Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0730108-224944 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0730108-224944
論文名稱
Title
組織政治行為與組織公民行為對組織政治知覺之影響-以政治技巧為干擾變項
Political skill as a Moderator of the Relationships between Political Behavior , Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Perceptions of Organizational Politics
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
167
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-06-14
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-30
關鍵字
Keywords
組織政治知覺、組織政治行為、組織公民行為、政治技巧
political skill, organizational political behavior, perceptions of organizational politics, organizational citizenship behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5635 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5635 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究依循Ferris et al.(2002)所提出的組織政治知覺修正模型,探討組織政治行為、組織公民行為、政治技巧與組織政治知覺之間的關係,並進一步驗證政治技巧於政治行為、組織公民行為對組織政治知覺間的干擾效果。
本研究以台灣地區40個機關為對象,共回收1,940份問卷,有效問卷為1,890份,分別以項目分析、因素分析、信度分析、相關分析、迴歸及層級迴歸等方法加以分析。研究結果發現:(一)組織政治行為、政治技巧與政治知覺無顯著相關,組織公民行為與政治知覺呈現負向顯著相關,組織政治行為、組織公民行為及政治技巧呈現正向顯著相關;(二)政治技巧在組織政治行為與政治知覺之間呈顯著干擾,政治技巧對組織公民行為與組織政治知覺無整體之干擾效果,政治技巧對組織公民行為與組織政治知覺之「薪資升遷政策之實務差距」則呈顯著干擾效果。
Abstract
This research relies on Ferris et al. (2002) proposed the organization politics perceptions revision model, the discussion organization politics behavior, between the organization citizen behavior, the political skill and the organization politics perceptions 's relations, and further confirm the political skill in the political behavior, the organization citizen behavior to organize the political perceptions the disturbance effect.

This research take the Taiwan area 40 institutions as an object, altogether recycles 1,940 questionnaire, the effective questionnaire is 1,890, respectively by methods and so on item analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, multiple linear regression and hierarchical regression analyzes. The findings discovered: (一) the political behavior, the political skill and political perceptions are not remarkable are related, the citizen behavior and political perceptions present negative remarkable related, the political behavior, the citizen behavior and the political skill present postive remarkable related; (二) the political skill assumes the remarkable disturbance between the political behavior and political perceptions, the political skill does not have disturbance of effect the whole to the citizen behavior and organization politics perceptions, the political skill “pay and promotion policies” to the citizen behavior and organization politics perceptions it to assume the remarkable disturbance effect.
目次 Table of Contents
中文摘要···························································I
英文摘要··························································II
目錄····························································· III
表目錄···························································· V
圖目錄·························································· VII
第一章 緒論·······················································1
第一節 研究動機···················································2
第二節 研究目的···················································3
第三節 研究流程···················································4
第二章 文獻探討··················································5
第一節 組織政治知覺·············································5
第二節 組織政治行為·········································· 18
第三節 組織公民行為············································ 23
第四節 政治技巧··················································30
第三章 研究方法·················································33
第一節 研究架構··················································33
第二節資料分析方法與研究變數衡量·································35
第三節 樣本與量表分析············································45
第四節 研究變數之操作型定義······································55
第四章 實證分析·················································57
第一節 研究變項在個人背景上之差異性分析··························57
第二節 各研究變數間之相關分析····································83
第三節 組織政治行為、組織公民行為、政治技巧對組織政治知覺的影響分析·······················································85
第四節 干擾效果分析與探討········································91
第五章 結論與建議··············································103
第一節 研究結果與分析···········································103
第二節 管理實務上之建議·········································112
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議···································113
參考文獻························································ 115
附錄一 研究問卷················································ 121
附錄二 研究問卷樣本描述······································ 130
參考文獻 References
中文部分:
池進通,1989,企業員工事業發展行為模式–採個人權力發展模式,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
李安民,2002,組織政治知覺對員工工作態度之影響,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
李青芬等譯,Stephen P. Robbins,2002,組織行為學(Organizational Behavior),台北:華泰書局。
李明鈐,2001,組織內成員政治行為與單位績效之關係研究---以M 公司為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。
何金銘,2003,組織政治知覺類型及其前因與後果模型之再建, 國科會, No.
