Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0729113-155916 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0729113-155916
論文名稱
Title
以行為學方式檢定雌性大鳳蝶擬態性狀之有效性
Examinations of the effectiveness of mimetic phenotypes of female Great Mormom Butterfly using behavioral experiments
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
113
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-06-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-08-29
關鍵字
Keywords
不完美擬態、雌性多態型、翅紋元素、貝氏擬態、迴避學習
elements, Imperfect mimicry, Batesian mimicry, avoidance learning, Wing pattern polymorphism, artificial prey
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5771 次,被下載 216
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5771 times, has been downloaded 216 times.
中文摘要
鱗翅目昆蟲的多態型以雌雄二型性且雌性多態型最為常見,其中鳳蝶屬(genus Papilio)的物種皆以貝氏擬態形式存在,並常依照其翅紋功能、用途、元素圖樣等,分別被提出檢視或討論,甚至以捕食者的觀點進行研究。而大鳳蝶(Papilio memnon)雌性被認為是參與翅紋擬態中的一員,於演化及基因觀點上也常被提出討論。由前人研究得知,大鳳蝶雌性具有17 種表型,多數表型以完美擬態型式存在,且其觀點已被長期運用於教科書中,但大鳳蝶之擬態對象及完美擬態與否仍有疑慮,且從未研究者以行為實驗來驗證大鳳蝶翅紋的擬態關係。因此,本研究經由檢視博物館之大量模式標本進行翅紋及地理分析,探討其翅紋表型分布及相似程度;以行為可行性實驗得知白頭翁可適用於大鳳蝶擬態關係之捕食者,故以白頭翁測試大鳳蝶與麝鳳蝶之擬態關係,並確定前人提出之擬態關係對捕食者而言多數是不存在的;以改變元素的方式,探討若兩者關係為不完美擬態時,捕食者是依何元素作為辦識依據,結果發現翅形、尾突、及前翅上半部變異單獨調控時,均不影響捕食者行為;以野外實驗探討改變獵物密度對擬態關係穩定性及擬態對象與獵物存活率關係,結果顯示擬態者密度增加,則存活率下降,其擬態關係可能消失,而改變擬態對象結果顯示,擬雄型確實能提高存活率,但經捕食者迴避學習後,擬態雌性模式才有較好存活率。
Abstract
The Batesian mimicry involving Papilionidae is often sexually dimorphic, female-limited, and polymorphic. According to the case studies based on the mimicry relationships exhibited by several North American, African and Asian Papilio species, it has been realized that the occurrence of mimetic female form correlates with relative abundance of the model. Papilio memnon is a fairly common swallowtail butterfly ranging throughout India, Sundaland and S.E. Palaeartic region. The female is extremely polymorphic with at least 17 forms being recognized and many of them often regarded perfectly mimetic with several troidine butterfly models occurring in the same distribution range. However, neither the occurrence of the so-called mimicry of this species has been questioned nor the effectiveness of the putative aposematic colouration has been tested using modern methods. Here we present a result based on an analysis of geographical correlations between possible mimetic female forms and their possible model(s) from numerous museum specimens and animal behavior experiment. The results show that: (1) There might be no prefect mimicry occurring between female P. memnon and their potential models; (2) the accurate mimicry involving the P. memnon complex may only be presented by P. lampsacus and P. oenomaus and their models; (3) the mimetic colouration (either perfect or imperfect) may have independently evolved for several times; (4) the presence or absence of hindwing tail or some specific maculation does not necessarily contribute in enhancing resemblance between P. memnon and the model(s); and (5) some elements of interactive regulation, it will affect the judgment of predator.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書  i
誌謝  ii
中文摘要  iii
英文摘要  iv
第一章 重新檢視大鳳蝶元素變異與量化分析
1.1 摘要  1
1.2 前言  2
1.3 材料方法  7
1.4 結果  8
1.5 討論  10
第二章 大鳳蝶元素變異與量化
2.1 摘要  13
2.2 前言  14
2.3 材料方法  18
2.4 結果  20
2.5 討論  22
第三章 以行為實驗探討大鳳蝶的擬態關係與擬態對象
3.1 摘要  25
3.2 前言  26
3.3 材料方法  30
3.4 結果  36
3.5 討論  39
第四章 大鳳蝶完美擬態探討與捕食者判定依據
4.1 摘要  44
4.2 前言  45
4.3 材料方法  47
4.4 結果  49
4.5 討論  51
參考文獻  54
附錄
附表1 大鳳蝶東山族群累代飼養記錄  100
附表2 大鳳蝶柴山族群累代飼養記錄  103
參考文獻 References
宮城秋乃。2013。沖縄島で見られた黒色部の発達した ナガサキアゲハ♀。Yadoriga。236: 38。
陳思源,曾玲,梁廣文。1999。玉帶鳳蝶人工飼料初步研究。Journal of South China Agricultural University. 20(1): 13-16。
陳素瓊,歐陽盛芝。2005。大鳳蝶的生活史。國立臺灣博物館學刊。58(1):47-58。
Bates HW. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society. 23: 495-556.
