Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0723107-224236 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0723107-224236
論文名稱
Title
旅行業競爭優勢分析-以Club Med地中海會旅行社在台之競爭優勢為例
The study of Competitive Advantage on Travel agencies - A case study of Club Med in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
103
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-07-23
關鍵字
Keywords
市場區隔、品牌、核心資源、Club Med、競爭優勢
Branding, Market segment, Core resources, Competitive advantage, Club Med
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5632 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5632 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
台灣出國旅遊的市場已漸趨成熟,尤其是在資訊科技及電子商務興起之後,資訊日益透明,旅行業的生態也跟著改變;雖然出國人數仍然成長,但旅行業的利潤卻不斷下降。當其他產業的經營進入「微利時代」時,其實旅行業者早已進入了「微微利」的市場競爭。 旅行業的經營是處在高度競爭的環境裡,因此該如何在一遍紅海的市場環境中,有效的評估經營環境與競爭的本質,並且建立獨特而持續性的優勢,以啟動企業長期成長及獲利的引擎,立於不敗之地,將是旅行業經營者能否繼續存在於市場的重要關鍵。
本研究發現,在面對外部競爭時,旅行業若要在與同業間相對競爭的條件下;包括「產品優勢面」、「品牌優勢面」、「服務優勢面」、「人力優勢面」、「成本優勢面」與「價格優勢面」等六個構面,建立競爭優勢,必須先分析內部所擁有的資源與能力;因此選擇「Club Med 地中海會旅行社」為個案公司,以本研究所建立的研究架構及模式,探討個案公司所能掌握的核心能力,以及依據所擁有的核心能力,制定競爭策略,以建立其在台灣市場之持續性競爭優勢。
因此本研究的主要貢獻是探討出「企業建立競爭優勢的模式」,及以下幾點結論,可作為旅行業之參考:
1. 旅行業在經營上,應不斷深化屬於企業的核心資源或核心能力,使其具有價值的、稀有的、仿效代價高的及不可取代等特性,才能在環境變化下,持續擁有競爭優勢。
2. 旅行業的未來發展雖然會朝向極大化或是極小化的趨勢,但不論規模大小,旅行業者都必須擁有競爭優勢,才能在高度競爭的環境下,獲致成功並且基業長青。
3. 目前,台灣大部分旅行業的規模都屬於中小企業,雖無法全面於品牌、產品、人力、服務、成本、價格等構面建立全面性的優勢,但至少必須擁有一至二個構面的競爭優勢,例如產品和服務,擁有獨特的產品和差異化的服務,即使是規模小的旅行業,也能於眾多的競爭者中勝出。
4. 個案公司因其品牌的知名度雖佔有相當大的競爭優勢,但仍必須採取成長策略,增加新的目標市場與區隔,以差異化策略開發適合該目標市場區隔之產品及服務,並且加強其與供應商航空公司及經銷商旅行社間之關係網絡,並且持續強化其度假村之管理能力及整體服務品質以獲致更高的競爭優勢。
Abstract
The market that Taiwanese travel abroad is ripening gradually, especially after the rise of information science, technology and e-commerce. The information about travel products is transparent day by day, the ecology of travel agencies change too; though the number of people going abroad still grows up, but the profit of the travel agencies is dropping constantly. When the management of other industries have already entered “the era of the meager profit”, in fact the travel agencies have already entered the market of “the slight profit “, so the travel agencies are in a highly competitive environment invariably . However, how to evaluate the competitive environment and the essence of the competition effectively? To set up the unique and constant advantage and to start up the enterprise for a long time and lucrative growing up, will be the key for the enterprise to sustain in an unassailable position and to continue existing in the market, it’s also the main purpose to conduct this study.
The result of this study shows that under the external competition, if the travel agencies want to build up the competitive advantage from 6 dimensions among the same trade; Including products advantage dimension, brand advantage dimension, service advantage dimension, human resource advantage dimension, cost advantage dimension and price advantage dimension, the travel agencies must to analyze the resources and abilities they have internally; this paper takes a case study of Club Med in Taiwan and use the model and framework which was created by this study to explore the core competency, competitive strategy and competitive advantages of Club Med.
Therefore, the main contribution of this study is to create “The model of enterprise setting up the competitive advantage”. Besides this key finding, there are some conclusions as following, which can be regarded as a reference by the travel agencies:
1. Travel agencies should enhance their core resources and abilities as valuable, rare, costly-to-imitate and non-substitutable capabilities, to create the sustainable competitive advantage.
2. Though the future development of the travel agencies will move towards the trend of the maximization or the minimization, but regardless the scale, the core competencies still the key success factors for a travel agent to sustain in the highly competitive environments.
