Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0725118-114859 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0725118-114859
論文名稱
Title
用可愛,做公益!可愛類型與公益訴求之廣告效果探討
Use cuteness, Do charity! The Effect of Cute Type and Charity Appeals in Advertisements
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
188
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-07-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-08-25
關鍵字
Keywords
公益訴求、嬰兒可愛、促發效果、心理表徵、圓點可愛、古怪可愛
charity appeals, whimsical cuteness, baby cuteness, priming effect, dot cuteness, mental representations
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5683 次,被下載 3
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5683 times, has been downloaded 3 times.
中文摘要
可愛的刺激/標的/事物,散發一種讓人想親近的特質,不僅帶來愉悅和滿足的正向情緒,在社交互動關係上也扮演關鍵角色。由嬰兒原型所構成的嬰兒基模被認為是引發情感和可愛感知的主要刺激,能激發人們的照顧動機,促使廣泛的親社會行為。隨著可愛概念的發展,學者們發現古怪的東西或是幾何圖案也能讓人覺得可愛,相較於具有嬰兒特徵的可愛,古怪的可愛卻與自我享樂的玩樂性質相關;實務觀察可見,許多公益活動和廣告嘗試結合可愛元素,然而不同類型的可愛若運用於公益活動,其效果如何,仍少有探討。基於此,本研究以可愛為主軸,細緻分類可愛類型,以不同可愛所促發的特定心理表徵與情緒反應為機制,考量公益訴求的干擾作用,分析不同公益廣告下,可愛類型的廣告態度與捐贈意願的影響效果。
基於促發效果理論、心理表徵和情緒的相關概念、公益訴求與有限容量模式,本研究採實驗法,以兩個實驗驗證假說。實驗一採一因子受測者間實驗設計,操弄可愛的三種類型:嬰兒可愛vs.古怪可愛vs.圓點可愛,並加入無添加可愛的控制組,旨在衡量不同可愛所產生的心理表徵和情緒反應;實驗二採3(可愛類型:嬰兒可愛vs.古怪可愛vs.圓點可愛)x2(公益廣告:利己訴求vs.利他訴求)的二因子受測者間實驗設計,另外加入無添加可愛的控制組,旨在檢測不同可愛類型與公益訴求的適配性。
研究結果發現:(1)不同的可愛類型會產生特定的心理表徵,且皆能產生愉悅的情緒感受;(2)在利他訴求的公益廣告下,嬰兒可愛(vs.古怪可愛)能有較佳的廣告效果;(3)在利己訴求的公益廣告下,古怪可愛(vs.嬰兒可愛)能產生較佳的廣告效果;(4)圓點可愛不論在利他訴求或是利己訴求的公益廣告中皆產生正向的廣告效果。本研究結果有助於確立可愛類型的分類,且進一步了解,透過可愛促發的心理表徵在不同公益訴求情境下的適配關係,擴充可愛概念的相關研究與應用,並提供非營利組織欲使用可愛元素作為公益廣告的參考建議。
Abstract
Cute things are approachable, bring you the positive emotions of pleasure and satisfaction, and play an important role in social interactions. The Kindchenschema is a prototype of human infants, perceived as a potent positive stimulus, which can elicit cuteness feeling, evoke emotion, trigger care-taking motivation, and induce wide prosocial behaviors. Along with the progress of cuteness concept, scholars have found that whimsical things or circular geometrical shapes and patterns are also described as cute. Compared with the vulnerable nature inherent in the Kindchenschema features, whimsical things are associated with fun and playfulness. Cute elements are used prevailingly in many charity activities and advertisements. However, the effects of the different types of cuteness used for charity activities are still unclear. Accordingly, the current research focuses on the cuteness effects and classified the types of cuteness. It examines how different types of cuteness prime specific mental representations and emotion response, and how charity appeals moderate the effects of the cuteness on ad attitudes as well as donation intentions.
