Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0731103-115742 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0731103-115742
論文名稱
Title
轉置成本,信任,與資訊分享因子對供應鏈之影響研究
The Effects of Switching Cost, Trust, and Information Sharing on Supply Chains
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
94
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2003-07-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2003-07-31
關鍵字
Keywords
資訊分享、信任、多重代理人系統、轉置成本、供應鏈管理
information sharing, multi-agent system, switching cost, trust, Supply chain management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5659 次,被下載 3572
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5659 times, has been downloaded 3572 times.
中文摘要
在現今的社會中,隨著資訊科技的發展,公司之間的商業行為也越來越複雜,而在多變的環境中,如何改善整體供應鏈的效能,是一項嚴肅且關鍵的課題。在本研究中,我們試圖從轉置成本、信任機制與資訊分享等因素來探討這個問題。
首先,我們提出一個有關轉置成本、信任機制與資訊分享對供應鏈效能的關係模式。為驗證這個模式的正確性,我們模擬了一個供應鏈的環境,並利用這樣的關係模式建構出一個廠商決策的機制。我們觀察了不同訂單需求狀況對此模式的影響,以及其關係變動的情況;此外,我們也觀察了不同資訊分享障礙程度、不同轉置成本與信任機制傾向的影響;最後,我們也探討了不同商品價格與不同技術穩定度對整個供應鏈結果的影響。
Abstract
With rapid development of information technology, the company can find and communicate with new partners easily, which makes the relation more complex and unstable. How to improve the performance of the supply chain is an important issue. In this study, we try to discuss the problem from the three factors including switching cost, trust and information sharing.
First, we propose a conceptual model of switching cost, trust, information sharing and supply chain performance. The performance indexes include the average fulfillment rate, average stock cost, and average cycle time. Second, in order to verify the model, we construct a simulation environment of supply chain and construct a decision mechanism based on the conceptual model. Final, we observe the effect and variation of the different order demand environment, the different information sharing threshold, different propensity of switching cost and trust, and different product price and different producing technology.
目次 Table of Contents
論文提要 I
致謝 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF TABLES IX

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 RESEARCH MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES 1
1.2 THESIS ORGANIZATION 2
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2.1 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT 3
2.2 INFORMATION SHARING 4
2.2.1 The levels of information sharing 4
2.2.2 The information sharing and firm performance 5
2.3 SWITCHING COST 5
2.3.1 Types and variables of switching cost 6
2.3.2 The switching costs and information sharing 8
2.3.3 The switching costs and firm performance 8
2.4 TRANSACTION COST THEORY 9
2.5 TRUST 11
2.5.1 Types and antecedents of trust 11
2.5.2 Trust and information sharing 14
2.5.3 The trust and firm performance 14
2.6 SIMULATION 15
2.7 THE MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM 16
2.8 SWARM SIMULATION PLATFORM 17
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 19
3.1 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 19
3.2 RESEARCH METHOD 20
3.2.1 Simulation model 20
3.2.2 Decision mechanisms 23
(1) Switching cost 23
(2) Trust 26
(3) Information sharing 30
3.2.3 Evaluation criteria 33
(1) In-time order fulfillment rate (iofr) 33
(2) Average inventory cost (aic) 33
(3) Average order cycle time rate (aoctr) 34
3.2.4 Summary 34
(1) Decision mechanisms 34
(2) Evaluation criteria 35
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 36
4.1 EXPERIMENTAL SETTINGS 36
4.2 EXPERIMENTS 39
4.2.1 Experiment A 39
4.2.2 Experiment B 40
4.2.3 Experiment C 41
4.2.4 Experiment D 42
CHAPTER 5 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 44
5.1 EXPERIMENT A 44
5.1.1 Comparison with A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 44
5.1.2 The relation of A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 47
5.1.3 Summary 53
5.2 EXPERIMENT B 54
5.2.1 Comparison with B-1-1, B-1-2, B-1-3, and B-1-4 54
5.2.2 Comparison with Experiment B-2 57
5.2.3 Summary 58
5.3 EXPERIMENT C-1 59
5.3.1 Comparison with C-1-1, C-1-2, C-1-3, and C-1-4 59
5.3.2 Comparison between Experiments C-1 and C-2 62
5.3.3 Summary 64
5.4 EXPERIMENT C-3 64
5.4.1 Comparison with C-3-1, C-3-2, C-3-3 and C-3-4 65
5.4.2 Comparison between Experiments C-2 and C-3 68
5.4.3 Comparison between Experiments C-1 and C-3 69
5.4.4 Summary 71
5.5 EXPERIMENT D 72
5.5.1 Comparison with D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4 72
5.5.2 Summary 76
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 78
6.1 CONCLUSIONS 78
6.2 RESEARCH LIMITATION 80
6.3 FUTURE WORK 81
REFERENCES 82
APPENDICES 86
APPENDIX A. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN INFORMATION SHARING LEVEL UPGRADING AND DOWNGRADING 86
Experiment A 86
Experiment B-1 87
Experiment C-1 87
Experiment C-3 88
Experiment D 89
APPENDIX B. THE RATIO OF SWITCHING COST OVER TRUST 91
Experiment A 91
Experiment C-1 92
Experiment C-3 92
Experiment D 93
參考文獻 References
Ali, F. F., Pauline, S.P. Ng., and William, L. C., “Building a successful e-business: the FedEx story”, CACM, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 84-89, 2003.
