Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0724112-115213 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0724112-115213
論文名稱
Title
以表皮生長因子受體突變特異抗體來預估 酪胺酸激脢抑制劑治療之成果
Usefulness of delE746-A750 and L858R Mutation-Specific Antibodies of EGFR for Predicting Treatment Outcome of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
57
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-07-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-07-24
關鍵字
Keywords
L858R、delE746-A750、酪胺酸激脢抑制劑、表皮生長因子受體基因突變、突變特異抗體
L858R, mutation-specific antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR gene mutation, delE746-A750
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5701 次,被下載 1143
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5701 times, has been downloaded 1143 times.
中文摘要
在非小細胞肺癌病人中,酪胺酸激脢抑制劑治療效果與表皮生長因子受體是否有基因突變有重要關聯。位於exon 19與exon 21的基因突變約佔了表皮生長因子受體基因突變的九成,其中又分別以delE746-A750及L858R突變為主。此篇研究,我們以delE746-A750及L858R兩種的表皮生長因子受體突變特異抗體來偵測表皮生長因子受體基因突變及探討與治療結果的相關性。43位非小細胞肺癌病人,25位(58.1%)有表皮生長因子受體基因突變,delE746-A750基因突變有7位,L858R基因突變有18位。以表皮生長因子受體突變特異抗體檢驗出delE746-A750基因突變有4位,L858R基因突變有12位。以免疫組織化學染色方法來偵測表皮生長因子受體基因突變的敏感性及特異性,對delE746-A750突變為57.1% 及97.3%,對L858R突變為66.7% 及100%。陽性預測率及陰性預測率,對delE746-A750突變為80% 及94.7%,對L858R突變為100% 及80.6%。以免疫組織化學染色方法來分析治療結果,對平均無進展生存期沒有意義,但對平均整體存活期有意義。表皮生長因子受體突變特異抗體來偵測表皮生長因子受體突變有著高陽性預測率及高特異性的優點,如此可用來當作表皮生長因子受體基因突變的初步篩檢,如此在一般的病理檢驗時即可施行。此外,對於整體存活率也有預測價值。
Abstract
Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy depends on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There has been an increasing interest in studying mutation-specific rabbit monoclonal antibodies of delE746-A750 mutation in exon 19 and L858R point mutation in exon 21 for detecting EGFR mutants. These two mutations account for approximately 90% of all EGFR mutations. We evaluated the two mutation-specific monoclonal antibodies for the detection of EGFR mutations by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the relationship with treatment outcome and survival. Twenty-five patients (58.1%) harbored EGFR mutations. These mutations include delE746-A750 mutation for seven patients, L858R point mutation for in eighteen patients. IHC showed, for the delE746-A750 and L858R mutations, sensitivity (57.1% and 66.7%), specificity (97.3% and 100%), positive predictive value (80.0% and 100%), and negative predictive value (94.7% and 80.6%). Analysis for progression-free survival was not correlated to IHC staining, but the overall survival was correlated to IHC staining. These mutation-specific antibodies for delE746-A750 and L858R mutations have high positive predictive value and specificity for predefined EGFR mutations and may be suitable for screening for these predefined mutations. However, negative IHC results required further mutation analyses before excluding EGFR TKI therapy.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書…………………………………...………………………
致謝………………………………………………………………..…I
中文摘要………………………………………………………..........II-III
英文摘要………………………………………………….…...…..…IV-V
第一章 背景介紹
1.1 背景及動機……………………………………….........1-2
1.2 研究動機…………………………………………….….3
1.3 研究目標…………………………………………….….4
第二章 研究方法
2.1 病患篩選與治療…………………………………….…..5
2.2 DNA萃取……………………………………………..….6
2.3 聚合酵素鍊鎖反應擴增DNA…………………………..6
2.4 即時聚合酵素鍊鎖反應及DNA定序偵測表皮生長
因子受體基因突變……………………………………..7
2.5 免疫組織化學染色偵測表皮生長因子受體基因突變..7-8
2.6 統計分析…………………………………….…………. 8
第三章 結果分析
3.1 病患特性及表皮生長因子受體酪胺酸激脢抑制劑治療
效果…………………………………….……………9-10
3.2 表皮生長因子受體基因突變分析…………………..10
3.3 表皮生長因子受體基因突變與治療結果分析……..10-11
3.4 表皮生長因子受體基因突變對存活率上的影響…..11-12
3.5 以分子生物技術及免疫組織化學染色方法偵測表皮生
長因子受體基因突變的比較……………………….12-13
3.6 以突變特異抗體染色結果來預測酪胺酸激脢抑制劑治
療效果…………………………………...…………..13
第四章 討論分析…………………………………...……………..14-18
第五章 結論…………………………………...…………………..19
表格…………………………………...…………………..…………20-31
圖次…………………………………...…………………………..…32-39
參考文獻…………………………………...………………………..40-46
附錄…………………………………...…………………..…………47
參考文獻 References
1. Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of
targeted inhibitors. Nature Reviews 2005;5:341–354.