Base on the priming effect, the concepts of mental representations, emotions, and charity appeals, and the limited capacity model, this research conducted two experiments to test the hypotheses. Experiment 1 was tested the mental representations and emotional response primed by different cuteness, with a one factor between-subject design (baby cuteness vs. whimsical cuteness vs. dot cuteness vs. non-cute control group). Experiment 2 used a 3 (cuteness types: baby cuteness vs. whimsical cuteness vs. dot cuteness) x 2 (charitable appeals: other-benefit vs. self-benefit) between-subject design and two non-cute control groups to test the match-up effects between different cuteness types and charity appeals.
The analytical results indicate that: (1) Different types of cuteness prime specific mental representations, but all types of cuteness evoke the pleasant emotion. (2) Under the condition of other-benefit charitable appeal, baby cuteness (vs. whimsical cuteness) yields better advertising effects. (3) Under the condition of self-benefit charitable appeal, whimsical cuteness (vs. baby cuteness) generates better advertising effects. (4) Dot cuteness has a positive impact on advertising effects for advertisements with either other-benefit or self-benefit charitable appeal. This research results help to clarify implications of the types of cuteness, and reveal the fitness between specific mental representations primed by cuteness and charity appeals. Meanwhile, it expands the concept and application of cuteness, and provides practical suggestions on how to use cuteness properly in charity advertising to generate better effects.
目次 Table of Contents
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iv
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 9
第三節、研究問題與目的 12
第二章、文獻探討 13
第一節、可愛概論 13
一、 可愛文化 13
二、 可愛定義與樣貌 14
三、 可愛與性別、年齡 17
四、 可愛與娃娃臉 19
第二節、可愛類型之分類 20
一、 嬰兒可愛及行為反應 21
二、 古怪可愛及行為反應 23
三、 圓點可愛及行為反應 25
四、 可愛類型與可愛程度的關係 27
五、 小結 28
第三節、可愛與心理表徵(Mental Representations) 29
第四節、可愛與社會參與行為(social engagement) 31
第五節、促發效果(priming effect) 33
第六節、情緒類別相關研究 35
一、 情緒的定義 35
二、 情緒的分類與測量 36
第七節、公益廣告之利己/利他訴求 41
第三章、研究架構與假說推論 44
第一節、研究架構 44
第二節、研究假說 45
第四章、實驗一 54
第一節、研究方法 54
一、 樣本與實驗設計 54
二、 實驗刺激與前測 55
三、 實驗程序 62
四、 變數衡量 63
第二節、結果分析 64
一、 研究樣本背景資料分析 64
二、 實驗一變數的平均值、標準差與信度分析 66
三、 實驗一研究變數之操弄性檢定與性別效果檢測 67
四、 實驗一研究假設檢定 69
第三節、討論 74
第五章、實驗二 78
第一節、研究方法 78
一、 樣本與實驗設計 78
二、 實驗刺激與前測 79
三、 實驗程序 83
四、 變數衡量 83
第二節、結果分析 87
一、 研究樣本背景資料分析 87
二、 實驗二變數的平均值、標準差與信度分析 88
三、 實驗二研究變數之操弄性檢定與性別效果檢測 89
四、 實驗二研究假設檢定 93
第三節、討論 100
第六章、結論與建議 104
第一節、研究發現與討論 104
第二節、理論意涵 109
第三節、實務意涵 113
第四節、研究限制與未來研究方向 115
參考文獻 120
附錄一、前測一問卷 120
附錄二、前測二問卷 144
附錄三、實驗一問卷 159
附錄四、前測三問卷 164
附錄五、實驗二問卷 169
參考文獻 References
中文文獻
Zoey. (2016). 除了可愛!圓點也能穿出女孩的個性風格!取自 http://www.styletc.com/archives/194891.
方菁容、衛萬里. (2013). 世界自然基金會 (WWF) 環保公益廣告創意效果與觀者認知差異. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 18(2), 79-91.
毛凌雲. (2016). “夢娃”公益廣告傳播社會主義核心價值觀的創作策略. 湖南人文科技學院學報, 4.
四方田犬彥. (2007). 可愛力量大 (陳光棻, Trans.). 台北市:遠見天下文化.
吳佳珍. (2015). 「醜得可愛」醜比頭,打開大人的想像世界. 取自 http://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5063841
每日頭條. (2016). 當插畫愛上飲料瓶!取自https//kknews.cc/comic/9mx25b.html.