NSC92-2416-H-110-034,行政院國家科學委員會。
何金銘,2006,統計法輯要,台南:台灣復文興業。
李衍新,2003,員工組織政治知覺、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
李佩玫,1998,女性主管之人格特質、政治行為與職位升遷關係之研究,私立中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
余定中,1985,組織內員工「向上影響」之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林淑姬,1992,薪酬公平、程序公平與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管
理研究所博士論文。
林月珠,1994,組織政治與組織發展:一個政治性觀點對中立性觀點的探索,東吳政治學報,第三期,P.279-313。
邱皓政,2001,量化研究與統計分析,台北:五南書局。
吳孝慈,2001,組織政治知覺及其對組織承諾之影響— 某大學的實證分析,中山大
學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
吳明隆、涂金堂,2006,SPSS與統計應用分析,台北:五南書局。
施孟君,2003,組織政治知覺後果模型之跨產業比較分析,中山大學人力資源管理研
究所碩士論文。
凌瑜郎,1994,政治學。台北:三民書局。
馬起華,1978,政治行為。台北:正中書局。
馬起華,1974,心理學與政治行為,台北:商務印書。
陳義勝、蘇明琪、劉仲矩,1997,組織政治知覺與組織承諾關係之研究,企銀季刊,
22 卷2 期,P15~27。
陳安瀅,2003,政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾因素-以工作滿足為例,中山大學人
力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳玫妃,2007,組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究-以某民營電信業基礎維運工程單位為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
許道然,2002,組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士畢業論文。
張正林,2002,組織政治行為量表:一個本土性的經驗建構,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
黃俊英、林震岩,1994,企業研究方法,台北:華泰書局。
黃隆民,1995,國小教師知覺政治行為之研究,初等教育研究集刊,3 卷,P.113-160。
黃俊英,2000,多變量分析,台北:華泰書局。
黃英忠,2001,現代管理學,台北:華泰書局。
黃良志等著,2007,人力資源管理理論與實務,台北:華泰文化。
彭郁芬,2002,組織政治行為對成員工作投入之影響,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
廖瑞星,1986,組織主管向下影響之研究,國立政治大學企管研究所碩士論文。
廖婉鈞,2006,內部行銷對組織公民行為的影響,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士班畢業論文。
蔡秀娟,1996,「組織政治」對公務人員升遷政策之啟示。人事行政,第118期。
蔡孟真,2003,角色定義幅度與組織公民行為:前置要素之探討,中原大學心理學系碩
士論文。
蕭文瑞,2005,組織文化與工作特性對組織公民行為之影響:台灣航空業員工為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
謝慶鎰,2002,組織政治知覺對組織承諾、工作績效、組織公民行為的影響--公民營企業成員比較分析,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
鐘嘉慧,1998,組織公平與管理者信任對組織政治行為影響之研究,淡江大學國際
企業研究所碩士論文。
英文部分:
Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., & Mayes, B. T., 1979, Organizational politics: Tactics and charactoristics of its actors, California Management Review, Vol. 22, pp.77-83.
Ahearn, K. K., Ferris. G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P., 2004,
Leader political skill and team performance,Journal of Management, 30: 309-327.
Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. (in press). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management.
Bateman T.S., & Organ, D.W. 1983, Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship
between affect and employee "citizenship', Academy of Management Journal, 26,pp587-595.
Buck, R. ,1991. Temperament, social skills, and the communication of emotion: A developmental-interactionist view. In D. G. Gilbert & J. J. Connolly (Eds.), Personality, social skills, and psychopathology: An individual difference approach: 85–105. New York: Plenum Press.
Chun. Hui,Kenneth S. Law, Zhen Xiong Chen,1999, A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader–member exchange, and perceived job mobility on In-role and extra-role performance: A Chinese case, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,Vol. 77, No. 1, January, pp. 3–21,
Cropanzano R., Howes J. C., Grandey A. A.,1997, The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes and stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol.18, 159-180.
Drory A., Romm,1990, The definition of organizational politics: A review, Human Relations, Vol.43, 1133-1154.
Falbo, Toni. 1977. Multidimentional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. Vol.35, No.8. pp.537-547.
Fairholm, G. & Fairholm, B.C. , 1984,Sixteen power tactics principals can use to improve management effectiveness, NASSP Bulletin, 68. pp.68-75,472
Fedor D. B., Davis W. D., Maslyn J. M., 2001, Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self- esteem, Journal of Management, Vol.27, 79-97.
Ferris, G. R., Kacmar, K.M., 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of
Management,Vol.18,No1, 93-116.
Ferris, G.R., Russ, G.S. & Fandt, P.M. 1989, Politics in organizations, In R.A.Giacalone & P. Rosenfield(Eds.),Impression management in the organization:143-170.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris G.R.,Frink D.D.,Galang M.C.,Zhou J.,Kacmar K.M.,Howard J.L. ,1996, Perceptions of organizational politics: prediction, stress-related implications, and outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49,No2, 233-266.
