本文是以科學園區內的高科技產業為對象，主要採用Aoki (2000) 的資訊系統模式和科學園區內不同的統理 (governance) 架構來建立不同的組織模式，進而分析在不同組織模式下，組織在資訊處理能力的配置效率，結果發現具有彈性化及專業化的垂直分工不只是新竹科學園區的內最具效率及優勢的組織模式，這將亦會是一個產業組織的趨勢。再加入制度層面的比較分析後結果，無法明確的證明，是否在創投業蓬勃發展後，能使科學園區走向矽谷的模，因為其中需考量的因素很多，包括經濟、政治、社會、教育等環境，但當台灣的創投業成熟發展後，將能發揮其金融面與實質面的優勢，對於協助國內廠商在進行研發以及創新具有相當的助益。

NONE

第一章 緒論…………………….………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………….1
第二節 全文架構……………………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻回顧 ……………..…………………………………………...…...3
第一節 資訊體系……………………………………………………………3
第二節 研發機構、研發外溢與地理上集中………………………………….5
第三節 廠商之組織模式………………………………………………………7
第三章新竹科學園區之組織與制度特色 …..………………………………9
第一節 新竹科學園區的高科技產業特色 ………………..………………….9
第二節 不同研發組織模式的形成 ………………………...…..……..…….10
第四章 模型………………………………………………………..…16
第一節 最適決策選擇 ……………………………………………………….17
第二節 不同組織模式之比較分析……………………………………………20
第三節 組織與其他領域之連結…………………………………………...26
第五章 新竹科學園區與矽谷各制度層面之比較與探討………..31
第一節 新竹科學園區……………………………………………………...31
第二節 矽谷…………………………………………………………………33
第六章 結論…………………………………………………………………36
參考文獻 ………………..……………………………………….……….……. 38
附錄 ………………………………………………………………………..….42







圖表目錄

圖3–1 1998年科學園區IC產業結構 ………………………………… .………..9
圖3–2 三種工作單位間資訊連結的一般模式 ….…………………………….11

表3–1 比較研發組織資訊系統之特性 …………………………………………10
表5–1新竹科學工業園區與矽谷制度層面之比較……………………………..35

中文部分
中國生產力中心 (1998)《能力雜誌》, 第502 期。
中華民國科學技術統計要覽 (1999) 行政院國家科學委員會。
中華民國創業投資公會 (2000)《創業投資通報》, 第22號。
吳豐祥 (1998) 產學合作創新與其相關政策之探討, 發表於《第七屆產業管理研討會》.
李文雄 (1998) 臺灣積體電路產業發展及其營運生態模型, 《台北銀行月刊》, 第28卷 第1期: 66-88.
李揚、胡均立、余培德 (2000) 新竹科學園區廠商之智慧財產權管理與訴訟策略,《科技管理學刊》, 第5卷 第1期: 1-29.
徐進鈺 (1997) 臺灣積體電路工業發展歷程之研究─ 高科技、政府干預與人才回流, 《國立臺灣大學地理學系地理學報》, 第23期: 33-48.
徐進鈺 (1998) 邁向一個學習性的區域？台北─新竹 高科技走廊的廠商聚集與技術學習,《師大地理研究報告》, 第29期: 143-159.
徐進鈺 (1999) 流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學園區的勞動市場與高科技發展,《臺灣社會研究季刊》, 第25期: 75-118.
馬維揚 (1997) 新竹科學園區產業發展之評估與展望, 《台北銀行月刊》, 第27卷第9期: 42-62.
馬維揚 (1998) 高科技產業與金融面發展調和之研究─ 科學園區IC業實證, 《台北銀行月刊》, 第28卷第10期: 66-88.
馬維揚 (2000) 臺灣IC產業垂直分工體系形成之研究，1993-1998,《科技管理學刊》,第5卷 第2期:1-20.
張維安、韓格理、潘美玲 (2000) 晶圓代工全球稱霸─台灣半導體產業競爭力http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~cpsun/chang-weian-global.htm
陳立功 (2000) 一九九九年全國科技動態調查─兼論國內研發經費, 《科學發展月刊》, 第28卷第10期: 772-779.
陳東升 (1997) 高科技產業組織間關係的權力分析：以臺灣積體電路產業的設計公司為例,《臺大社會學刊》, 第25期: 47-104.
陳東升 (1999) 高科技產業組織網絡統理架構的內涵及其演變的探討：以臺灣積體電路產業封裝部門為例,《中山管理評論》, 第7卷 第2期: 293-324.
陳東升 (2000) 創新、創業與臺灣積體電路產業組織網絡的動態發展：創業投資公司網絡介面角色的探討,《臺大社會學刊》, 第28期: 1-64.
陳素娟 (2000) 政府出資研究發展之技術移轉與績效, 《台灣經濟金融月刊》, 第36卷 第5期: 80-88.
曾銘深 (1999) OECD國家推動產學合作之作法, 《經濟情勢暨評論》, 第5卷第3期:80-91.
黃淑芬 (2001) 晶圓代工 《產業調查與技術》, 第136期：35-43.
楊維楨、李文雄 (1999) 台灣高科技產業營運績效之探討─ 新竹科學園區經驗, 《台北銀行月刊》, 第29卷第5期: 22-38.
鄒繼礎 (2001) 數位經濟時代新興交易制度對經濟發展的影響, 發表於《知識經濟時代之經濟發展與人力運用研討會》.
蔡宏明 (1999) 數位經濟時代下的產業發展趨勢, 《經濟情勢暨評論》, 第5卷第2期.
蔡蕙安、陳致綱 (2001) 研究發展之外溢效果對廠商成本結構之影響─台灣高科技產業之實証分析,發表於《第二屆全國實證經濟學會》.