沈俐萱. (2017). KITTY熱!主題餐廳開2店,路跑、展覽都少不了. 取自 http://news.tvbs.com.tw/travel/698553
林昱婷. (2014). 產品善因適配度重要嗎? 探討廣告視覺主題與消費者自我究責對善因行銷廣告效果的影響. 國立中山大學, 高雄市, 未出版.
林若寧. (2016). 小心!辦公室皮卡丘出沒!實境遊戲正當紅. 取自 http://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5077289&page=1
邱家琳. (2016). 2016時代百大人物 圓點女王草間彌生上榜.取自http://artemperor.tw/focus/1322
洪絹雅. (2017). 吃的可愛?吃得健康?可愛類型、食品類型與不同促發效果對消費行為的影響. 國立高雄應用科技大學, 高雄市,未出版.
胡幼偉. (1997). 選舉新聞的第三人效果。《中華傳播學會第一屆年會論文集》.台北:中華傳播學會.
李宏翰. (1995). 試論利他主義的動機過程. 西南師範大學學報, 3, 56-60.
神奇海螺. (2015). 超衝擊美感!看一眼就無法忘記的謎樣吉祥物.Cityzine城市誌.
張春炎、楊昊、李柏諭、戚栩僊. (2015). 網路時代企業參與公益活動的分析與反思:以微軟MSN 公益捐助計畫為例. 中華傳播學刊, 27, 167-201.
黃恆獎 & 蕭廣仲 (1994). 綠色行銷與消費者購買行為之結構性分析.管理評論.14(2), 21-40.
陳佩儀、程文欣. (2014). 萌樣收服全世界 吸金寶貝皮卡丘 產值破1.4兆. 取自 http://magazine.chinatimes.com/ctweekly/20140829005122-300106
陸宛蘋、李俊達、陳俋潓、吳佳倫. (2016). 臺灣中介型非營利組織之角色與功能. TASPAA線上學術研討會議.
陸宛蘋. (1999). 非營利組織的定義與角色。社區發展季刊, 85, 30-35.
楊蜜、於存鋒. (2016). 萌動中國,傳遞夢想—“夢娃”系列公益廣告的社會功能研究.設計, 7.
葉思含. (2014). 首購當道 可愛行銷抓年輕客.取自 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/consumer/paper/800997
網路溫度計. (2016). 最賤的美式卡通!這十部你絕對不能錯過!取自 https://dailyview.tw/Daily/2014/12/30
數位時代. (2016). 可愛又迷人的反派角色!在現實世界也能捕捉皮卡丘,任天堂實境手遊發表.取自: http://www.bnext.com.tw/ext_rss/view/id/935865
蔡依錞.(2013).公益廣告訴求與涉入程度對消費者情緒、廣告注意力及廣告效果之影響. 國立台中教育大學數位內容科技學系碩士班.未出版.
鄧卉、梁歡、趙國安. (2015). 借“可可小愛”向世界傳遞動漫的力量.人事天地, 4.
聯合新聞網. (2015). 萌死人了!全台超級卡通主題餐廳大集合。取自 http://udn.com/news/story/7188/860296

英文文獻
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of consumer research, 34(4), 468-479.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of consumer research, 39(2), 307-323.
Aaker, J. and Williams, P.(1998). Empathy versus pride: The influence of emotional appeals across cultures.Journal of Consumer Research , 25(3), 241-261.
Ahn, H.K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224-229.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Alley, T. (1981). Head shape and the perception of cuteness. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 650-654.
Allison, A. (2003). Portable monsters and commodity cuteness: Pokemon as Japan's new global power. Postcolonial Studies, 6(3), 381-395.
Aragón, O. R., Clark, M. S., Dyer, R. L., & Bargh, J. a. (2015). Dimorphous expressions of positive emotion:displays of both care and aggression in response to cute stimuli. Psychological Science, 26(3), 259-273.
Archer, J., & Monton, S. (2010). Preferences for Infant Facial Features in Pet Dogs and Cats. Ethology ,117(3), 217-226
Aronoff, J., Woike, B., & M. Hyman, L. (1992). Which Are the Stimuli in Facial Displays of Anger and Happiness? Configurational Bases of Emotion Recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1050-1066.
