Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721108-163613 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721108-163613
論文名稱
Title
台灣短期利率的極端行為與風險值
Extreme behavior and VaR of Short-term interest rate of Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
70
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee

口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-21
關鍵字
Keywords
結構改變、GARCH模型、動差比估計式、Hill估計式、極值、厚尾
Fat-tailed, Hill estimator, GPD, GEV, Moment ratio estimator, Extreme Value Theory, Filtered model, GARCH, Structural change, Modified Hill estimator
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5663 次,被下載 18
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5663 times, has been downloaded 18 times.
中文摘要
本文應用極值理論實的參數與非參數模型實證分析台灣短期利率的極端行為,探討貨幣市場開放政策與金融風暴等不利事件對利率極端行為的影響。對於這些短期利率行為如:厚尾、不對稱、左、右尾厚尾程度不一…等特性的了解,有助於掌握短期利率的極端行為,俾於正確估計利率風險。另外,本文也探討過濾(filtered)及未過濾(unfiltered) VaR (Value at risk)模型的預測表現,以建議合適的利率風險估計模型。實證結果顯示,首先,與常態分配相較,短期利率變動分配之尾部更厚,代表常態分配假設的VaR將低估實際風險;第二,短期利率變動的非條件分配屬於厚尾的ARCH 或Student’t分配型式;第三,利率變動分配的右尾比左尾更厚,代表極端利率上漲發生的機率與變動幅度將高於極端利率下跌的機率與幅度;第四,利率變動分配的尾部在1999年以後更為肥厚,造成厚尾程度發生結構改變的主要因素為央行的利率政策,而非貨幣市場開放政策;第五,基於左、右兩尾存在的兩個結構改變點,長時間的利率資料不能視為來自同一分配的樣本資料;第六,應用極值理論於財務資料時,為提高VaR估計結果的正確性,資料間的相依性與異質變異性需加以考慮;最後,2001年以前,極值理論模型能正確的估計短期利率的VaR;2001以後,歷史模擬法及GARCH法則比極值模型有更佳的預測表現;極值模型中以Hill估計式及動差比估計式的風險預測能力較好,其預測結果亦較為穩健。
Abstract
The current study empirically analyzes the extreme behavior and the impact of deregulation policies as well as financial turmoil on the extreme behavior of changes of Taiwan short term interest rate. A better knowledge of short-term interest rate properties, such as heavy tails, asymmetry, and uneven tail fatness between right and left tails, provide an insight to the extreme behavior of short-term interest rate as well as a more accurate estimation of interest risk. The predicting performances of filtered and unfiltered VaR (Value at risk) models are also examined to suggest the proper models for management of interest rate risk. By applying Extreme Value theory (EVT), tail behavior is analyzed and tested and the VaR based on parametric and non-parametric EVT models are calculated.The empirical findings show that, first, the distribution of change of rate are heavy-tailed indicating that the actual risk would be underestimated based on normality assumption. Second, the unconditional distribution is consistent with the heavier-tailed distributions such as ARCH process or Student’t. Third, the right tail of distribution of change of rate are significantly heavier than the left one pointing out that the probabilities and magnitudes of rise in rate could be higher than those of drop in rate. Fourth, the amount of tail-fatness in tail of distribution of change of rate increase after 1999 and the vital factors to cause structural break in tail index are the interest rate policies taken by central bank of Taiwan instead of the deregulation policies in money market. Fifth, based on the two break points found in tail index of right and left tail, long sample of CP rates should not be treated as samples from a single distribution. Sixth, the dependent and heteroscedastic properties of data series should be considered in applying EVT to improve accuracy of VaR forecasts. Finally, EVT models predict VaR accurately before 2001 and the benchmark model, HS and GARCH, generally are superior to EVT models after 2001. Among EVT models, MRE and CHE are relative consistent and reliable in VaR prediction.