Baur E. 1911. Einführung in die experimentelle Vererbungslehre. Pp. 155-159. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger.
Beatty CD, Beirinckx K & Sherratt TN. 2004. The evolution of Müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities. Nature. 431: 63–67.
Bennett ATD & Cuthill IC. 1994. Ultraviolet vision in birds: What is its function? Elsevier. 34(11): 1471-1478.
Behrens Yamadaa S & Bouldingb EG. 1998. Claw morphology, prey size selection and foraging efficiency in generalist and specialist shell-breaking crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 220(2): 191-211.
Blest AD. 1957. The function of eyespot patterns in the Lepidoptera. Behaviour. 11: 209-256.
Blount JD, Speed MP, Ruxton GD & Stephens PA. 2009. Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 276: 871-877.
Calvert WH. 1979. Mortality of the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.): avian predation at five overwintering sites in Mexico. Science. 204:847–851.
Caldwell JP, Thorp JH & Jervey TO. 1980. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia. 46(3): 285-289.
Chow YS & Tsai RS. 1989. Protective chemicals in caterpillar survival. Experientia. 45(4): 390-392.
Clark AB. 1978. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science. 201(4351): 163-165.
Clarke CA & Sheppard PM. 1959. The genetics of some mimetic forms of Papilio dardanus, Brown, and Papilio glaucus, Linn. Journal of Genetics. 56: 236-260.
Clarke CA & Sheppard PM. 1960. Super-genes and mimicry. Heredity. 14: 175-185.
Clarke CA & Sheppard PM. 1962. The Genetics of the Mimetic Butterfly Papilio Glaucus. Ecological Society of AmericaStable. 43(1): 159-161.
Clarke CA & Sheppard PM. 1971. Further studies on the genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 263(847): 35-70.
Clarke CA & Sheppard PM. 1972. The Genetics of the Mimetic Butterfly Papilio polytes L. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 263(855): 431-458.
Clarke CA, Sheppard PM & Thornton IWB. 1968. The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 254(791): 37-89.
Clutton-Brock TH & Vincent ACJ. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 351: 58-60.
Coppinger RP. 1970. The Effect of Experience and Novelty on Avian Feeding Behavior with Reference to the Evolution of Warning Coloration in Butterflies. II. Reactions of Naive Birds to Novel Insects. The American Naturalist. 104(938): 323-335.
Cott HB. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Cox DR. 1972. Regression models and life-tablea (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. 34:187-220.
Cuthill IC. 2006. Color perception. In Bird coloration(Hill GE & McGraw KJ eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Hart NS & Hunt S. 2000. Ultraviolet Vision in Birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior. 29: 159-214.
Dunn OJ. 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics. 6: 241-252.
Exnerová A, Svádová K, Štys P, Barcalová S, Landová E, Prokopová M, Fuchs R & Socha R. (2006) Importance f colour in the reaction of passerine predators to aposematic prey: experiments with mutants of Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 88: 143-153.
Fischer K & Fiedler K. 2000. Sex-related differences in reaction norms in the butterfly Lycaena tityrus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oikos. 90(2):372-380.
Fisher RA. 1929. Tests of significance in harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 125: 54-59.
Fisher RA. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Frederick KL & Edward JT. (王季蘭譯) 2012。觀念地球科學。天下遠見。台北。
Gamberale-Stille G, Johansen AI & Tullberg BS. 2010. Change in protective coloration in the striated shieldbug Graphosoma lineatum (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): predator avoidance and generalization among different life stages. Evolutionary Ecology. 24:423-432.
