Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0730101-143614 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0730101-143614
論文名稱
Title
企業特性、人力資本、產業環境與組織創新相關性研究
The Study on the Correlations of Organizations’ Characteristics, Human Capital, Industrial Environment and Organizational Innovations
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
92
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2001-06-18
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2001-07-30
關鍵字
Keywords
組織創新、高階主管的知識與願景領導能力、人力資本
employees’ enterpreneurship & innovativeness, deposit of human capital, human capital, upgrading of human capital, top management’s knowledgeable & visionary lead, organizational innovation, rejuvenesce of human capital
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5655 次,被下載 5477
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5655 times, has been downloaded 5477 times.
中文摘要
「人力」不再只是勞動力的代名詞,「人力」的內涵還有知識、智慧、創意、潛能……等。時至今日,全球已進入知識社會、知識經濟的體系中,人才競爭無疑地代替資金、土地、設備,形成企業競爭的核心因素。將經濟學「資本」的概念運用到人力資源理論中,是凸顯「人力」重要的經濟意涵,並將「人力資產」看成像財務問題般影響大局。不論傳統或非傳統行業,幾乎只要是營利的企業都承認創新的重要,「業競天擇」,企業與其擔心競爭優勢與地位還能維繫多久,不如不斷地進步創新、持續地超前,藉由實施創新管理的過程,達到組織創新的目的。本研究以「人力資本」與「組織創新」的相關性為研究主體,同時考慮企業特性與產業環境會對人力資本與組織創新的關係產生干擾/影響。透過實證研究統計分析的方式,本研究發現:
一、企業人力資本的五構面
(1) 高階主管的知識與願景領導能力
(2) 員工創業與創新能力
(3) 人力資本活化
(4) 人力資本提升
(5) 人力資本蓄積
二、企業不同的特性在人力資本構面的差異性分析
(1) 屬不同產業的公司在「人力資本提升」構面有些微顯著差異,服務業對教育訓練、人才培育的投資程度稍高。
(2) 資本額大小不同的企業在「人力資本活化」、「人力資本蓄積」構面有顯著差異,做法皆以資本額較大的公司較為重視。
(3) 處於不同的組織生命週期的企業在「人力資本提升」、「人力資本蓄積」做法上皆有顯著差異;處於成熟期的企業較重視「人力資本蓄積」,處於成長期的企業較重視「人力資本提升」。
(4) 企業成立年數長短在「人力資本蓄積」上有顯著差異,成立20年以上的企業較成立15年以下的企業注重「人力資本蓄積」。
三、人力資本對於組織創新的直接影響
(1) 高階主管的知識與願景領導能力對管理創新有顯著正向影響。
(2) 高階主管的知識與願景領導能力對技術創新有顯著正向影響。
四、產業環境與人力資本的交互作用對於組織創新的影響效果不顯著。
五、企業特性與人力資本的交互作用對於組織創新的影響效果:
(1) 公司成立年數與人力資本活化的交互作用對管理創新有顯著正向影響;
(2) 資本額以及高階主管的知識與願景領導能力的交互作用對管理創新有顯著正向影響。

關鍵字:人力資本、組織創新、高階主管的知識與願景領導能力

Abstract
ABSTRACT
Human capital comprises not only man power but also brain power which implies people’s intelligence, potentiality, intellect….etc. Nowadays the world has been getting into the new era of knowledge economy; and the competency of brain power instead of financial capital, land, facility/equipment becomes the core element of competition among enterprises. In this context, human capital in organizations is considered as the valuable assets, which are critically influential and significant. Organizations aiming at best performance admit the vital importance of the innovation and make every endeavor to maintain their competitive strengths and advantages by means of innovative management to achieve the goal of organizational innovations. The thesis focuses on the correlation between human capital and organizational innovation, in conjunction with organizational characteristics and industrial environment which might interfere with the correlation. After empirical study & statistical analysis, the thesis reveals as following:
I. Five dimensions of human capital in organizations---
1. Top management’s knowledgeable & visionary leadership;
2. Employees’ enterpreneurship & innovativeness;
3. Rejuvenesce of human capital;
4. Upgrading of human capital;
5. Deposit of human capital
II. Differenciation analysis on the five dimensions of human capital by organizational characteristics---
1. The organizations in various industries indicate slightly obvious differentiation in the upgrading degrees of human capital; in comparison, the organizations in service industry invest more in employees’ training & cultivation than those in manufacturing industry.
2. The organizations with bigger capital amounts obviously put much more emphasis on rejuvenesce as well as deposit of human capital.
3. The organizations in the maturity period of life cycle comparatively concentrate much more of their attention on deposit of human capital; whereas those in the growing period of life cycle emphasize much more on upgrading human capital.
4. Over-20-years-old organizations lay much more emphasis on deposit of human capital than those at the ages less than 15 years.
III. Human capital’s direct influence on organizational innovation---
Top management’s knowledgeable & visionary leadership exerts obviously positive effect on the innovation of management as well as technique.
IV. The interaction of organizational characteristics and human capital has obviously positive effect on the organizational innovation---
1. The interaction of the ages of the organization and rejuvenesce of human capital has obviously positive effect on the innovation of management.
2. The interaction of the capital amount of the organization and top management’s knowledgeable & visionary leadership has obviously positive effect on the innovation of management.