Austin, J. E. (2000). The Collaboration challenge:How nonprofits and business succeed throuth strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Aydınoğlu, N. Z., & Cian, L. (2014). Show me the product, show me the model: Effect of picture type on attitudes toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 506-519.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Values. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public Service Advertisements: Emotions and Empathy Guide Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56-70.
Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184-206.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects. Psychological Science, 17(8), 645-648.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230-244
Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a fourcategory model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2008). Guilt and giving:A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology and Marketing, 25(1), 1–23.
Bassili, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(3), 373-379.
Batra, R., & Stayman, D. M. (1990). The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 203-214.
Batra, R., Seifert, C., & Brei, D. (2015). The psychology of design:Creating consumer appeal. Routledge.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question:Toward a social-psychological answer. Psychology Press.
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N. Y., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). Four Motives for Community Involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 429-445
Bellfield, J., Bimont, C., Blom, J., Dommeyer, C. J., Gardiner, K., Mathenia, E., & Soto, J. (2011). The Effect of a Cute Stimulus on Personally-Initiated, Self-Administered Surveys. Marketing Bulletin, 22(1), 1-9.
Belson, K., & Bremner, B. (2004). Hello kitty: The remarkable story of Sanrio and the billion dollar feline phenomenon. Singapore:John Wiley & Sons.
Bendapudi,N.,Singh,S.,& Bendapudi, V.(1996) .Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3),33-49.
Berlyne, D. E., Craw, M. A., Salapatek, P. H., & Lewis, J. L. (1963). Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation, and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(6), 560-567.
Berman, P. W. (1980). Are women more responsive than men to the young? A review of developmental situational variables. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 668-695.
Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some Components and Consequences of a Babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 312-323.
Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627-651.
Borgi, M., Cogliati-Dezza, I., Brelsford, V., Meints, K., & Cirulli, F. (2014). Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children. Front Psychol, 5(411).1-12.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In Handbook of emotiont elicitation and assessment (eds Coan J., Allen J.), 29–46. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, memory, and cognition, 18(2), 379-390.
Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That baby caught my eye... attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7(3), 685-689.
Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining Gendered Responses to "Help-Self" and "Help-Others" Charity Ad Appeals: The Mediating Role of World-Views. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15-28.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures:The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25.
Calvo, Manuel G. Aavero, Pedro. (2009). Reaction time normative data for the IAPS as a function of display time, gender, and picture content. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 184-191.
Chang, C. (2014). Guilt Regulation:The Relative Effects of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Appeals for Charity Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 211-227.
Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2011). The ‘I’ of the Beholder: How Gender Differences and Self-referencing Influence Charity Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 447-478.
Choi, J., Rangan, P., & Singh, S. N. (2016). Do Cold Images Cause Cold-Heartedness? The Impact of Visual Stimuli on the Effectiveness of Negative Emotional Charity Appeals. Journal of Advertising, 45(4) 417-426.
Chou, H.-Y., & Wang, S. S. (2016). The effects of happiness types and happiness congruity on game app advertising and environments. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20(C), 1-14.
Chowdhury, R. M. M. I., Olsen, G. D., & Pracejus, J. W. (2008). Affective Responses to Images In Print Advertising: Affect Integration in a Simultaneous Presentation Context. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 7-18.
Cialdini, R., L. Brown, S., P. Lewis, B., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship:When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494.
Constantinou, E., Bogaerts, K., Diest, I.V., & Bergh, O.V. (2013). Inducing symptoms in high symptom reporters via emotional pictures: the interactive effects of valence and arousal. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74(3), 191-196.
Cooper, D. and Schindler, P. (2011) Business Research Methods. 11th Edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.
Day, H. (1967). Evaluations of subjective complexity, pleasingness and interestingness for a series of random polygons varying in complexity. Perception & Psychophysics. 2(7), 281-286.
Dennis B. A., Steve D. G., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success:The Case of Nonprofit Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89-105.