目次 Table of Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 5
2.1 VaR and fat tail 5
2.2 Extreme value theory 5
2.3 Structural Break of Tail index 10
3. Methodology 13
3.1 VaR models 13
3.2 Extreme value theory 15
3.3 Threshold choice 21
3.4 Tests on tail behavior 22
4. Empirical Results 28
4.1 Preliminary data analysis 28
4.2 Full Sample Estimation 32
4.3 Tests of Structural Break 40
4.4 Backtesting Results of VaR 45
5. Conclusion 55
References 57
參考文獻 References
1. Andersen, T. G., and J. Lund, 1997, Estimating Continuous Time Stochastic Volatility Models of the Short Term Interest Rate, Journal of Econometrics, 77, 343-377.
2. Bali, T. G., 2003, An Extreme Value Approach to Estimating Volatility and Value at Risk, Journal of Business, 76, 1, 3-107.
3. Bali, T. G., and S. N. Neftci, 2003, Disturbing extremal behavior of spot rate dynamics, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 455-477.
4. Balkema, A. A., and L. de Haan, 1974. Residual Life Time at Great Age, Annals of Probability, 2, 792-804.
5. Bao, Y., T. H. Lee, and B. S. Lu, 2006, Evaluating Predictive Performance of Value-at-Risk Models in Emerging Markets: A Reality Check, Journal of Forecasting, 25, 101–128
6. Berman, S. M., 1964; Limiting Theorems for the Maximum Term in Stationary Sequences, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 502-516.
7. Booth, G. G., J. P. Broussard, T. Martikainen, and V. Puttonen, 1997, Prudent Margin Levels in the Finnish Stock Index Futures Market, Management Science, 43, 8, 1177-1188.
8. Brenner, R. J., R. H. Harjes, and K. F. Kroner, 1996, Another Look at Models of the Short Term Interest Rate, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 85-107.
9. Brooks, C., A. D. Clare, J. W. Dalle Molle and G. Persand, 2005, A Comparison of Extreme Value Theory Approaches for Determining Value at Risk, Journal of Empirical Finance, 12, 339-352.
10. Candelon, B., and S. Straetmans, 2006, Testing for Multiple Regimes in the Tail ehavior of Emerging Currency Returns, Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 1187-1205.
11. Campbell, J. and L. Hentschell, 1992, No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 281-318.
12. Chan, K. C., G. A. Karolyi, F. A. Longstaff, and A. B. Sanders, 1992, An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Models of the Short-Term Interest Rate, Journal of Finance, 47, 1209-1227.
13. Chuang, Y. Y., W. C. Lin, J. B.Hsu, and Y. J. Chiu, 2004, Comparison of Static and Dynamic VaR Models, Review of Securities and Futures Markets, 15, 4, 107-159.
14. Cotter, J., 2001, Margin Exceedances for European Stock Index Futures using Extreme Value Theory, Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 8,1475-1502.
15. Cotter, J., 2005a, Tail Behaviour of the Euro: Applied Economics, 37, 827-840.
16. Cotter, J., 2005b, Extreme Risk in Futures Contract: Applied Economics Letters, 12, 489-492.
17. Dacarogna, M., U. Muller, O. Pictet, and C. de Vries, 1995, The Distribution of Extremal Foreign Exchange Rate Returns in Extreme Large Data Sets, Discussion Paper 95-70. Tinbergen Institute.
18. Danielsson, J., L. de Haan, L. Peng and C. G. de Vries, 2001, Using a Bootstrap Method to Choose the Sample Fraction in Tail Index Estimation, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 76, 226-248.
19. Danielsson, J., and C. G. de Vries, 1997, Tail Index and Quantile Estimation with Very High Frequency Data, Journal of Empirical Finance, 4, 241-257.
20. Danielsson J., D. W. Jansen, and C. G. de Vries, 1996, The Method of Moments Ratio Estimator for the Tail Shape Parameter, Communication in Statistics Theory and Methods, 25, 4,711-720.
21. de Haan, L., and L. Peng, 1998, Comparison of tail index estimators, Preprint, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
22. Dekkers, A. L. M. and L. de Haan, 1989, On the Estimation of the Extreme-value Index and Large Quantile Estimation, Annals of Statistics, 17, 4, 1795-1832.
23. Dekkers, A., J. Einmahl, and L. de Haan, 1989, A moment Estimator for the Index of an Extreme-Value Distribution, Annals of statistics, 17, 4, 1833-1855.