Key words: human capital, organizational innovation, top management’s knowledgeable & visionary leadership, employees’ enterpreneurship & innovativeness, rejuvenesce of human capital, upgrading of human capital, deposit of human capital

目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與研究目的------------------------------------------- 01
第二節 觀念性架構---------------------------------------------------03
第三節 研究流程----------------------------------------------------- 04
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 人力資本--------------------------------------------------------05
第二節 組織創新---------------------------------------------------13
第三節 人力資本與組織創新的關係--------------------------------------- 18
第四節 企業特性與產業環境的影響----------------------------------------20
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構與研究假設----------------------------------------------22
第二節 操作性定義與測量------------------------------------------------24
第三節 抽樣方法與樣本特性分析------------------------------------------30
第四節 因素分析、信度分析與量表構面重整--------------------------------32
第五節 修正後之研究架構及資料分析方法----------------------------------37
第四章 實證結果與分析討論
第一節 研究變項之描述性統計分析----------------------------------------40
第二節 產業環境、人力資本與組織創新之相關分析--------------------------42
第三節 企業特性在人力資本上之差異分析----------------------------------46
第四節 產業環境與人力資本對組織創新之影響性分析------------------------51
第五節 企業特性與人力資本對組織創新之影響性分析------------------------57
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論與建議--------------------------------------------------70
第二節 研究限制與對後續研究的建議--------------------------------------78
參考文獻
一、中文部份------------------------------------------------------------- 80
二、英文英文------------------------------------------------------------- 81
附錄 問卷-------------------------------------------------------------- 85

表 目 錄
表2-1-1 學者對人力資本觀點摘要彙總------------------------------------ 06
表2-1-2 學者所提出的人力資本衡量指標彙總--------------------------- 09
表2-2-1 產品創新與製程創新的比較--------------------------------------- 16
表3-2-1 人力資本量表設計------------------------------------------------ 27
表3-3-1 本研究之樣本基本資料-------------------------------------------- 32
表3-4-1 人力資本量表之因素分析結果與信度------------------------------ 34
表3-4-2 產業環境量表之信度分析------------------------------------------ 36
表3-4-3 組織創新量表之信度分析------------------------------------------ 37
表4-1-1 產業環境描述性統計分析表--------------------------------------- 41
表4-1-2 人力資本描述性統計分析表--------------------------------------- 41
表4-1-3 組織創新描述性統計分析表--------------------------------------- 41
表4-2-1 產業環境與人力資本之相關分析--------------------------------- 43
表4-2-2 產業環境與組織創新之相關分析--------------------------------- 44
表4-2-3 人力資本與組織創新之相關分析--------------------------------- 44
表4-3-1 產業別在人力資本之差異分析------------------------------------ 46
表4-3-2 企業成立年數在人力資本之差異分析--------------------------- 47
表4-3-3 組織生命週期在人力資本各構面之差異分析------------------ 48
表4-3-4 資本額在人力資本之差異分析------------------------------------ 49
表4-3-5 所有權型態在人力資本之差異分析------------------------------ 50
表4-4-1 環境不確性與人力資本對於管理創新之影響------------------ 52
表4-4-2 環境變動頻率與人力資本對管理創新之影響------------------ 53
表4-4-3 環境複雜性與人力資本對管理創新之影響--------------------- 54
表4-4-4 環境不確性與人力資本對於技術創新之影響------------------ 55
表4-4-5 環境變動頻率與人力資本對技術創新之影響------------------ 56
表4-4-6 環境複雜性與人力資本對技術創新之影響--------------------- 57
表4-5-1 產業別與人力資本對於管理創新之影響------------------------ 59
表4-5-2 成立年數與人力資本對管理創新之影響------------------------ 60
表4-5-3 資本額與人力資本對管理創新之影響--------------------------- 61
表4-5-4 組織所有權型態與人力資本對管理創新之影響--------------- 63
表4-5-5 組織生命週期與人力資本對管理創新之影響------------------ 64
表4-5-6 產業別與人力資本對於技術創新之影響------------------------ 65
表4-5-7 成立年數與人力資本對技術創新之影響------------------------ 66
表4-5-8 資本額與人力資本對技術創新之影響--------------------------- 67
表4-5-9 組織所有權型態與人力資本對技術創新之影響--------------- 68
表4-5-10組織生命週期與人力資本對技術創新之影響------------------ 69
表5-1-1 企業不同的特性在人力資本各構面差異性假設驗證表------ 73
表5-1-2 直接影響假設驗證表---------------------------------------------- 74
表5-1-3 交互作用影響假設驗證表I---------------------------------------- 75
表5-1-4 交互作用影響假設驗證表II--------------------------------------- 76

圖 目 錄
圖1-2-1 本研究之觀念性架構-----------------------------------------------03
圖1-3-1 研究流程--------------------------------------------------------- 04
圖2-2-1 創新的架構------------------------------------------------------- 14
圖2-2-2 組織創新的四種類型-----------------------------------------------15
圖2-3-1 組織內部員工分類------------------------------------------------- 18
圖3-1-1 本研究之研究架構------------------------------------------------- 23
圖3-5-1 修正後之研究架構------------------------------------------------- 38
圖4-5-1 公司成立年數與人力資本活化的交互作用對管理新的影響 60
圖4-5-2 資本額與高階主管知識願景領導力的交互作用對管理創新的影響--------- 62
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
中華徵信所(1999/2000)。 台灣地區企業名錄。
王柏年(1999),高科技產業革新性人力資源管理制度與組織創新之關係研究,高雄:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
伍家德(1990)。 企業技術政策與新產品發展績效相關之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研。
吳思華(1996),策略九說,台北市:麥田出版。
宋偉航譯(1998),智慧資本–資訊時代的企業利基。台北市:智庫股份有限公司。
李仁芳(1990),管理心靈,台北市:商務印書館出版。
林大容譯(1999),智慧資本 – 如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值。台北市:麥田出版。
張文菁(2001),企業特性、人力資本、產業環境以及組織績效之相關性研究,高雄:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
張火燦(1996),策略性人力資源管理,台北:揚智文化。
張如蓮(1996),高科技事業中創新類型與組織知識創造之研究,台北市:國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,p4-6。
陳玉玲(1998),組織內人力資本的蓄積–智慧資本管理之觀點。桃園:國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
廖川億(1996),研究發展團隊特性與創新績效關係之研究。高雄:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
蔡啟通(1997)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。台北:國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版博士論文。



二、英文部份
Aberathy,W.J. & Utterback,J.M.(1978),”Patterns Industrial Innovation”,In R.A.Burgerlman and M.A.Maidique (Eds.),Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation,Homewood,IL.:Irwin,141-8
Baldridge, J.V., & Burnham, R.A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual,
20, 165-176.
Booz, Allen & Hamilton(1982),”New Product Management for the 1980s”, New York; Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc.
Brooking,A.(1997), “Intellectual Capital”, International Thomson Business Press, p.51-52
Brooking,A.(1999), “Corporate Memory: Strategies for Knowledge Management”, International Thomson Business Press, pp.10,16,26,27,136,154
Carnevale, A.(1983), “Human Capital: A High Yield Corporate Investment”, Washington, DC: American Society for Training and Development.
Clark,K. & Fujimoto,T.(1991),”Product Development Performance”, Boston; Harvard Business School.
Crawford, R.(1991), “In the Era of Human Capital”
Daft, R.L. & Becker, S.W. (1978). “Innovation in Organizations”. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
Daft, R.L. (1978). “A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation”. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
Damanpour, F. & Evan, W.M. (1984). “Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of "Organizational Lag"”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
Damanpour, F. (1987). “The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors”. Journal of Management, 13, 675-688.
Damanpour, F. (1991). “Organizational innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators”, Academy of management journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F. (1996). “Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models”. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716.
Davenport, T.O. (1999), “Human Capital: What Is It and Why People Invest It”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Delaney, J.T. & Huselid, M.A. (1996), “The Impact of Human Resource Managemenet Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 88-171.
Drucker, P.F. (1985). “Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles”. London: Heinemann.
Drucker, P.F. (1995). “Managing In a Time of Great Change”. London: The Penguin group.
Dzinkowski, Ramona(2000),“The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction”, Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36.
Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S.(1997), “Intellectual Capital. Realizing Your Co.’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots,” U.S.A.: HarperCollins
Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (1992). “Structure and Process of Diversification, Compensation Strategy, and Firm Performance”. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 315-342.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin D.B., & Cardy R.L. (1995), Managing Human Resources, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Grossman, R.J. (2000), “Measuring up: Appropriate Metrics Help HR Prove its Worth”, HR Magazine, 45(1), 28-35.
Herderson,R.M. & Clark,K.B.(1990),”Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly,35,286-316
Kaufman, B.E.(1994),The Economics of Labor Markets and Labor Relations, Chicago: The Dryden Press.
King, N., & Anderson, N. (1995), ” Innovation and Change in Organizations.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Knight, D.J. (1999), “Performance Measures for Increasing Intellectual capital”, Strategy & Leadership, 27(12), 22-27.
Lazear,E.P.(1998),”Personnel Economics for Managers”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,
LeBlanc, P. V., Oxman, J. A., & Gonzal, J. P. (1998), “Case Study: Maximize your Compensation ROI with High-Yield Investment in Human Capital”, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(2), 59-68.
LeBlanc, P.V., Rich, J.T., & Mulvey, P.W. (2000), “Improving the Return on Human Capital: New Metrics”, Compensation & Benefits Review, 32(1), 13-20.
Lepak, D. & Snell, S. (1999), “The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48.
London & New York.
Lynn, Bernadette E. (2000), “Intellectual Capital: Unearthing Hidden Value by Managing Intellectual Assets”, Ivey Business Journal, 64(3), 48-52.
organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quaterly,
Parnes, H. (1984), “People Power: Elements of Human Resource Policy”. California: Sage.
Robbins, S.P. (1996). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Roos, J., Roos, G., Edvinsson, L., & Dragonetti, N.C. (1998), Intellectual Capital – Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York: New York University Press, Washington Square.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). “The Theory of Economic Development”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Solomon, C.M. (2000), “Putting HR on the Score Card “, Workforce, 79(3), 94-98.
Stewart,T.A.(1997), “Intellectual Capital: the new Wealth of Organizations”, Doubleday, A Division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Tushman,M.L. & Nadler,D.A.(1986),”Qrganizing for Innovation”, California Management Review,28(3),74-92.
U.S. Department of Labor (1993). “High Performance Work Practices and Firm Competitiveness”. Washington,D.C.: Office of the American Workplace.
Utterback,J.M.(1971),”The Process of Technological Innovation within the Firm”, Academy of Management Journal,14,75-88.
Utterback,J.M.(1994a),”Innovation and Industrial Evolution.” Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, p.79-102.
Utterback,J.M.(1994b),”Difference in Innovation for Assembled and Nonassembled Products.” Mastering the dynamics of Innovation. Harvard business School Press. p.123-145.
Van Buren, Mark E. (1999), “A Yard Stick for Knowledge Management”, Training and Development, 53, 71-74.
Wah, Louisa (1999), “Making Knowledge Stick”, Management Review, 88(5), 24.
Wolfe, R.A. (1994). “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions”. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-430.
Wolfe, R.A. (1995). “Human Resource Management Innovations: Determinants of their Adoption and Implementation”. Human Resource Management, 34(2), 313-327.
Zwell, M. & Ressler, R. (2000), “Powering the Human Drivers of Financial Performance”, Strategic Finance, 91(III), 40-45.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code