Desjardins, J., Zelenski, J. M., & Coplan, R. J. (2008). An Investigation of Maternal Personality, Parenting Styles, and Subjective Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 44 (3), 587-597.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The Perception-Behavior Expressway: Automatic Effects of Social Perception on Social Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1-40.
Dijksterhuis, A., Smith, P. K., van Baaren, R. B., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2005). The Unconscious Consumer:Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 193-202.
Dovidio, J. E., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). Specificity of Empathy-Induced Helping:Evidence for Altruistic Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 249-260.
Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421-433.
Ein‐Gar, D., & Levontin, L. (2013). Giving from a distance:Putting the charitable organization at the center of the donation appeal. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 197-211.
Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Multidimensionality of prosocial behavior: Rethinking the conceptualization and development of prosocial behavior. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (17-39). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
Engel, J. F, Warshaw, M. R, & Kinnear, T. C. (1979). Promotional strategy : managing the marketing communications process. (4th ed.) Homewood, Ill.: R. D. Irwin.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human:A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
Farias, S. A. d., Aguiar, E. C. & Melo, F. V. S. (2014). Store Atmospherics and Experiential Marketing:A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions for An Extraordinary Customer Experience. International Business Research, 7(2),87-99.
Faseur, T. & Geunes, M. (2006). Different Positive Feelings Leading to Different Ad evaluations: The case of coziness, excitement, and romance, Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 129-142.
Feinberg, J. (1965). Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. Dickenson Pub. Co.
Finlay, K., Marmurek, H. H. C., & Morton, R. (2005). Priming effects in explicit and implicit memory for textual advertisements. Applied Psychology, 54(4), 442-455.
Fisher, R. J., Vandenbosch, M., & Antia, K. D. (2008). An Empathy-Helping Perspective on Consumers' Responses to Fund-Raising Appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 519-531.
Fishman,J. J., & Schwarz, S. (2000). Nonprofit Organizations Cases and Materials. In University Casebook Series, 2nd, Edited by:Clark, R. C. New York, NY: Foundation Press.
Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior:How Apple Makes You “Think Different”. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 21-35.
Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2007). When Available Resources Become Negative Resources. Communication Research, 34(3), 277-296.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Levenson, R. W. (1998). Positive Emotions Speed Recovery from the Cardiovascular Sequelae of Negative Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 12(2), 191-220.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The Neural Basis of Mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531-534.
Galentino, A., Bonini, N., & Savadori, L. (2017). Positive Arousal Increases Individuals’ Preferences for Risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2142.
Garretson, J. A., & Niedrich, R. W. (2004). Spokes-characters:Creating character trust and positive brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 25-36.
Glocker, M. L., Langleben, D. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., & Sachser, N. (2009). Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults. Ethology, 115(3), 257-263.
Golle, J., Lisibach, S., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Sweet puppies and cute babies: perceptual adaptation to babyfacedness transfers across species. PLoS One, 8(3), e58248.
Gorn, G. J. (1982). The Effects of Music in Advertising on Choice Behavior: A Classical Conditioning Approach. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 94-101.
Gould, S. J. (2008). A Biological Homage to Mickey Mouse. Ecotone, 4(1-2), 333-340.
Granot, E., Alejandro, T. B., & Russell, L. T. M. (2013). A socio-marketing analysis of the concept of cute and its consumer culture implications. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 66-87.
Gray, J. A.(1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.
Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Neufeld, S. L. (2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing:a functional evolutionary approach. Emotion, 10(2), 190-206.
Guéguen, N., & Ciccotti, S. (2008). Domestic dogs as facilitators in social interaction: An evaluation of helping and courtship behaviors. Anthrozoos, 21, 339-349.
Hahn, A. C., Xiao, D., Sprengelmeyer, R., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Gender differences in the incentive salience of adult and infant faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,66(1), 200-208.
Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835-901.
Harris, D. (2000). Cute, Quaint, Hungry And Romantic:The Aesthetics of Consumerism. Basic Books, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Harris, J. L., Bargh, J. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2009). Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health Psychol, 28(4), 404-413.
