Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0722108-200701 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0722108-200701
論文名稱
Title
多因子模型於台股市場之擇股策略績效分析
Stock Selection Performance Analysis using Multi-Factor Model in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
119
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-06-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-22
關鍵字
Keywords
多因子模型、市場中立策略、風險因子
market neutral strategy, risk factor, common factor, multi-factor model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5796 次,被下載 1317
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5796 times, has been downloaded 1317 times.
中文摘要
本研究參考Barra模型利用横斷面分析法,以實務為導向建構台灣股市的多因子模型。主要目的為二個,第一是找出能預測股票下期報酬之因子;第二則是利用顯著之因子建構多因子模型,並模擬市場中立策略以進行績效回測。研究發現,不論採取任何的投資策略,本研究之績效回測結果皆優於大盤。
Abstract
The objective of this study is to discover the sources of securities return in forecasting stock return from different sides of potential factors including fundamental and market information. We test currency sensitivity, earnings variability, earnings yield, growth, leverage, trading activity, momentum, size, value, volatility, capital spending discipline, free cash flow, efficiency, solvency, earnings quality, corporate finance policy and technical 17 factors basing on different factor dimensions in this study. We construct a Taiwan multi-factor model by using the most significant factors for universal stocks according to 0HMSCI Barra’s Multiple-Factor Modeling process, and then apply market neutral investment to build portfolios for performance back-testing.

As a result, the most significant top five factors in forecasting are respectively “Volatility2,” “Earnings Quality1,” “Trading1,” “Volatility1” and “Growth1” factors. In addition, we find the most useless bottom four factors in forecasting are respectively “Size1,” “Earning Yield1,” “Value1,” and “Capital Spending1.” No matter which strategies we adopt to build the portfolio, the Sharpe ratios of back-testing performance are all higher than the Benchmark, and all bring stable and consistent performance. It actually proves that this model is robust.
目次 Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION 1
1. Introduction and Background 1
2. Pros & Cons of Quantitative Management 2
3. Multi-Factor Model and Factor Category 4
4. Market Neutral Strategy 5
5. The Objective of This Study 5
II. LITERATURE REVIEW 7
1. Modern Portfolio Theory 7
2. Multi-Factor Model 10
3. The Mathematics of Multi-Factor Model 12
4. Composite Factors by Principal Component Analysis 15
III. METHODOLOGY 17
1. Analytical Framework 17
2. Step One: Compute and Determine Descriptors 20
3. Step Two: Industry Allocation 26
4. Step Three: Handling The Outliers 20
5. Step Four: Descriptors Standardization 21
6. Step Five: Test and Select The Descriptors 21
7. Step Six: Develop Composite Risk Factors by PCA 22
8. Step Seven: Test and Select Significant Factors 26
9. Step Eight : Estimate Factor Return and MFM 27
10. Step Nine : Handle Heteroscedasticity and Multicollinearity problems 28
IV. EMPIRICAL STUDY 31
1. Data 31
2. Sample 31
3. Empirical Result 34
V. CONCLUSION 61
REFERENCES 67
APPENDIX A : Descriptor Definitions 71
APPENDIX B : Descriptor Significance Test 90
APPENDIX C : Principal Component Result 94
APPENDIX D : Detailed Performance Analysis 101
參考文獻 References
Ana Paula Serra (2002), “The Cross-Sectional Determinants of Returns-Evidence from Emerging Markets’ Stocks,” Working Papers da FEP, No. 120, October.
Asteriou, D. and Hall, Stephen G. (2007), “Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach using EViews and Microfit Revised Edition.”
Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2006), “Evaluating Latent and Observed Factors in Macroeconomics and Finance,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.131, pp. 507-537.
BARRA (1998), “United States Equity Version 3 (E3), “Risk Model Handbook.”
Barry, C. B., Goldreyer, E., Lockwood, L., and Rodriguez, M. (2002), “Robustness of Size and Value Effects in Emerging Equity Markets, 1985-2000,” Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, March, pp. 1-30.
Bettman, Jenni L. (2007), “Australian Evidence Regarding The Value-Relevance of Technical Information,” Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, June, pp. 57-71.
Black, F. (1972), “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing,” Journal of Business, Vol. 45, No. 3, July, pp. 444−455.
