Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721105-193330 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721105-193330
論文名稱
Title
集團公司資訊系統委外決策調適過程探討─以子公司與資訊衍生公司之關係為例
The Exploration Of The Decision Adaptation Process Of The Group Company’s Information System Outsourcing -A Case Study Of The Relationship Between A Subsidiary And Spin-off Company
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
104
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-06-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-07-21
關鍵字
Keywords
資訊系統專案管理、資訊系統委外、渴望程度調適
Information system project management, Information system outsourcing., Aspiration-level adaptation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5827 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5827 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
企業朝集團化發展已是一種普遍化的現象,各大集團企業都在積極擴張版圖,而且急欲利用多角化轉投資,俾以創造更大的市場空間與更多的獲利。
有一些集團化公司鑒於公司自行開發的系統已經完備,且業務流程上的實務經驗,可提供業界各種系統開發之參考,因此,鼓勵資訊單位以「企業內部創業」的方式轉型為「資訊衍生公司」,而集團企業子公司因雙方以往合作的印象,將資訊系統委外給集團資訊衍生公司已是企業的策略之一。
以往有文獻研究,以社會認知心理學的態度延續現象(belief perseverance phenomenon)來看待此類將資訊系統委外給由公司部門內部創業所產生的資訊衍生公司的委外績效時,以持續期待(persistent expectations in outsourcing)的觀點來看待雙方的委外行為,會有一些期待落差的現象產生。集團公司間的資訊外包合作關係應該是較與其他廠商更加的受到信任與期待,但是集團子公司延續過去與衍生公司的關係,卻破壞了正常的外包關係。
本研究個案經過實地與長期的觀察,以Cyert 與March(1963)的渴望程度調適(Aspiration-Level Adaptation)為理論基礎,解釋個案中的集團子公司與衍生公司的軟體外包決策的調適過程。
集團子公司間的委外,基於過去以往良好績效印象,雙方在互信的基礎上去建構委外關係,其決定指標其實是以極簡單的法則去做判斷,但當資訊衍生公司的服務水準無法滿足子公司的期待時,此時子公司對資訊衍生公司的做法會依經驗來學習與調整行為,並訂定適當的委外管理與控制機制,可知子公司間的資訊委外過程是一種持續性的委外績效渴望程度的調整過程,並會依其是否滿足其期待的程度而將委外決策做適當的調適。
Abstract
The phenomenon of industries developing into group organizations has become more and more popular. Most group industries are working actively and hard to expand their market shares and profits by diversifying their investments.
Because of having a complete self-developed system, some group companies think their practical experience of business flow paths in system development can be used as reference resources for other companies. These group companies, therefore, encourage their information units to shift the models of “entrepreneurial venture Spin-off company”. According to the past experience and impressions of cooperating with the spin-off companies, some subsidiaries of the group companies have developed a strategy to outsource their information system to spin-off companies.
This is a case study with long-term observation in the field. We use the theory of Aspiration-Level Adaptation (Cyert & March, 1963) as a basis to explain the process of decision adaptation while the subsidiary of the group company seeks for software outsourcing from a spin-off company.
