污泥是污水處理過程中產生的副產物，包括初沉污泥、剩餘活性污泥及其混合污泥。在傳統污泥處理與處置方法應用的同時，一系列新興的污泥處理方法漸漸推廣，大致可分為源頭減量、預處理和資源化利用三個方面。污泥處理應當遵循減量化為主，資源化末端處置為輔的原則。採用減量化技術的前提是不影響污水的正常處理。雖然污水處理廠可通過新方法從源頭控制污泥的產量，但每年仍有大量的剩餘活性污泥產生，且經過預處理後，污泥體積仍就非常龐大。
針對本研究透過現場連續式投加生物製劑應用於啤酒廠有機廢水處理之污泥減量結果提出相關研究結果。
現場試驗處理流量2000-3000 m3/day、COD為2,500-3,000 mg/L、BOD為1,250-1,500 mg/L、pH為7之啤酒製造廢水，於活性污泥池加入BioAmp生物製劑(年總費用80萬)。結果顯示：污泥年產生量由未使用生物製劑之3,100噸，降為使用生物製劑之1,800噸，年污泥減量約42%。以每噸污泥處理費新台幣2,500元計，年省污泥處理費325萬，扣除生物製劑費用80萬，年省費用245萬。另外，污泥凝聚劑PAC (每公斤3元)使用費用由44減至27萬，減少17萬；活性污泥曝氣槽(4,600 m3)鼓風機馬力由500 Hp (250 Hp/台×2台)減為250 Hp(1台)，年總操作電費由757減至676萬，減少81萬。以上合計減少343萬，以每日廢水2500噸、每年操作300日計，每噸廢水處理費降低4.57元。
活性污泥曝氣單元添加生物製劑，可有效去除COD，且不需(少量)廢棄生物污泥，節省後續污泥處理費用。

Sludge is by-product of wastewater treatment process, including settling sludge, excess activated sludge and mixed sludge. There’s traditional way of sludge treatment and disposal methods, on the other hand, a serial of new revolution methods get introduced, can be consider three way of doing this job, like reduce organic waste from the beginning, pretreatment and sludge recycling or utilization. The principle for sludge treatment should mainly focus on reduction, and recycling should be an add-on. Using this reduction technology should not cause any trouble for daily waste water treatment process. Even waste water treatment plant can use new technology to reduce waste from the beginning, but still produced lots of excess activated sludge every year. After pretreatment, the sludge volume is extremely tremendous.

In this study, we will focus on analyzing the result of consistency dosing bacteria into the organic wastewater treatment for brewery plant.

Field test, daily average flow of 2000-3000 m3 / day, COD of 2,500-3,000 mg / L, BOD of 1,250-1,500 mg / L, pH of 7 before the waste water get into to process plant, dosing the BioAmp active bacteria into aeration tank (Cost NT$800,000). Result shows that the annual production of sludge reduced from 3,100 tons to 1,800 tons. The reduction rate is about 42%, according to sludge disposal fee for NT 2,500 per ton, the annual saving for sludge reduction will be 3.25 million, deduct the cost of BioAmp NT$ 800,000, and the real annual saving cost will be 2.45 million. In addition, the sludge coagulation chemical PAC (NT $3 per kg) cut down from 44 to 27 million, reduced by 17 million; activated sludge aeration tank (4,600 m3) blower horsepower supposed operated 500 Hp (250 Hp x2) and after BioAmp treatment cut down to only 250 Hp, the total annual operating electricity reduced from 7.57 to 6.76 million, annual electricity saving NT$ 810,000. Include all the saving, it’s about 3.43 million per year. Calculated by average 2,500 tons of daily wastewater, 300 operation days, the cost of waste water will drop NT$ 4.57 per ton.

Dosing the BipAmp active bacteria into aeration will help to remove COD, and also no need (or less) to waste the active sludge from the system to achieve the sludge reduction.

第一章、前言 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究目的 1
第二章、文獻回顧 2
2.1 污泥來源與分類 2
2.2 污泥種類 2
2.3 污泥特性 3
2.4 污泥源頭減量的設計方法比較 4
2.5 生物污泥性質 8
2.6 污泥產量 9
2.7 生物應用於廢水處理的特性 11
2.7.1 解偶聯代謝 12
2.7.2 溶胞隱性生長 13
2.7.3 維持代謝 13
2.7.4 生物補食 13
2.8 現場自動化培菌設備的應用 14
2.9 生物代謝作用 17
2.10 消化 21
2.10.1 厭氧消化 21
2.10.2 好氧消化 26
第三章、研究方法 30
3.1 研究架構 30
3.2 實驗室研究方法 31
3.3 研究場址概況 32
3.3.1廢水主要來源 32
3.3.2廢水特性 32
3.3.3啤酒廠廢水處理流程及水質現況 33
3.3.4 現場連續式添加生物製劑於生物曝氣池 35
3.4 分析方法 36
第四章、結果與討論 37
4.1 實驗室試驗結果 37
4.1.1 豐年豐和試驗(Plant A) 37
4.1.2 統一試驗(Plant B) 41
4.2 啤酒廢水處理現場試驗(Plant C) 44
4.2.1 污泥減量 44
4.2.2 化學凝聚劑 46
4.2.3 電量減量 48
4.2.4 成本比較 49
第五章、結論與建議 50
5.1 結論 50
5.2 建議 52
參考文獻 53
附件一 分析數據 56

