Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0729112-010524 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0729112-010524
論文名稱
Title
轉換型領導與交易型領導對Y世代員工離職傾向之影響 —以知覺主管支持為中介、組織認同為調節變項
The effect of Transformational and Transactional Leaderships on Y Generation Employee to Turnover intention : Perceived Supervisory Support as the Mediator, Organizational Identification as the Moderator
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
104
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-06-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-07-29
關鍵字
Keywords
離職傾向、組織認同、知覺主管支持、轉換型領導、交易型領導
turnover intention, organizational identification, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, perceived supervisory support
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5735 次,被下載 1596
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5735 times, has been downloaded 1596 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討領導者的轉換型領導與交易型領導對Y世代(1977年至1995年出生)員工離職傾向之影響,並以知覺主管支持為中介、組織認同為調節變項。研究者透過國內企業之Y世代在職員工進行問卷調查。共計發放出243份問卷,最後獲得回收有效樣本205份,有效樣本回收率為84.36﹪﹔統計分析採用SPSS 12.0中文版做為資料分析的工具,所得到的資料以信度分析、描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、相關分析及迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析,以檢定本研究之假設。研究結果發現:
1、轉換型領導對Y世代員工離職傾向具有顯著負向影響。
2、交易型領導對Y世代員工離職傾向具有顯著負向影響。
3、知覺主管支持對Y世代員工離職傾向具有顯著負向影響。
4、Y世代員工的知覺主管支持對轉換型領導與離職傾向之間具部份中介效果。
5、Y世代員工的知覺主管支持對交易型領導與離職傾向之間具顯著中介效果。
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of transformational and transactional leaderships on Y generation (Was born between 1977 to 1995) employee to turnover intention, and also use the perceived supervisory support as the mediator、organizational identification as the moderator. This research targeted samples were the Y generation employee from domestic companies. Total of 243 questionnaires were issued,and 205 valid samples were returned with responding rate at 84.36%. Statistical analysis,such as Reliability、Descriptive Statistical、Independent t-Test、One-way ANOVA、Correlation and regression, is conducted with SPSS 12.0 software. The results could be summarized as follows﹕
1. Transformational leadership show significant negative effects on Y generation employee to Turnover intention.
2. Transactional leadership show significant negative effects on Y generation employee to Turnover intention.
3. Perceived supervisory support show significant negative effects on Y generation employee to Turnover intention.
4. On Y generation employee to perceived supervisory support has the mediated
effect between transformational leadership and turnover intention.
5. On Y generation employee to perceived supervisory support has the full mediated
effect between transactional leadership and turnover intention.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 3
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍與流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 轉換型領導、交易型領導 6
第二節 知覺主管支持 16
第三節 組織認同 19
第四節 離職傾向 23
第五節 各變數間之關係 26
第三章 研究方法 32
第一節 研究架構 32
第二節 研究假設 33
第三節 研究變項之操作性定義 34
第四節 研究工具與信效度分析 37
第五節 研究對象與問卷發放 48
第六節 資料分析方法 53
第四章 研究結果 55
第一節 個人屬性在各研究變項之差異性 55
第二節 各研究變項間之關係 65
第三節 相關研究變項之迴歸分析 67
第四節 知覺主管支持之中介效果分析 69
第五節 組織認同之調節效果分析 72
第六節 研究假設驗證結果 74
第五章 結論與建議 75
第一節 研究結論 75
第二節 研究建議 77
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 79
參考文獻 81
一、中文部分 81
二、英文部分 85
附錄 92
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
王美娟,2007,不同世代員工的人格特質及其對工作滿足、組織承諾與離職傾向之影響,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

王郁智、章淑娟、朱正一,2006,升遷機會、社會支持、工作滿意度與留任機會之相關性研究,志為護理,5(4),90-101。

方慈霞,2011,領導風格工作動機對工作投入之影響:以組織公平為調節變項,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

李佳勳,2008,情緒勞動、情緒耗竭、工作滿意度與離業承諾-以工作投入、知覺主管支持為調節變項,國立國防大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。

李晉豪,2007,員工價值觀、組織認同與專業認同對員工生涯發展之影響,國立中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

底正平,2006,倫理氣候認知對組織承諾、組織公民行為與離職傾向影響之研究-以南部地區醫院員工為例,長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。

林合懋,1994,學校主管與企業主管轉型領導之比較研究,國立政治大學教
育研究所碩士論文。

林怡君,2010,西藥業業務人員企業倫理「期望-實際」落差對工作滿足與離職傾向影響之研究,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

林柏年,2008,家長式領導與員工組織承諾、工作績效及離職傾向關係之研究,
國立中正大學企業管理研究碩士論文。

施妤璇,2006,轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向之研究-以組織
承諾為中介變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

