Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0725101-233720 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0725101-233720
論文名稱
Title
組織公平與組織承諾關係之研究─檢驗薪資制度知覺的調節效果
THE PAY INSTITUTE PERCEPTION AS A ADJUSTMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODS OF ORGANIZATION JUSTICE AND ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
82
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2001-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2001-07-25
關鍵字
Keywords
激勵性、合理性、薪資制度知覺、組織承諾、組織公平、回饋性、競爭性
organization commitment, organization justice, reliability, pay institute perception, competence, feedback, incentive
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5744 次,被下載 8090
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5744 times, has been downloaded 8090 times.
中文摘要
組織公平與組織承諾的關係,是許多學者曾做過的研究,然而,以往這些研究都是探討其間的直接影響關係,並未探討在不同情境下,組織公平與組織承諾間的關係,是否會受到情境因素的影響。而因薪資制度是連結組織績效發展與員工利益的一項制度,也是與員工切身利益最直接相關的一種組織制度,因此,本研究參考激勵理論的觀點,選擇員工對薪資制度的知覺做為情境變項,探討其對組織公平與組織承諾關係的調節效果。本研究共分兩階段,第一階段為定義薪資制度知覺概念及發展問卷,第二階段為探討薪資制度知覺對組織公平與組織承諾關係的調節效果;問卷調查對象為軍需事業工廠從業勞工,總計有效問卷221份。

第一階段為考量目前國內外並無合適的薪資制度知覺研究構面,因此,本研究歸納國內外學者對薪資制度設計、目標及政策的共同概念,定義合理性、競爭性、激勵性及回饋性為薪資制度知覺構面,並以此構面為基礎發展問卷,最後完成之問卷,經分析信度值為0.8756,各構面的內部一致性係數介於0.6388至0.8655之間,解釋變異量達到67.835%,以Pearson相關分析檢定建構效度亦均達顯著水準,顯示根據四項薪資制度知覺構面為基礎所發展的問卷,已具有研究及實用價值,表示本研究第一階段的探索性研究目的已達到。

第二階段為將薪資制度的知覺做為組織變項時,探討其對組織公平與組織承諾關係的調節效果。雖然研究結果僅發現合理性知覺與分配公平的交互作用項,對留職承諾具有影響力,但應可部分證實在進行組織公平與組織承諾的研究時,薪資制度知覺為不可忽略的一項調節變項,並且,本研究結果亦可推論Szilagui and Wallace(1983)在其整合激勵模型與報償模型中的觀點,在激勵過程中,組織變項是會影響績效的一項情境因素。

Abstract
The relationship between organization justice and organization commitment have be researched by many scholars. However, researchers have never considered the influence of different organization situations to the relationship. According to some researchers in practice, pay institute is considered as a situation variance to analyze the effect to the relationship between organization justice and organization commitment in the pay institute perception of employment. This theme has steps: first step, we include the common conception of designs, goal, and polices of pay institute to define the pay institute perception with reliability, competence, incentive and feedback and develop a valid questionnaire; Second step, we analyze the effect in the relationship between organization justice and organization commitment to conclude that the pay institute perception of employment is an important adjustment variance. We also proof organization variance does affect the merit, which is indicated by theme of Szilagui and Wallance(1983).
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機 …………………………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的 …………………………………………………………………………… 4
第二章 文獻探討 …………………………………………………………………………… 5
第一節 知覺 ………………………………………………………………………………… 5
第二節 薪資制度 …………………………………………………………………………… 7
第三節 組織公平 …………………………………………………………………………… 20
第四節 組織承諾 …………………………………………………………………………… 26
第五節 組織公平與組織承諾的理論與實證研究 ………………………………………… 33
第三章 薪資制度知覺問卷編製 …………………………………………………………… 37
第一節 薪資制度知覺構面 ………………………………………………………………… 37
第二節 問卷編製與前測 …………………………………………………………………… 39
第三節 問卷修訂與分析 …………………………………………………………………… 43
第四章 薪資制度知覺對組織公平與組織承諾關係的調節效果 ………………………… 50
第一節 研究設計 …………………………………………………………………………… 50
第二節 資料初步分析 ……………………………………………………………………… 54
第三節 組織公平與組織承諾之關係 ……………………………………………………… 57
第四節 薪資制度知覺的調節效果 ………………………………………………………… 61
第五章 結論與建議 ………………………………………………………………………… 68
第一節 結論 ………………………………………………………………………………… 68
第二節 建議 ………………………………………………………………………………… 71
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………………………… 73
附錄 問卷 …………………………………………………………………………………… 78


