Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0804108-110110 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0804108-110110
論文名稱
Title
俄羅斯與中國的軍事武器交易
Russia-China MIlitary Arms Trade
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
97
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-08-04
關鍵字
Keywords
none
Implications for Taiwan, China - USA axis, Arms Trade
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5826 次,被下載 3384
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5826 times, has been downloaded 3384 times.
中文摘要
none
Abstract
To observers who are not indifferent toward Russia, the trend of Russia’s foreign policy clearly is disquieting, if not alarming. The titanic efforts made by the Russian ruling establishment to enter the mighty G-7 club appear now to be a waste of time and energy. Feeling itself a stranger within the G-8, Russia seems to be trying to establish an international club (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) of its own with it at the head it (China-Russia military exercise in Central Asia) .
There is nothing reprehensible in any country’s quest to normalize relations with its neighbors and from that point of view Mikhail Gorbachev’s visit to China in 1989, this was a good start in the process of burying the past thirty years of open confrontation between the two countries. The hostility between the two nations saw, time and time again, armed border clashes and skirmishes. Boris Yeltsin’s government willingly took the baton from his predecessor but carried it in an unlikely direction. In 1992, Russian opened the flow of military hardware and know-how to China by selling 24 fighters Su-27s. 2 At that time, Russia did not appear to harbor any thoughts of China as a potential ally and regarded the giant neighbor as a very solvent buyer of its armaments – mainly of old Soviet surpluses rather than really new material. However, China soon made it clear that it wanted only first-rate merchandise, and proved to be a tough negotiator and shrewd buyer. 3
Historically, military contracts between Russia and China were implemented on the basic of more or less special agreements and could not be viewed as part of a larger political strategy although Boris Yeltsin’s proactive diplomacy toward China (armed largely at counterbalancing “NATO’s move eastward”) created a fertile field for what followed in the early 2000s. Trade was driven, on the Chinese side, by China’s willingness to acquire quite sophisticated weapons at a very reasonable price and by Russia’s willingness to sell anything to anybody just to keep the production lines going and to convince its highly-qualified specialists to stay put. Despite friendly rhetoric from both sides and the rather hefty military sales by Russia, immediate military cooperation was not on the agenda at that time. The whole picture of bilateral ties between Moscow and Beijing began changing with Putin’s rise. Naturally, along the path to the revival of Russia’s past “greatness” Putin chose a very definite company of fellow travelers and staked his presidency on an eventual estrangement from the West.
The turning point in Chinese-Russian relations came on July 16, 2001, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese counterpart Jiang Zemin, aspiring to forge a ``new international order' and offset U.S. influence, signed the first post-Soviet friendship Treaty for Good Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation, between the two nations, cementing their decade-long partnership which opened the way to increase arms deliveries. Jiang said after the signing ceremony in the Kremlin, that “it was a milestone in the development of Russia-Chinese relations.' 4
The document comes at a time when the two giant countries were expressing mounting concern over American national missile defense plans and trying to attract more nations into their own orbit. In a joint statement, Putin and Jiang said “they were hoping for a just and rational new international order' to reflect their concept of a multipolar' world led by the United Nations, rather than Washington.” 5
Yet the treaty between Russia and China made it clear that the two countries had no immediate plans to form a closer alliance. The treaty was the first such document since 1950 when Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong created a Soviet-Chinese alliance that later soured into a bitter rivalry by the 1960s. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Moscow and Beijing have put their disputes behind them and forged what they call a “strategic partnership”. This agreement opens the door to broad Sino-Russian cooperation with joint actions to offset long disputed border issues.
Some Russian scholars have voiced concern about Chinese migrants overrunning Russia's sparsely populated Far Eastern and Siberian regions bordering on China.6 When China and the Soviet Union were rivals, China raised territorial claims against Russia. Waves of Chinese migrants have settled there since the Soviet collapse and both Putin and Jiang have stated that the Russian-Chinese border from now on will become a border of “eternal peace' and pledged that the two sides will jointly resolve “the questions left by history.' 7