Ham AD, Ihalainen E, Lindstrőm L & Mappes J. 2006. Does colour matter? The importance of colour in avoidance learning, memorability and generalization. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 60: 482-491.
Hamilton WD. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science. 156: 477-488.
Harvey GT. 1983. Environmental and genetic effects on mean egg weight in spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist. 115(9): 1109-1117.
Holmes RT & Pitelka FA. 1968. Food overlap among coexisting sandpipers on northern Alaskan tundra. Systematic Zoology. 17(3): 305-318.
Ihalainen E, Rowland HM, Speed MP, Ruxton GD & Mappes J. 2012. Prey community structure affects how predators select for Müllerian mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 279(1736): 2099-2105.
Ioannou CC, Ruxton GD & Krause J. 2008. Search rate, attack probability, and the relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate. Behavioral Ecology. 19(4): 842-846.
Jacobson E. 1909. Beobachtungen über den Polymorphismus von Papilio memnon L. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. 52: 125-157.
Jacobson E. 1910. Corrigenda zu Beobachtungen über den Polymorphismus von Papilio memnon L. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. 53:195.
Joron M, Jiggins CD, Papanicolaou A & McMillan WO. 2006. Heliconius wing patterns: an evo-devo model for understanding phenotypic diversity. Heredity. 97: 157–167.
Joron M, Papa R, Beltrán M, Chamberlain N, Mavárez J, Baxter S, Abanto M, Bermingham E, Humphray SJ, Rogers J, Beasley H, Barlow K, ffrench-Constant RH, Mallet J, McMillan WO & Jiggins CD. 2006. A Conserved Supergene Locus Controls Colour Pattern Diversity in Heliconius Butterflies. PLoS biology. 4(10): e303.
Krebs JR & Davies NB. 1981. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Chapter 8.
Kruskal WH & Wallis WA. 1952. Use of ranks on one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 47: 583-621.
Lederhouse RC & Scriber JM. 1996. Intrasexual selection constrains the evolution of the dorsal color pattern of male black swallowtail butterflies, Papilio polyxenes. Evolution. 50(2): 717-722.
Lina CP. & Danforth BN. 2004. How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined datasets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 30(3): 686-702.
Lindstedt C, Eager H, Ihalainen E, Kahilainen A, Stevens M & Mappesa J. 2011. Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth. Behavioral Ecology. 22(3): 580-587.
Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A & Mappes J. 2001. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences. 268: 357-361.
Lindström L, Alatalo RV & Mappes J. 1997. Imperfect Batesian mimicry ─ the effects of the frequency and the distastefulness of the model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 264: 149–153.
Lindström L, Alatalo RV & Mappes J. 1999a. Reactions of hand-reared and wild-caught predators toward warningly colored, gregarious, and conspicuous prey. Behavioral Ecology. 10(3): 317-322.
Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Riipi M & Vertainen L. 1999b. Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? Nature. 397: 249-251.
Lindström L & Kotiaho JS. 2002. Signalling and Reception. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, Nature Publishing Group, 1-6.
MacDougall A & Dawkins MS. 1998. Predator discrimination error and the benefits of Müllerian mimicry. Animal Behaviour. 55, 1281–1288.
Mann HB & Whitney DR. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistical. 18: 20-60.
de Meijere JCH. 1910. Über Jacobsons Züchtungsversuche bezüglich des Polymorphismus von Papilio memnon L. ♀ und über die Vererbung sekundärer Geschlechtsmerkmale. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre. 3: 161-181.
Merilaita S & Lind J. 2005. Background-matching and disruptive coloration,and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 272: 665-670.
Müller F. 1879. Ituna and Thyrida: a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Proclamations of the Entomological Society of London. 1879: 20-29.
Murray JD. 1981. On pattern formation mechanisms for lepidopteran wing patterns and mammalian coat markings. Transactions of the Royal Society. 295(1078): 473-496.
Nagasawa S & Nakayama I. 1969. Rearing of Papolio Protenor Demetrius Cramer (Lepidoptera : Papilionidae) on Artificial Dies with a Special Rererence to the Nutritional Roles of Yeast, Soybean Protein, Cholesterol and Choline Chloride. Japanese journal of entomology. 37(3): 327-337.
