論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
以Rasch 模式檢驗中文版多向度幽默感量表之信效度 A Rasch Analysis of the Chinese-version Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
79 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2010-06-28 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2010-07-26 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
多向度幽默感量表、幽默感、Rasch模式 sense of humor, Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale, Rasch model |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5835 次,被下載 2836 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5835 times, has been downloaded 2836 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究旨在修訂Ho、Chik 和 Thorson(2008)所發展的中文版多向度幽默感量表(The Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale),並比較此量表的網路問卷與紙本問卷之測量差異。研究對象包含預試樣本634位大學生,正式樣本587位大學生,其中正式樣本依據不同施測方式區分為四組,以進行不同施測方式的差異比較。資料分析第一部份先以Rasch評定量尺模式(Rating Scale Model)進行模式-資料適配度檢驗,作為修訂量表之依據。第二部份則以多變量共變數分析(MANCOVA)比較網路問卷與紙本問卷的測量差異。 研究結果顯示,修訂後之中文版多向度幽默感量表具有良好的模式-資料適配度,可分為「幽默產生」、「幽默態度」以及「幽默因應」三個向度,共計18題。所有的題目在男、女生以及施測方式(網路和紙本)上,並無明顯的差異試題功能(Differential Item Functioning)。幽默產生、幽默態度及幽默因應的信度分別是 .89、.81和 .81。三個幽默向度與一般性自我效能和情緒適應力間具有適當的關聯性。此外,網路與紙本問卷施測結果之差異分析顯示,除了幽默態度向度外,其餘向度皆無明顯差異。最後,本研究針對幽默感評量工具的發展以及施測方式,提出未來研究之建議。 |
Abstract |
This study aims at revising the Chinese-version Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale (Ho, Chik, & Thorson, 2008) using Rasch analysis, and to compare differences between two kinds of data collection—web-based questionnaire and paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Participants were 634 (sample 1) and 587 (sample 2) undergraduate students respectively for item revision and validation. Sample 2 were grouped into 4 groups to test differences between the two kinds of data collection. Rasch Rating Scale Model analysis was used to assess model-data fit, and MANCOVA was employed to compare the differences between the web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. The results indicated that three dimensions of the revised 18-item scale—humor production, attitudes towards humor, and coping humor—showed good model-data fit. All items had no statistically significant differential item functioning in genders (boys and girls) and in ways of testing (the web-based and the paper-and-pencil). Reliabilities for humor production, attitudes towards humor, and coping humor were .89, .81, and .81 respectively. The revised scale was further examined through construct-related validity through general self-efficacy and emotional adaptive ability. Furthermore, only the dimension of attitudes towards humor had a statistically significant difference in ways of testing. Suggestions for future research on developing instrument of sense of humor were proposed. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目 次 第一章 緒論-------------------------------------------------------------- 1 第一節 研究背景與目的---------------------------------------------- 1 第二節 研究限制------------------------------------------------------- 6 第三節 名詞釋義------------------------------------------------------- 7 第二章 文獻探討-------------------------------------------------------- 9 第一節 幽默感的起源與定義---------------------------------------- 9 第二節 幽默感相關研究--------------------------------------------- 12 第三節 Rasch 模式-------------------------------------------------- 30 第四節 網路施測與紙本施測之比較------------------------------ 33 第三章 研究方法------------------------------------------------------- 36 第一節 研究對象------------------------------------------------------ 36 第二節 研究工具------------------------------------------------------ 42 第三節 研究程序------------------------------------------------------ 44 第四節 資料分析------------------------------------------------------ 46 第四章 研究結果------------------------------------------------------- 47 第一節 量表預試結果------------------------------------------------ 47 第二節 量表正式施測結果------------------------------------------ 49 第三節 網路與紙本差異分析結果------------------------------------ 53 第五章 討論與建議---------------------------------------------------- 55 參考文獻----------------------------------------------------------------- 59 附錄------------------------------------------------------------------------68 附錄一 預試量表—「幽默感」的自我評估--------------------- 68 附錄二 正式施測量表—大學生日常生活評估問卷------------ 69 附錄三 中文版多向度幽默感量表 作者同意使用信件-------- 72 |
參考文獻 References |
參考文獻 中文部分 王文中(2004)。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究,27(4),637-694。 毛國楠(1995)。國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力的認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心理學報,28,177-194。 何茉如、林世華(2000)。國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康之調節作用。教育心理學報,32(1),123-156。 吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2007)。國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製。應用心理研究,35,185-210。 李新民、陳密桃、謝青曇(2007)。職場幽默與心理健康之相關研究:以幼兒教師為例。教育心理學報,38,4,375-396。 李蘭、江宜珍、邱玉蟬、鄭其嘉、吳文琪、楊蕙如(2008)。國中生的幽默概念及表現類型:焦點團體討論結果。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,27(6),519-529。 邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(2003)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報,34(2),179-198。 徐芝君、陳學志、邱發忠(2005)。千萬別笑,不然您的態度會從看笑話中洩露:貶抑類幽默感知態度調整理論之驗證。應用心理研究,26,143-166。 張景媛、陳學志、黃譯瑩(2004)。幽默訓練融入綜合活動對國一學生創造思考與人際因應之影響。教育心理學報,36(1),13-33。 陳李綢(2000)。大學生心理適應量表-指導手冊。台北,心理出版社。 陳淑蓉、陳學志(2005)。幽默感的定義與測量:多向度幽默感量表之編製。應用心理研究,26,167-187。 陳學志(2004)。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」—統整知、情、意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報,35(4),393-411。 陳學志、卓淑玲、賴惠德(2005)。解決問題發揮創意的次好方法就是發現其中的幽默:幽默中的創意與創意中的幽默。應用心理研究,26,95-115。 陳學志、徐芝君(2006)。