24. Drees, H., 2007, Some Aspects of Extreme Value Theory under Serial Dependence, preprint, University of Hamburg.
25. Drees, H., and E. Kaufmann, 1998, Selecting the optimal sample fraction in univariate extreme value estimation, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 15, 75, 2, 149-172.
26. DuMouchel, W. M., 1983, Estimating the Stable Index in Order to Meaure Tail Thickness: A Critique. Annals of Statistics, 11, 1019-1031.
27. Embrechts, P., C. Klüppelberg, and T. Mikosch, 2008, Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance, Springer-Verlag, London.
28. Galbraith, J. W., and S. Zernov, 2004, Circuit Breakers and the Tail Index of Equity Returns, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2, 1, 109-129.
29. Gençay, R., and F. Selçuk, 2006, Overnight Borrowing, Interest Rates and Extreme Value Theory, European Economic Review, 50, 547-563.
30. Gençay, R., F. Selçuk, and A. Ulugülyağci, 2003, High volatility, Thick Tails and Extreme Value Theory in Value-at-Risk Estimation, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 337-356.
31. Goldie, C. M. and R. L. Smith, 1987, Slow Variation with Remainder: A Survey of the Theory and its Applications, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 38, 2, 45-71.
32. Haile, F. D. and S. Pozo, 2006, Exchange Rate Regimes and Currency Crises: an Evaluation using Extreme Value Theory, Review of International Economics, 14, 4, 554–570.
33. Hall, P., 1990, Using Bootstrap to Estimate Mean Square Error and Select Smoothing Parameters in Non-parametric Problems, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 32, 177-203.
34. Hill, B., 1975, A Simple General Approach to Inference about the Tail of a Distribution, Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 3, 1163-1174.
35. Hols, M. C. A. B. and C. G. de Vries, 1991, The Limiting Distribution of Extremal Exchange Rate Returns, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, 3, 287-302.
36. Ho, L. J., P. Burridge, J. Cadle and M. Theobald, 2000, Value-at-risk: Applying the Extreme Value Approach to Asian Markets in the Recent Financial Turmoil, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8, 249-275.
37. Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis, 1987. Parameter and Quantile Estimation for the Generalized Pareto Distribution, Technometrics, 29, 339-349.
38. Hsing, 1991, On Tail Index Estimation Using Dependent Data, Annals of Statistics, 19, 3, 1547-1569.
39. Huisman, R., K. G. Koedijk, and R. A. J. Pownall, 1998, VaR-x: Fat Tails in Financial Risk Management, Journal of Risk, 1, 47-61.
40. Huisman, R., K. G. Koedijk, C. J. M. Kool, and F. Palm, 2001, Tail-index Estimates in Small Sample , Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19, 208-216.
41. Jansen, D. W. and C. G. de Vries, 1991, On the Frequency of Large Stock Returns: Putting Booms and Busts into Perspective, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 1. 18-24.
42. Jenkinson, A. F., 1955, The Frequency Distribution of the Annual Maximum (or Minimum) Values of Meteorological Elements, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorology Society, 87, 145-158.
43. Jondeau, E. and M. Rockinger, 2003, Testing for Difference in the Tails of Stock-Market Returns, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 5, 559-581.
44. Kearns P., and A. Pagan, 1997, Estimating the Density Tail Index for Financial Time Series, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 171-175.
45. Koedijk, K. G. and C. J. M. Kool, 1992, Tail Estimates of East European Exchange Rates, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 1, 83-96.
46. Koedijk, K. G. and Kool, C. J. M., 1994, Tail estimates and the EMS target zone, Review of International Economics, 2, 153-65.
47. Koedijk, K. G., F. G. J. A. Nissen, P. C. Schotman, and , C. C. P. Wolff, 1997, The dynamics of Short-term Interest Rate Volatility Reconsidered, European Finance Review, 1, 105-130.
48. Kuester, K, S. Mittnik, and M. S. Paolella, 2006, Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4, 1, 53-89.
49. Leadbetter, M. R., G. Lindgren, and H. Rottzén, 1983, Extreme and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes. Springer-Verlag: New York.
50. Lin, C. H. and Y. M. Chen, 2006, An Empirical Study on the Value at Risk Model of the Taiwan Stock Market, Journal of Management, 19, 4, 737-758.