Ohsaki N. 1995. Preferential predation of female butterflies and the evolution of batesian mimicry. Nature. 378: 173-175.
Okagaki H. 1967. Forced oviposition of butterfly by ethanol injection method. Transactions of the Lepidopter. 17: 51-53.
Oliver JC & Monteiro A. 2011. On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 278(1714): 1981-1988.
Osorio D, Miklosi A & Gonda Z. 1999. Visual ecology and perception of coloration patterns by domestic chicks. Evolutionary Ecology. 13: 673-389.
Otaki JM, Hiyama A, Iwata M & Kudo T. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity in the range-margin population of the lycaenid butterfly Zizeeria maha. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 10: 252.
Pearson K. 1900. On the citrtion that a give system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can reasonably be supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine. 50(5): 157-175.
Pekár S & Jarab M. 2011. Assessment of color and behavioral resemblance to models by inaccurate myrmecomorphic spiders (Araneae). Invertebrate Biology. 130: 83-90.
Penney HD, Hassall C, Skevington JH, Abbott KR & Sherratt TN. 2012. A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature. 483: 461-464.
Pilecki C & O'Donald P. 1971. The effects of predation on artificial mimetic polymorphisms with perfect and imperfect mimics at varying frequencies. Evolution. 25: 365–370.
Prokopová M, Veselý P, Fuchs R & Zrzavý J. 2010. The role of size and colour pattern in protection of developmental stages of the red firebug (Pyrrhocoris apterus) against avian predators. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 100(4): 890–898.
Prudic KL, Jeon C, Cao H & Monteiro A. 2011. Developmental Plasticity in Sexual Roles of Butterfly Species Drives Mutual Sexual Ornamentation. Science. 331(6013): 73-75.
Reed RD & Gilbert LE. 2004. Wing venation and Distal-less expression in Heliconius butterfly wing pattern development. Development Genes and Evolution. 214(12): 628-634
Reed RD, McMillan WO & Nagy LM. 2008. Gene expression underlying adaptive variation in Heliconius wing patterns: non-modular regulation of overlapping cinnabar and vermilion prepatterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences. 275(1630): 37-46.
Ridley M. 1985. Evolution. Blackwell Science Ltd. (3rd ed., 2004) (8.1)
Rothschild M, Reichstein T, von Euw J, Aplin R & Harman RRM. 1970. Toxic Lepidoptera. Toxicon. 8(4): 293-296.
Rowe C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Animal Behaviour. 58: 921-931.
Rowland HM, Ihalainen E, Lindström L, Mappes J & Speed MP. 2007. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences. Nature. 448: 64-68.
Rowland HM, Hoogesteger T, Ruxton GD, Speed MP & Mappesb J. 2010a. A tale of 2 signals: signal mimicry between aposematic species enhances predator avoidance learning. Behavioral Ecology. 21(4): 851-860.
Rowland HM, Mappes J, Ruxton GD & Speed MP. 2010b. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Ecology Letters. 13: 1494-1502.
Ruxton GD. 2009. Non-visual crypsis: a review of the empirical evidence for camouflage to senses other than vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 364:549-557.
Sandre SL, Stevens M & Mappes J. 2010. The effect of predator appetite, prey warning coloration and luminance on predator foraging decisions. Behaviour. 147: 1121-1143.
Sargent RC & Turner JRG. 1981. Gestalt Perception by Birds as Individuals and in Flocks. The American Naturalist. 117(1): 99-103.
Scali V & Masetti M. 1973. The Population Structure of Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): The Sex-Ratio Control. Journal of Animal Ecology. 42(3): 773-778.
Shapiro SS & Francia RS. 1972. An approximate analysis of varance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 67: 215-216.
Sherratt TN. 2002. The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behavioral Ecology. 13(6): 821-826.
Sims SR. 1980. Diapause Dynamics and Host Plant Suitability of Papilio zelicaon (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). American Midland Naturalist. 103(2): 375-384.
Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Speed MP & Ruxton GD. 2010a. Masquerade: Camouflage Without Crypsis. Science. 327(5961): 51.
Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Speed MP, Wert LD, Quinn L, Delf J & Ruxton GD. 2010b. Size-dependent misclassification of masquerading prey. Behavioral Ecology. 21(6): 1344-1348.
Spearman C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology. 15: 72-101.
Speed MP. 2001. Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism? Animal Behaviour. 61: 205-216.
Speed MP, Brockhurst MA & Ruxton GD. 2010. The Dual Benefits of Aposematism: Predator Avoidance and Enhanced Resource Collection. Evolution. 64(6): 1622-1633.
Speed MP, Ruxton GD, Blount JD & Stephens PA. 2010. Diversification of honest signals in a predator–prey system. Ecology Letters. 13(6):744-753.
Stevens M & Cuthill IC. 2005. The unsuitability of html-based colour charts for estimating animal colours – a comment on Berggren and Merilä (2004). Frontiers in Zoology. 2(1): 14.
Stevens M & Cuthill IC. 2006. Disruptive Coloration, Crypsis and Edge Detection in Early Visual Processing. Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 273(1598): 2141-2147.
Stevens M, Cuthill IC, Windsor AM & Walker HJ. 2006. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 273: 2433-2438.
Stevens M, Párraga CA, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC & Troscianko TS. 2007a. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 90:211–237.
Stevens M, Hopkins E, Hinde W, Adcock A, Connolly Y, Troscianko T & Cuthill IC. 2007b. Field experiments on the effectiveness of ‘eyespots’ as predator deterrents. Animal Behaviour. 74(5): 1215-1227.
Stevens M, Hardman CJ & Stubbins CL. 2008. Conspicuousness, not eye mimicry, makes ‘‘eyespots’’ effective antipredator signals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 19(3): 525-531.
Stevens M & Merilaita S. 2009. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 364(1516): 423-427.
Strutzenberger P, Brehm G, Bodner F & Fiedler K. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of Eois (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): evolution of wing patterns and host plant use in a speciesrich group of Neotropical moths. Zoological Scripta. 39(6): 603-620.
Tsao WC & Yeh WB. 2008. DNA-Based Discrimination of Subspecies of Swallowtail Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilioninae) from Taiwan. Zoological Studies. 47(5): 633-643.
Thorpe WH. 1958. The learning of song patterns by birds, with especial reference to the song of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. IBIS. 100(4): 535-570.
Turner JRG. 1987. The evolutionary dynamics of batesian and muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecological Entomology. 12(1): 81-95.
Uésugi K. 1996. The Adaptive Significance of Batesian Mimicry in the Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio polytes (Insecta, Papilionidae): Associative Learning in a Predator. Ethology. 102: 762-775.
Underwood DLA, Hussein S, Goodpasture C, Luis A, Bousquets JL & ShapiroAM. 2005. Geographic Variation in Meiotic Instability in Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 98(2):227-235.
Vallin A, Jakobsson S & Wiklund C. 2010. Constant eyespot display as a primary defense - survival of male and female emperor moths when attacked by blue tits. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. 43:9-17.
Wallace AR. 1889. Darwinism. An exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. London: Macmillan & Co.
Wang WY, Guo YS, Hu JC, Sun LH & Zhu L. 2005. Preliminary Study on Feeding and Spatial Niche of Pycnonotus sinensis in Spring. Sichuan Journal of Zoology. 24(4): 466-468.
Weimerskirch H, Chastel O & Ackermann L. 1995. Adjustment of parental effort to manipulated foraging ability in a pelagic seabird, the thin-billed prion Pachyptila belcheri. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 36(1): 11-16.
Werren JH. 1980. Sex Ratio Adaptations to Local Mate Competition in a Parasitic Wasp. Science. 208(4448): 1157-1159.
Wiklund C & Persson A. 1983. Fecundity, and the relation of egg weight variation to offspring fitness in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria, or why don't butterfly females lay more eggs? Oikos. 40(1): 53-63.
Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by rsnking methods. Biometrika. 1: 80-83.
Windig JJ. 1991. Quantification of Lepidoptera wing patterns using an image analyzer. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. 30(1-2): 82-94.
Yoshio M & Ishii M. 2001. Relationship between cold hardiness and northward invasion in the great mormon butterfly, Papilio memnon L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Japan. Applied Entomology and Zoology. 36 (3): 329–335.
Youngsteadt E. 2011. A Cheap Imitation Is Sometimes Best. ScienceNOW. online published. 21 June.
Zakharov EV, Caterino MS & Sperling FAH. 2004. Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Systematic Biology. 53 (2): 193-215.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code