The outsourcing of the subsidiary of the group company was determined by the inter-trust relationship between the subsidiary and spin-off company as well as the past working performance. The decision index is quite simple. But when the performance of the outsourcing information spin-off company cannot meet the subsidiary’s expectations, the subsidiary will adjust its behaviors and decisions toward the spin-off company by its past experience. The subsidiary will also set up a suitable outsourcing management and control mechanism. Thus, we can see that the information outsourcing process is a continual process of aspiration-level adaptation, and the outsourcing company will adjust its decision according to the degrees that the spin-off company meets its expectancy level.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒 論
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的3
第三節研究範圍3
第四節研究步驟4
第二章 文獻探討5
第一節企業集團化相關理論5
第二節集團企業網絡相關資料18
第三節資訊委外相關理論22
第四節渴望程度調適過程相關理論39
第三章 研究設計42
第一節研究架構42
第二節研究方法43
第三節個案選擇43
第四節資料蒐集方法43
第四章 個案分析與討論46
第一節個案背景簡介46
第二節訪談資料收集59
第三節資料分析63
第四節軟體開發渴望程度調適過程71
第五章 結論與建議85
第一節 研究結論85
第二節 研究建議90
第三節 研究限制及對後續研究者之建議91
參考文獻93
參考文獻 References
中文
1.任慶宗 (2002),「集團企業子公司之綜效利益與彈性限制---網絡觀點」,國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
2.盧天富(2002),「資訊部門企業內部創業經營管理之研究」,中山大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。
3.陳承瑞 (2005),「控制理論在資訊系統委外專案管理之運用—以母公司與資訊衍生公司之關係為例」,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
4.孫思源 (2001),「由社會交換理論探討資訊系統委外合夥關係之影響因素」,國立中山大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
5.中華徵信所 (2002),台灣地區集團企業研究,台北:中華徵信所。
6.中華徵信所 (2005),台灣地區集團企業研究,台北:中華徵信所。
7.陳怡芬(2003),「策略聯盟宣告對集團企業成員的影響」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.林信惠、黃明祥、王文良(2002),軟體專案管理,智勝文化。
9.榮泰生 (1997) ,管理資訊系統,華泰書局。
10.吳思華(1999),「組織邏輯:人情與理性」,收錄於張笠雲主編之網絡台灣:台灣的人情關係與經濟理性,遠流出版社,台北。
11.吳思華(2000)。策略九說:策略思考的本質(三版)。台北市:臉譜出版社。
12.楊國樞(1989) 「社會及行為科學研究法」,台北,東華書局。
13.吳萬益 (1996),「集團企業組織文化、決策模式與經營策略之研究-中美日德韓墨主要集團企業運作模式之實證分析」, 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃.
14.許士軍 (1987),台灣地區集團企業研究: 台灣地區集團企業與經濟發展座談會記錄,第7 版, 台北:中華徵信所.
15.陳希沼 (1976),「台灣地區集團企業之研究」,台灣銀行季刊,第二十七卷,第三期.
16.司徒達賢(1995),策略管理,遠流出版社,台北。
17.司徒達賢(2001)。策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法(初版)。台北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。
18.張慧莉,資訊系統委外成功因素之探討—以我國海關為例,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,1997 年。
19. 朱文儀、莊正民(1999), 「Decision-making autonomy and divisional effectiveness in multibusiness firms: From contingency perspective to culture control perspective」,亞太管理評論,第四卷第四期,頁345-356。
英文
20. Allison, G. (1971), Essences of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
21.Amit, Raphael and Joshua Livnat. (1988), “A Concept of Conglomerate Diversification”, Journal of Management, (14/4), pp.593-604.
22.Anderson, Craig A. (2001), “Implicit personality theories and empirical data :Biased assimilation,belief perseverance and change, and covariation detection sensitivity” Soc. Cognition 13(1), pp.25-48.
23.Andersson, U., M. Forsgren and U. Holm (2001), “Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs --- A Multi-level Analysis,” Organization Studies, 22(6), pp.1013-1034.
24.Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5): 113-124.
25.Ashford, S. J. and A.S. Tsui, “Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking,” Acad. Management Journal,Vol. 34, No. 2, 1991,pp. 251-280
26.Astley, W. G. and E. J. Zajac (1990), “Beyond Dyadic Exchange: Functional Interdependency and Sub-unit Power,” Organization Studies, 11(4), pp.481-501.
27.Aoki M., ”Information, Incentives and bargaining in the Japanese Economy” Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988.
28.Aoki, M., ”Toward an Economic model of the Japanese firm”, Journal of Economic Literature, March, 1990, 1-27.
29.Badaracco, J. L.(1991). The Knowledge Link:How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
30.Berry, C. H. (1971), “Corporate Diversification”, Journal of Law and Economics and Management Science, 5: 196-204.
31.Blumberg, B. F. (2001), “Cooperation Contracts between Embedded Firms,” Organization Studies, 22(5), pp.825-852.
32.Brass, D. (1995), “A Social Network Perspective on Human Resource Management,” Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, pp.39-79.