1. 吳俊哲, 2015，污泥資源化再利用，逢甲大學環境工程與科學系
2. 苑娟娟，2006，啤酒廢水處理方法比較, 環境工程論文
3. 張添晉、陳俞穎，2005，有機污泥之生物減量計數，台北科技大學。
4. 林正祥，2004，污泥減容減量計數案例討論- 嗜熱菌污泥減量計數，廢水污泥減量技術講習會。
5. 張添晉，游勝傑，鄭欽恆，2006，「下水污泥處理減量新技術」，下水道與水環境再生研討會論文集。
6. 經濟部工業局，2005，廢水污泥減量技術手冊，台北
7. 高效率有機污泥生物減量技術開發，巫鴻章，林畢修平，董金龍，陳睿斌，蔡明珊，工業污染防治 第92 期(Oct. 2004)
8. 廢水污泥減容減量技術研析
9. 陳鴻濤，污泥減量設備技術及選用實例，台灣環保產業雙月刊第20期，2003年8月。
10. 李俊德，“傳統式擴散曝氣活性污泥處理法簡介”，工業污染防治技術叢書─廢水好氧處理論著彙編(上)，經濟部工業局，2000年3月。
11. 歐陽嶠暉，“廢水處理廠操作管理─活性污泥系統”，工業污染防治技術叢書─廢水好氧處理論著彙編(上)，經濟部工業局，2000年3月。
12. 林季螢、牟敦剛， “活性污泥生物活性特性探討”，工業污染防治技術叢書─廢水好氧處理論著彙編(下)，經濟部工業局，2000年3月。
13. 鄭仁川，“活性污泥法之設計與應用”，工業污染防治技術叢書─廢水好氧處理論著彙編(下)，經濟部工業局，2000年3月。
14. 張晉，“水處理工程與設計”，鼎茂圖書，1995年11月。
15. 吳勇興，“自發性高溫好氧處理程序之研究：系統參數測定演算法之開發”，國立中興大學環境工程學系博士論文，台中市，2003。
16. 廢水生物處理技術，經濟部工業局，1995年6月。
17. 賴志彥，“污泥雙重調理及共調理之研究”，國立台灣科技大學化學工程學系碩論文，台北市，2002。
18. 染整工程與廢水處理效能提昇技術手冊，經濟部技術處，91年11月。
19. 石濤，“環境微生物”，鼎茂圖書，1999年2月。
20. 環訓所污泥處理講義。
21. Ahn, J.H., J.G. Pan, and J.S. Rhee. 1999. Identification of the tliDEF ABC Transporter Specific for Lipase in Pseudomonas fluorescens SIK W1. Journal of Bacteriology, 131: 1847-1852.
22. Atkinson, B. and Ferda Mavituna. 1991. Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology Handbook, M Stockton Press, New York, New York.
23. Difco Manual-Dehydrated Culture Media and Reagents for Microbiology. 1984. Difco Laboratories, Publisher, Detroit, Michigan.
24. Fernandez-Valverde, M., A. Reglero, H. Martinez-Blanco, and J.M. Luengo. 1993.
25. Purification of Pseudomonas putida acyl coenzyme A ligase active with a range of aliphatic and aromatic substrates. Appliced and Environmental Microbiology, 59: 1149-1154.
26. Frenken, L.G., M.R. Egmond, A.M. Batenburg, J.W. Bos, C. Visser, and C.T. Verrips. 1992. Cloning of the Pseudomonas glumae lipase gene and determination of the active site residues. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58: 3787-3791.
27. Huijberts, G.N., G. Eggink, P. de Waard, G. W. Huisman and B. Witholt. 1992. Pseudomonas putida KT2442 cultivated on glucose accumulates poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) consisting of saturated and unsaturated monomers. 1992. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58: 536-544.
28. Johnson, L.A., I. R. Beacham, I. C. MacRae and M.L. Free. 1992. Degradation of triglycerides by a pseudomonad isolated from milk: molecular analysis of a lipase-encoding gene and its expression in E. coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58: 1776-1779.
29. Liao, C.-H., D.E. McCallus. 1998. Biochemical and Genetic Characterization of an Extracellular Protease from Pseudomonas fluorescens CY091. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64: 914-921. Merck Index, The. 1979. Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey.
30. Morrison, T. T.H. and R.T. Boyd. 1969. Organic Chemistry, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts. Patent, NCH Corporation 6,335,191. January 1, 2001 Dale Kiplinger, Jose E. Evaro, Judith Pruitt, Robert Pearce
31. Schweizer, H.P. and C. Po. 1996. Regulation of glycerol metabolism in Pseudomonas: characterization of the glpR repressor gene. Journal of Bacteriology, 78: 5215-5221.
32. Sonenshein, A.L., J.A. Hoch, and R. Losick. 1993. Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria, American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, D. C.
33. Stainer, R.Y., E.A. Adlberg, and J.L. Ingraham. 1976. The Microbial World, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
34. Tan, Y. and K.J. Miller. 1992. Cloning, expression, and nucleotide sequence of a lipase gene from Pseudomonas B52. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58: 1402-1407.
35. Temple, L., A. Sage, G.E. Christie and P.V. Phibbs Jr. 1994. Two genes for carbohydrate catabolism are divergently transcribed from a region of DNA contaning the hexC locus in Pseudomonas PAO1. Journal of Bacteriology, 176: 4700-4709.
36. Wiedmann, M., D. Weilmeier, S.S. Dineen, R. Ralyea, and K.J. Boor. 2000. Molecular and Phentypic Characteristic of Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Milk. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66: 2085-2095.
37. Williams, N.R., J.G. Holt. And R. G. Murrary. 1984. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
38. Additional literature sources
39. Independent study at Glamorgan University - An Investigation of Bio-Amplified Aerobic Microbes on Lignocellullosic Degradation, Independent study by Stover Laboratories- Enhanced Nitrification/Denitrification.