自1950年代Guilford鼓吹創造力研究後，相關學術研究成果的質與量大幅提升。世界各國也制定相關提升創造力的方案，國家競爭力亦評比各國創新狀態。然而自2000年後尚未有針對創造力學術期刊探討近期的研究趨勢。故本研究針三本創造力期刊2000年至2011年期間的文獻進行內容分析。本研究採用Mayer（1999）六種創造力研究取向，並整合Runco（2004）創造力研究主題等觀點作為編碼依據。本研究獨特性為提供近11年760篇創造力文獻之研究趨勢，並提供未來發展方向供後續研究者思索。研究結果發現在2000年到2011年間創造力文獻中前三大研究主題依序為心理計量取向、脈絡取向及實驗取向。在研究主題中，認知歷程於各年度皆為最多的主題，其次為人格但2006年後隨後則轉為教育。多數文獻以高等教育學生為主要研究對象，較少以學齡前或是老年階段進行探究。跨國比較中，美國為主要研究產出國家，而各國創造力文獻的刊登數量排名與世界經濟論壇（WEF）提出的全球競爭力報告書（GCR）中創新指標得分排名呈現正相關。後續研究可再擴大取樣範圍，並發展不同方法論與文化體系下的創造力研究領域。

Since 1950 Guilford promoted creativity research, the quality and quantity of creativity studies have increased substantially. Several programs have been designed for such purpose worldwide. The competitiveness of nations assesses innovation status among different countries as well. However, no study aims to analyze the recent research trends in creativity academic journal since 2000; therefore, this study analyzed three major creativity journals from 2000 to 2011 using the content analysis. This study employed Mayer (1999)’s approach, and integrated the Runco (2004)’s research topics for coding foundation. The uniqueness of this study was to provide the research trend from 760 creativity research literature in the past 11 years, and directions for future development. Results showed that the first three research approaches adopted were psychometric, experimental and contextual approach respectively. As for research topics, most of the articles elaborated on cognitive process, and then on personality. After 2006, however, the topics of personality shifted to education. The participants were mainly from higher education stage but rarely from preschool or retirees. Regarding international comparisons, the USA was the major output country. The rank of publish number in different countries was correlated with the rank of the innovation scores in the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) of World Economic Forum (WEF). More journals and further investigations are needed for future studies. And also develop the creativity research area in different methodology and cultural system.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與重要性 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 創造力之趨勢研究 6
第二節 創造力之研究取向 10
第三節 創造力之研究主題 20
第四節 創造力之研究對象 29
第五節 各國創造力研究成果 33
第三章 研究方法 35
第一節 研究架構與研究流程 35
第二節 研究方法 37
第三節 研究對象 40
第四節 分析單位與類目 44
第五節 研究工具之信度與效度 54
第六節 資料分析方法 58
第四章 研究結果與分析 59
第一節 研究取向的分析 59
第二節 研究主題的分析 65
第三節 研究對象的分析 74
第四節 各國創造力研究成果的分析 78
第五章 結論 84
第一節 結論與建議 84
第二節 研究限制 88
參考文獻 89

王文科、王智弘（2006）。教育研究法。臺北市，五南。
王石番（1991）。傳播內容分析方法－理論與實證。台北，幼獅。
吳靜吉（2002）。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，17-42。
吳靜吉（2004）。台灣創造力教育實施現況。台北，教育部。
吳靜吉、丁興祥、邱皓政（2002）。創造力的發展與實踐。應用心理研究，15，15-16。
吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀、徐悅淇（2002）。國際創造力教育發展的趨勢。資優教育研究，2(1)，1-26。
吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀、徐悅淇（2002）。國際創造力教育趨勢及其對我國創造力教育的啟示。學生輔導，79，80-97。
吳靜吉、樊學良（2011）。台灣創造力教育相關政策與實踐經驗。創造學刊，2（1），5-28。
李乙明、李淑貞（譯）（2005）。創造力II應用（Handbook of Creativity）（原作者：Sternberg, R. J.）。台北﹕五南。（原著出版年：1999）。
李乙明、李淑貞（譯）（2005）。創造力I理論 （Handbook of Creativity）（原作者：Sternberg, R. J.）。台北﹕五南。（原著出版年：1999）。
林清山（2000）。學習理論與教育心理學的互動。教育研究集刊，45，1-13。
林義南、陳淳文（譯）（1989）。內容分析法導論（原作者：R.P. Weber）。台北市，巨流。
洪蘭（譯）（2005）。不同凡想（Deflying the crowd）（原作者：Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I.）。台北﹕遠流。（原著出版年：1995）。
洪蘭（譯）（2008）。改變是大腦的天性－從大腦發揮自癒力的故事中發現神經可塑性（The Brain That Change Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science）（原作者：Norman Doidge）。台北﹕遠流。（原著出版年：2007）。
國家教育研究院（編）（2011）。我國百年教育回顧與展望。台北：國家教育研究院。
