Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0731108-193258 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0731108-193258
論文名稱
Title
知識分佈與知識互動對組織績效之影響
Knowledge Distribution, Knowledge Interaction and Firm Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
130
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-07-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-07-31
關鍵字
Keywords
知識管理績效、知識互動、知識管理、組織績效
knowledge management performance, organizational performance, knowledge interaction, knowledge management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5802 次,被下載 28
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5802 times, has been downloaded 28 times.
中文摘要
隨著科技的進步以及企業競爭的加劇,知識管理已經是企業脫穎而出以及維持競爭優勢的不二法門,因此知識管理也成為管理科學最重要的研究議題之一,建構於不同理論基礎的知識管理模式紛紛被提出來。
本研究探討組織的知識分佈對於組織各種知識互動的影響,進而探討對知識管理的績效及組織績效。瞭解組織中所擁有的各項專業知識的強度以及多樣性是否會影響組織各種方式的知識互動與交流。而組織不同方式的知識互動與交流會如何影響組織的知識管理績效以及組織績效。
透過實證資料的蒐集與統計檢定,研究的發現為:1.組織知識分佈中的知識強度會正面影響組織的各種知識互動以及知識互動結果的品質。2.組織的內部互動、合作式互動以及個體之間的知識互動對於知識互動過程的品質有顯著的正向影響;組織的外部互動、合作式的互動以及群體間的知識互動亦會正面影響知識互動品質的結果品質。3.知識互動的結果品質對於組織的知識管理績效有正面的影響。4.知識管理績效會正向地直接影響組織績效。
Abstract
The proverb “Knowledge is power” points out the importance of knowledge. Most organizations understand the importance of knowledge and treat knowledge as a vital resource. Research in knowledge management has gained much attention in recent years.
This study investigates how knowledge distribution affects knowledge interaction types, and how knowledge interaction affects the performance of knowledge management in an organization. A measure of interaction quality is also defined to include process and outcome quality. A survey research was conducted to examine our research framework.
The results show that: 1. knowledge intensity affect the type of knowledge interaction and outcome quality. 2. Different types of knowledge interaction results in different interaction quality. 3. Outcome quality of knowledge interaction types affects KM performance. 4. KM performance affects organizational performance.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章、緒論……………………………………………………………1
第一節、研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………1
第二節、研究目的…………………………………………………………………3
第三節、研究流程…………………………………………………………………4
第四節、論文結構…………………………………………………………………6
第二章、文獻探討………………………………………………………7
第一節、知識管理範疇……………………………………………………………7
第二節、知識生態模型……………………………………………………………11
第三節、知識分佈與知識互動……………………………………………………15
第四節、知識互動品質……………………………………………………………22
第五節、知識管理績效……………………………………………………………25
第六節、組織績效…………………………………………………………………35
第三章、研究架構與方法………………………………………………41
第一節、研究架構…………………………………………………………………41
第二節、研究假說…………………………………………………………………43
第三節、變數之操作性定義及問卷設計…………………………………………49
第四節、資料收集與分析方法……………………………………………………55
第四章、資料分析與研究成果…………………………………………58
第一節、樣本敘述性統計…………………………………………………………58
第二節、信度與效度分析…………………………………………………………61
第三節、研究假說之驗證…………………………………………………………72
第四節、研究模式的調節變數分析………………………………………………79
第五節、研究結果彙整……………………………………………………………90
第五章、結論與建議……………………………………………………95
第一節、研究結論…………………………………………………………………95
第二節、研究貢獻…………………………………………………………………98
第三節、研究限制…………………………………………………………………99
第四節、未來研究建議…………………………………………………………100
參考文獻………………………………………………………………101
附錄……………………………………………………………………114
參考文獻 References
1. 田維國 (2005), 知識管理推動力、流程與組織績效關係之研究, 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2. 汪昭芬 (2000), 組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究:科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證, 成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
3. 吳萬益, 林清河 (2001), 「企業研究方法」, 華泰文化。
4. 林姿儀 (2008), 組織文化、知識循環過程與工作績效關係之研究, 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 林東清 (2007), 「知識管理(再版)」, 智勝出版。
6. 馬曉雲 (2001), 「新經濟的運籌管理:知識管理」, 台北:中國生產力中心。
7. 許宏明 (1995), 高科技產業的教育訓練制度與組織績效之相關性研究, 國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8. 陳灯能 (2004), 知識生態理論的建構與實證, 國立中山大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
9. 陳哲彥 (1998), 人力資源管理與組織績效之關係-本土及外資企業的比較, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
10. 彭志宏 (2004), 知識創造活動對組織績效之影響, 國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
11. 詹貞儀 (2002), 內部管理與互動品質因素對顧客關係品質影響效果之研究--以台灣地區人壽保險業為對象, 淡江大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
12. 趙必孝 (1994), 國際企業子公司人力資源策略、控制與績效, 國立中山大學企業管理所博士論文。
13. 劉京偉 譯, Arthur Andersen Business Consulting 著 (2000). 「知識管理的第一本書」, 商周出版社。
14. 蕭榮德 (2005), 知識資源對組織績效之影響, 國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
15. 譚大純, 蘇政宏 (2003), 知識管理策略、知識管理績效與功能性績效之聯結模式建構與跨產業實證研究, 輔仁管理評論, (10:2), 119-144頁。
16. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. (1999). “Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits,” Communication of the AIS (1), 1999.
17. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. (2001). “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management System: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly(25:1), pp. 107-136.
18. Andersen, A., & APQC. (1996). the American Productivity and Quality Center, “The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool,” External Benchmarking Version: Winter.
19. Anderson, Carl and Carl P. Zeitham. (1984).“Stage of The Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, (27:1), pp. 5-24.
20. Beckman, T. (1997). “A Methodology for Knowledge Management,” Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on AI and Soft Computing.
21. Berry, L. L. (1981). “The Employee As Customer,” Journal of Retailing Banking, 371(March), pp. 33-40.
22. Brady, M. K. & Cronin, J. J. (2001). “Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchic Approach,” Journal of Marketing, (65:3), pp. 34-49.
23. Bruderer, E. and Singh, J. (1996) “Organizational Evolution, Learning, and Selection: A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Model,” Academy of Management Journal (39:5), pp. 1322-1349.
24. Burgelman, R. A. (1991). “Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Filed Research,” Organization Science (2:3), pp. 239-262.
25. Carpenter, M. A. (2002). “The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal (23:3), pp. 275-284.
26. Carroll, G. R. (1988). “Ecological Models of Organizations,” Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge.
27. Carroll, G. R., and Hannan, M. T. (1995). “Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure, and Selection,” Oxford University press, NY, 1995.
28. Chase, R. (1997). “The Knowledge-Based Organization: An International Survey,” Journal of Knowledge Management (1:1), pp. 38–49.
29. Chin, W. W. (1998). ”The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 336.
30. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). “A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effect: results from a Monto Carlo simulations study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study,” Information Systems Research, 14(2), pp. 189-217.
31. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. “Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed),” Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.
32. Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D .A. (1990). “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), pp. 128–152.
33. Cummings, J. N. (2004). “Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization,” Management Science (50:3), pp.352-364.
34. Darr, E. D., Argote, L., and Epple, D. (1995) “The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises,” Management Science (41:11), pp. 1750-1762.
35. Davenport, T. H. (1997). “Information Ecology,” Oxford University Press, N.Y.
36. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. (1998). “Working Knowledge,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
37. Demarest, M. (1997). “Understanding knowledge management,” Long Range Planning, 30(3), 321-384.
38. Dess, G. G., and Robinson Jr. R. B. (1984). “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measure: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit,” Strategic Management Journal (l5), pp. 265-273.
39. Delaney, J. T., and Huselid, M. A. (1996) “The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance,” Academy of Management Journal (39:4), pp. 949-969.
40. DiBella, A. J., & Nevis, E. C. (1998). “How Organizations Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability,” Jossey-Bass.
41. Doney, P. M. and Canon, J. P. (1997). “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationship,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, No.1, pp. 3-21.
42. Drucker, P. F. (1999). “Knowledge Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge,” California Management Review (41:2), pp. 79-94.
43. Earl, M. (2001). “Knowlegde Management Stratege: Toward A Taxonomy,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1), pp.215-233.