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報:教育類(創造力特刊),51,71-93。 游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較:多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊,53(1),103-127。 黃毓華、鄭英耀(1996)。一般性自我效能量表之修訂。測驗年刊,43,279-285。 劉佩雲(1990)。性別、創造力、自我檢校與幽默感的關係。國立政治大學研究所碩士論文。 蕭颯、王文欽、徐智策(1999)。幽默心理分析。台北:智慧。 西文部分 Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor, 15(4), 365-381. Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1-23. Andich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573. Ardalan, A., Ardalan, R., Coppage, S., & Crouch, W. (2007). A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1085-1101. Beuckelaer, A. D., & Lievens, F. (2009). Measurement equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet organizational surveys: A large scale examination in 16 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(2), 336-361. Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-822. Booth-Kewley, S., Larson, G. E., & Miyoshi, D. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 463-477. Buchan, B. D., DeAngelis, D. L., & Levinson, E. M. (2005). Comparison of the web-based and paper-and-pencil versions of the career key interest inventory with a sample of university women. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42, 39-46. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the Internet: Validation of a World Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31, 365-371. Cann, A., & Etzel, K. C. (2008). Remembering and anticipating stressors: Positive personality mediates the relationship with sense of humor. Humor, 21(2), 157-178. Carbelo-Baquero, B., Alonso-Rodriguez, M. C., Valero-Garces, C., & Thorson, J. A. (2006). A study of sense of humor in Spanish and American samples. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 447-454. Chen, G. H., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor: Internaional Joural of Humor Research, 20(3), 215-234. Cheng, Y.-Y., Wang, W.-C., & Ho, Y.-H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth–fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 369-388. Clariana. R. B., & Wallace, P. E. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602. Cundall, M. K. (2007). Humor and the limits of incongruity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 203-211. Dilek, D. (2009). The reconstruction of the past through images: An iconographic analysis on the historical imagination usage skills of primary school pupils. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(2), 665-689. Dodge, B. J., & Rossett, A. (1982). Heuristic for humor in instruction. Performance & Instruction, 21(4), 11-32. Dowling, J. S., & Fain, J. A. (1999). A Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale for school-aged children: Issues of reliability and validity. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14(1), 38-43. Egan, K., & Judson, G. (2009). Values and imagination in teaching: With a special focus on social studies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(2), 126-140. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, (91), 330-335. Führ, M. (2002). Coping humor in early adolescence. Humor, 15(3), 283-304. Galloway, G. (2010). Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 563-567. Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778-822. Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(2), 322-333. Hempelmann, C. F., & Ruch, W. (2005). 3 WD meets GTVH: Breaking the ground for interdisciplinary humor research. Humor, 18(4), 353-387. Hill, D. (1988). Humor in the classroom: A textbook for teachers and other entertainers! Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Ho, S. K., Chik, M. P. Y., & Thorson, J. A. (2008). Psychometric study of a Chinese version of the Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 425-434. Holland, P. W., and Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Howe, N. E. (2002). The origin of humor. Medical Hypotheses, 59(3), 252-254. Hsieh, C. J., Hsiao, Y. L., & Chang, C. (2005). Positive psychological measure:Constructing and evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese Humor Scale applicable to professional nursing. Journal of Nursing Research, 13(3), 206-215. José, H., Parreira, P., Thorson, J. A., & Allwardt, D. (2007). A factor-analytic study of the Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale with a Portuguese sample. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 595-610. Koning, E. D., & Weiss, R. L. (2002). The Relational Humor Inventory: Functions of humor in close relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 1-18. Kuhrik, M., Kuhrik, N., & Berry, P. A. (1997). Facilitating learning with humor. Journal of Nursing Education, 36(7), 332-334. Kuiper, N. A., & McHale, N. (2009). Humor styles as mediators between self-evaluative standards and psychological well-being. The Journal of Psychology, 143(4), 359-376. Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D., & Belanger, K. A. (1995). Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications. Personality and Individual Difference, 19(3), 359-372. Lefcourt, H. M., & Martin, R. A. (1986). Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. New York: Springer Publishing. Looij-Jansen, P. M. V., & Wilde E. J. (2008). Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: Effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents. Health Research and Educational Trust, 43(5), 1708-1721. Lothane, Z. (2008). The uses of humor in life, neurosis and in psychotherapy: Part 1. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 17, 180-188. Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., Swanson, D. B., & Case, S. M. (1998). A comparative study of a comprehensive basic sciences test using paper-and pencil and computerized formats. Academic Medicine, 73(10), s51-s53. Lund, D. A., Utz R. Caserta, M. S., & Vries, B. D. (2009). Humor, laughter, and happiness in the daily lives of recently bereaved spouses. OMEGA, 58(2), 87-105. Martin, R. A. (1996). The Situational Humor Response Questionnaire (SHRQ) and Coping Humor Scale (CHS): A decade of research findings. Humor, 9(3), 251-271. Martin, R. A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. In The Sense of Humor (pp. 15-60). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Martin, R. A. (2003). Sense of Humor. In Lopez, S. J., & Synder, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychological Assessment (pp. 313-325). Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association. Martin, R. A. (2004). Sense of humor and physical health: Theoretical issues, recent findings, and future directions. Humor, 17(1/2), 1-19. Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 145-155. Martin, R. A., Doris, P. P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75. Marziali, E., McDonald, L., & Donahue, P. (2008). The role of coping humor in the physical and mental health of older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 12(6), 713-718. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149-174. McGhee, P. E. (1971). Cognitive development and children’s comprehension of humor. Child Development, 42, 123-138. Nevo, O., Aharonson, H., & Klingaman, A. (1998). The development and evaluation of a systematic program for improving sense of humor. In W. Ruch, (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Humor research, 385-404. Berlin, Germany: Walter De Gruyter & Co. Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Yin, J. L. (2001). Singaporean humor: A Cross-cultural cross-gender comparison. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 143-156. Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction. Humor, 14(4), 395-413. Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X., & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results from computerized and paper & pencil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessment program. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(6), 1-30. Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(1), 73-80. Ruch, W., & Deckers, L. (1993). Do extraverts’ like to laugh?: An analysis of the Situational Humor Response Questionnaire (SHRQ). European Journal of Personality, 7, 211-220. Samson, A. C., Hempelmann, C. F., Huber, O., Zysset, S. (2009). Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1023-1033. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. Suoqiao, Q. (2007). Translating ’humor’ into Chinese culture. Humor, 20(3), 277-295. Susan, R. (2009). Leading with a sense of humor. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 84(3), 10-11. Swart, S. (2009). “The terrible laughter of the afrikaner”-Toward a social history of humor. Journal of Social History, 879-917. Svebak, S. (1974). Revised questionnaire on the sense of humor. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 328-331. Svebak, S. (1996). The development of the Sense of Humor Questionnaire: From SHQ to SHQ-6. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 9(3-4), 341-362. Taher, D., Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2008). Validation of the Arabic humor styles questionnaire in a community sample of Lebanese in Lebanon. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(5), 525-564. Theall, M. (2000, November/December). Electronic course evaluation is not necessarily the solution. Technology Source. Retrieved 19 June 2004, from http://technologysource.org/article/electronic_course_evaluation_is_not_necessarily_the_solution/ Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, January, 49(1), 13-23. Thorson, J. A., Brdar, I., & Powell, F. C. (1997). Factor-analytic study of sense of humor in Croatia and the USA. Psychological Reports, 81, 971-977. Thorson, J. A., Powell, F. C., & Samuel, V. T. (2001). Sense of humor in black and white. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 1-12. Vallejo, M. A., Mañanes, G.., Comeche, M. I., & Díaz, M. I. (2008). Comparison between administration via Internet and paper-and-pencil administration of two clinical instruments : SCL-90-R and GHQ-28. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 201-208. Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 5-24. Wang, W.-C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(4), 1-22. Vereen, L. G., Butler, S. K., Williams, F. C., Darg, J. A., & Downing, T. K. E. (2006). The use of humor when counseling African American college students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 10-15. Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, R. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). Relations between humor styles and the dark triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 772-774. Wright, B. D., and Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370. Wu, M. (2004). Plausible values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2004, 18(2), 976-978. Ziv, A. (2010). The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships. Society, 47, 11-18. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |