本研究旨在以自我效能理論為基礎，建立一份檢核中山大學大學生學業自我效能之量表，以供學校未來在學生學業自我效能檢核上的參考。受試樣本採立意取樣的方式自國立中山大學六個學院（文學院、理學院、工學院、管理學院、海洋科學學院、社會科學院）中抽取大學部一、二年級的學生進行施測，共409人。量表除了參考並修改國內外相關研究所使用過之量表外，並由研究者自編之試題組合而成，量表名稱為「學業效能與動機量表」。在量表效度檢核上，首先邀請三位領域專家進行試題的審核，再以ConQuest軟體進行評等量尺模式 (Rating Scale Model, RSM) 的資料分析。結果發現：1.最後保留之69道試題，每題皆具備良好的適配度（MNSQ介於0.6~1.4）；2.量表大部分試題對受試者而言難度偏易；3.量表之四個向度信度不高，其中以「實際行為表現」信度最高 (0.575)，以「替代經驗」信度最低 (0.382)；4.量表之「身心狀態」與「實際行為表現」、「替代經驗」兩向度為負相關，符合過去研究結果。綜合上述研究發現，研究者建議後續研究：1.提供社會讚許量表，控制社會期望對受試者的影響；2.增加受試人數以提高試題估計的穩定性；3.提供符合受試者能力的題目；4.增加部分向度之試題、刪除異質性試題，並增加難度較高之試題以提升量表信度；5.加入不同檢驗分析以提高量表之效度，並確保各試題針對不同群體學生的有效性；6.使用等級反應模式 (graded response model, GRM) 進行試題反應分析。

The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure academic self-efficacy for undergraduates. The theoretical framework of the questionnaire was based on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. A total of 409 participants were selected by judgment sampling from the first- and second-grade undergraduate of six colleges in national Sun Yat-sen university (Liberal Arts, Science, Engineering, Management, Marine Sciences, and Social Sciences). The newly developed Academic Efficacy and Motivation Questionnaire (AEMQ) was modified and derived from eight related scales. Expert content validity was conducted by three experts in the field, and the data were analyzed by rating scale model (RSM) in ConQuest. The findings were as follows: 1. All the 69 items in AEMQ have good fit values (MNSQ between 0.6 and 1.4). 2. The items of the AEMQ tended to be too easy for participants. 3. The reliability of each dimension of AEMQ was poor. The highest reliability value was 0.575, and the lowest was 0.382. 4. The first dimension “actual performance” and the second dimension “vicarious experience” have negative correlation with the forth dimension “psychological index”. The result was consistent with past studies.

論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究限制 3
第五節 名詞釋義 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 自我效能 5
第二節 學業自我效能 9
第三節 本章總結 13
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究對象 14
第二節 研究工具 15
第三節 研究過程 17
第四節 資料分析 19
第四章 結果與討論 21
第一節 專家審核量表試題 21
第二節 試題反應分析與信度檢驗 21
第五章 結論與建議 33
第一節 結論 33
第二節 建議 34
參考文獻 36
一、中文部分 36
二、英文部分 37