44. Edvardsson, B., Larsson, G. & Setterlind, S. (1997). “Internal Service Quality and The Psychosocial Work Environment: An Empirical Analysis of Conceptual Interrelatedness,” The Service Industries Journal, 17(2), pp. 252-263.
45. Elton, C. (1972). “Animal Ecology,” Sidgewick and Jackson, London.
46. Elton, C. (1958). “The Ecology of Invasions by Plants and Animals,” Chapman and Hall, London.
47. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
48. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. (2001). “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1), pp. 185-214.
49. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., and Neale, M. A. (2003). “Virtualness and Knowledge in Trams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), pp. 265-287.
50. Gronroos, Christian, (1982). “Strategic Management and Marking in the Service Sector,” Helsingfors: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
51. Grover, V., and Davenport, T. H. (2001). “General Perspective on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1), pp. 3-22.
52. Guimaraes, T., Cook, D. and Natarajan, N. (2002). “Exploring the Importance of Business Clockspeed as a Moderator for Determinants of Supplier Network Performance,” Decision Science (33:4), pp. 629-644.
53. Gummesson, E. (1987). “The New Marketing-Developing Long-term Interactive Relationship,” Long Range Planning, 20(4), pp. 10-20.
54. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). “Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading,” NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
55. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). “Multivariate Data Analysis,” Prentice Hall, NJ.
56. Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. (1989). “Organizational Ecology,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
57. Hansen, M. T. (2002). “Knowledge Networks: Explaining Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit,” Organization Science (13:3), pp. 232–248.
58. Hendriks, P. (1999). “Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management (6:2), pp. 91-100.
59. Heskett, J. L. & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). “Putting the Service Profit Chain to Work,” Harvard Business Review, 7 2(2), pp. 167-174.
60. Hidding, G. J., and Catterall S. M. (1998). “Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Anderson,” Knowledge and Process Management 5.
61. Hill, C.W.L., and Jones, G.R. (1995). “Strategic Management Theory,” Hongton Mifflin, Boston.
62. Holzner, B., & Marx, J. H. (1979). “Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society,” Allyn and Bacon.
63. Ives, B., O. M. and Baroudi, J., 1983, “The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM, October, pp. 785-793.
64. Jarmo, R., Lehtinen. (1983). “Customer Oriented Service System,” Service Management Institute Working Paper, Finland.
65. Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Staples, D. S. (2000). “The Use of Collaborative Electronic Media for Information Sharing: An Exploratory Study of Determinant,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9:2-3), pp. 129-154.
66. Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Staples, D. S. (2001). “Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownnership of Information and Expertise,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1), pp.151-183.
67. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1999). “Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups,” Administrative Science Quarterly (44:4), pp. 741-763.
68. Kaplan, RS and Norton DP. (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review (83:7), pp.71-79.
69. Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., and Mehra, A. (2000). “Top Management-team Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Role of Cognitions,” Organization Science (11:1), pp. 21-34.
70. Kim. S, Suh, E., and Hwang, H. (2003). “Building the Knowledge Map: an Industrial Case Study,” Journal of Knowledge Management (7:2), pp. 34–45.
71. Krebs, C. J. (1978). “Ecology,” Harper&Row, New York.
72. Krebs, C. J. (1999). “Ecological Methodology,” Harper Collins, New York.
73. Lee, H., and Choi, B. (2003). “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination,” Journal of Management Information System (20:1), pp. 179-228.
74. Lee, J. H., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). “A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis.” Expert Systems With Applications, 20(4), pp. 299-311.
75. Lee, K. C., Lee, S., & Kang, I. W. (2005). “KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance.” Information & Management, 42(3), 469-482.
76. Lehtinen, U. & Lehtinen, J. R. (1982). “Service Quality: A Study of Quality Dimensions,” Unpublished Working Paper, Service Management Institute, Helsinki.
77. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). “Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation,” Harvard School Press, Boston.
78. Levitt, Theodore, (1972) “Production-Line Approach to Service,” Harvard Business Review, (50), pp. 41-52.
79. Lytras, M. D., Pouloudi, A., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). “Knowledge management convergence: expanding learning frontiers,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 40-51.