51. Lin, C. H. T. C. Kao, and C. Y. Chiou, 2005, Incorporating Extreme Value Theory into GARCH Model for Value-at-Risk, Journal of Management, 22, 1, 133-154.
52. Longin, F. M., 1999, Optimal Margin Level in Futures Markets: Extreme Price Movements, Journal of Futures Market, 19, 2, 127-152.
53. Longin, M. F., 2000, From Value at Risk to Stress Testing: the Extreme Value Approach, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1097-1130.
54. Longin, M. F., 2005, The Choice of the Distribution of Asset Returns: How Extreme Value Theory can Help? Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1017–1035.
55. McNeil, A. J. and R. Frey, 2000, Estimation of Tail-related Risk Measures for Heteroscedastic Financial Time Series: an Extreme Value Approach, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 271-300.
56. Neftci, S. N., 2000, Value at Risk Calculations, Extreme Events, and Tail Estimation, Journal of Derivatives, Spring, 1-15.
57. Nowman, K. B., 1997, Gaussian Estimation of Single-Factor Continuous Time Models of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance, 5, 1695-1706.
58. Nowman, K. B., 1998, Continuous-Time Short Term Interest Rate Models, Applied Financial Economics, 8, 401-407.
59. Nowman, K. B., 2002, The Volatility of Japanese Interest Rates Evidence for Certificate of Deposit and Gensaki Rates, International Review of Financial Analysis, 11, 29-38.
60. Phillips, P. C. B. and M. Loretan, 1990. Testing Covariance Stationarity under Moment Conditional Failure with and Application to Common Stock Returns, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 947.
61. Pickands, J., 1975, Statistical Inference using Extreme Order Statistics, Annals of Statistics, 3, 119-131.
62. Pictet, O., M. Dacorogna, and U. Müller, 1996, Hill Bootstrap and Jacknife Estimators for Heavy Tails, working paper, Olsen & Associates.
63. Poon, S. H., M. Rockinger, and J. Tawn, 2004, Extreme Value Dependence in financial Markets: Diagnostics, Models and Financial Implications, Review of Financial Studies, 17, 2, 581-610.
64. Pownall, R. A. and K. G. Koedijk, 1999, Capturing Downside Risk in Financial Markets: the Case of the Asian Crisis, Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, 853-870.
65. Pozo, S. and C. Amuedo-Dorantes, 2003, Statistical distributions and the Identification of Currency Crises, Journal of International Money and Finance, 22, 4, 591-609.
66. Quintos, C, Z. Fan, and P. C. B. Phillips (2001). Structural Change Tests in Tail Behaviour and the Asian Crisis, Review of Economic Studies, 68, 633-663.
67. Reiss, R. D. and M. Thomas, 2001, Statistical Analysis of Extreme Values, Birkhause Verlag, Basel.
68. Resnick, S., and C. Stărică, 1997, Asymptotic Behavior of Hill’s Estimator for Autoregressive Data, Communications in Statistics: Stochastic Models, 13, 703-721.
69. Resnick, S., and C. Stărică, 1998, Tail index Estimation for Dependent Data, Annals of Applied. Probability, 8, 1156–1183.
70. Segers, J., 2001, Abelian and Tauberian Theorems on the Bias of the Hill Estimator, Working Paper, Univeristy of Leuven.
71. Smith, R. L., 1985, Maximum Likelihood Estimation in a Class of Nonregular Cases, Biometrika, 72, 1, 67-90.
72. Tsay, R. S., 2002, Analysis of Financial Time Series, John Wiley and Sons: New York.
73. von Mises, R., 1936, La Distribution de la plus grande de n valeurs, American Mathematical Society Selected Papers, 2, 271-294.
74. Wagner, N., 2002, The Hill Estimator in Financial Risk Assessment and an application to Extremal Exchange Rate Risk, Financial Risk and Financial Risk Management, 16, 173-187.
75. Wagner, N., and T. A. Marsh, 2004, Tail Index Estimation in Small Samples Simulation Results for Independent and ARCH-type Financial Return Models, Statistical Papers, 45, 545-562.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.190.156.80
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.190.156.80
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code