英文部分

Adams, D.J. (1999) “The Structure of Firm R&D, The Factor Intensity of Production, and Skill Bias,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3): 499-510.
Aoki, Masahiko (1985) “Horizontal V.S. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm” American economic review, 76: 971-983
Aoki, Masahiko (1995) “An Evolving Diversity of Organizational Mode and Its Implications for Transitional Economies” Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 9: 333-353
Aoki, Masahiko (1999) “Information and Governance in the Silicon Valley Model,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper.
Aoki, Masahiko (2000) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, book manuscript, Stanford University Press.
Ausretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman (1996) “R&D Spillovers and The Geography of Innovation and Production,” American Economic Review, 86: 630-640
Banina, Neil, Randall W. Eberts, and Michael S. Fogarty (1993) “Universities and The Startup of New Companies: Can We Generalize from Routh 128 Silicon Valley,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75: 761-66
Baptista, Rui (2000) “Do Innovations Diffuse Faster within Geographical Clusters?” Inter-national Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(3): 515-535
Baptista, Rui and P. Swann (1998) “Do Firms in Cluster Innovate More,” Research Policy, 27(6): 525-540.
Bernstein, J.I. and M.I. Nadiri (1988) “Interindustry R&D Spillovers, the Rates of Return and Production in High-Tech Industries,” American Economic Review, 78(2): 429-434.
Bernstein, Jeffrey (1997) “Interindustry R&D Spillovers for Electrical and Electronic Products: The Canadian case,” Economic systems Research, 9(1): 111-125.
Bryjorfsson, E. (1994) “Information Assets, Technology, and Organization,” Management Science, 40(12): 1645-62.
Chang, Pao-Long, Chiung-Wen Hsu and Chien-Tzu Tsai (1999) “A Stage Approach for Industrial Technology Development and Implementation-The Case of Taiwan’s Computer Industry,” Technovation, 19: 233-241
Chen, E. Yegin (1994) “The Evaluation of University-Industry Technoloty in Hong Kong,” Technovation, 14: 449-459
Cremer, J. (1990) “Common Knowledge and the Co-ordination of Economic Activities,” in M. Aoki, B. Gustafsson and O.E. Williamson (eds.), The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties, Sage Publications: 53-76.
DeCanio, Stephen J. and William E. Watkins (1998) “Information Processing and Organizational Structure,” Journal of economic behavior & organization, 36: 275-294
Ellison, Glen and Edward Glaeser (1997) “The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 89 (2): 311-316.
Ezkowitz, H. (1998) “The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of The New University-Industry Linkages,” Research Policy, 27: 823-833
Feldman, M.P. (1994) The Geography of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Geisler, E. and A Rubenstein (1989) “University-Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues,” in A. Link and Tassey (ed.) Cooperative Research; New Strategies for Competitiveness, New York: ST, Martin Press, 43-62
Gorman,M. And W.A. Sahlman (1989) “What Do Venture Capitalists Do?” Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 231-48.
Hans, Corsten (1987) “Problems with Cooperation Between Universities and Enterprises-A Comparative Study on the Size of Enterprise,” Technovation, 7:295-301
Hellmann, T. (1998) “The Allocation of Control Rights in Venture Capital Contracts”, Rand Journal of Economics, 29: 57-76. .
Holmstrom R. Bengt and Jean Tirole (1989) “ The Theory of Firm,” in R. Schmalesness and R.D. Willig (ed.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume I:63-133
Jaffe, Adam B. (1986) “Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value,” American Economic Review, 77: 987-1001.
Jaffe, Adam B. (1989) “Real Effects of Academic Research,” American Economic Review, 79: 957-70
Jaffe, Adam B. (1993) “Geographic Localization Of Knowledge Spillovers As Evidenced By Patent Citations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics August, 577-598
Lerner Josh and Samuel Kortum(1998) “Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?,” Working paper series, NO.6846
Lerner, J. (1994) “The Syndication of Venture Capital Investments,” Financial Management, 23: 16-27.
Liu, Chung-Yuan (1993) “Government’s Role In Developing A High-Tech Industry: The Case of Taiwan Semiconductor Industry,” Technovation, 13(5): 299-309
Mai, Chao-Cheng and Shin-Kun Peng (1999) “Cooperation VS Competition In a Spatial Model,” Regional science and urban economics, 29: 463-472
Nelson, R. R. (1982) “The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97: 453-470.
Papaconstantinou, G., N. Sakurai and A. Wyckoff (1998) “Domestic and International Product-embodied R&D Diffusion,” Research Policy, 27: 301-314
Prat, Andrea (1996) “Shared Knowledge VS Diversified Knowledge In Teams,” Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 10: 181-195
Prat, Andrea (1998) “How Homogeneous Should a Team Be?,” Ph.D. dissertation. Email: a.prat@kub.nl
Rander, Roy (1987) “Decentralization and Incentives,” in Theodore Groves, Roy Radner, and Stanley Reiter (eds.), Information, incentives, & economic mechanisms, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Saxenian, A. (1999) “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connections: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading,” SIEPR working paper, Stanford University.
Saxenian, Annalee (1991) “The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley,” Research Policy, 20(5): 423-437
Saxenian, Annalee (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, Annalee (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press.
Tsai, Diana H. (2001) “R&D Spillovers and High-Technology Clustering: An Empirical Analysis Using Taiwanese Microdata,” paper presented at the 76th Annual WEA conference, San Francisco, U.S., July 4-8.
Tushman, Michael L. and David A. Nadler (1978) “Information Processing As an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design,” Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624
West, Jonathan (2000) “Institutions, Information Processing, and Organization Structure In Research and Development: Evidence From The Semiconductor Industry,” Research Policy, 29: 349-373