許士軍,1988,管理學,台北﹕東華書局。

陳文忠,2008,台北縣市國中文理補習班員工組織認同與離職傾向關係之研究,
淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文。

郭倍宏,2009,工作-家庭衝突、工作壓力、知覺主管支持與離職傾向關係研究:以輔導會所屬員工為例,國立中正大學企業管理研究碩士論文。

曹翠栩,1984,我國企業界技術專業人員離職意願之探討,管理評論,第3卷,第三期,52-57。

梁雙蓮,1984,中央行政機關公務員組織認同之研究,台灣大學政治研究所博士論文。

張火燦、紀乃文,2006,護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾多元構面交互作用對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響:離職傾向與離業傾向的中介效果,人力資源管理學報,第6卷,第二期,111-133。

溫金豐,2005,新進專業人員的組織社會化戰術與組織認同之關係:工作經驗與成長需求強度的干擾效應,臺大管理論叢,第15卷,第二期,143-164。

溫金豐,2011,轉換型領導與組織認同:領導者組織典範性知覺的調節效果,臺大管理論叢,第21卷,第二期,265-286。

張志育,2003,管理學,台北:前程企業管理有限公司。

張甜、楊維忠,2012,SPSS統計分析與應用學習實務,台北市,清華大學出版社。

黃品全,2005,轉型與交易領導對心理賦能及服務導向組織公民行為之影響-模式建立及全職、部份工時餐飲人員比較分析,觀光研究學報,11(3),233-258。

黃英宗, 趙必孝,1991,產業內知覺之新工作比較在離職模式內的因果關係研究,管理評論,117。

黃開義,1984,工作特性、個人特質、領導型態、工作滿足與組織承諾對離職意願之影響,中原大學機械工程研究所碩士論文。

黃新波,2009,企業聲望對工作態度與行為之影響,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

游曉郁,2005,領導行為與員工效能:知覺組織支持及知覺主管支持的中介效果,國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文。

楊婷淳,2008,在職進修人員角色間衝突、社會支持與學習倦怠關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

湛瑄宇,2000,員工薪資滿足之前因後果之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

鄭文俊,1995,工作壓力、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職傾向關係之研究-以台北市民營公車駕駛員為例,文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。

鄭伯壎,1988,家族主意與領導行為,輯于楊中方與高尚仁編之中國人、中
國心:人格與社會篇,頁306-407。台北:遠流。

鄭伯壎,2000,華人組織的家長式領導:概念再建構、測量及模式的建立
(1/2),國科會專題研究報告。

鄭凱儒,2009,航空維修人員工作壓力與維修失誤之關聯性:知覺主管支持的調節效果,國防大學管理學院運籌管理學系碩士論文。

蔡宗興、曾瑞譙,2008,雲嘉南地區國民中學教育人員知覺校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究,學校行政,57,110-146。

賴志超、鄭柏壎、陳欽雨,2001,台灣企業員工組織認同的來源及其效益,人力資源管理學報,第1卷,第一期,27-51

羅新興、周慧珍,2006,組織成員知覺主管支持對其離職傾向之影響-探討工作負荷與成就動機之干擾作用,人力資源管理學報,第6卷,第四期,67-80。

蘇慧玲,2002,服務業建教合作支持系統對員工組織承諾與離職傾向影響之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。

樊景立,1978,紡織廠女性員工離職行為之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份

Adams, J. S. 1963. Wage inequities, productivity, and work quality. Industrial
Relations, 3 , 916.

Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P.,& Moffitt, K. R. 2005. Turnover Intentions and Voluntary
Turnover: The Moderating Roles of Self-Monitoring, Locus of Control, Proactive Personality, and Risk Aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980-990.

Amabile, T. M. 1997. Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do, California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.

Angle H. & Perry J. 1981. An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-14.

Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. 1992. Loyal from day one : Biodata, Organizational Identification and Turnover among Newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.

Avolio, B. J. & Berson, Y. 2004. Transformational leadership and the dissemination
of organizational goals:A case study of a telecommunication firm, The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 625-646.

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York:
Free Press.

Bass, B. M. & Avolio , B. J. 1990. Transformational Leadership Developmt:
Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, California:
Consulting Psychologists Press.

Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. 1985. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge.
New York: Harper & Row.

Blanchard, K. & Johnson, S. 1982. The One Minute Manager. NewYork:William
Morrow.

Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

Bycio, P., Allen J. S., & Hackett, R. D. 1995. Further assessments of Bass’s (1985)
conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468-478.

Cheney, G. 1983. On the various and changing meaning of organizational membership: A Field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.