3. Most of the travel agents in Taiwan belong to small and medium-sized enterprises, although they are not able to build up the advantage overall at brand, products, manpower, service, cost and price, but they must at least have one or two competitive advantages, such as products and service, if the travel agent own the unique products and differentiate service, even it’s a small agent, still can compete with the competitors.
4. Even though the case company has the competitive advantage on brand image, case company still need to take the growth strategy to increase new market segments for growing up, and to take the differentiation strategy to develop the products and service which are suitable to the target audiences’ need, to enhance the network with supplier's airline and distributor's travel agent, to strengthen the managerial ability of its holiday village continuously and to improve the service quality in order to obtain higher competition advantage .
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
中文摘要..............iii
Abstract................v
致謝詞.................vii
目錄....................viii
表目錄..................x
圖目錄..................xi
第一章 緒論.........1
第一節 研究背景與動機..........1
第二節 研究目的......................3
第三節 研究流程......................5
第二章 文獻探討......................7
第一節 旅行業之定義與特性..7
第二節 旅行業之發展概況.....14
第三節 競爭策略.....................22
第四節 競爭優勢.....................33
第三章 研究方法.....................47
第一節 研究架構.....................47
第二節 研究方法.....................48
第三節 研究範圍與對象.........49
第四節 研究界定.....................50
第四章 產業初探及個案分析.51
第一節 產業初探及五力分析.51
第二節 Club Med地中海會旅行社概況..................57
第三節 Club Med地中海會旅行社核心資源分析..66
第四節 Club Med在台灣市場之SWOTt分析.........69
第五節 Club Med在台灣市場之競爭策略..............71
第六節 Club Med未來之競爭策略以創造持久之競爭優 勢.74
第七節 產業初探及個案分析小結............................76
第五章 結論與建議.......................................................78
第一節 研究結論........................................................78
第二節 研究建議........................................................79
參考文獻........................................................................82
中文文獻.....................................................................82
英文文獻.....................................................................85
附錄 個案訪談內容摘要...............................................88
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
1.方至民,2000,企業競爭優勢,初版,前程企管。
2.尤國彬,1995,高雄地區觀光旅館經營策略之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.司徒達賢,1995,策略管理,遠流出版,p.11-15、p.19-24、p.32-41。
4.任曙,2003,旅行業核心資源與經營策略之研究,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。
5.交通部觀光局,2007,「中華民國94年國人旅遊狀況調查」,交通部觀光局。
6.交通部觀光局,2007,「中華民國95年1~12月中華民國國民出國目的地調查」。
7.交通部觀光局,2007,「中華民國旅行業家數統計表」。
8.吳淑華、鍾震東、鑾錦榮、龔昶元、呂益丞,2004,策略管理,第五版,Strategic management:Competitiveness and Globalization-Concepts By Hitt, Irelad, and Hoskisson,新加坡商湯姆生亞洲私人有限公司台灣分公司,(原文於2003年出版)。
9.吳武忠省訂;賴韻如、黃千婷、張宜婷、蔡卓芬、王雅芬、蕭莉蘭、胡瑋珊等譯,2007,觀光學,初版,Tourism:The business of travel,Roy A.Cook、Laura J. Yale、Joseph J. Marqua,台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司,第三版。
10.吳思華著,1998,策略九說,二版,臉譜文化。
11.何明修,1993,旅行業品牌形象建立策略之研究,私立中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
12.余朝權,1998,產業競爭分析專論,五南圖書公司出版,pp.3-19。
13.李明軒與邱如美譯,1999,競爭優勢,Michael E.Porter 著,”Competitive Advantage”,天下文化。
14.李金梅(譯),2002,後數位時代的經營策略,eCommerce:Formulation of Strategy,Robert Plant,台灣培生出版。
15.林彥甫,2003,旅行業網絡關係運用之研究-以台中市專營國民旅遊業務之旅行社為例,靜宜大學觀光事業學系研究所碩士論文。
16.周明智,2005年11月,「論旅遊產業特性及發展策略」,應用倫理研究通訊,第36期:26-34頁。
17.徐作聖,1999,策略致勝,遠流出版,p.131。
18.容繼業,1993/2002,旅行業理論與實務,揚智出版。
19.孫慶文,1999,旅運實務,台北:揚智出版。
20.許士軍,1985,掌握競爭優勢的策略思考,天下文化,p.221-231。
21.許梅芳譯,1988,超競爭優勢,D’Aveni,R.A.,遠流出版社,p.385-496。
22.陳姿雯,1999,旅行社運用網際網路之行銷策略研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
23.陳嘉隆,2001,旅行業經營與管理,台北:自行出版。
24.張玉穎,2000,e 路順風—數位時代的旅遊服務,台北:漢智出版。
25.黃宏義譯,1997,策略家的智慧,大前研一著,長河出版社。
26.黃應豪,1994,我國國際觀光旅館業經營策略之研究--策略矩陣分析法之應用,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
27.黃營杉譯,1999,策略管理,四版,p156,Charles W.L Hill&Gareth R Jones,華泰文化。
28.楊慧華,2001,企業文化、企業願景、經營策略與經營績效之關係研究--以台灣國際觀光旅館為實證,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
29.楊明青,謝永茂,2002。協力網絡與旅行產業之相關研究—以台中地區為例。論文發表於中華民國戶外遊憩學會、世新大學觀光系主辦之「第四屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會(2002)」,台北。
30.經濟部商業司,2000,電子商務用語,台北:官方出版品。
31.蔡雪紅,1998,企業文化、領導型態與企業績效關係之研究-以臺灣地區國際觀光旅館為例,逢甲大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
32.鄭紹成,1991,企業關鍵成功因素、競爭優勢及競爭策略之研究,中國文化大學碩士論文。
33.韓傑,1984,旅行業管理,高雄:前程出版。
二、英文部分
1. Aaker,D.A.,1989,Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to a Sustainable Competitive Advantage, CaliforniaManagementReview,Vol.31, p.91-106.
2. Aaker, D. A. ,1992, Strategic Market Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p.342-348.
3. Ansoff, H. I., 1965, Corporate Strategy,McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Ansoff, H. I. and McDonnell,1965, Implanting Strategic Management, 2nd. ,Prentice-Hall(UK).
5. Bain,J.S.,1956 ,“Economics of Scale,Concentration,and the Condition of Entry in Twenty Manufacturing Industries”, Journal of Management, Vol.17.
6. Barney,J.B.,1986,“Organizational Culture: Can It be a source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, Nov. p.656-665.
7. Barney,J.B.,1986,“Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck,and Business Strategy”, Management Science, Vol.42, p.123-124.
8. Barney,J.B.,1991,‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’,Journal of Management,Vol.17, p.99-120.
9. Boseman, G. & Phatak A,1989, Strategic Management ,Text and Cases,2nd , New York: John Wiley & Sons Co., p.11-12.
10. Chandler,A.D. ,1962,”Strategy and Structure”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Collins,D.J. & Cynthia A.M. ,1995,”Competing on Resources: Strategies in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review.
12. George,S.,1984,Strategic Market Planning : The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage ,West Publishing Company,Minnesotap,p26。
13. Gluck,W.F.1976,Business Policy:“Strategy Formation and Management Action”,2nded.,McGraw-Hill Book Co.,New York, p.115~147.
14. Hamel,G.,1994,the concept of core competence, competence-based competition, p.11-33.
15. Hill, W. L.,and G.R.Jones,1998, Strategic Management: An Integated Approach ,4rd ed,Houghton Mifflin Co.,Boston.
16. Hofer,C.W. & D.Schendel,1978, Strategy Formulation:Analytical Concepts,Mn West Publishing St. Paul.
17. Hamel,G. and A. Heene edit, 1994,Competence-Based Competition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.24.Hax.
18. Leonard-Barton, D. ,1992, “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, p.111-125.
19. Michael J. R., and Urs S. Daellenbach,1999, "Research Notes and Communications Rethinking Methods for the Resource-Based Theory Perspective: Isolating Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20,p.487-494
20. Miles, R. E. and C. C. Snow,1987,Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process, New York ,McGraw-Hall,p.28-30.
21. Porter, E.Michael.1980,“Competitive Strategy-Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors”, The Free Press ,New York,
22. Porter, E.Michael, 1985, “Competitive Advantage - Creating & Sustaining Superior Performance”,The Free Press, New York.
23. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G, 1990.“The Core Competence of the Corporation,”Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, No.3, May, p.79-92.
24. Ragin and C. Becker Vaughan ,D. 1992,”Theory Elaboration : The Heuristics of Case Analysis”,In H.(eds.),”What is A Case ?”,Cambridge University Press , New York, p.173-202
25. Robinson W.T. and Fornell C. , 1985,”The Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22,p.297-304.
26. Stephen P .Robbins,1994,Management, fourth edition , Prentice Hall.27. Tilles,S.,”How to Evaluate Corporate Strategy“,Harvard Business Review, 1963,p112.
28. Tampoe ,M. ,1994,”Exploiting the Core Competences of your Organization “Long Range Planning ,Vol.27 , No.4 , Aug. p.66-67.
29. Watson , G. H. , 1993,”How Process Benchmarking Support Corporate strategy “ ,Planning Review , Vol.21 , No.1, p.12-15.
30. Wernerfelt, B. 1995, “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After”trategic Management Journal, Vol.16, p.171-174.
31. Wernerfelt, B. 1989,”From Critical Resources to Corporate Strategy”, Journal of General Management, p.4-12.
32. Yin , R.K., 1984 “Case Study Research” , Sage , Beverly , Hills, CA,
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.129.23.30
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.129.23.30
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code