Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0726110-152403 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0726110-152403
論文名稱
Title
以Rasch 模式檢驗中文版多向度幽默感量表之信效度
A Rasch Analysis of the Chinese-version Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
79
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-07-26
關鍵字
Keywords
多向度幽默感量表、幽默感、Rasch模式
sense of humor, Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale, Rasch model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5835 次,被下載 2836
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5835 times, has been downloaded 2836 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在修訂Ho、Chik 和 Thorson(2008)所發展的中文版多向度幽默感量表(The Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale),並比較此量表的網路問卷與紙本問卷之測量差異。研究對象包含預試樣本634位大學生,正式樣本587位大學生,其中正式樣本依據不同施測方式區分為四組,以進行不同施測方式的差異比較。資料分析第一部份先以Rasch評定量尺模式(Rating Scale Model)進行模式-資料適配度檢驗,作為修訂量表之依據。第二部份則以多變量共變數分析(MANCOVA)比較網路問卷與紙本問卷的測量差異。
研究結果顯示,修訂後之中文版多向度幽默感量表具有良好的模式-資料適配度,可分為「幽默產生」、「幽默態度」以及「幽默因應」三個向度,共計18題。所有的題目在男、女生以及施測方式(網路和紙本)上,並無明顯的差異試題功能(Differential Item Functioning)。幽默產生、幽默態度及幽默因應的信度分別是 .89、.81和 .81。三個幽默向度與一般性自我效能和情緒適應力間具有適當的關聯性。此外,網路與紙本問卷施測結果之差異分析顯示,除了幽默態度向度外,其餘向度皆無明顯差異。最後,本研究針對幽默感評量工具的發展以及施測方式,提出未來研究之建議。
Abstract
This study aims at revising the Chinese-version Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale (Ho, Chik, & Thorson, 2008) using Rasch analysis, and to compare differences between two kinds of data collection—web-based questionnaire and paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Participants were 634 (sample 1) and 587 (sample 2) undergraduate students respectively for item revision and validation. Sample 2 were grouped into 4 groups to test differences between the two kinds of data collection. Rasch Rating Scale Model analysis was used to assess model-data fit, and MANCOVA was employed to compare the differences between the web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires.
The results indicated that three dimensions of the revised 18-item scale—humor production, attitudes towards humor, and coping humor—showed good model-data fit. All items had no statistically significant differential item functioning in genders (boys and girls) and in ways of testing (the web-based and the paper-and-pencil). Reliabilities for humor production, attitudes towards humor, and coping humor were .89, .81, and .81 respectively. The revised scale was further examined through construct-related validity through general self-efficacy and emotional adaptive ability. Furthermore, only the dimension of attitudes towards humor had a statistically significant difference in ways of testing. Suggestions for future research on developing instrument of sense of humor were proposed.
目次 Table of Contents
目 次
第一章 緒論-------------------------------------------------------------- 1
第一節 研究背景與目的---------------------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究限制------------------------------------------------------- 6
第三節 名詞釋義------------------------------------------------------- 7
第二章 文獻探討-------------------------------------------------------- 9
第一節 幽默感的起源與定義---------------------------------------- 9
第二節 幽默感相關研究--------------------------------------------- 12
第三節 Rasch 模式-------------------------------------------------- 30
第四節 網路施測與紙本施測之比較------------------------------ 33
第三章 研究方法------------------------------------------------------- 36
第一節 研究對象------------------------------------------------------ 36
第二節 研究工具------------------------------------------------------ 42
第三節 研究程序------------------------------------------------------ 44
第四節 資料分析------------------------------------------------------ 46
第四章 研究結果------------------------------------------------------- 47
第一節 量表預試結果------------------------------------------------ 47
第二節 量表正式施測結果------------------------------------------ 49
第三節 網路與紙本差異分析結果------------------------------------ 53
第五章 討論與建議---------------------------------------------------- 55
參考文獻----------------------------------------------------------------- 59
附錄------------------------------------------------------------------------68
附錄一 預試量表—「幽默感」的自我評估--------------------- 68
附錄二 正式施測量表—大學生日常生活評估問卷------------ 69
附錄三 中文版多向度幽默感量表 作者同意使用信件-------- 72
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文部分
王文中(2004)。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究,27(4),637-694。
毛國楠(1995)。國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力的認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心理學報,28,177-194。
何茉如、林世華(2000)。國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康之調節作用。教育心理學報,32(1),123-156。
吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2007)。國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製。應用心理研究,35,185-210。
李新民、陳密桃、謝青曇(2007)。職場幽默與心理健康之相關研究:以幼兒教師為例。教育心理學報,38,4,375-396。
李蘭、江宜珍、邱玉蟬、鄭其嘉、吳文琪、楊蕙如(2008)。國中生的幽默概念及表現類型:焦點團體討論結果。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,27(6),519-529。
邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(2003)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報,34(2),179-198。
徐芝君、陳學志、邱發忠(2005)。千萬別笑,不然您的態度會從看笑話中洩露:貶抑類幽默感知態度調整理論之驗證。應用心理研究,26,143-166。