Hasler, G. (2016). Disney Ufufy:The Cutest Thing from Japan Since Tsum Tsum. from https://www.laughingplace.com/w/articles/2016/12/19/disney-ufufy-cutest-thing-japan-since-tsum-tsum/
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987).Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
Hellen, K., & Sääksjärvi, M. (2013). Development of a scale measuring childlike anthropomorphism in products. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 141-157.
Herrewijn, L., & Poels, K. (2013). Putting brands into play. International Journal of Advertising, 32(1), 17-44.Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154.
Hildebrandt, K. A., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1978). Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness. Behavioural Processes, 3(2), 159-172.
Hildebrandt, K. A., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1979). Adults' perceptions of infant sex and cuteness. Sex Roles, 5(4), 471-481.
Hinde, R. A., & Barden, L. A. (1985). The evolution of the teddy bear. Animal Behaviour, 33(4), 1371-1373.
Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 121-137.
Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420.
Hopkins, R., & Fletcher, J. E. (1994). Electrodermal measurement: Particularly effective for forecasting message influence on sales appeal. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages.113-132. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Isen, A. M. (2001). An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations:Theoretical Issues With Practical Implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 15-85.
Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 384-388.
Jacobs, M. (2016). Yayoi Kusama:The world's 100 most influential people. from http://time.com/4299687/yayoi-kusama-2016-time-100/.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.1-49.
Kamins, M. A. (1990). An Investigation into the “Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising:When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4-13.
Kanungo, R. N., & Pang, S. (1973). Effects of Human Models on Perceived Product Quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 172-178.
Kensinger, E. A.(2004). Remembering emotional experiences: The contribution of valence and arousal. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 15(4), 241-252.
Koo, D.-M., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). Inter-relationships among dominance, energetic and tense arousal, and pleasure, and differences in their impacts under online vs. offline environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1740-1750.
Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a Marketing Tool. Journal of Retailing, 49(4), 48-64.
Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control (7th ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kringelbach, M. L., Stark, E. A., Alexander, C., Bornstein, M. H., & Stein, A. (2016). On Cuteness:Unlocking the Parental Brain and Beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 545-558.
Kubo, M. (2000). Why Poke´mon Was Successful in America. Japan Echo, 59–62.
Lang, A., Schwartz, N., Lee, S., & Angelini, J. (2007). Processing Radio PSAs: Production Pacing, Arousing Content, and Age. Journal of Health Communication, 12(6), 581-599.
Lang, P. J. (1979). A Bio-Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery. Psychophysiology, 16(6), 495-512.
Lang, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion:Fear and anxiety. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ, US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,131-170
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures:Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261-273.
Lang, P. J., M Bradley, M., & Cuthbert, B. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS):Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual. Technical report.
Lang,A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70.
Langley, L. (2017). This Is Why We Find 'Ugly' Animals Cute. from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/animals-ugly-cute-psychology/
Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., & Steuer, E. L. (2012). Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 404-413.
Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2009). Discrete Emotion and Motivation: Relative Activation in the Appetitive and Aversive Motivational Systems as a Function of Anger, Sadness, Fear, and Joy During Televised Information Campaigns. Media Psychology, 12(2), 148-170.
Lobmaier, J. S., Sprengelmeyer, R., Wiffen, B., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 16-21.
Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Ethology, 5(2), 235-409.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H. & Kunda, Z., (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864.
Lundholm, H. (1921). The Affective Tone of Lines:Experimental Researches. Psychological Review, 28(1), 43-60.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness:A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2)130-143.
Madan, C. R., Bayer, J., Gamer, M., Lonsdorf, T. B., & Sommer, T. (2017). Visual Complexity and Affect:Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2368
Maimaran, M., & Wheeler, S. (2008). Circles, Squares, and Choice:The Effect of Shape Arrays on Uniqueness and Variety Seeking. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 731-740.
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Relations between Values, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions:The Moderating Role of Attitude Function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 266-285.
Manrai, L. A., & Gardner, M. P. (1992). Consumer processing of social ideas advertising:A conceptual model. ACR North American Advances. 19, 15-22.
Marin, M. M., and Leder, H. (2016). Effects of presentation duration on measures of complexity in a ective environmental scenes and representational paintings. Acta psychologica, 163, 38-58.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self:Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
McArthur, L. Z., & Apatow, K. (1984). Impressions of Baby-Faced Adults. Social Cognition, 2(4), 315-342.
Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 67-72.
Miesler, L., Leder, H., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Isn’t It Cute An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs. Journal of Design, 5(3), 17-30.
Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., Dickson, P. R., Lord, K. R. & Unnava, H. R. (1991). Picture-based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1),92-107.
Monroe, K. R. (1996). The heart of altruism: Perceptions of a common humanity.Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Morreall, J. (1991). Cuteness. British Journal of Aesthetics, 31(1), 39-47.
Morris, J. D. (1995). Observations:SAM:the Self-Assessment Manikin; an efficient cross-cultural measurement of emotional response. Journal of advertising research, 35(6), 63-68.
Morris, J. D., & McMullen, J. S. (1994). Measuring multiple emotional responses to a single television commercial. ACR North American Advances.21, 175-180.
Morse, A. G. (2001). The effects of negative affect and cognition on anger and fear. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B, The Sciences and Engineering, 62(3-B), 1591.
Muehling, D. D., & Pascal, V. J. (2011). An empirical investigation of the differential effects of personal, historical, and non-nostalgic advertising on consumer responses. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 107-122.
Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). The Psychology of Evaluation:Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Lawerence Erlbaum.
NAz, K. A. Y. A., & Epps, H. (2004). Relationship between color and emotion:A study of college students. College Student Journal, 38(3), 396-405.
Nelson, M. R., Brunel, F. F., Supphellen, M., & Manchanda, R. V. (2006). Effects of Culture, Gender, and Moral Obligations on Responses to Charity Advertising Across Masculine and Feminine Cultures. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 45-56.
Nenkov, G. Y., & Scott, M. L. (2014). “So Cute I Could Eat It Up”:Priming Effects of Cute Products on Indulgent Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 326-341.
Ngai, S. (2005). The Cuteness of the Avant-Garde. Critical Inquiry, 31(4), 811-847.
Ngai, S. (2010). Our Aesthetic Categories. Modern Language Association of America, 125(4), 948-958.
Nittono, H. (2016). The two-layer model of " kawaii ":a behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2(1), 79-95.
Nittono, H., & Ihara, N. (2017). Psychophysiological Responses to Kawaii Pictures With or Without Baby Schema. SAGE Open, 7(2).1-11.
Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The power of Kawaii: viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. PLoS One, 7(9), e46362.
Nunnally, J.C., (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing:An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247-265.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. H. & Tannenbaum, P. H. ( 1957 ) . The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations:A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, B. J., & Gyoerick, B. (1999). The cow, the cook, and the Quaker: Fifty years of spokes-character advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 713-728.
Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity. Journal of Marketing. 74(5), 48-60.
Plutchik, R. (1982). A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Social Science Information, 21(4-5), 529-553.
Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions:Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344-350.
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2006). How to capture the heart? Reviewing 20 years of emotion measurement in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(1), 18-37.
Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design:A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431-441.
Rholes, W., Riskind, J., & W. Lane, J. (1987). Emotional States and Memory Biases: Effects of Cognitive Priming and Mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 91-99.
Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127-146.
Riva, P., Sacchi, S., & Brambilla, M. (2015). Humanizing machines: Anthropomorphization of slot machines increases gambling. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 21(4), 313-325
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success:Inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits:Short report. Psychological Science, 19(2), 109-111.
Russell, J.A.(1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39(6), 1161–1178.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the Bipolarity of Positive and Negative Affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3-30..
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 18(4), 317-352.
Sanders, J. T. (1992). On ‘cuteness’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 32(2), 162-165.
Sanefuji, W., Ohgami, H., & Hashiya, K. (2006). Development of preference for baby faces across species in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Ethology, 25(3), 249-254.
Schacter, D. L., Delaney, S. M., & Merikle, E. P. (1990). Priming of Nonverbal Information and the Nature of Implicit Memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 83–123.
Schmitt, B. H. (1994). Contextual priming of visual information in advertisements. Psychology & Marketing, 11(1), 1-14.