Cole M. S., Bruch H. & Vogel B. 2006. Emotion As Mediators of The Relations Between Perceived Supervisor Support and Psychological Hardiness on Employee Cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 463-484.

C. Rusbult & D. Lowery. 1985. When Bureaucrats Get the Blues, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(1), 83.

Cummings, A. & Oldham, G. R. 1996, Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work, Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.

Douglas, B. C. 1999. The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in model of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 495-524.

Eisenberger, R., Sucharski, L., Rhoades, L., Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C.
2002. Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to received Organizational Support and Employee Retention. Journal of Applied Psychology ,87, 565-573.

Fulk, J., & Wendler, E. R. 1982. Dimensionality of leader-subordinate interactions:A path-goal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
30, 241-264.

Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. 1988. Superiors’ Evaluations and Subordinates’
Perceptions of Transformational and transactional Leadership. Journal of
Applied Ps ychology, 73, 695-702.

Homans, G., C. 1958. Social behaviors as exchange. American Journal of Sociology,
63, 597-606.

Homans, G., C. 1961. Social Behavior: It’s Element Form. N. T.: Harcourt, Brace
and World.

House, R .J. 1971. A path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness. Administrative
Science Quarterly , 16, 321-338.

Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. 1993. Transformational leadership, Transactional
leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation: Key predictors
of consolidated-business-unit performance.

Karatepe & Kilic, 2007. Relationships of supervisor support and conflicts in the
work-family interface with the selected job outcomes of frontline employees.
Tourism Management, 28, 238-252.

Kevin C. S. 2006. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288-307.

Kirschenbaum, A., & Weisberg, J. 2002. Employee’s turnover intentions and job
destination choices. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 109-125.

Ko, J. W., Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. 1997. Assessment of Meyer and Allen’s three component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 961-973.

Kotter, J. P. 1990. A force for change: How leadership differs from management.
New York: Free Press.

Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. 1988. Measuring perceived supervisory and
organizational support. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 48, 1075-1079.

Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramanian, N. 1996. Effectiveness of
correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic
review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.

Luthans, F., & Kreitner, R. 1985. Organizational behavior modification and beyond.
Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

Mobley, W. H. 1977. Intermediate Linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237-240.

Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. 1978. An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414.

Morris, J. H. & J. D. Sherman. 1981. Generalizability of an Organizational Commitment Model, Academy of Management Journal, 24,512-526.

Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, & R. M. Steers, 1982. Employee-Organization Linkage-the Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Turnover. New York: Academic Press, 20-56.

Pearce, C. L., Jr, H. P. S., Cox, J. F., Ball, G., Schnell, K. A., Smith. K. A., & Trevino, L. 2003. Transactors, transfmormers and beyond: Amultimethod
development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management
Development, 22, 273-307.

Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990.
Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Trust, Satisfaction
and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Leadership Quarterly , 1, 107-142.

Prasad B., & Martin K. 2006. The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 419-439.

Price, J. L. 1977. The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

Randall, D. M. 1993. Cross-Cultural Research on Organizational Commitment : A Review and Application of Hostede’s Value Survey Module. Journal of Business Research, 26(1), 91-110.

Ronald F. P., & Jason A. C. 2006. Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327-340.

Staw, B. M. 1981. The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action. American Management Review, 6, 577-587.

Steers, R. M. 1977. Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 22(3), 46-56.

Steven V. C. 2010. Generational management in corporate America: The differences and challenges in management of four generations of working adults. Chinese Business Review, 9(8),46-54.

Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe. 2003. Organizational and supervisor as sources
of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study. Journal of
organizational Behavior, 24, 251-270.

Stumpf, S. A. & Hartman, K. 1984. Individual exploration to organizational commitment or withdrawal, Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 308-329.

Tichy, N. W. & Devanna, M. A. 1990. The Transformational Leadership. New York:
Wiley.

Vroom, V H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley & Sons, In

Waldman, D. A., Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. 1990. Adding to contigent-reward
behavior: The augementing effect of charismatic leadership. Group and
Organization Studies, 15, 381-394.

Yammarino, F. J. & Bass, B. M. 1990. Long-term forecasting of transformational
leadership and its effects among naval offices: Some preliminary findings. In
K. E. Clark (Eds). Measures of Leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership
Library of America.

Yoon, J., & Thye, S. 2000. Supervisor support in the work place: legitimacy
an positive affectivity. Journal of Social Psycholoyg, 140, 295-316.

Yukl, Gary. A. 1998. Leadership in Organizations-5thed. Prentice-Hall, Inc.,Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey, 07458.

Zhu, W., Chew I. K.H., & Spangler, W. D. 2005. CEO transformational leadership
and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human–capital-enhancing human resource management, The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 39-52.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code