Aulakh P. S., Kotabe M., Sahay A., ”Trust and performance in cross border marketing relationships: a behavioral approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 27, No. 5, pp. 1005-1032, 1996.
Bakos, J. Y. and Kemerer, C. F., “Recent applications of economic theory in information technology research”, Decision Support Systems, December, pp. 365-386, 1992.
Ball, M. O., Ma, M., Raschid, R. and Zhao, Z., “Supply Chain Infrastructures: System Integration and Information Sharing”, SIGMOD Record, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 2002.
Basu, A. and Kumar, A., “Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No 1, pp. 1-14, 2002.
Becerra, M. and Gupta, A.K., “Trust within the organization: Integrating the trust literature with agency theory and transaction costs economics”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 177-203, 1999.
Beggs, A. and Klemperer, P., ”Multi-Period Competition with Switching Costs”, Econometrica, 1992.
Bond, A. H. and Gasser, L., “Readership in Distributed Artificial Intelligence”, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
Dajun, D. and Katia, D.,“Agent-Facilitated Real-Time Flexible Supply Chain Structuring” AA '98, 1998.
Dyer, J. H., “Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 535-556, 1997.
Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R. and Corkill, D.D., “Trends in Cooperative Distributed Problem Solving”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 63-83, March 1989.
Gehrig, T. and Stenbacka, R., “Information sharing in banking: A collusive device?”, CEPR Discussion Papers, 2001.
Hess, M. and Ricart, J. E., “Managing customer switching costs: A framework for competing in the networked environment”, IESE, 2002.
Hitt, L. M. and Chen, P.-Y., “Switching cost and brand loyalty in electronic markets: evidence from on-line retail brokers”, Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, 2000.
Jeffry H. D. and Wujin C., “The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea”, Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-68, 2003.
Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K. and Wooldridge, M., “A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development”, In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Journal, N.R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Georgeff (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-38, 1998.
Julander, C. and Söderlund, M., “Effects of Switching Barriers on Satisfaction, Repurchase Intentions and Attitudinal Loyalty”, Working Paper Series in Business Administration, Inventoryholm School of Economics, 2003.
Kasuga, N. and Torii, A., “Long-term Business Relationships between Consignor and Trucking Carrier in Japan”, IPTP Discussion Paper Series, 1999.
Klemperer, P., “Markets With Consumer Switching Costs”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987.
Klemperer, P.,” Multi-period competition with switching costs”, Econometrica, 1992.
Klemperer, P., “Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade”, Review of Economic Studies, 1995.
Lee, H.L., and Billington, C., “The evolution of supply-chain-management models and practice at Hewlett-Packard”, Interfaces Vol.25, No.5, pp.42-63, 1995.
Lin, F.-r., and Hwang, S.-H., “The Evolution of Supply Chain Structure in Electronic Commerce”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Management (Volume I), TaoYuan, Taiwan, pp.408-414, January 1999.
Lin, F.-r., Sung, Y.-w., and Lo, Y.-p., “Effects of Trust Mechanisms on Supply Chain Performance Using Multi-agent Simulation and Analysis”, The First Workshop on Electronic Business, Barcelona, Spain, December 2002.
Lin, F.-r., Tan, G.W., and Shaw, M.J., “Modeling Supply-Chain Networks by A Multi-Agent System”, Proceedings of the 31rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 105-114, 1998.
Lin, F.-r., Yang, M-c., and Pai, Y-h., “A Generic Structure for Business Process Modeling”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 8, No.1, pp.19-41, 2002.
Lingnau, A., and Drobnik, O., “Simulating Mobile Agent Systems with Swarm”, Proc. 1st Int'l Symposium on Agent Systems and Applications and 3rd Int'l Symposium on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA'99), 1999.
MacDuffie, J. P. and Helper, S., “Creating Lean Suppliers: The Honda Way”, California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp.118-151, Summer 1997.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F.D., “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review”, Vol.20, No.3, pp. 709-734, 1995.
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R. and Zaltman, G.., “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, pp. 81-101, January 1992.
Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 20-38, 1994.
Parunak, H. V. D., “The DASCh Experience: How to Model a Supply Chain”, ICCS'98, 1998.
Seidmann and Sundararajan, “Building and Sustaining Interoganizational Information Sharing Relationships: The Competitive Impact of Interfacing Supply Chain Operations with Marketing Strategy”, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 205-222, Atlanta, Georgia, December 1997.
Seidmann and Sundararajan, “Sharing logistics information across organizations: thchnology, competition and contracting”, Operations management, 1997.
Shin, N., “The Impact of Information Technology on Firm Performance: the Importance of Strategic Choice”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2001.
Simon, H. A., “Models of Bounded Rationality”, Vol. 2, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982.
Smith, A. D. and Aldrich, H.E., "The Role of Trust in the Transaction Costs Economics Framework: Transaction contexts and Governance Structures in U.S. Manufacturer-Supplier Relations", Academy of Management Conference, Miami, FL., 1991.
Swaminathan, J., Smith, S. F., and Sadeh, N., “Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach”, Decision Sciences, 1998.
Williamson, O.E., “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, New York: The Free Press, 1975.
Zucker, L. G. “Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, pp. 53-111, 1986.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code