Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721110-181611 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721110-181611
論文名稱
Title
組織成員的工作身份、工作年資及組織的正式化、集權化對組織成員的政治知覺之影響
The Effect of Personal Position 、Personal Tenure 、Organizational Formalization and Organizational Centralization on Perceptions of Organizational Politics
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
94
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-11
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-07-21
關鍵字
Keywords
工作身份、工作年資、正式化、集權化、組織政治知覺
Position, Tenure, Formalization, Perceptions of organizational politics, Centralization
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5642 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5642 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的主要是依循Ferris, Adams, Kolodinsky, Hochwarter, & Ammeter, (2002)修正模型探討組織成員的工作身份、工作年資及組織的正式化、集權化對組織成員的政治知覺之影響。
本研究以公私立醫院、公私立學校、政府機關、公營服務業、製造業、民營金融服務業、民營服務業、民營高科技製造業及民營傳統製造業等九大類41個機關為研究對象,共計發出2,133份問卷,回收1,940份,回收率達91.0%,剔除無效問卷50份,有效問卷為1,890份,有效問卷回收率88.6%,再將缺失值移除,最後剩下1765份問卷。調查資料分別使用描述性統計、信度分析、相關分析、探索性因素分析、層級線性模型等分析方法。
研究結果發現:
1.組織成員的工作身份對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著之影響。
2.組織成員的工作年資對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著之影響。
3.組織正式化對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著之影響。
4.組織集權化對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著之影響。
5.組織正式化對「組織成員的工作身份對組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具有干擾效果
6.組織正式化對「組織成員的工作年資對組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具有干擾效果。
7.組織集權化對「組織成員的工作身份對組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具有干擾效果。
8.組織集權化對「組織成員的工作年資對組織成員政治知覺的影響力」不具有干擾效果。
Abstract
The main purpose of this research, which are based on Ferris, Adams, Kolodinsky, Hochwarter, & Ammeter, (2002). revised model, is to explore the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and the member of position, the member of tenure, the formalization, and the centralization.
There are 2133 questionnaires provided from public and private hospitals, public and private schools, government agencies, public and private service industries, manufacturing, private financial institution, the high-tech industries and traditional industries. Questionnaires’ response rate are 91.0%. Available response rate are 88.6%. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation, and hierarchical linear model.

The major results of this study are as following:
1. The member of position has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
2. The member of tenure has no effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
3. Formalization has no effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
4. Centralization has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
5. Formalization has no moderate effect on the relationship between the member of position and perceptions of organizational politics.
6. Formalization has no moderate effect on the relationship between the member of tenure and perceptions of organizational politics.
7. Centralization has no moderate effect on the relationship between the member of position and perceptions of organizational politics.
8. Centralization has no moderate effect on the relationship between the member of tenure and perceptions of organizational politics.
目次 Table of Contents
表目錄…………………………………………………Ⅵ
圖目錄……………………………………………………Ⅶ
第一章緒論
第一節研究背景與動機……………………………………1
第二節研究目的………………………………………4
第三節研究流程………………………………………5
第二章文獻探討
第一節組織政治與組織政治知覺………………………6
第二節組織正式化與組織政治知覺................................17
第三節組織集權化與組織政治知覺 ...............................19
第四節組織員工工作身份與組織政治知覺....................20
第五節組織員工工作年資與組織政治知覺.....................23
第三章研究方法
第一節研究架構................................................................24
第二節研究假設................................................................25
第三節研究對象及資料分析方法.....................................26
第四節研究變項操作性定義與衡量工具.........................27
第五節量表之因素分析及信度分析................................30
第四章資料分析結果
第一節樣本描述...............................................................33
第二節組織成員的工作身份、工作年資及組織的正式化、集權化與組織政治知覺之相關分析........................................................................................35
第三節組織成員的工作身份、工作年資及組織的正式化、集權化與組織政治知覺之影響分析---層級線性模型 ......................................................................36
第五章結論與建議
第一節研究結論…………………………………………44
第二節管理實務建議……………………………………47
第三節研究限制.................................................................49
第四節後續研究建議…………………………………….49
參考文獻…………………………………………………51
附錄一 抽樣機關及問卷回收情形統計表.........................57
附錄二 抽樣機關之特性、問卷編號及抽樣方式.............60
附錄三 問卷..........................................................................................82
參考文獻 References
中文部分
王保進,2006,英文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,第三版,台北:心裡出版社。
何金銘,2006,統計分析方法-SPSS軟體的輔助分析,台南:台灣復文興業股份有限公司。
何金銘,2008,層級線性模型:「巢套」資料的有效分析方法,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所授課講義。
何金銘,2008,組織政治知覺研究現況的缺憾,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所授課講義。
李安民,2002,組織政治知覺對員工工作態度之影響,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯,2002,組織行為學,第九版,台北:華泰文化。
林惠玲、陳正倉,2001,統計學-方法與應用,第二版,台北:雙葉書廊。
林鍾沂,2001,行政學,台北:三民書局。
秦夢群,2000,教育行政-理論部分,台北:五南。
黃素貞,2002,員工組織政治知覺與工作投入及工作績效關係之研究,未發表的碩士論文,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究,高雄。
張劭勳,2004,管理學,台中:滄海書局。
溫金豐,2007,組織理論與管理,台北:學貫。

英文部分
Allen, R.W., Madison, D.L., Porter, L.W., Renwick, P.A., & Mayes, B.T. (1979). Organizational politics: Tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 22: 77-83.
Bacharach, S.B., & Lawler, E.J. (1998). Political alignments in organizations: Contexualization, mobilization, and coordination. In: R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds), Power and Influence in Organizations (pp.67-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Burn, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6: 257-281.
Conner, D.S. (2006). Human-Resource Professionals' Perceptions of Organizational Politics as a Function of Experience, Organizational Size, and Perceived Independence, The Journal of Social Psychology, 146: 717-732.
Cropanzano, R.S., Kacmar, K.M., & Bozeman, D.P. (1995). Organizational politics, justice, and support: Their differences and similarities. In: R.S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace (pp.2-18). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Dalton, D.R., Todor, W.D., Spendolini, M.J., Fielding, G.J., & Porter, L.W. (1980). Organization Structure and Performance : A Critical Review. Academy of Management Review, 5:49-64.
Dewar, R. D., Whetten, D. A., & Boje, D. (1980). An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization, and task routineness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 120-128.
Drory, A. (1993). Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organization Studies, 14: 59–71.
Drory, A., & Romm, T. (1988). Politics in organizations and its perception within the organization, Organization Studies, 9: 165–179.
Drory, A., & Romm, T. (1990). The definition of organizational politics: A review. Human Relations, 43: 1133-1154.
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high velocity environment : Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737-770.
Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues, Volume 1: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp.179–254). Oxford: JAI Press/Elsevier Science.
Ferris, G. R., Fedor, D. B., Chachere, J.G., & Pondy, L.R. (1989). Myths and politics in organizational contexts , Group and Organizational Studies, 14: 88-103.
Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Beehr, T. A., & Gilmore, D. C. (1995). Political fairness and fair politics: The conceptual integration of divergent constructs.In: R.S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the work place (pp.21-36). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Galang, M. C., Zhou, J., Kacmar, M. K., & Howard, J. L. (1996), Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-related Implications, and Outcomes, Human Relations, 49: 233-266.
Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Gilmore, D. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (1994). Understanding as an antidote for the dysfunctional consequences of organizational politics as a stressor, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 1204-1220.
Ferris, G. R., Harrell-Cook, G., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2000). Organizational politics: The nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp.89-130). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Joumal of Management, 18: 93-116.
Ferris, G. R., & King, T. R. (1991). Politics in human resources decisions : A walk on the dark side. Organizational Dynamics, 20: 59-71.
Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M. (1989). Politics in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfield(Eds.), Impression management in the organization (PP.143-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
French, J.R.P., Jr. & Raven, B.H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright, (Ed.), Studies in Social Power. Ann Harbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
French, J. R. P., Jr.,& Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Frost, P.J. (1987). Power, politics, and influence. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Frost, P. J., & Hayes, D. C. (1997). An exploration in two culture of political behavior in organizations. Paper presented at the Conference on Cross-Cultural Studies of Organizational Functioning, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Kacmar, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (1999). Organizational politics: the state of the field, links to related research, and an agenda for future research. In: G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 17, pp. 1–39). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kacmar, M. K., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): a multiple sample investigation. Journal of Management, 23: 627-658.
Kacmar, M. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51: 193-205.
Kacmar, K.M. & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Politics at work: Sharpening the focus of political behavior in organizations. Business Horizons, 36: 70-74.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Madison, D. L. (1980). Organizational politics: An exploration of managers’ perceptions. Human Relations, 33: 79-100.
Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 4: 672-677.
Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of Research Design & Social Measurement. USA: Sage Publication Inc.
Gandz, J., & Murray, V.V. (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 237-251
Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program Change and Organizational Properties: A Comparative Analysis, The American Journal of Sociology, 72: 503 -519.
Hochwarter, W. A., Kiewitz, C., Castro, S. L., Perrewè, P. L., & Ferris G. R. (2003). Positive Affectivity and Collective Efficacy as Moderators of the Relationship Between Perceived Politics and Job Satisfaction, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33: 1009-1035.
Hochwarter W. A., Witt L. A., & Kacmar K. M. (2000). Perceptions of Organizational Politics as a Moderator of Relationship Between Conscientiousness and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 472-478.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational Administration-Theory,Research and Practice(3rd ed.).New York: Random House.
June, M. L. Poon. (2003). Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics perceptions, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18: 138 - 155.
Miller, B. K., & Nicols, K. M. (2008). Politics and Justice: A Mediated Moderation Model, Journal of Managerial Issues, 20: 214-237.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (1981). Relationships between organization structure and employee reaction:Comparing alternative framework, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 66-83.
Pettigrew, A. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making, London: Tavistock.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds), Research on Organizational Behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1-52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations. In: L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 109-149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13: 65–105.
Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organizational Behavior-Concepts, Controversies and Application(6th ed.). New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
Scott, W. E. (1992). Organizations:Rational,Natural,and Open Systems,(3rd ed.) New Jersey:Prentical Hall.
Treadway, D. C., Adams, G. L., & Goodman, J. M. (2005). The Formation of Political Sub-Climates : Predictions from Social Identity, Structuration, and Symbolic Interaction, Journal of Business and Psychology, 20: 201-219.
Tushman, M. L. (1977). A political approach to organizations: A review and rationale. Academy of Management Review, 2: 206-216.
Valle, M., Harris, K., & Andrews, M. C. (2004). An Examination of Tenure in Negative Organizational Environments, Journal of Management Research, 4: 113-119.
Weber, M. (1947). Theory of Social and Economic Orgainzation.Chicago:Free Press.
Welsh, M. A., & Slusher, E. A. (1986). Organizational design as a context of political activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 389-402.
Witt, L. A. (1995). Influences of supervisor behaviors on the levels and effects of workplace politics. In Organizational Politics. Justice, and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work, Cropanzano R, & Kacmar M (eds). Quorum Press: Westport CT; 37-53.
Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in Organizations(3nd ed.). New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.222.69.152
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.222.69.152
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code