Schwartz S.H., Howard J.A. (1984) Internalized Values as Motivators of Altruism. In: Staub E., Bar-Tal D., Karylowski J., Reykowski J. (eds) Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice, 31, 229-255. Springer, Boston, MA.
Scott, M. L., & Nenkov, G. Y. (2016). Using consumer responsibility reminders to reduce cuteness-induced indulgent consumption. Marketing Letters, 27(2), 323-336.
Shapiro, S., MacInnis, D. J. & Park, C. W. (2002). Understanding Program-Induced Mood Effects: Decoupling Arousal from Valence, Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 15-26.
Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., & Shemesh-Iron, M. (2010). A behavioral systems perspective on prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior:The better angels of our nature . Washington, D.C:American Psychological Association.73-92.
Sherman, G. D., & Haidt, J. (2011). Cuteness and Disgust:The Humanizing and Dehumanizing Effects of Emotion. Emotion Review, 3(3), 245-251.
Sherman, G. D., Haidt, J., & Coan, J. A. (2009). Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion, 9(2), 282-286.
Shiota ,MN., Neufeld, SL., Yeung, WH., Moser,SE., Perea, EF. (2011) Feeling good:autonomic nervous system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion, 11(6),1368–1378.
Sprengelmeyer, R., Lewis, J., Hahn, A., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infant faces:studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle. PLoS One, 8(5), e65844.
Sprengelmeyer, R., Perrett, D. I., Fagan, E. C., Cornwell, R. E., Lobmaier, J. S., Sprengelmeyer, A., . . . Young, A. W. (2009). The cutest little baby face:a hormonal link to sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces. Psychological Science, 20(2), 149-154.
Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2008). The Affective Regulation of Cognitive Priming. Emotion, 8(2), 208-215.
Strasser, A. (2010). A Functional View Toward Mental Representations.In Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge. Springer US. 15-25.
Suk, H. J., & Irtel, H. (2010). Emotional response to color across media. Color Research & Application, 35(1), 64-77.
Tam, K,P., Lee,S,L., & Chao,M,M. (2013), “Saving Mr. Nature:Anthropomorphism Enhances Connectedness to and Protectiveness toward Nature,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (3), 514-521.
Tavassoli, N. T., Shultz, C. J. & Fitzsimons, G. J. (1995). Program involvement are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad? Journal of Advertising Research. 35(5), 61-72.
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623-1626.
Wang, T., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2017). Getting Consumers to Recycle NOW!:When and Why Cuteness Appeals influence Prosocial and Sustainable Behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36(2),269-283.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219-235.
Watson, D., Anna Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect:The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-Benefit Versus Other-Benefit Marketing Appeals:Their Effectiveness in Generating Charitable Support. Journal of Marketing,, 73(4), 109-124.
Xu, Q., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Lights, Camera, Music, Interaction! Interactive Persuasion in E-commerce. Communication Research, 41(2), 282-308.
Yamato, M. (1988). Ku¯zen no Shakai Gensho¯ “Pokemon” Cho¯ hitto no Nazo’ (The Riddle of the Super-hit Poke´mon that is an Unprecedented Social Phenomenon). Gendai January:242–249.
Yano, C. R. (2009). Wink on Pink:Interpreting Japanese Cute as It Grabs the Global Headlines. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(3), 681-688.
Yi, Y. (1990a). Cognitive and Affective Priming Effects of the Context for Print Advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19(2), 40-48.
Yi, Y. (1990b). The Effects of Contextual Priming in Print Advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 215-222.
Yun Yoo, C., Kim, K. (2005). Processing of animation in online banner advertising: the roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing.19(4), 18-34.
Zebrowitz, L. a., & Montepare, J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced individuals across the life-span. Developmental Psychology, 28(6), 1143-1152.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2005). Appearance DOES Matter. Science, 308(5728), 1565-1566.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1497-1517.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Brownlow, S., & Olson, K. (1992). Baby Talk to the Baby Faced. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16(3), 143-158.
Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Price, L. (2006). The Impact of Self-Construal on Aesthetic Preference for Angular Versus Rounded Shapes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 794-805
Zhu, R., & Argo, J. J. (2013). Exploring the impact of various shaped seating arrangements on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 336-349.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code