2000). A cooperative tool for facilitating knowledge management. Expert Systems With Applications, 18(4), 315-330.
61. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
62. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
63. Gallupe, B. (2001). Knowledge management systems: surveying the landscape. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 61-77.
64. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.
65. Gavin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 78–91.
66. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
67. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(10), 109-122.
68. Greenberg, J. (1999). Managing behavior in organizations: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
69. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management’s social dimension: lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71-80.
70. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
71. Haeckel, S. H., & Nolan, R. L. (1993). Managing by wire. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 122-132.
72. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 72-92.
73. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
74. Hauschild, S., Licht, T., & Stein, W. (2001). Creating a knowledge culture. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1(1), 74-81.
75. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
76. Heron, J. (1996). Co-Operative Inquiry: Research Into the Human Condition: Sage, London.
77. Holzner, B., & Marx, J. H. (1979). Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society: Allyn and Bacon.
78. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
79. Huysman, M., Creemers, M., & Derksen, D. (1998). Learning from the Environment: Exploring the Relation Between Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management and Information/Communication Technology,“. Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 598-600.
80. Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 75-91.
81. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).
82. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups: New York: John Wiley and Sons.
83. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Making global strategies work. Sloan Management Review, 34(3), 11-27.
84. Knapp, E. M. (1998). Knowledge Management. Business and Economic Review, 44(4), 3-6.
85. Kong, H. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation IN Knowledge Sharing: Examining THE Roles OF Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, AND Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
86. Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 179-228.
87. Lee, J. H., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis. Expert Systems With Applications, 20(4), 299-311.
88. Lee, K. C., Lee, S., & Kang, I. W. (2005). KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Information & Management, 42(3), 469-482.
89. Leonard-Barton. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
90. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319-340.
91. Liebowitz, J., & Beckman, T. (1998). Knowledge organizations: what every manager should know. St. Luice Publications.
92. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135.
93. Lytras, M. D., Pouloudi, A., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). Knowledge management convergence: expanding learning frontiers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 40-51.
94. Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-12.
95. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 147-171.
96. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
97. Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the learning organization: McGraw-Hill New York.
98. Mascitelli, R. (2000). From experience: harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 179-193.
99. McGill, M. E., Slocum, J. W., & Lei, D. (1992). Management practices in learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 5-17.
100. Menon, A., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1992). A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use within Firms. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 53-71.
101. Meyers, P. W. (1990). Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms. Research Policy, 19(2), 97-115.
102. Miller, K. D. (1992). A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311-331.
103. Morey, D. (2001). High-speed knowledge management: integrating operations theory and knowledge management for rapid. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 322-328.
104. Morgan, G., & Ramirez, R. (1984). Action Learning: A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Social Change. Human Relations, 37(1), 1.
105. Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B. (1995). The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field. Human Relations, 48(7), 727.
106. Nonaka, I. (1998). Konno; N.: The Concept of ?Ba “: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
107. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation: Oxford University Press, USA.
108. O’Leary, D. E. (1999). Reengineering and knowledge management. Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management. 11th Europen Workshop, EKAW, 99.
109. O'Connor, G. C. (1998). Market Learning and Radical Innovation: A Cross Case Comparison of Eight Radical Innovation Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 151-166.
110. Pentland, B. T. (1995). Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 5(1), 1-21.
111. Perrow, C. (1967). A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194-208.
112. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organization. California Management Review, 40(2), 96-125.
113. Polanyi, M. E. (1958). Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy: Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
114. Polanyi, M. E. (1966). Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
115. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Leveraging Intellect. Academy of Management Executive, 10(3), 7–27.
116. Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structure, design and application.: Prentice-Hall, San Diego
117. Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior: New Jersey: Pretience Hall.
118. Rudy, R. (1998). The state of the notion: Knowledge Management in practice “. California management review, Berkeley, spring.
119. Shrivasta, P., & Grant, J. (1985). Empirically derived models of strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 97-113.
120. Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology or organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 7-28.
121. Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2004). Knowledge Management in Organizations: The State of Current Practice. Handbook on knowledge management.
122. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 17-27.
123. Stewart, I. (1997). Squaring the Square. Scientific American, 74-76.
124. Strata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: The key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 63-74.
125. Tampoe, M. (1993). Motivating knowledge workers—The challenge for the 1990s. Long Range Planning, 26(3), 49-55.
126. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev, 40(3), 55–78.
127. Templeton, G. F. (2002). Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 175-218.
128. Tiwana, A. (2000). The knowledge management toolkit: practical techniques for building a knowledge management system: Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
129. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations: John Wiley & Sons.
130. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
131. Wiig, K. M. (1993). Knowledge Management Foundations, vol. 1: Schema Press, Arlington.
132. Yap, C. M., & Souder, W. E. (1994). Factors Influencing New Product Success and Failure in Small Entrepreneurial High-Technology Electronics Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 418-432.
133. Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.139.72.78
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.139.72.78
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code