張世慧（2003）。創造力－理論、技術�技法與培育。台北：達雯。
教育部（2002）。創造力教育白皮書：打造創造力國度（Republic of Creativity, R.O.C.）。台北：教育部。
郭有遹（2001）。創造心理學。台北，正中書局。
陳昭儀、吳武典、陳智臣（2005）。我國創造力教育發展史。教育資料集刊，1，97-111。
程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥（譯） （2003）。科學革命的結構（原作者：Kuhn, T. S.）。台北市：遠流。
楊孟麗、謝水南（譯） （2003）。教育研究法：研究設計實務（原作者：Fraenkel, J.R.&Wallen, N.E.）。台北，心理出版社。（原著出版年：2000）。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園等人編（1989）。社會及行為社學研究法。台北：東華。
葉重新（2011）。教育心理學。台北，心理出版社。
葉寶玲、陳秉華、陳盈君、蔡毅樺（2010）。《教育心理學報》四十年（1967-2007）之內容分析。教育心理學報，41（3），685-702。
歐用生（1997）。內容分析法。載於黃光雄、簡茂發（主編），教育研究法。台北，師大書苑。
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11（1），115-143。
駐歐盟兼駐比利時代表處（2009）。歐盟執委會探討如何衡量創造力。2012年2月25日，取自http://www.taiwanembassy.org/ct.asp?xItem=94579&ctNode=316
4&mp=10 1&nowPage=2& pagesize=15。
瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞等人編（2012）。社會及行為社學研究法。台北：東華書局。
Ai-Girl, T. (2001). Singaporean teachers' perception of activities useful for fostering creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 131-148.
Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17-34.
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429.
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusiveleadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
Carroll, H.S. (2000). Creativity Research Journal, 1999 in summary (Unpublished
master's thesis).State Univeristy of New York, New York.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., Liu, K. S., & Chen, Y. L. (2010). Effects of association instruction on fourth graders' poetic creativity in Taiwan. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 228-235. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.481542
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Morrison, K.R.B. (2007). Research methods in education: New York, NY: Routledge.
Cropley, A.J., & Cropley, D. (2009). Fostering creativity: a diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations: Hampton Press.
Csiksentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: Harpercollins.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). The bitter-sweet Labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 191-197. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1802_5
Feist, G.J., & Runco, M.A. (1993). Trends in the creativity literature: an analysis of research in the Journal of Creative Behavior (1967-1989). Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 271-283.
Fryer, M. (2012). Some key issues in creativity research and evaluation as seen from a psychological perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 21-28.
Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., & Reynolds, C.R. (1989). Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences. Nova iorque: Plenum Press.
Goertzel, Ben. (1997). From complexity to creativity : Explorations in evolutionary, autopoietic, and cognitived dynamics: Plenum Press.
Gruber, H.E., & B?deker, K. (2005). Creativity, psychology and the history of science (Vol. 245): Kluwer Academic Pub.
Horng, J. S., & Hu, M. L. (2008). The mystery in the kitchen: Culinary creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 221-230. doi: 10.1080/10400410802060 166
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90.
Ivcevic, Z. (2007). Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(4), 271-290.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L.B. (2010). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches: Sage Publications, Inc.
Jung, D. I. (2000). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185-195.
Kahl, C. H., da Fonseca, L. H., & Witte, E. H. (2009). Revisiting creativity research: An investigation of contemporary approaches. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1080/10400410802633350
Kaufman, J.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The international handbook of creativity: Cambridge Univ Pr.
Kogan, N. (2002). Careers in the performing arts: A psychological perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1401_1
Kozbelt, A., & Serafin, J. (2009). Dynamic Evaluation of high- and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 349-360. doi: 10.1080/10400410903297634
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lee, E. A., & Seo, H. A. (2006). Understanding of creativity by korean elementary teachers in gifted education. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 237-242. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1802_9
Lee, M.H., Wu, Y.T., & Tsai, C.C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020.
Li, C. H., & Wu, J. J. (2011). The Structural Relationships Between Optimism and Innovative Behavior: Understanding Potential Antecedents and Mediating Effects. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 119-128. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571184
Lindauer, M.S. (2003). Aging, creativity, and art: A positive perspective on late-life development: Springer Us.
Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la cr?ativit?. Recherche, 67, 02.
Mayer, R.E. (1999). 22 Fifty Years of Creativity Research. Handbook of creativity, 449.
Mertens, D.M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods: Sage Publications, Inc.
Miller, Arthur I. (2000). Insights of Genius : Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art: MIT Press.
Moynihan, P. (2001). Organizing and dissminating knowledge About Creativity: Themes In The 1999 Journal of Creative Behavior.
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj152&3_01
Mumford, M.D. (2008). Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation (Vol. 7): JAI Press.
Niu, W. H., & Sternberg, R. (2002). Contemporary studios on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 269-288.
Nolen, A.L. (2009). The content of educational psychology: An analysis of top ranked journals from 2003 through 2007. Educational psychology review, 21(3), 279-289.
Papworth, M. A., Jordan, G., Backhouse, C., Evans, N., Kent-Lemon, N., Morais, J., & Winchester, K. J. G. (2008). Artists' vulnerability to psychopathology: Towards an integrative cognitive perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(3), 149-163.
Petocz, P., Reid, A., & Taylor, P. (2009). Thinking Outside the Square: Business Students' Conceptions of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 409-416. doi: 10.1080/10400410903297998
Romo, M., & Alfonso, V. (2003). Implicit theories of Spanish painters. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 409-415. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1504_8
Ronald A, Beghetto. (2008). Prospective teachers' beliefs about imaginative thinking in K-12 schooling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.06.001
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 8-22.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 393-400.
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Runco, M.A., & Pagnani, A.R. (2011). Psychological research on creativity.
Sawyer, K. (2011). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity: A Critical Review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137-154. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571191
Sawyer, R.K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation: Oxford Univ Pr.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1604_1
Scratchley, L. S., & Hakstian, A. R. (2000). The measurement and prediction of managerial creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 367-384.
Simonton, D.K. (2006). Creativity Around the World in 80 Ways... but with One Destination.
Stapleton, P. (2011). A survey of attitudes towards critical thinking among Hong Kong secondary school teachers: Implications for policy change. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.11.002
Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 607.
Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Handbook of creativity: Cambridge Univ Pr.
Tan, A. G. (2000). A review on the study of creativity in Singapore. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(4), 259-284.
Taylor, I.A., & Getzels, J.W. (2007). Perspectives in creativity: Aldine.
Urban, K.K. (1991). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal of High Ability, 1(1), 99-113.
Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis (Vol. 49): Sage Pubns.
Wu, Jing-Jyi, & Albanese, Dale. (2010). Asian creativity, chapter one: Creativity across three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(3), 150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.10.002
Xu, F. Q., McDonnell, G., & Nash, W. R. (2005). A survey of creativity courses at universities in principal countries. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 75-88.
Yadav, R. (2007). Review of An Interaction: Creativity, Cognition and Knowledge, Terry Dartnall (Ed.); Praeger, London, 2002, 337 pages. Cognitive Systems Research, 8(4), 300-303.
Zausner, T. (2009). The Effects of Aging on Creativity: A Study of Lindauer's Investigations Into the Visual Arts. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 305-306. doi: 10.1080/10400410902861745
Zha, P., Walezyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism-collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults.Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 355-366. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10