2. Janne PA, Engelman JA, Johnson BE, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for treatment and tumor biology. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3227–3234.
3. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2787–2799.
4. Kato Y, Peled N, Wynes MW, et al. Novel epidermal growth factor receptors mutation-specific antibodies for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1551–1558.
5. Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:339–346.
6. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, et al. Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:
958–917.
7. Riely GJ, Politi KA, Miller VA, et al. Update on epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:7232–7241.
8. Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T, et al. Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3340–3346.
9. Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L, et al. EGFR mutations in non-small- cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:857–865.
10. Mitsudomi T, KosakaT, Endoh H, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2513–2520.
11. Yu, J., S. Kane, J. Wu, et al. Mutation-specific antibodies for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(9):3023–3028.
12. Mendelsohn J: Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1s–13s.
13. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:337–345.
14. Ranson M, Hammond LA, Ferry D, et al. ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors. Results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2240–2250.
15. Herbst RS, Maddox AM, Rothenberg ML, et al. Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well- tolerated and has activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors. Results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3815–3825.
16. Yatabe Y, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T, et al. Epidermal growth factor
receptor gene amplification is acquired in association with tumor
progression of EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Cancer Res 2008;68:
2106–2111.
17. Sholl LM, Yeap BY, Iafrate AJ, et al. Lung adenocarcinoma with
EGFR amplification has distinct clinicopathologic and molecular
features in never-smokers. Cancer Res 2009;69:8341–8348.
18. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nature Reviews 2007;7:169–181.
19. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207–214.
20. Riely, G. J., W. Pao, D. K. Pham, et al. Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12: 839–844.
21. Jackman, D. M., B. Y. Yeap, L. V. Sequist, et al. Exoni 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are assoc ated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12(13): 3908–3914.
22. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from ‘‘never smokers’’ and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:13306–13311.
23. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: Correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497–1500.
24. Han, S. W., T. Y. Kim, P. G. Hwang, et al. Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(11): 2493–2501.
25. D'Angelo, S. P., M. C. Pietanza, M.L. Johnson, et al. Incidence of EGFR Exon 19 Deletions and L858R in Tumor Specimens From Men and Cigarette Smokers With Lung Adenocarcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2011;29: 2066–2070.
26. Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Cappuzzo F, et al. Combination of EGFR gene copy number and protein expression predicts outcome for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. Ann Oncol 2007;18:752–760.
27. Lee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, et al. Somatic mutations of EGFR gene in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2879–2882.
28. Li, A. R., D. Chitale, Gregory J. R., et al. EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma: clinical testing experience and relationship to EGFR gene copy number and immunohistochemical expression. J Mol Diagn 2008;10(3): 242–248.
29. Yatabe Y, Hida T, Horio Y, et al. A rapid, sensitive assay to detect EGFR mutation in small biopsy specimens from lung cancer. J Mol Diagn 2006;8:335–341.
30. Kitamura A, Hosoda W, Sasaki E, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of EGFR mutation using mutation-specific antibodies in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:3349–3355.
31. Kawahara A, Yamamoto C, Nakashima K, et al. Molecular diagnosis of activating EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer using mutation-specific antibodies for immunohistochemical analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:3163–3170.
32. Li D, Chen S, Hu C, et al. Immunohistochemistry with mutation specific antibodies detecting the status of EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Mod Pathol 2010;23:407A.
33. Brevet M, Arcila M, Ladanyi M. Assessment of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry using antibodies specific to the two major forms of mutant EGFR. J Mol Diagn 2010;12:169–176.
34. McCormick SR, Lillemoe TJ, Beneke J, et al. HER2 assessment by immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization: comparison of HercepTest and PathVysion commercial assays. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;117:935–943.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code