Official assurances by both parties that the Russia – China military treaty is not being directed against any third country, the agreement stops just short of being a military alliance. In official statements, the two sides stressed that they still viewed the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty as the “cornerstone of strategic stability' which must be preserved. The two neighbors have also called for international talks that could curb missile proliferation and make space weapons free. Both Russia and China warn that a proposed American missile shield defense would upset the strategic balance and trigger a new global arms race. China's concerns are potentially even stronger; because its nuclear arsenal is tiny compared to Russia's and even a limited missile defense could erode its deterrent value. Russia and China say their “partnership' is not aimed against the United States and according to Chinese officials, the new friendship treaty does not contain any secret articles like the military alliance between Stalin and Mao.8
China has bought billions of dollars worth of Russian jets, submarines, missiles and destroyers during the 1990s, becoming the biggest customer for Russia's ailing military industrial complex. Military analysts say Russia is in a position to help Beijing speed its military building by providing even more sophisticated weaponry. Joint statements by both governments focus at length on future cooperation in the sphere of advanced technologies, space exploration and industries including electronics, telecommunications and nuclear energy production and called for Chinese companies to invest in Russia.9
A careful examination of this treaty leaders to the striking, but obvious conclusion that never during its post-Soviet history has Russia taken such an openly anti-American step.10
Nearly five years after the military agreement was signed by Russia and China, the results of the treaty (as well as preceding and subsequent agreement) are impressive. Since 1992, military sales by Russia to China have reached at least $20 billion. 11 Russia has managed to sell China enough military hardware to arm a medium-sized European country and 12 (ref. 4) most of these weapons are obviously directed against a rebellious island province – Taiwan.13
Likewise of concern for Taiwanese leaders as well as China’s other neighbors were the Russian-Chinese military exercises carried out in August 2005 – the first time in more than 40 years.14 The scale of the event was considerable; it encompassed 10, 000 military personnel as well as approximately 70 ships and submarines. While the Chinese participated mainly with personnel (around 8 000) and sea vessels (some 60 ships and submarines), the main contributions from the Russian side were advanced air assets, such as 2 Tu-95MS Bear strategic bombers, 4 Tu-22M3 Backfire long-range bombers, Su-24M2 Fencer bombers, Su-27SM Flanker fighters, 10 IL-76 Candid transport aircraft, an A-50 Mainstay air warning command and control aircraft, and an Il-78 Midas air tanker.15
The public objective of the maneuvers was coordinating in the fight against international terrorism, but few missed the real implications for conventional warfare: Anti-terrorist military actions do not require the use of the strategic bombers and large scale amphibious operations. One may only surmise who proposed the scenario but the message sent by the exercise seemed clear enough: The Asian-Pacific region is a domain of Russia and China, and no one else should challenge their influence in the region.
It is possible that only one of the participants, Russia, wanted to send this message to the rest of the world and China, quite possibly, views this partnership in the Pacific as temporary and likely is playing its own game. Russia should be aware that the eventual loser can be the one who deals its partner the winning cards. According China’s nowadays strategy, China would like to enjoy and use all advantages of the USA-unipolar world if it restricts Russia’s international interests and it is not opposite to China’s interests. According Chinese resources China does not consider Russia as a strategic partner, China has interest in modernization of own military capabilities, but not to form the full-pledge alliance and even restrict USA’s international policy.16
China had become a major political factor in the world long before Deng Xiaoping set the country on the path of economic reforms that now have transformed China into second largest economy on the planet (measured by Purchasing Power Parity, or PPP).17 In the 1960’s, China’s joining the world nuclear club greatly boosted China’s influence on the world affairs as a whole, and its authority in the Third World in particular. For the past decade, China has demonstrated a 10 % annual economic growth, a pace that requires more and more energy resources. At present, China is the second largest consumer and the second largest importer of oil and is desperately seeking new sources of energy.18
The armed forces of China are a far cry from the vast formation of under trained men of the 1970s who were armed with poor copies of Soviet AK-47 assault rifles and flying inadequate copies of old Soviet airplanes. Today the nation of China has absorbed the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with 2.5 million men. In addition, China has close to 5, 000 aircraft, and up to 2, 700 warships (not to mention hundreds of strategic and tactical nuclear missiles) – represents quite a formidable force. 19 Accordingly, the almost unanimous opinion of military experts believe that by 2025 or earlier, China will have all the necessary battle capabilities for invading Taiwan. Even now, China’s front line aviation has 400 fourth generation modern combat planes – more than Russia does.20
Still, theoretical capabilities and the ability to launch an aggressive planned assault are altogether different. The latter enterprise implies and requires firm determination and political will. Does the Chinese leadership posses that kind of will and determination? If China were a democratic country, then the answer definitely would be no. China, however, is not a democracy. It is a totalitarian, and to some, a fascist state21 with little regard for human life (as evidenced by the Tiananmen Square Massacre in June 1989). So, the answer is yes: China will attack Taiwan as soon as it feels prepared; not only to break Taiwanese resistance but to oppose, successfully, American forces as well.