參考文獻 References
參考文獻

一、中文部分

1.蔡憲六,1980,企業薪資管理,三民書局。
2.謝安田,1982,人事管理。
3.許士軍,1982,管理學,東華書局,PP. 301-310.
4.傅肅良,1985,人事心理學,三民書局。
5.蔡玲玉,1989,薪酬管理制度與勞資關係氣氛之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
6.吳靄書,1989,企業人事管理,大中國圖書公司。
7.邱文賢,1989,「台灣製造業薪資報酬之國際比較」,台灣銀行季刊。
8.沈清文,1989,「員工對管理措施的滿意程度與抵制行為傾向之研究─以台灣紡織業為例」,管理評論。
9.趙必孝,1990,金融自由化與金融機構人員離職因素關係之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10.陳文光譯,小柳勝次郎著,1990,人事、薪資管理改善實務,台華工商圖書出版公司。
11.鍾聖校,1990,認知心理學,心理出版社。
12.徐承然,1991,「薪資結構合理化」,管理雜誌,201期,頁125-127。
13.徐承然,1991,「知己知彼謀求對策:薪資調查釐清市場行情」,管理雜誌,201期,頁134-136。
14.鄭乃壬,1992,國營事業人事制度與組織承諾關係之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.李慕華,1992,組織忠誠的內涵意義、影響因素與行為結果之探討-以台灣中小企業為例,私立輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
16.林瑞煌,1992,「國營事業薪資制度改進芻議」,石油通訊(技術篇),第四卷。
17.郭榮哲,1992,策略性的薪資設計在管理上的應用,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
18.林淑姬,1992,薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
19.李德玲,1992,企業員工對薪酬制度反應之研究,中國文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
20.林征霆,1992,薪酬策略與企業策略類型之配合成效,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
21.李慕華、劉兆明,1993,「組織忠誠的內涵意義、影響因素與行為結果-以台灣中小企業為例」,應用心理學報,第2輯,99-124頁,台北縣:輔仁大學出版社。
22.葉清泉,1994,勞資協商、薪酬管理與薪酬滿足關係之研究─以製造業員工為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
23.林福堂,1994,「薪資制度探討」,中船季刊,第十五卷。
24.王秉鈞,1994,管理學,華泰書局。
25.余坤東,1995,「認知型態、薪資公平對工作滿足之影響研究」,中國工商學報,第十六期,173-186頁。
26.李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯,Stephen P. Robbins著,1995,組織行為學,華泰書局。
27.陳惠玟,1996,「績效薪資制度的應用」,勞工研究,123期。
28.諸承明,戚樹誠,李長貴,1996,「薪資設計之文獻回顧與評論─建立「薪資設計四要素模式」,人力資源學報,第6卷。
29.古永嘉譯,1996,Donald R. Cooper & C. Willian Emory著,企業研究方法,華泰書局。
30.黃英忠,1997,現代人力資源管理,華泰書局。
31.諸承明,戚樹誠,李長貴,1998,「我國大型企業薪資設計現況及其成效之研究─以「薪資設計四要素模式」為分析架構」,輔仁管理評論,第五卷,第一期。
32.劉克勇,1997,企業薪資制度及其影響因素之研究─以我國電力電子製造業為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
33.丘宏昌,1997,「各種薪資酬償制度之介紹與比較」,台北銀行季刊,第27卷,第6期。
34.洪振順,1998,組織公正對組織公民行為影響之研究─信任關係的觀點,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。