80. Madsen, T. L., Mosakowski, E., and Zaheer, S. (2003). “Knowledge Retention and Personnel Mobility: The Nondisruptive Effects of Inflows of Experience,” Organization Science (14:2), pp. 173–191.
81. Marquardt, M. J. (1996). “Building the learning organization,” McGraw-Hill New York.
82. McGlade, J., eds. (1999). “Advanced Ecological Theory,” Blackwell Science, Malden, M.A.
83. McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T. and Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). “The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors,” MIS Quarterly (18:4), pp. 427-451.
84. Mels, G., C. Boshoff and D. Nel. (1997). “The Dimensions of Service Quality: The Original European Perspective Revisited,” Service Industries Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 173-189.
85. Morey, D. (2001). “High-speed knowledge management: integrating operations theory and knowledge management for rapid,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 322-328.
86. Morita, M. & Takanashi, T. (1999). “Nyuumon Knowledge Management,” Tokyo: Kan Ki Publishing Inc.
87. Mowday, R. T., Stress, R. T. and Porter, L. W. (1979). “The Measure of Organizational Commitment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 224-227.
88. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review (23:2), pp.242-266.
89. Nelson, K. M., and Cooprider, J. G. (1996). “The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance,” MIS Quarterly (20:4), pp. 409-432.
90. Nonaka, I. (1994). “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science (5:1), pp. 14-37.
91. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995). “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,” Oxford University Press, New York.
92. Nunnally, J. C. “Psychometric theory (2nd ed),” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
93. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) “Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,” New York, pp.362-269.
94. O’Dell, C., and Grayson, C. J. (1998). “If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices,” California Management Review (40:3), pp. 154-173.
95. Parasuraman, A., Zeuthaml, V. A. and L. L. Berry. (1985). “Quality Counts in Service, Too, Business Horizons, (28), pp. 44-53.
96. Parasuraman, A., Zeuthaml, V. A. and L. L. Berry. (1985). “A Conceptal Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, (49), ppt. 41-50.
97. Pegels, C. C., Song, Y. I., and Yang, B. (2000). “Management Heterogeneity, Competitive Interaction Groups, and Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal (21:9), pp. 911-923.
98. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., and Xin, K. R. (1999). “Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity: Conflict and Performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly (44:1), pp. 1-28.
99. Peters, W. S. and Champoux, J. E. (1979).“The Use of Moderated Regression in Job Redesign Decisions,” Decision Science (10:1), pp. 85-95.
100. Porter, M. E. (1985). “Competitive Advantage,” The Free Press, New York.
101. Rulke, D. L., and Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). “Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance,” Management Science (46:5), pp. 612-625.
102. Sasser, W. E., R. P. Olsen, Jr., and D. D. Wyckoff. (1978). “Management of Service Operations,” Text and cases, Boston: Ally and Bacon, pp. 33-54.
103. Schultze, U., and Leidner, D. E. (2002). “Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions,” MIS Quarterly (26:3), pp. 213-242.
104. Spender, T. (1996). “Intellectual capital the new wealth of organizations,” antam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
105. Stivers, B. P. & Joyce, T. (2000). “Building a balanced performance management system,” Sam Advanced Management Journal, Spring, pp. 22-29.
106. Teece, D. J. (1998). “Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets,” California Management Rev, 40(3), pp. 55–78.
107. Venkatraman, N., and Ramanujam, V. (1984). “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Review (11:4), pp. 801-814.
108. von Krogh, G. (1998). “Care in Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review (40:3), pp. 133-153.
109. Wiig, K. M. (1993). “Knowledge Management Foundations,” vol. 1: Schema Press, Arlington.
110. Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W., and Lepak, D. P. (1996). “Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance,” Academy of Management Journal (39:4), pp. 836-866.
111. Zack, M. (1999). “Developing a Knowledge Strategy,” California Management Review 41(3), pp. 125-145.
112. Zack, M. H. (1999). “Managing codified knowledge,” Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
113. Zhang, Z. (2000). “Developing a Model of Quality Management Methods and Evaluating Their Effects on Business Performance,” Total Quality Management (11:1), pp. 129-137.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.108.9
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.145.108.9
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code