一、 中文部分
中山大學教學發展中心（2012）。學生學習與生活檢核平台。未出版之工具。取自http://www.opinion.nsysu.edu.tw/cirpsys/mainform.asp
高高屏區域教學資源中心（2012）。電腦線上測驗系統。未出版之工具。取自http://iris.ge.nsysu.edu.tw/cat/user_papers.aspx
李監萍（2006）。工藝技能學習成效與自我效能之相關性研究。藝術教育研究，12，39-64。
余民寧（1992）。試題反應理論的介紹（二）—基本概念和假設。研習資訊，9(1)，5-9。
余民寧（1992）。試題反應理論的介紹（三）—試題反應模式及其特性。研習資訊，9(2)，6-10。
余民寧、劉育如、李仁豪（2008）。台灣憂鬱症量表的實用決斷分數編製報告。教育研究與發展期刊，4(4)，231-258。
余民寧（2009）。試題反應理論（IRT）及其應用。台北：心理。
吳淑貞（2004）。自我效能訓練對肌無力症患者的自我效能、憂鬱及生活品質之成效探討（未出版碩士論文）。國立台北護理學院，台北市。
林宜信、葉美玲、陳興夏、陳靜修（2006）。中醫護理動畫情境多媒體之學習自我效能。醫護科技學刊，8(3)，169-176。
邱郁文、林益民、施東河（2007）。系統特性、任務學習與電腦自我效能對個人線上學習行為傾向影響。電子商務學報，9(2)，235-266。
施慶麟、王文中（2006）。評等量尺之Rasch分析。國立政治大學教育與心理研究，29(2)，399-421。
侯雪香（2007）。國中資優生學業自我效能、解釋型態與學業成就之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北市。
涂美方（2009）。國小六年級學生線對稱圖形概念之自我效能感與自我效能（未出版碩士論文）。台北市立教育大學，台北市。
許禎元（2004）。社會科學信度與效度的檢定及其關聯性。醒吾學報，27，1-23。
郭李宗文（2007）。原住民學童對社區本位中自然科學之自我效能初探－以植物單元為例。台灣原住民研究論叢，1，147-158。
張春興（1996）。現代心理學。台北：東華。
張家銘、黃芳銘、陳玉樹（2006）。結構方程模式應用在體育與休閒領域之期刊論文研究分析。台灣體育運動管理學報，4，1-17。
張憲卿、程炳林（2010）。成敗情境對行動與狀態導向者負向情感、自我效能與工作記憶容量之影響。台灣師範大學教育心理學報，41(3)，605-634。
黃惠卿、林啓超（2005）。國中生數學之成就目標導向對自我效能和不適應學習行為之關係。教育科學期刊，5(2)，27-51。
黃心如（2011）。英語字彙學習自我效能改變—男女學習差異之縱向研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
詹敏娟（2003）。國小三年級數學學習困難學生與普通學生學業自我效能之研究 （未出版碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
鍾清文（2005）。不同教學活動與性別對班級躲避球比賽的自我效能、 認知焦慮及參與動機之差異分析（未出版碩士論文）。屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
二、 英文部分
Amoon, P. B. & Fuertes, J. N. (2011). Self-efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment, and academic performance. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 431-438.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Cahill, S. P., Gallo, L. A., Lisman, S. A. & Weinstein, A. (2006). Willing or able: the meaning of self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(2), 196-209.
Chen, S.-Y., Sheu, S., Chang, C.-S., Wang, T.-H. & Huang, M.-S. (2010). The effects of the self-efficacy method on adult asthmatic patient self-care behavior. Journal of Nursing Research, 18(4), 266-274.
Chester, A., Buntine, A., Hammond, K., & Atkinson, L. (2011). Podcasting in education: student attitudes, behavior and self-efficacy. Educational Technology and Society, 14(2), 236–247.
Denogean, A. & Schwalbach, P. (2010). Student services transformed: helping students to help themselves. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34, 895-897.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Fields, A. M. (2005). Self-efficacy and the first-year university student's authority of knowledge: an exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6), 539-545.
Fife, J. E., Bond, S. & Winston, A. B. (2011). Correlates and predictors of academic self-efficacy among African students. Education, 132(1), 141-148.
Galyon, C. E., Blondin, C. A., Yaw, J. S., Nalls, M. L. & Williams, R. L. (2011). The relationship of academic self-efficacy to class participation and exam performance. Social Psychology of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9175-x
Jaret, C. & Reitzes, D. C. (2009). Currents in a stream: college student identities and ethnic identities and their relationship with self-esteem, efficacy, and grade point average in an urban university. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 345-367.
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Love, K. M., Bahner, A. D., Jones, L. N. & Nilsson, J. E. (2007). An investigation of early research experience and research self-efficacy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 314-220.
Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., Yin, H. (2010). Using multidimensional Rasch analysis to validate the Chinese version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ-CV). European journal of psychology of education, 25, 141-155.
Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: an introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Eds.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research, and application. (pp. 3-33). New York : Plenum Press.
Martinez, C. T., Kock, N., Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(5), 351-360.
Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. (1988). Development of a college academic self-efficacy scale. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED298158)
Odaci, H. (2011). Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students. Computers and Education, 57, 1109–1113.
Owen, R. L. J, Richelle, M., Audrey, E., George, G. G., Eli, B., R., Rosaire, P. D., Katherine, F. W., Donnalin, C. & Kevin, P. (2012). Self-efficacy for affect regulation as a predictor of future: life satisfaction and moderate of the negative affect. Journal of happiness studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9312-4
Posadzki, P., Stockl, A., Musonda, P. & Tsouroufli, M. (2010). A mixed-method approach to sense of coherence, health behaviors, self-efficacy and optimism: towards the operationalization of positive health attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychol- ogy, 51, 246-252.
Rivard, L. P. (2004). Are language-based activities in science effective for all students, including low achievers? Science Education, 88, 420-442.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf
Solberg, V. S., O'Brien, K., Villareal, P., Kennel, R., & Davis, B. (1993). Self-efficacy and Hispanic college students: validation of the college self-efficacy instrument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 80-95.
Sander, P. & Sanders, L. (2003). Measuring confidence in academic study: a summary report. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 1(1), 1-17.
Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2006). Understanding academic confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), 29-39.
Sander, P. & Sanders, L. (2009). Measuring academic behavioural confidence: the ABC scale revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 19-35.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2011). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. (pp. 35-53). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (1998). Acer ConQuest. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research press.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R. & Haldane, S. A. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: generalised item response modeling software. Australian: Acer Press.
Wang, C.-C. & Carrie, C. S. (2008).The role of generational status, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy, and perceives social support in college students' psychological well-being. Journal of College Counseling, 11, 101-118.
Yowell, E. B., Andrews, L. & Buzzetta, M. E. (2011). Explaining career decision-making self-efficacy_personality, cognotions, and cultural mistrust. The Career Develop- ment Quarterly, 59, 400-411.
Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M. & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677-706.