二、英文部分

1.Adams J. S., 1988, “amesican Compensation Assosiation Position Paper On Principles Of Executive Pay Program”, In C. H. Fay & R. W. Beatty, (eds.), The Compensation Sourcesbook, Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource development Press, pp.317-315.
2.Anthony Ryden W. P., Perrewe Pamela L. & Kacmar K Michele, 1993, “Stregic Human Resource Management”, The Dryden Press.
3.Adams, J. S. 1963, Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67:422-436.
4.Adams, J. S. 1965, Inequity in social exchange, In Advances in experimental social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, 2:267-299. New York: Academic Press.
5.Alexander, S., and M. Ruderman, 1987, The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1(June):177-198.
6.Bierhoff, H. W., R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg. 1986. Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum.
7.Blau, P. M. 1964, Exchange and power in social life, New York: Wiley.
8.Bluedorn, A. C. 1982, A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations 35:135-153.
9.Carrol, 1978, “Compensation Planning And Strategy”, In D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia, New Perspectives On Compensation, Prentice-Hall, INC.
10.Dessler, Gray, 1988, “Personnel Management” (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, INC.
11.Dailey, R., and D. Kirk. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job satisfaction and intend to turnover. Human Relations 45(3): 305-317.
12.Deutsch, M. 1975 Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31(3): 137-149.
13.Dittrich, J. E., & M. R. Carrell, 1979, Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performanec 24:29-40.
14.Folger, R., and M. A. Konovsky. 1989. Effects of proccdural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32(March):115-130.
15.Goodman. P. S., 1974, “An Examination of Referents Used in the Evaluation of Pay”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, pp. 340-352.
16.Greenberg, J. 1987, “A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories,” Academy of Management Review, 12, pp. 9-12.
17.Gomez-Mejia & L. R.Balkin D. B., 1992, “Compensation, Organization Strategy, And Firm Performace”, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.
18.Hellriegel, Slocum & Woodman, 1989, “Organization Behavior”, 5th, St. Paul: West Publishing Company, pp. 63.
19.Hughes, Robert J. & Kapoor, Jack R., 1989, “Business”, Houghton Mifflin Company.
20.Hughes C. L. & W. L. Wright, 1989, “Make Pay Plans Work For The People They Pay”, Personnel Journal, Vol.68, No.5, pp, 54-63.
21.Herbert G. Heneman, Ⅲ, 1985, “Pay Satisfaction”, Research In Personnel And Human Resource Management, Vol.3, pp.115-139.
22.Katz D. & R. L. Kahn, 1978, “The Social Psychology Of Organization”, 台北:華泰書局.
23.Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 1988, “Agency-and Institutional-Theory Explanation: The Case Of Retail Sales Compensaation”, Academy Of Management Journal, 31, 488-511.
24.Konovsky, M. A. and R. Cropanzano. 1991. Perceived fairness of employee drug testion as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 698-707.
25.Konovsky, M. A., R. Folger, and R. Corpanzano. 1987. Relative effects of procedural and distributive justice on employee attitudes. Representative Research in Social Psychology 17: 15-24.
26.Lance & Dorothy, 1999, ”The Compensation Handbook”, 4th, pp.42,McGraw-Hill,USA..
27.Lawler, E. E., 1983, “Pay And Organization Development”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
28.Lawrence P. & J. Lorsch, 1967, “Organizational And Environment”, Boston: Harvard University Press.
29.Luthans F., 1998, “Organigational Behavior”, 8th , Singapore: Mcgraw-Hill.
30.Leventhal, G. S. 1980, What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships, In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K. Gergen. M. Greenberg, and R. Willis, 27-55. New York: Plenum Press.
31.Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenem.
32.Lissak, R, I., H. Mendes, & E. A. Lind. 1983. Organiziational and nonorganizational influences on attitudes toward work. Manuscript, Univerity of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
33.Mahoney, Thomas A., 1989, “Multiple Pay Contingencies: Strategic Design Of Compensation”, Human Resource Management, vol.28, no. 3.
34.Milkovich & Newman, 1993,” Compension”, Richard D. Irwin, Inc, USA. .
35.Milkovich, G. T. & Newman, J. M., 1990, “Compensation”, Boston: Homewood, IL.
36.Milkovich, G. T. & J. Boudreau, 1987, “Personnel: Human Resource Management”, Texas: Business Publication, p.705.
37.Magner, N., and R. B. Welker. 1994. Responsibility center managers’ reactions to justice in budgetary resource allocation. Advances in Management Accounting 3:237-253.
38.Martin, C. L., and N. Bennett. 1996. The role of justice in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organization Management 21(March): 84-104.
39.McFarlin, D. B., and P. D. Sweeney. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35:626-637.
40.Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, and R. M. Steers. 1982. Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
41.Richard M. Steers & J. Stewart Black, 1994, “Organizational Behavior”, 5th, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
42.Robbins, S. P., 1978, “Personnel: The Management Of Human Resources”, Engewood Cliffs, N. Y.: Prentice-Hall INC., pp.267-270.
43.Reichers, A. E. 1985.A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review 10:465-476.
44.Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr. J. G. Hunt, and R. N. Osborn. 1994. Managing organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.
45.Singer, M. S. 1992. Procedural justice in managerial selection: Identification of fairness determinants and associations of fairness perceptions. Social Justice Research 5:49-70.
46.Sullivan, J. “Indirect Compensation: The Years Ahead”, 1972 by the regents of the University of California, from California Management Review vo1. XV. No.2, p.65, table 1.
47.Szilagui, A. D., and Wallace, M. J. 1983, “Organizational Behavior and performance”, 3 th , Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co.
48.Trarp C. G., 1987, “The Link Between Compensation Enviorment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.12, pp.590-613.
49.Tang, T. L. P., and L. J. Sarsfield-Baldwin. 1996. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Related to Satisfaction and Commitment. Sam Advanec Management Journal (Summer): 25-31.
50.Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51.Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1978. A theory of procedure. Dalifornia Law Review 66:541-566.
52.Tyler, T. R., and E. A. Lind. 1990. Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: When does group membership matter? Journal of Social Issues 46(1): 83-94.
53.Weber C. L. & Rynes, S. L., 1991, “Effects Of Compensation Strategy On Job Pay Decisions”, Academy Of Management Journal, 34(1).
54.Walster, E., G. W. Walster, and E. Berscheid. 1978. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
55.Zollisch, H. G. & A. Langsher, 1982, “Wage And Salary Adminstration”, Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co., P.3.

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code