33.Chandler, Alfred D. jr. (1962), “Strategy and structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise”, Cambridge, MA, M.I.T. Press.
34.Chang, S and J. Hong (2000), “ Economic Performance of the Korean Business Groups: Intra-Group Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transaction,” Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.429-448.
35.Chen, H. & Chen, T. J.(1998). Network Linkage and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 445-467.
36.Choudhury, V. and R. Sabherwal, “Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects,” Information Systems Res., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2003, pp. 291-314.
37.Coleman, J. S. (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), pp.95-120.
38.Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.
39.Das, T. and B. Teng (2000), “A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliance,” Journal of Management, 26, pp.31-61.
40.Eisenhardt, K. M., (1985)“Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches,” Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 2,pp. 134-149.
41.Eisenhardt, K. M., (1988)“Agency and institutional theory explanations : the case of retail sales compensation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3,pp. 488-511.
42.Eisenhardt, K. M., (1989)“Agency theory: An assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1,pp. 57-74.
43.Eisenhardt, K. M. and D. C. Gulunic (2000), “Coevolving: At Last, a Way to Make Synergies Work,” Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., pp.91-101.
44.Fishburn, P. C. (1977). Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target return. American Economic Review, 67, 116-126
45.Galbraith, J.R., and D. A. Nathanson. (1978), Strategy Implementation: Structure, Systems and Process. St. Paul, MN: West
46.Ghemawat, P. and T. Khanna (1998), “The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case Studies,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, pp.35-61.
47.Ghoshal, S. and C. Bartlett (1990), “The Multinational Corporation as An Interorganizational Network,” Academy of Management Review, 15(4), pp.603-625.
48.Glynn, M. A., Lant, T. K., and Mezias, S. J. (1991). Incrementalism, learning and ambiguity: An experimental study of aspiration level updating. In J. L. Wall, L. R. Jauch, (Eds). Best paper Proceedings of the academy of management meetings. Omnipress, Madison, WI
49.Goold, M. & Campbell, A.(2000). Taking Stock of Synergy:A Framework for Assessing Linkage between Businesses. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 72-96.
50.Gort, A. (1962), “Diversification and Integration in American Industry.”, Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research.
51.Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: A Theory of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481-510.
52.Granovetter, M. (1994), “Business Groups,” In N. Smelser and R. Swedberg(Ed.) The Handbook of Economics Sociology, pp.453-475, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Grover, Cheon, and Teng “The Effect of Service Quality and Partnership on the Outsourcing of Information Systems Functions” , Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 1996, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 89-116
54.Gulati, R. (1995), “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, pp.619-652.
55.Gulati, R., N. Nohria, and A. Zaheer (2000), “ Strategic Networks,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp203-215.
56.Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.82-103.
57.Hansen, M. T.(1999). The Search-Transfer Problem:The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
58.Hakansson, H. & Johanson, J.(1988). Formal and Informal Co-operation Strategies in International Industrial Network. In F. J. Contractor, & P. Lorange(Eds), Co-operative Strategies in International Business. Lexington, Mass.:Lexington Books.
59.Hakansson, H. & Snehota, I.(1989). No Business is an Island:The Network Concept of Business Strategy. Scandiwavian Journal of Management, 4(3), 187-200.
60.Henderson, J. C. and S. Lee, “Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective,” Management Sci., Vol. 38, No. 6, 1992, pp. 757-777.
61.Hill, Charles W. L. and Robert E. Hoskisson. (1987), Strategy and Structure in the Multiproduct Firm, Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 331-341.
62.Holmstrom, B., “Moral hazard and observability,” Bell Journal of Economic, Vol. 10, 1979, pp. 74-91.
63.Ito,K.,”Japanese spinoffs :Unexplored Survival Strategies” ,Strategic Management Journal,16,1995,PP.431-446.
64.Jacobs, r. L. and Jones, R. A. (1980). Price expectations in the United States: 1947-1975. American Economic Review, 70, 269-277
65.Jae-Nam Lee, Young-Gul Kim “Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation”,Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 1999, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p29-61
66.Jarillo, J. C.(1988). On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41.
67.Jaworski, B. J., “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, July 1988, pp. 23-39.