With few doubts regarding the future of Taiwan a question arises whether Russia should beware of China’s intentions as well. The answer may depend on two aspects: the first of them is, if China sees something across its northern border that might be worth resorting to force in dealings with its neighbor; and the second, if Russia would be able to curb any dangerous impulse from the south. It is common knowledge that the natural resources of Siberia and the Russian Far East are enormous and diverse. To get protracted access to those riches at reasonable prices would be a coup for any serious aspirant and it might be easier to obtain the permanent possession of these resources by means short of military force.
The hard reality for the world and especially for China’s neighbors is that, with a current rate of growth that very likely will remain at 8-10% in the foreseeable future, the increasing demands of the economy and enhanced military muscle, Beijing might try its fortune in the North. It is true that the border disputes between China and Russia have been settled, presumably amicably. However, there are a few realities that have to be taken into consideration.
One issue is the belief in fairly important circles within China that in its modern history, China was robbed of 5 million sq. km of territory. For Russians, the worst part of this historical lesson, as it is written in Chinese school textbooks, is that Russia is alleged to have seized these Chinese lands (Primorskiy Krai and Sakhalin Island), and in place of today’s Russian cities of Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, and Blagoveshchensk in the past they were the Chinese cities of Haishenway, Boli and Hailenbao.22
Another concern is with demography. The Russian Far East is one of the least inhabited regions of the country with only 6.7 million people living there. At the same time three adjoining Chinese provinces are crowded with about 120 million inhabitants.23 Illegal migrations of Chinese across the Russian border, a problem rooted deeply from the 19th century, have grown into a fairly large modern problem for Russian authorities. Estimates on the total Chinese Diaspora in Russia vary greatly, from an overly optimistic official 40,000 to a xenophobic figure of 10 million.24 However, it is safe to say that the Russian territories in question have at least 1 million Chinese.
This number shows a clear growing trend due to a variety of factors including expedited procedures of entry into Russia for Chinese citizens, many of whom choose to settle in Russia. It would be preposterous and a great overreaction to view all those re-settlers as a "fifth column," but this demographic situation could be used by the Chinese military to its advantage. As for Russia's ability to oppose a future advance by China, it has to be seen as questionable at best. For the past decade, the formidable rate of economic growth has been driving up Chinese defense expenditures. Estimated at around 90 billion dollars for the year 2005, they are expected to reach a figure of something between $120 billion and $150 billion in 2015 and from $225 billion to $325 billion in 2025.25
Russia has the tenth largest economy in the world (by PPP), with economic growth (5.9% in 2005) that lags far behind China and a probable total military spending of slightly over $30 billion in 2005. The best possible illustration of these trends consists of the statistics of production and distribution of Russian armaments in 1992-99 (the figures for 2000-2006 are most likely better), while the Russian Air Force received 7 aircraft during this period, 278 were sold abroad (101 went to China). The Russian Land Forces obtained 31 tanks whereas foreign clients received 435 (China received 140). And so on and so forth for all major weapons systems.26
The picture might not look so bleak if Russia held a decisive technological edge over China. However, even the most sophisticated combat assets that Russia currently has (although superior to Chinese assets) produced during the Soviet era when the military-industrial establishment was fully supported by the state. Now, Russia cannot afford to be a leader in all spheres of military research and development. However wide the gap that exists between Chinese and Russian military know-how, it is now only a matter of time before China catches up and perhaps even surpasses Russian development and production. China's willingness and ability both to bargain and to employ "total intelligence" to obtain advanced technologies in the West also provides a significant edge.27
Taking all these factors into consideration, Russia appears to have chosen the wrong priority of reanimating it’s mourned over past greatness by means of allying itself with a probable adversary. This decision is apparently prompted by a psychological tradition of hurt national pride and what can be formulated as 'civilization preferences' (which is the feeling among Russian leaders). In a decade or two the newly-found friendship with Russia's southern neighbor might take such a twisted turn that Russia will have to think more about survival as a sovereign entity than nurturing its great power status ambitions.
目次 Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Historical review of Sino-Russian relations from 1991 to nowadays
1. Introduction, p.1
1.1 Research background, p.1
1.2 Motivation and purpose for research, p.5
1.3 Research questions of this study, p.7
1.4 Objects of research, methodologies, p.7
1.5 Literature Review and Validation p.8

Chapters 2. The Russian deliveries and geostrategical balance p.12
2.1 Balance of the forces on the China – USA axis p.13
2.2 Military – technological cooperation p.14
2.3 China’s changing strategic concerns p.16
2.4 Military budget of the People's Republic of China (China’s defense
expenditure as a percentage of its GDP) p.16

2.4.1 Various studies p.16
2.4.2 Real Volume Comparison p.18
2.4.3 Controversy and reaction p.18

Chapter 3. Regional balance of forces p.20
3.1 Implications for India’s military growth p.20
3.2 Implications for Pakistan p.21
3.3 Implications for China p.25
3.4 Implications for ASEAN’s countries p.29
3.5 Implications for Taiwan p.30
3.6 Implications for Japan p.31

3.6 Implications for Koreas p.32
3.7 Is China-Russia Cooperation fundamentally altering the balance of Power
between East Asian states? p.34
Chapter 4. Challenges of the Sino-Russian Strategic Partnership (USA’s view) p.36
4.1 What Does China – Russia Cooperation Mean in Practice? p.36
4.2 What does it mean “The Sino – Russian partnership”? p.36
4.3 China-Russia Cooperation in United Nations p.36
4.4 Russia, China Veto UN Resolution on Burma p.36
4.5 Russia, China block UN resolution on Iran p.37
4.6 East – West split p.38
4.7 Russia and China oppose Kosovo independence p.38
4.8 Tibet protests: Russia supports China, UN silent p.38
4.9 To What Degree Is China – Russia Rapprochement directed at United States? p.39
4.10 Is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization the Foundation of a Regional
Strategic Alliance against the United States? p.40
4.11 Sino – Russian Military Exercises p.42
4.12 The Significance of Sino-Russian Military Exercises 2005 p.42
4.13 Peace Mission 2005 and Other Regional Military Exercises p.42
4.14 Moscow and Beijing Create a More Cohesive SCO p.44
4.15 Continued US Resistance p.45
4.16 Future Prospects p.45
4.17 USA response p.46
4.18 The negative near-term consequence of Russia’s contribution
to Chinese military modernization p.47
Chapter 5 Safety of Russia p.49
5.1 Challenges of the Sino – Russian Strategic Partnership p.50
5.1.1 The leadership’s relations of the two countries p.50
5.1.2 Largely state-directed and focused on defense’ economic ties p.50
5.1.3 Why Russia abstains from transferring Beijing the most modern kinds of arms? p.50
5.2 Russia – China: friends or competitors? p.51
5.3 Friendship against whom? p.51
5.4 Not “Brothers”, but Partners? p.52
5.5 Vigilance will not prevent p.53
5.6 Strategic suspicions between Russia and China p.53
5.7 Island of “friendship” p.54
5.8 Partnership “with a counterbalance” p.54
5.9 Threat Perception and Security Interests: Similarities and Differences p.55
5.10 Arms Trade p.56
5.11 What pushed Moscow to develop close partnership/alliance relations with Beijing? p.56
Chapter 6 Chinese view toward Sino-Russian Partnership p.59
6.1 China’s Grand Strategy and International Security or the difference between Beijing’s
official and non-official view toward Russian – Chinese cooperation p.59
6.2 Beijing’s current strategy p.60
6.3 Beijing’s view toward Chinese – Russian Partnership in terms of arms trade p.61
6.4 How Are Social and Cultural Elements Affecting China – Russia Relations? p.64
6.4.1 How do Chinese see Russians p.64
6.4.2 How do Russians see Chinese p.66
6.4.3 Cross – border demographic imbalance p.67
6.5 Russian Moscow’s and Far East Perceptions of Chinese Migrants p.69
6.5.1 Border relations and perceptions of the regional balance of power p.69
6.5.2 The consequences of migration: Russian regional opinion surveys p.69
6.5.3 China and Russia’s Migration Policy p.71
6.5.4 The Security Dilemma in China – Russia Regional Relations – Policy Implications p.73
6.5.5 Pragmatism dominate Russia – China Relations p.73
6.6 The Russian Far East: A Chinese Future? p.74
6.6.1 Post – Cold War Sentiments p.74
6.6.2 Tempered by Reality p.75
6.6.3 A US Example? p.75
6.6,4 Challenges for Moscow p.76

Chapter 6 Conclusion p.78
Bibliography p.84

Index of Tables

1.1 Table 1. Absolute expenditures (in USD).(2004-2005) p.17
1.2 Table 2. Relative expenditures (as percentage of GDP). p.17
1.3 Table 3. Comparision of the equipment of each country which can afford with its budget. p.18
1.4 Table 4. The datas of GDP (PPP) for countries on 2007 p.18
1.5 Table 5. India’s budget allocation for defense expenditure witnesses a perpetual
rise in subsequent years (1996 – 2002) p.21

1.2 Table 6. Recent Russian - Indian Military Acquisitions/ Purchases of the Air Force p.22

1.3 Table 7. Russia Transfers/licensed Production of Major Conventional Weapons
to China, 1995-2005. p.26

1.4 Table 8. Rise of Russian military export to Asian countries (90 percent of figures is
China’s arms imports between 2003 and 2007) p.29

1.5 Table 9. Taiwan Strait Military Balance, Naval Forces p.30

1.6 Table 10.Attitudes of Russian Respondents toward Chinese Migrants % of respondents per city p.70

1.7 Table 11. Russian Respondents’ Assessment of Chinese Migrants % of respondents per city p.71
參考文獻 References
Bibliography

English resources

(1) Abzavaty, Yazep. “Everything is Quiet on the Bielorusian -Chinese Border.” “Our Opinion” Journal, Vol. 14, number 1, pp. 1 - 4 via http://www.nmnby.org/pub/220805/china.html.

(2) Alexseev, Mikhail A., and Hofstetter, Richard C. “Russia, China, and the immigration security dilemma,” June 19, 2006 via http://www.psqonline.org/

(3) Alekseev, Mikhail. “The Chinese Are Coming’: Public Opinion and Threat Perception in the Russian Far East,” Program on New Approaches to Russian Security: Policy Memo 184 (Washington, D.C.: Council on Foreign Relations, January 2001), 92 p.

(4) Andrew J. Nathan and Robert S. Ross, “The Great Wall and the Empty Fortress: China’s Search for Security,” New York: W.W. Norton, 1997, 25 p.

(5) Annual Report to Congress, The Military Power of the People's Republic of China, 2005. Department of Defense via http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/d20050719china.pdf.

(6) Asian Library, Moscow Research center, 1999, pp. 3-4 via http://asiapacific.narod.ru/countries/china/arms_trading1.htm

(7) Blanchard, Jean-Marc. “The US role in the Sino–Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945–1971,” The China Quarterly, No. 161, (March 2005), pp. 95–123.

(8) Chernenko, Andrei, Deputy Interior Minister and Chief of the Federal Migration Service regarding the Law on the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Territory of the Russian Federation, Press Conference, Federal News Service, October 31, 2006.

(9) Cohen, Ariel. “The Russia-China Friendship and Cooperation Treaty: A Strategic Shift in Eurasia?“,”The Heritage Foundation”, Backgrounder # 1459, 18 Jul 2001 via http://www.heritage.org/Research/RussiaandEurasia/BG1459.cfm.

(10) Conley, Jerome M. “Indo-Russian Military And Nuclear Cooperation: Implications for US Security Interests”, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, www.fas.org/nuke/guide/india/ doctrine/ocp32.htm

(11) Christensen, Thomas J. “Chinese realpolitik,” Foreign Affairs 75(5), September 2005, pp. 23 - 40.

(12) Dawson, Chester. “Flying the age,” Far Eastern Economic Review, July, 2004, pp. 12–19.

(13) Defense outlays in South Asia’, Dawn, March 10, 2005.

(14) Department of Defense, the USA. “The Military Power of the People's Republic of China”, Annual Report to Congress 2005, GlobalSecurity.org via http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/d20050719china.pdf

(15) Deviatov, Andrei. “Under the Motto “Greatness and Pride”, Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie (Independent military review), October 15, 2006.

(16) Donaldson, Robert H. “The arms trade in Russian-Chinese Relations:
Identity, domestic politics, and geopolitical positioning,” The George Washington University, Washington, DC, International Studies Quarterly, Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 47, Number 4, Dec. 2003, July 26-28, 2001 via
http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~robert-donaldson/armspaper.htm.

(17)"Economic Brief: China's Energy Acquisitions", 2006.

(18) “Explaining Chinese Migration to the Russian Far East.” Columbia University Press, New York, 2005, pp.3 - 8 via http://gsti.miis.edu/CEAS-PUB/2003_Wishnick.pdf.

(19) Funabashi, Yoichi quoted in Richard Halloran. “Awakening the giant”, Far Eastern Economic Review, February 2004, 43 p.

(20) Gelbras, Vilya G. “Russia’s Chinese Reality”, Moscow: Muravei, 2006, pp. 124-145. See Michail A. Alexseev, “Socioeconomic and Security Implications of Chinese Migration in the Russian Far East,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2005, pp. 101 - 128.

(21) Gertz, Bill. “Chinese Dragon Awakens,” The Washington Times, Published June 26, 2005, APFN MESSA GEBOARD ARCHIVES, p. 1 - 3, via http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20050626-071711-4995r.

(22) Goldstein, Avery. “Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International security”, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2006, 275 p.

(23) Golts, Aleksandr. “A Trade Partner, a Military Ally. The Evolution of the Military-Technological Cooperation between Russia and China.” via http://www.carnegie.ru/ru/pubs/procontra/vol9num3-06.pdf.

(24) Grieco, Joseph. “Systematic Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia, and the Americas,” in Edward W. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner eds., The Political Economy of Regionalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2005, pp. 169 - 177.

(25) Haas, Marcel D. “Russian-Chinese Military Exercises and Their Wider Perspective: Power Play in Central Asia.”, RNLAF. Defence Academy of the United Kindom, The Clingendael Publishing via http://www.da.mod.uk/CSRC/documents/Russian/05%2851%29MDH3.pdf.

(26) Hagelin, Bjorn, Wezeman, Pieter D. and Wezeman, Siemon T. “Transfers of Major Conventional Weapons,” in SIPRI Yearbook 2005: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security, ed. Rotfeld, Adam Daniel (New York: Oxford University Press,
2005), 383 p.

(27) Harrison, Selig. “Promoting a soft landing in Korea”, Foreign Policy, No. 106, Spring 2006, pp.15 -23.

(28) Heinlein, Peter. “Russia, China Veto UN Resolution on Burma,” United Nations, VOICE OF AMERICA’ News, 13 January 2007, http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2007-01/2007-01-13-voa2.cfm?textmode=0

(29) Hill, Fiona. “Siberia: Russia's Economic Heartland and Daunting Dilemma,” Current History, October 2004, 68 p.

(30) Hollifield, James F. “The Politics of International Migration: How Can We “Bring the State Back In?” in Caroline B. Brettell and James F. Hollifield, eds., Migration Theory: Talking across Disciplines, New York: Routledge, 2005, 241p.

(31) Huntington, Samuel. ‘The Hispanic Challenge’, Foreign Policy, March-April 2006, 172 p.

(32) “India and Vietnam to sign defense agreement tomorrow,” Indian Express, March 28, 2004, 83p.

(33) “India forms defense council to speed acquisition process,” Defense News, August 31, 2001, www.bharat-rakshak.com

(34) "Intelligence Brief: Uzbekistan-C.I.S.", 2007.

(35) Isachenkov, Vladimir. “Russia, China sign Friendship Treaty”, CDI Library, Johnson Russia List, July 16, 2001. http://www.cdi.org/russia/Johnson/5348.html.

(36) Johnson, Tim; Ridder, Knight . “China Turns to Russia for Big-Ticket Military Items.” McClatchy Newspapers. Posted on 27 Sep 2005 via
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12756194.htm.

(37) Kaiser, Robert G, and Mufson, Steven. “Blue team” draws a hard line on Beijing: action on Hill reflects informal group’s clout”, Washington Post, 22 February 2000, pp. 1 -6; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:h.r.01838.

(38) Katz, Mark N. “How much does Moscow have poles?” http://inosmi.ru/stories/05/10/11/3461/233223.html ,”United Press International”, USA, March 5, 2007.

(39) Keliher, Macabe. “News from greater China; Hong Kong and Taiwan “, Asia Times, Feb 11, 2004, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FB11Ad01.html.

(40) Khazbiev. Aleksei. “VTS Problems between Russia and China,” 20 March 2007, 56 p.

(41) List of countries by GDP (PPP). From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29.

(42) Lukin, Alexander. “Russia’s Image of China and Russian-Chinese Relations,” CNAPS Working Paper, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, May 2007, 94 p.

(43) Mainville, Michael. “Muslim birthrate worries Russia,” Washington Times, 21 November 2006 via http://www.washtimes.com/world/20061120-115904-9135r.htm

(44) Mehmet Ögütçü “Fifth Asian Security Conference “Asian and Chinese Security Issues in the Decade to 2011,” New Delhi, India, “Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence” Journal, Vol. 1, issue # 02, 26 March 2003, pp. 4-11, via http://www.gasandoil.com/ogel/samples/freearticles/article_15.htm.

(45) Menshikov Aleksandr. “Problems of Russian Antimissile Defense: What it can and should protect against, and what it should not,” Vozdushno-Kosmicheskaya Oborona (Air-space defense review), 15 August 2007, 39 p.

(46) Mikheeva, Nadezhda. “Social and Economic Differentiation in the Russian Far East, Statistics” in Judith Thornton and Charles E. Ziegler, ed., Russian Far East: Region at Risk, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007, pp. 88, 95, 101.

(47) Minnick, Wendell. “Analysis: Strains Show in Complex China-Russia Relations,” Defense News, March 17, 2007, 82 p.

(48) Myasnikov, V.S. “Confirmed by Treaty Articles,” Moscow: Mosoblpoligrafizdat, 2006, pp. 413 - 419; Yegor Gaydar. “Russia in the 21st Century: Not a World Policeman but an Outpost of Democracy in Eurasia,” Izvestiya News, 18 May 2007, pp. 330 – 351.

(49) Myers, Steven. “N. Korea’s talks with US fail over demand for GI pullout,” New York Times, September 2002, 37 p.

(50) Political Science Quarterl, Volume 121 • Number 1 • Spring 2006. Accessed from the internet via http://www.psqonline.org/

(51) "Pakistan: a Geopolitical Crux", 2007.

(52) “Part V of ‘Guidelines for US–Japan defense cooperation,” US–Japan Security Consultative Committee release, 23 September 1997.
See http://www.arc.org.tw/USIA/www.usia.gov/regional/ea/easec/sccguide.htm

(53) Perry, William J. PhD.” American Relations with Russia and China,” Professor and Co-director, Preventive Defense Project, Stanford University, 2007, 143 p.

(54) “Production and Distribution of Russian Military Armaments (1992-1999)” via http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mo-budget.htm.

(55) “Pyongyang accepts framework for peace talks’, Straits Times, 2002, pp. 21.

(56) Rodriguez, Nestor “The Battle for the Border: Notes on Autonomous Migration, Transnational Communities, and the State,” Social Justice, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 22-25.

(57) Reid, Robert. “Korean peace talks break down,” Associated Press, September 2002, 91 p.

(58) “Russia Doesn’t Plan to Form Military Blocs in the East—Ivanov,” Interfax-AVN, October 31, 2007, pp. 3 – 6.

(59) “Russia, China Step up Cooperation in Space Research,” Interfax-AVN, November 13, 2006, pp. 57-93.

(60) Russia, China blocks UN resolution on Iran” MSNBCT, the Associated Press, Tues., March. 4, 2008, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23463529/

(61) Russia, China oppose Kosovo independence; UN Security Council meets” NEW YORK, United States, Southeast European Times, Feb, 18, 2008, http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2008/02/18/nb-03

(62) “Russian Opinion Poll: China Seen as Partner, Fear of Chinese Expansion,” Interfax, August 15, 2005, cited in Andrew Kuchins, “Russian Perspectives on China: Strategic Ambivalence,” paper prepared for a Center for Naval Analyses Corporation conference on “China-Russia Relations in the 21st Century,” February 22–23, 2007.

(63) Sassen, Saskia. “Beyond Sovereignty: Immigration Policy Making Today,” Social Justice, Vol. 23, No.3, 2006, pp. 6 - 9.

(64) Shimbun, Yomiuri (18 August 1998), as quoted in Zhong Yan, ‘Xin ri-mei fangwei hezuo zhizhen ji xiangguan lifang pingxi’ [‘An analysis of the new “Guideline for Japan–US defense cooperation” and its related legislation’], Riben Xuekan [Japanese Studies], No. 2, 2003, pp. 1–12.

(65) “South Korea, Russia issue joint statement on peninsula issues,” Korea Herald, Spring 2003, pp. 33 – 39.

(66) Smith, Charles R. “Long-range Bombers for Beijing.” NewsMax.com, 26 Jan 2005 via http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/25/141838.shtml.

(67) Smith, Mark. “The Russian Far East: A Chinese Future?” Journal DEFENCE DEVELOPMENT, Defense Academy of United Kindom, Sept. 2007, 204 p.

(68) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. SIPRI Yearbook 2006: Armaments, Disarmaments and International Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 494-495; SIPRI web site; http://www.sipri.org/contents/armstrad/access.html, accessed April 18, 2007: IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies), The Military Balance 2007 (London: Routledge, 2007), pp.380-381. See: “Military Power of the People’s Republic of China”.