張景媛、陳學志、黃譯瑩(2004)。幽默訓練融入綜合活動對國一學生創造思考與人際因應之影響。教育心理學報,36(1),13-33。
陳李綢(2000)。大學生心理適應量表-指導手冊。台北,心理出版社。
陳淑蓉、陳學志(2005)。幽默感的定義與測量:多向度幽默感量表之編製。應用心理研究,26,167-187。
陳學志(2004)。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」—統整知、情、意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報,35(4),393-411。
陳學志、卓淑玲、賴惠德(2005)。解決問題發揮創意的次好方法就是發現其中的幽默:幽默中的創意與創意中的幽默。應用心理研究,26,95-115。
陳學志、徐芝君(2006)。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報:教育類(創造力特刊),51,71-93。
游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較:多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊,53(1),103-127。
黃毓華、鄭英耀(1996)。一般性自我效能量表之修訂。測驗年刊,43,279-285。
劉佩雲(1990)。性別、創造力、自我檢校與幽默感的關係。國立政治大學研究所碩士論文。
蕭颯、王文欽、徐智策(1999)。幽默心理分析。台北:智慧。

西文部分
Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor, 15(4), 365-381.
Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1-23.
Andich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
Ardalan, A., Ardalan, R., Coppage, S., & Crouch, W. (2007). A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1085-1101.
Beuckelaer, A. D., & Lievens, F. (2009). Measurement equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet organizational surveys: A large scale examination in 16 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(2), 336-361.
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-822.
Booth-Kewley, S., Larson, G. E., & Miyoshi, D. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 463-477.
Buchan, B. D., DeAngelis, D. L., & Levinson, E. M. (2005). Comparison of the web-based and paper-and-pencil versions of the career key interest inventory with a sample of university women. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42, 39-46.
Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the Internet: Validation of a World Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31, 365-371.
Cann, A., & Etzel, K. C. (2008). Remembering and anticipating stressors: Positive personality mediates the relationship with sense of humor. Humor, 21(2), 157-178.
Carbelo-Baquero, B., Alonso-Rodriguez, M. C., Valero-Garces, C., & Thorson, J. A. (2006). A study of sense of humor in Spanish and American samples. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 447-454.
Chen, G. H., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor: Internaional Joural of Humor Research, 20(3), 215-234.
Cheng, Y.-Y., Wang, W.-C., & Ho, Y.-H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth–fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 369-388.
Clariana. R. B., & Wallace, P. E. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602.
Cundall, M. K. (2007). Humor and the limits of incongruity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 203-211.
Dilek, D. (2009). The reconstruction of the past through images: An iconographic analysis on the historical imagination usage skills of primary school pupils. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(2), 665-689.
Dodge, B. J., & Rossett, A. (1982). Heuristic for humor in instruction. Performance & Instruction, 21(4), 11-32.
Dowling, J. S., & Fain, J. A. (1999). A Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale for school-aged children: Issues of reliability and validity. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14(1), 38-43.
Egan, K., & Judson, G. (2009). Values and imagination in teaching: With a special focus on social studies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(2), 126-140.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, (91), 330-335.
Führ, M. (2002). Coping humor in early adolescence. Humor, 15(3), 283-304.
Galloway, G. (2010). Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 563-567.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778-822.
Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(2), 322-333.
Hempelmann, C. F., & Ruch, W. (2005). 3 WD meets GTVH: Breaking the ground for interdisciplinary humor research. Humor, 18(4), 353-387.
Hill, D. (1988). Humor in the classroom: A textbook for teachers and other entertainers! Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Ho, S. K., Chik, M. P. Y., & Thorson, J. A. (2008). Psychometric study of a Chinese version of the Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 425-434.
Holland, P. W., and Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Howe, N. E. (2002). The origin of humor. Medical Hypotheses, 59(3), 252-254.
Hsieh, C. J., Hsiao, Y. L., & Chang, C. (2005). Positive psychological measure:Constructing and evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese Humor Scale applicable to professional nursing. Journal of Nursing Research, 13(3), 206-215.
José, H., Parreira, P., Thorson, J. A., & Allwardt, D. (2007). A factor-analytic study of the
Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale with a Portuguese sample. North American
Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 595-610.
Koning, E. D., & Weiss, R. L. (2002). The Relational Humor Inventory: Functions of humor in close relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 1-18.
Kuhrik, M., Kuhrik, N., & Berry, P. A. (1997). Facilitating learning with humor. Journal of Nursing Education, 36(7), 332-334.