68.Jones,Software System Failure and Success,Internation Thomson Computer Press,1996.
69.Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, ” Journal of Financial Economics, October 1976, pp. 305-360.
70.Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L. G. (1987). Internationalization in Industry System:A Network Approach. In N. Hood, & J. E. Vahlne ( Eds.), Strategies in Global Competition. London, UK:Routledge.
71.Kahneman, D, Slovic, P, and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
72.Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 262-291.
73.Kaneko, I. & Imai, K.(1987). A Network View of Firm. Paper Presented at 1st Hitotsubashi-Stanford Conference.
74.Keister, L. A. (1998), “Engineering Growth: Business Group Structure and Firm Performance in China’s Transition Economy,” American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), pp.404-440.
75.Kerr, J. and L. Kren, “Effect of relative decision monitoring on chief executive compensation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1992, pp. 370-397.
76.Khanna, T. and K. Palepu (2000a), “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets: An Analysis of Indian Diversified Business Groups,” Journal of Finance, 55(2), pp.867-891.
77.Khanna, T. and K. Palepu (2000b), “The Future of Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Long-run Evidence from Chile,” Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.268-285.
78.Khanna, T. and J. W. Rivkin (2001), “Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets,” Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.45-74.
79.Kirsch, L. J. “The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process,” Organization Sci., Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1996, pp. 1-21.
80.Kirsch, L. J. and L. L. Cummings, “Contextual Influence on Self-Control of IS Professionals Engage in Systems Development,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1996, pp. 191-219.
81.Kirsch, L. J. “Portfolios of Control Mode and IS Project Management,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, Sep. 1997, pp. 215-239
82.Kirsch, L. J., V. Sambamurthy, D. Ko, R. L. Purvis, “Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client,” Management Sci. Vol. 48, No. 4, 2002, pp. 484–498
83.Kraatz, M. S. (1998), “Learning by Association? Inter-organizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), pp.621-643.
84.Lant, T. K. (1992). Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Science, 38, 5, 623-644.
85.Lant, T. K. and Mezias, S. J. (1990). Managing discontinuous change: A simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurial strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 147-179
86.Lant, T. K. and Mezias, S. J. (1992). An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3, 47-71.
87.Levinthal, D. and March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307-333.
88.Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociology, 14, 319-340.
89.Lewin, Kurt, Dembo, T, Festinger, L. and Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In Personality and the Behavior Disorders, J. McV. Hunt (ed.), The Ronald Press Company, New York
90.Lorange, P. ( 1989 ) . Cooperative Ventures in Multinational Setting. Advances in International Marketing, 3, 211-234.
91.Manz, Charles C., Kevin W. Mossholder and Fred Luthans, “An Integrated Perspective of Self-Control in Organization,” Administration & Society, Vol. 19, No. 1, May 1987, pp. 3-24.
92.March, J. G. and Shapira, Z. (1992). Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychology Review, 99, 172-183.
93.March, J. G. and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations, Wiley, New York.
94.Markides, C. and P. Williamson (1996), “Corporate Diversification and Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), pp.340-367.
95.Martin, J. and K. Eisenhardt (2001), “Exploring Cross-Business Synergies,” Academy of Management Proceedings, BPS: H1-H6.
96.Mezias, S. J., chen, Y., and Murphy, P. R. (2002). Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Science, 48, 10, 1285-1300.
97.Milliken, F. J. and Lant, T. K. (1991). The effect of an organization’s recent performance history on strategic persistence and change: The role of managerial interpretations. In P. Shrivastava, J. Dutton and a. Huff(eds.). Advances in strategic management. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 7, 129-156.
98.Morecroft, J. D. (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Management Science, 3, 900-916.
99.Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational expectation and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29, 315-335
100.Nidumolu, S. R. and M. R. Subramani, “The Matrix of Control: Combining Process and Structure Approaches to Managing Software Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 3, Winter 2003–4, pp. 159–196.
101.Nohria, N. & Ghoshal, S.(1994). Differentiated Fit and Shared Value:Alternatives for Managing Headquarter-Subsidiary Relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6),491-502.
102.Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationship:Integration and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
103.Ouchi, W. G., “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,” Management Science, Vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 1979, pp. 828-843.
104.Padgett, J. F. (1980). Bounded rationality in budgetary research. American Political Science Review, 74, 354-372.
105.Payne, J. W., Laughhunn, D. J., and Crum, R. (1980). Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Science, 26, 10, 1039-1060.
106.Penning, J. M.(1981). Strategically Interdependent Organizations. In Handbook of Organizational Design. New York:Oxford University Press.
107.Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organization:A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York:Harper and Row.
108.Phan,D.D.,Vogel,D.R.,Nunamaker,Jr.,J.F.,“Empirical Studies in Software Development Project:Field Survey and OS/400 Study. ”,Information and Management,Vol.28,1995,pp.271-280.
109.Piccoli, G. and B. Ives, “Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, Sep. 2003, pp. 365-396.
110.Porter, M. E.(1985). Competitive Advantage. New York:Free Press.
111.Porter, M. (1996), “Interrelationships Across Businesses,” In Goold, M. and K. S. Luchs(ed.), Managing the Multibusiness Company, New York: Routledge, pp.178-217.
112.Powell, W. W.(1990).Neither Market nor Hierarchy:Network Forms of Organization Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
113.Powell,W., K Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996), “Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41,pp.116-145.
114.Prahalad, C.K. and P. Varadarajan, ”Research on corporate Diversification : A Synthesis”, Strategic Management Journal ,10,pp.521-523.
115.Ramanujam, V. & P. Varadarajan (1989), “Research on Corporate iversification: A Hypothesis”, Strategic Management Journal, (10/6),pp.523-551.
116.Rowley, T., D. Behrens and D. Krackhardt (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.369-386.
117. Shenhar AJ, Dvir D, Levy O. Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal 1997;28(2):5–13.
118.Simon, H. A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man. Herbert A. Simon(Ed.), John Wiley, New York.
119.Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. 4th ed. Simon and Schuster, New York.
120.Sterman, J. D. (1987). Expectation formation in behavioral simulation models. Behavioral Science, 32, 190-211.
121.Sterman, J. D. (1987). Expectation formation in behavioral simulation models. Behavioral Science, 32, 190-211
122.Sung Kim,Young-Soo Chung “Critical Success Factors For IS Outsourcing Implementation from an Interorganizational relationship perspective” , Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2003 summer, pp. 81-90
123.Thorelli, H. B.(1986). Network:Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.
124.Tsai, W. ( 2000 ) . Social Capital, Strategic Relationship and Formation of Intra-Organizational Linkage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.
125.Tsai, W. (2001), “Knowledge Transfer in Intra-organizational Network: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capability on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), pp.996-1004.
126.Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 185, 1124-131.
127.Uzzi, B. (1997), “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.35-67.
128.Van Horne, J.C. and J.M.Wachowicz, Jr.”Fundamentals of Financial Management (9ed.), Englewood Cliffs , N.J.: Pretice-Hall,1995,P.652.
129.Van Horne, J.C. and J.M.Wachowicz, Jr.”Fundamentals of Financial Management (9ed.), Englewood Cliffs , N.J.: Pretice-Hall,1995,P.652.
130.Violet T. Ho, Soon Ang, Detmar Straub (2003), “When Subordinates Become IT Contractors:Persistent Managerial Expectations in IT Outsourcing ,” Information System Research ,2003 INFORMS Vol. 14 ,No.1,Mar 2003, pp.66-86.
131.White, M., M. Smith, and T. Barnett (1994), “Strategy Inertia: The Enduring Impact of CEO Specialization and Strategy on Following Strategies,” Journal of Business Research, 31(1), pp.11-22.
132.Wilson,S. (1997), The use of techniques in educational research, Review of Educational Research.
133.Williamson, O. E.(1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York:Free Press.
134.Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies, N.Y.: Free Press.,1975.
135.Woo, C.Y.,G.E. Willard and U.S. Daellenbach, ”Spin-Off Performance : A Case of Overstated Expectations﹖”, Strategic Management Journal,1992,PP.433-447.
136. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publication
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.137.221.163
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.137.221.163
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code