Ferris G. R., King T. R.,1991, Politics in human resources decisions: A walk on dark side, Organization Dynamics, 20, 59-71.
Ferris, Fedor, Chachere, Pondy,1989, Myths and politics in organizational contexts, Group and Organizational Studies, Vol.14, 88-103.
Ferris, G. R. Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D,2005, Development and validation of the political skill inventory, Journal of Management, 31, 126-152.
Gerald R. Ferris, Garry Adams, Robert W. Kolodinsky, Wayne A. Hochwarter & Anthony P. Ammeter,2002, Perceptions of organizational politics:Theory and research directions,Research in Multi-Level Issues Volume 1:The Many Faces of Multi-Level Issues,179-254.
Gerald R. Ferris,Darren C. Treadway, Pamela L. Perrewe, Robyn L. Brouer,Ceasar Douglas,2007, Political skill in organizationst, Journal of Management, 33 no3 Jen, 290-320.
Gandz J., Murray V. V.,1980, The experience of workplace politics, Academy of Management Journal,Vol.23,No2, 237-251.
Harrell-Cook G., Ferris Gerald R., Dulebohn J. H.,1999, Political behaviors as moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics--work outcomes relationships, Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol.20,1093-1105.
Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrew6, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. 2007, Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability-Job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102: 226-239.
Jones, E. E. 1990. Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
Jackall, R. 1998. Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
K. Michele Kacmar, Dawn S. Carlson,1997, Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple sample in vestigation, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 5, 627-658
K. Michele Kacmar, Bozeman D.P.,Carlson D.S.,Anthony W.P,1999, An examination of perceptions of organizational politics model: Replication and extension, Human Relations, Vol.52,No3, 384-415.
Kacmar K. Michele, Baron R. A.,1999, Organizational politics: The state of field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research, Research in Personnel and Human Resources management, Vol.17,1-39.
Katz, Kahn,1978, The social psychology of organizations(2nd ed.), New York.
Kipnis, Schmidt, Wilkinson,1980, Intraorganizational influence tactics: Exploration in getting one’s way, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.65, 440-452.
Lewin,1936, Principles of topological psychology, New York.
Madison D. L.,1980, Organizational politics: An exploration of managers' perceptions, Human Relations, Vol.33,Num2, 79-100.
Mintzberg H.,1985, The organization as political arena , Journal of Management Studies, 22,2, 133-154.
Mintzberg H.,1983, Power in and around organizations, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Murtha, T. C., Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. ,1996,Toward an interactionist taxonomy of personality and situations: An integrative situational– dispositional representation
of personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 193–207.
Mainiero, L. A. 1994. On breaking the glass ceiling: The political seasoning of powerful women executives.Organizational Dynamics, 22: 5–20.
Mayes, B.T., & Allen, R.W. 1977. Toward a definition of organizational politics.Academy of Management Review, 2: 672-678
Organ, D. W., 1988, Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier Syndrom, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Pamela L. Perrewe, Kelly L. Zellars, Ana Maria Rossi, Gerald R. Ferris, Charles J. Kacmar, Yongmei Liu, Robert Zinko, Wayne A. Hochwarter,2005, Political skill: An antidote in the role overload–strain relationship, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 239–250
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: Vol. 3, 1–52. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Randall M. L., Cropanzano R., Bormann Carol A., Birjulin Andrej,1999, Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20,159-174.
Robert W. Kolodinsky, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Gerald R. Ferris,2004, Nonlinearity in the relationship between political skill and work outcomes: Convergent evidence from three studies Journal of Vocational Behavior 65 ,294–308
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. 1993. Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley.
Sandy J. Wayne, Gerald R. Ferris,1990, Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study, Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright by the American Psychological A ssociation,Inc.
1990, Vol. 75, No. 5,487-499
Valle M., Pamela L P.,2000, Do politics perceptions relate to political behaviors? Tests of an implicit assumption and expand model, Human Relations, Vol.53,No3, 359-386.
Vigoda E., ,2000, Internal politics in public administration systems, Public Personnel Management,Vol.29,No2, 185-210.
Vigoda E., ,2000, Organizational politics ,job attitudes, and work outcomes: Exploration and implications for the public sector, Journal of Vocational Behavior,Vol.57, 326-347.
Yongmei Liu, Gerald R. Ferris, Robert Zinko, Pamela L. Perrewe, Bart Weitz, Jun Xu,2007, Dispositional antecedents and outcomes of political skill in organizations:A four-study investigation with convergence, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71 ,146–165
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.80.155.163
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.80.155.163
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code