Brennan, M., Chordia, T. and Subrahmanyam, A. (1998), “Alternative Factor Specifications, Security Characteristics, and The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 49, pp. 345–73.
Campbell, J., and Shiller, R. (1988), “The Dividend Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, March, pp. 195−228.
Chincarini, Ludwig B. and Kim, D. (2006), “Quantitative Equity Portfolio Management: An Active Approach to Portfolio Construction and Management,” McGraw-Hill.
Connor, G. and Korajczyk, Robert A. (1993), “A Test for The Number of Factors in An Approximate Factor Model,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 4, September, pp. 1263-1291.
Connor, G. and Korajzcyk, A. (1998), “Risk and Return in An Equilibrium APT Application of A New Test Methodology,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 225-289.
Connor, G. (1995), “The Three Types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power,” Financial Analysis Journal, May/June.
Dash, Ranjan K. and Singh, S. (2007), “Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns: An Application of Fama and French Model for India,” The International Journal of Finance, Vol.19, No. 1.
Fama, Eugene F. and French, Kenneth R. (1992), “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 2, June, pp. 427-465.
Fama, Eugene F. and French, Kenneth R. (1993), “Common Risk Factors in The Returns to Stocks and Bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, February, pp. 3-56.
Fama, Eugene F. and French, Kenneth R. (1998), “Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 6, December, p.p. 1975-2000.
Fama, Eugene F. and James D. MacBeth (1973), “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, May/June, pp. 607-636.
Gujarati, Damodar N. (2003), “Basic Econometrics (4th Edition).”
Jun, S., Marathe, A., and Shawky, Hany A. (2003), “Liquidity and Stock Returns in Emerging Equity Markets,” Emerging Market Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, March, pp. 1-24.
Knez, Peter J., and Ready, Mark J. (1997), “On the Robustness of Size and Book-to-market in Cross-sectional Regressions,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 4, September, pp. 1355−1382.
Kothari, S.P., Shanken, J., and Sloan, Richard G. (1995), “Another Look at The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 1, March, pp. 185−224.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, Robert W. (1994), “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, No. 5, December, pp. 1541−1578.
Lehmann, Bruce N. and Modest, David M. (1988), “The Empirical Foundations of The Arbitrage Pricing Theory,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 213-254.
Lintner, J. (1965), “The Valuation of Risk Assets and The Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, No. 1, February, pp. 13−37.
Litterman, R. and The Quantitative Resources Group of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (2003), “Modern Investment Management: An Equilibrium Approach.”
MacQueen, J. (2003), “The Structure of Multifactor Equity Risk Models,” Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, December, pp. 313-322.
Madhavan, A. and Jian Y. (2003) , “Practical Risk Analysis,” The Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, Fall, pp. 73.
Miller, G. (2006), “Needles, Haystacks, and Hidden Factors,” The Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, Winter, pp. 25-32.
Morel, C. (2001), “Stock Selection Using a Multi-factor Model: Empirical Evidence From the French Stock Market,” The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, pp. 312-334.
Morelli, D. (2007), “Beta, Size, Book-to-market Equity and Returns: A Study Based on UK Data,” Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 17, pp. 257-272.
Northfield Information Services, “U.S. Fundamental Equity Risk Model.”
Ross, Stephen A. (1976), “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 13, pp. 341-360.
Sharpe,William F. (1964), “Capital Asset Price: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3, September, pp. 425-442.
Stambaugh, Robert F. (1988), “The Information in Forward Rates: Implications for Models of The Term Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 41-70.
Stephan, Thomas G., Raimond Maurer and Martin Du ̈rr (2000), “A Multiple Factor Model for European Stocks,” working paper series: finance & accounting, No.57 Goethe University Frankfurt am Maim, September.
Shyu, S., Jeng, Y., Ton, W.H., Lee, K.J. and Chuang, H.M. (2006), “Taiwan Multi-factor Model Construction: Equity Market Neutral Strategies Application,” Department of Finance, Managerial Finance, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 915-947. National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
Trzcinka, C. (1986), “On the Number of Factors in the Arbitrage Pricing Model,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 347-368.
Wang, F. and Miller G. (2004), “Forecasting US Equity Risk Over Different Horizons,” Senior Research Consultants, Equity Model Research, Barra, Inc.
Wang, Y., Di Iorio, A. (2007), “The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns in The Chinese A-share Market,” Global Finance Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 335-349.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code