Kuiper, N. A., & McHale, N. (2009). Humor styles as mediators between self-evaluative standards and psychological well-being. The Journal of Psychology, 143(4), 359-376.
Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D., & Belanger, K. A. (1995). Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications. Personality and Individual Difference, 19(3), 359-372.
Lefcourt, H. M., & Martin, R. A. (1986). Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. New York: Springer Publishing.
Looij-Jansen, P. M. V., & Wilde E. J. (2008). Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: Effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents. Health Research and Educational Trust, 43(5), 1708-1721.
Lothane, Z. (2008). The uses of humor in life, neurosis and in psychotherapy: Part 1. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 17, 180-188.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., Swanson, D. B., & Case, S. M. (1998). A comparative study of a comprehensive basic sciences test using paper-and pencil and computerized formats. Academic Medicine, 73(10), s51-s53.
Lund, D. A., Utz R. Caserta, M. S., & Vries, B. D. (2009). Humor, laughter, and happiness in the daily lives of recently bereaved spouses. OMEGA, 58(2), 87-105.
Martin, R. A. (1996). The Situational Humor Response Questionnaire (SHRQ) and Coping Humor Scale (CHS): A decade of research findings. Humor, 9(3), 251-271.
Martin, R. A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. In The Sense of Humor (pp. 15-60). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Martin, R. A. (2003). Sense of Humor. In Lopez, S. J., & Synder, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychological Assessment (pp. 313-325). Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Martin, R. A. (2004). Sense of humor and physical health: Theoretical issues, recent findings, and future directions. Humor, 17(1/2), 1-19.
Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 145-155.
Martin, R. A., Doris, P. P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75.
Marziali, E., McDonald, L., & Donahue, P. (2008). The role of coping humor in the physical and mental health of older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 12(6), 713-718.
Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149-174.
McGhee, P. E. (1971). Cognitive development and children’s comprehension of humor. Child Development, 42, 123-138.
Nevo, O., Aharonson, H., & Klingaman, A. (1998). The development and evaluation of a systematic program for improving sense of humor. In W. Ruch, (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Humor research, 385-404. Berlin, Germany: Walter De Gruyter & Co.
Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Yin, J. L. (2001). Singaporean humor: A Cross-cultural cross-gender comparison. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 143-156.
Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction. Humor, 14(4), 395-413.
Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X., & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results from computerized and paper & pencil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessment program. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(6), 1-30.
Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(1), 73-80.
Ruch, W., & Deckers, L. (1993). Do extraverts’ like to laugh?: An analysis of the Situational Humor Response Questionnaire (SHRQ). European Journal of Personality, 7, 211-220.
Samson, A. C., Hempelmann, C. F., Huber, O., Zysset, S. (2009). Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1023-1033.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
Suoqiao, Q. (2007). Translating ’humor’ into Chinese culture. Humor, 20(3), 277-295.
Susan, R. (2009). Leading with a sense of humor. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 84(3), 10-11.
Swart, S. (2009). “The terrible laughter of the afrikaner”-Toward a social history of humor. Journal of Social History, 879-917.
Svebak, S. (1974). Revised questionnaire on the sense of humor. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 328-331.
Svebak, S. (1996). The development of the Sense of Humor Questionnaire: From SHQ to SHQ-6. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 9(3-4), 341-362.
Taher, D., Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2008). Validation of the Arabic humor styles questionnaire in a community sample of Lebanese in Lebanon. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(5), 525-564.
Theall, M. (2000, November/December). Electronic course evaluation is not necessarily the solution. Technology Source. Retrieved 19 June 2004, from http://technologysource.org/article/electronic_course_evaluation_is_not_necessarily_the_solution/
Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, January, 49(1), 13-23.
Thorson, J. A., Brdar, I., & Powell, F. C. (1997). Factor-analytic study of sense of humor in Croatia and the USA. Psychological Reports, 81, 971-977.
Thorson, J. A., Powell, F. C., & Samuel, V. T. (2001). Sense of humor in black and white. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 1-12.
Vallejo, M. A., Mañanes, G.., Comeche, M. I., & Díaz, M. I. (2008). Comparison between administration via Internet and paper-and-pencil administration of two clinical instruments : SCL-90-R and GHQ-28. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 201-208.
Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 5-24.
Wang, W.-C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(4), 1-22.
Vereen, L. G., Butler, S. K., Williams, F. C., Darg, J. A., & Downing, T. K. E. (2006). The use of humor when counseling African American college students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 10-15.
Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, R. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). Relations between humor styles and the dark triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 772-774.
Wright, B. D., and Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
Wu, M. (2004). Plausible values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2004, 18(2), 976-978.
Ziv, A. (2010). The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships. Society, 47, 11-18.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code