Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721113-173723 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721113-173723
論文名稱
Title
柔性領導與角色績效之研究─知覺主管支持的中介效果
The Effects of Feminine Leadership on Role Performance─ Perceived Supervisor Support as a mediator variable
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
117
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-05-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-08-27
關鍵字
Keywords
剛性領導、柔性領導、知覺主管支持、組織公民行為、角色績效、角色內行為
Masculine Leadership, Feminine Leadership, Perceived Supervisor Support, Role Performance, organizational citizenship behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5686 次,被下載 1706
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5686 times, has been downloaded 1706 times.
中文摘要
本研究以組織層次之柔性領導為自變項,以個人層次之角色績效為依變項,並以個人層次的知覺主管支持為中介變項,以檢驗知覺主管支持是否對柔性領導及角色績效行為間具中介效果。

本研究之柔性領導定義是指廣義意涵的具備女性特質之領導,不受性別限制,不拘限於女性。

本研究採用問卷調查法收集資料。本研究從員工來蒐集樣本,共計發放320 組,總共回收了250 筆資料,202 位員工填寫之有效問卷。討論的變項因為有個體層次與跨部門層次的不同,故分析方法分別採用SPSS、HLM 進行統計分析,以驗證變數間之關係。

本研究顯示:知覺主管支持對角色績效有顯著之正向影響。柔性領導對知覺主管支持有正向影響。柔性領導對角色績效雖有正向影響,但僅達弱支持水準。知覺主管支持對柔性領導與角色績效的關係也僅達弱支持水準。最後本研究根據研究結果進一步說明研究限制及未來研究方向。
Abstract
This study adopted the Feminine Leadership in organization level as the independent variable and the Role Performance in individual level as dependent variable.
The Perceived Supervisor Support was a mediator between the independent and dependent variable to examine the mediating effects.

Feminine leadership in this research is defined as a broad interest in leadership with feminine characteristics, which is irrelevant to gender labeling and unrestricted to females.

This research employed the questionnaire suvey to collect the data. By surveying for subordinates, the researcher sent out 320 questionnaires and received 250 back with 202 valid. Due to the multi-level research framework, this research used SPSS and HLM as analysis tools to examine the relationships among the variables.

The result indicate that:First, Feminine Leadership has significant positive influences on Perceived Supervisor Support; second, the correlation between Perceived Supervisor Support and Role Performance is significant; third, the correlation between Feminine Leadership and Role Performance is weak significant; finally, Perceived Supervisor Support is also a mediator between the relationships for Feminine Leadership and Role Performance and has weak positive influences on them. Based on the results, this study proposed some empirical and practical suggestions.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 領導的定義與理論 7
第二節 剛性領導與柔性領導 13
第三節 角色績效 22
第四節 知覺主管支持 29
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 34
第二節 研究變項之操作性定義與衡量工具 37
第三節 問卷發放與回收 43
第四節 資料分析 46
第四章 研究結果 50
第一節 主要變數間之相關分析 50
第二節 知覺主管支持對角色績效之影響 52
第三節 柔性領導對角色績效之影響 55
第四節 柔性領導對知覺主管支持之影響 66
第五節 知覺主管支持對柔性領導與角色績效之中介效果 70
第五章 結論與建議 84
第一節 研究結論 84
第二節 研究建議 87
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 90
參考文獻 91
一、 中文部分 91
二、 英文部分 94
三、 網站資料 101
附錄 102
【問卷調查】主管之柔性領導、領導效能及知覺主管支持與下屬角色之績效關係 102
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
天下雜誌編輯 (2000),不一樣的她:e 世紀女性新典範,台北:天下雜誌編輯。

余佩娟 (2012),主管支持行為影響部屬情緒、反應、及看法之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

余美玲 (2009),女性領導者人格特質、性別角色、組織變革認知與轉換型領導關聯性之研究,國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位碩士論文。

吳明隆、涂金堂 (2006),SPSS 與統計應用分析,台北:五南圖書。

呂春嬌 (2008),大學圖書館中階主管女性領導特質與領導效能之關係及環境脈絡效果,國立臺灣大學文學院圖書資訊學系博士論文。

李中一(2004),測量工具的效度與信度,台灣衛誌,23(4),272-281。

林文政 (2005),人力資源管理角色—CEO 觀點,人資高峰會:變革領導與創新服務,桃園:國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。

林志峰 (2006),主管領導型態、人格特質、組織承諾與工作績效關聯性之研究—以國防部軍備局生產製造中心生產工廠為例,南台科技大學高階主管企管碩士班碩士學位論文。

林芬英 (2003),女性領導者領導特質與領導風格之研究,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。

林宴夙、徐荷合譯 (1995),Sally Helgeson著,柔性優勢:女人的領導風格,台北:允晨。

林鉦棽 (2005),組織公民行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式的應用,管理學報,22(4)。

金洪琦 (2010),個人-主管及個人-群體適合度對角色績效、工作滿足及知覺支持的影響:以某航空公司空勤人員為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

哈佛商業評論春季號特刊(2013),哈佛教你成為成功主管,台北:天下遠見。

洪春吉 (1999) ,台灣地區中、美、日資企業主管之領導行為與權力基礎、影響手段之實證比較,中山管理評論,7(4),1115-1146。

高民凱、林清文 (2002) ,中學生解釋風格量表之編製。彰化師大輔導學報,23,131-162。

商業周刊 (2012),管理相對論,1280,26-30,台北:巨思文化。

商業周刊 (2012),管理相對論,1281,26-30,台北:巨思文化。

張康玲 (2001),女性業務主管的人格特質、領導型態及領導效能關係之研究-以台灣南區保險業為例」長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。

張潤書(1990),組織行為與管理,台北:五南圖書。

許士軍 (2002),管理學(10版),台北:東華書局。

許士軍(1995),管理學,台北:東華書局。

許道然(2002),組織公民行為之研究,空大行政學報,12,113-146。

陳儀蓉 (2006) ,新領導典範─價值導向式領導理論之概述。T&D 飛訊,42,1-14。

馮逸藍 (2008),人力資源系統對服務人員組織承諾與角色績效之影響-以金融業為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

黃俊英、林震岩 (1994),企業研究方法,台北:華泰書局。

黃家齊編譯(2011),組織行為學(13版),Stephen P. Robbins著,台北:華泰文化。

黃素慧 (2011),女性主管領導特質與核心能力對於員工工作投入之影響─以領導效能為中介變項,南台科技大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

黃麗蓉 (1996),組織中的女性領導,人事管理,33(6),19-25。

楊銘賢(1995),管理概論,台北:中興管理。

經理人MANAGER today特刊 (2013),看圖學管理─高效主管養成術,11。

廖啟義 (2012),領導者與成員交換關係對角色績效的影響─與更上層主管交換關係及領導者組織典範性之調節效果,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

劉復苓譯 (2002),男女領導大不同,Cook, Liz & Rothwell, Brian著,台北:聯經。

謝秦強 (2005),主管之領導行為與工作特性對員工工作滿意度及組織承諾影響之研究—以台南市銀行為實證,南台科技大學高階主管企管碩士班碩士學位論文。



二、英文部分
Amadnda Sinclair, Doing Leadership Differently: Gender, Power and Sexuality in a Changing Business Culture (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1998), 19.

Appelbaum, Stephen H. & Shapiro, Barbara T. (1993). Why can’t men lead like women? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(7), 28

Barnard, C.I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.

Bartol, K.M. & Butterfield, D. “Sex Effects in Evaluating Leaders,” Journal of Applied Psychology 61:4 (August 1976): 446-454.; Judi Brownell, “Perceptions of Effective Listeners: A Management Study,” Journal of Business Communication 27:4 (October 1990): 401-415.

Bass, B. M. (1990). “From Transactional to Transformational Leadership:Learning to Share the Vision,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 22. American Management Association, New York.

Bass, B.M. & B.J., Avolio.(1997). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnare. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

Biddle, B. J., (1979). Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behavior. New York:
Academic Press.

Blake, R.R. & Mouton, J.S.(1964). “ Break through in Organization Development,” Harvard Business Review, p.136.

Bolino, M.C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good
actors? Academy of Management Reviews, 24(1), 82-98.

Boman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual
performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human
Performance, 10(2), 99-109.

Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J., (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 710-725.

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial
and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (Eds.).
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2, Pala Alto, CA:
Consulting Psychologists Press, 687-732.

Cammann C., Fichman M., Jenkins, D. & Klesh, J. (1979). “The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire”, Unpublished Manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Carmen Sue Griggs, “Exploration of a Feminist Leadership Model at University Women's Centers and Women's Studies Programs: A Descriptive Study” (PhD diss., The University of Iowa, 1989), 8.

Chavez, Marcela Gonzalez.(2003). “A Study of Feminist Leadership Characteristics in Women’s Centers and Women’s Studies Programs at Southern California Universities and College.” PhD diss., University of La Verne.

Churchill, G. A. Ford, N. M. Hartley, S. W. (1985). The Determinants of Salesperson
Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Reserch, 22(2), 103-118.

Cindy Simon Rosenthal, When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 18-25.

Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. A. (1998). “Conclusion: Patterns and Trends in Studying Charismatic Leadership,” In Conger J. A. & Kanungo R. A. (Eds.), Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Coppolino, Y. and Seath, C.B. (1987), “Women Managers: Fitting the Moulding or Moulding the Fit” Equal Opportunity International, Vol. 6 No. 3, 4-10

Cook, L., & Rothwell, B. (2000). The X and Y of leadership. London: Spiro Press.

Durham,C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on tem effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231.

Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis,” in Leaders and the Leadership Process: Readings, Self-Assessments, and Applications (Chicago: Austen Press, 1994), 50-51.

Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia J. E. (1987). New approaches to leadership, cognitive eResources and organizational performance (New York: John Wiley and Sons).

Gary A. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations 5th ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001), 131.

Greenleaf, R.K. (1997)”The power of servant leadership.”, San Francisco: Berrett–
Koehler.

Helgeson, S. (1995). The female advantage: women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

Hines, R. (1992). Accounting: filling the negative space. Accounting, Organization and Society, 17, 3-4, 314-341.

House et al. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project, GLOBE. In: W.H. Mobley, M.J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in global leadership,Vol.1, Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press.

House. R. J. & Mitchell. T. R. (1971). “Path-goal theory of leadership”, Journal of Contemporamay Business, (3), pp.81-97.

James LR, RG Demaree and G Wolf (1993) Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(2), 306-309.

James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(2), 219-229.

Johnson, P. “Women and Power: Toward a Theory of Effectiveness,” Journal of Social Issues 32:3 (Summer 1976): 99-110.

Julie Indvik, “Women and Leadership,” in Leadership: Theory and Practice 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001), 221.

Katherine J. Klein, and Steve W. J. Kozlowski, “From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research,” Organizational Research Methods 3:3 (July 2000): 211-236.

Kate, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations, New York:
Wiley.

Katz, D. (1964). The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior. Behavioral Science, 9:131-146.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978) The social psychology of organization (2nd ed.). New
York: Wiley.

Koontz, H. & Weihrich, C. (1990). “Essentials of Management”, 5th.ed., New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Koys, D. J.(2001), “The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational
Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness: A Unit-Level, Longitudinal Study”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.54(1), pp101-114.

Loden, M.(1987), “Recognizing Women’s Potential:No Longer Business as Usual”, Management Review, Vol. 76 No. 12, December, p.45.

Lucille Martin Pritchard, “Women in the Nonprofit Sector: Leadership for Social Change” (PhD diss., Massachusetts, Graduate School of the University Massachusetts Amherst, 2000), 37-45.

Melamed, T., & Bozionelos, N. (1992). Managerial promotion and height. Psychological Reports, 71, 979–986.

Morrison, D. (1994). Psychological Contract and Change. Human Resource Management 33:353-372.

Msir, M. (1992). “Evolving Paradigms of Management in Organizations: A Gendered Analysis,” Journal of Management Systems 4:1 : 31.

Nelton, S. (1991), “Men, Women & Leadership”, Nation’s Business, May, 16-22

Organ, D. W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The good Solider Syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Peggy McIntosh, “Interactive Phases of Curricular Revision: A Feminist Perspective, ” (working paper 124 VIII, Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, 1983), 1-34.; Betty J. Turock, “Women and Leadership,” Journal of Library Administration 32:3/4 (September 2001): 116-117.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000,
Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and
empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management,
26:513–563.

Robbins, S. (1989), Organizational Behaviour, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p.302.

Rosener, J. B. (1990). “Ways Women Lead”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.28 No.6, November/December, pp.119-25.

Robbins, Stephen P., (1991), Management, NY : Prentice-Hall Inc., pp.411-436.

Ruth L. Jacobs, and David C. McClelland, “Moving Up the Corporate Ladder: A Longitudinal Study of the Leadership Motive Pattern and Managerial Success in Women and Men,” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research 46:1 (Winner 1994): 32-41.

Sandra Bem, “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42:2 (April 1974): 155-162.

Sargent, A. G. & Stupak, R. J. “Managing in the 90’s: The Androgynous Manager,” Training and Development Journal 43:12 (December 1989): 29-35.

Schermerhorn, J. R. (1989). Management for Productivity. John Wiley and Sons,
New York, NY.

Scott, W. G., Mitchell, T. R. & Birnbaum, P. H., 1981. Organizational Theory: A
Structural and Behavioral Analysis. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Sharma,S.1990,”Psychology of women in management: A distinct feminine leadership”, Equal Opportunities International,Vol.9 No.12:13-18

Segal,J.A. (1991). ”Women on the Verge…of Equality”, HR Magazine, Vol.36 No.6,June:117-118,120,123

Susskind, A. M., Kacmar, K. M., & Borchgrevink, C. P. (2003). Customer Service
Providers' Attitudes Relating to Customer Service and Customer Satisfaction in
the Customer-Server Exchanfe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 179-187.

Tuner, J. H. (1982). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Wadsworth Pub. Co.,
Belmont, CA:417-437.

Vroom, V. H. & P. W., Yetton . (1973). Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job statisfaction and organizational
commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors.
Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.

Yvonne Due Billing & Mats Alvesson,July. ( 2000). Gender, Work and Organization,Vol7 No.3.


三、 網站資料

1111人力銀行:http://www.1111.com.tw/

104人力銀行:http://www.104hunter.com.tw/edm/BEP00-00001-1101/03.htm
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code