(69) “Tibet protests: Russia supports China, UN silent,” TIMEOFMALTA.COM, Tuesday, 18th March 2008, http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20080318/world-news/russia-supports-china-un-silent

(70) The Military Balance, International Institute For Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press, Arundel Street, London, December 2006, pp. 236 -241.

(71) “The Military Power of the People's Republic of China”, Annual Report to Congress 2005. Department of Defense, GlobalSecurity.org via http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/d20050719china.pdf.

(72) “The one-China principle and the Taiwan issue,” Renmin Ribao (People’s Daily), 22 February 2000, pp. 1 - 8.

(73) “Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation”, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, 2000, via http://www.shaps.hawaii.edu/fp/russia/r_c_treaty_20010716.html

(74) Verbitz, Max. “The Arms Trade in Russian-Chinese Relations: How Firm a Foundation?” Presented to the 2001 Hong Kong Convention of International Studies "Globalization and Its Challenges in the 21st Century". Hong Kong, PRC, 26-28 Jul 2001 via http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~robert-donaldson/armstrade.htm.

(75) Weiner, Myron “Security, Stability, and International Migration,” International Security, Vol. 17, No.3, Winter 2007, pp. 102 - 110.

(76) “White paper on China’s national defense” (taken from SWB, FE/3291), originally printed by Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, in English 0339 gmt (27 July 1998), quoted in ‘Quarterly chronicle and documentation (July–September 1998)’, The China Quarterly, No. 156, (December 1998), pp. 1115–1117.

(77) Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton ).

(78) Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, May 16, 2008 via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_revolution

(79) Wikipedia, free encyclopedia via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neorealism .
Wikipedia, free encyclopedia via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Sino-Russian_border_agreement.

(80) Wishnick, Elizabeth, Department of Defense, the USA.“The Military Power of the People's Republic of China”, Annual Report to Congress 2005, GlobalSecurity.org via http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/d20050719china.pdf.

(81) Yu Bin, “China’s Year of Russia and the Gathering Nuclear Storm,” Comparative Connections: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations 8, no.1 (April 2006), pp. 302 - 311.

(82) Yu Bin, “Pragmatism dominate Russia-China Relations,” Global Communication platform, Japanese Institute of Global Communications, March 22, 2006, via GLOCOM Platform - Debates.htm.

(83) Yong, David. “China bids for influence in Central Asia,” Asia Times, STRATFOR.COM, May 17, 2006, pp. 1 - 3 via http://journalism.berkeley.edu/pipermail/chinadn-updates/2005-August.txt.

(84) Zolberg, Aristide. “Introduction: Beyond the Crisis,” in Aristide R. Zolberg and Peter M. Benda, eds., Global Migrants Global Refugees, New York: Berghahn Books, 2006, pp 10-11.

(85) Zhao, Suizheng. “China’s periphery policy and its Asian neighbors”, Security Dialogue 30, September 2004, pp. 313 - 330.

Russian resources

(86) “Азиатские «пираты» стянули с России атомную «рубашку» (Asian "pirates" have pulled together nuclear shirt from Russia), Pravda.ru, 23 May 2008 via http://pravda.ru/news/economics/23-05-2008/268994-0.

(87) Болдиев, Олег, "Россия - Китай: Стратегические Подозрения" (Boldirev, Oleg. “Russia-China: Strategically suspicions,”) http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/life/newsid_3254000/3254962.stm, BBC RUSSIAN.com, Dec. 01, 2003.

(88) Концепция Внешней политики Росской Федерации, одобренная Президентом Владимиром Путином, доступно в июне 2007, “Chronology of Chinese-Russian Bilateral Relations 1999-mid 2002 (The Russian Federation’s Foreign Policy Concept), approved by President Vladimir Putin, June 28, 2006, pp. 9, accessed June 2007, www.1n.mid.ru/ns-osndoc.nsf.

(89) Лукин, Александр. "Россия - Китай: Друзья или враги?" Независимая Газета, (Lukin, Alexander. “Russia – China: Friends or rivals?”), http://www.ng.ru/world/2001-08-03/6_friends.html, “Independent “Newspaper, Vol. 24, Number 263 (4223), Aug. 08, 2006, pp. 1- 13.

(90) Макменко, Константин "Опасно ли торговать с Китаем?",
Библиотека стран Азии, Московский Исследовательский Центр" (Makienko, Konstantin “Is it dangerous to trade with China?”), http://asiapacific.narod.ru/countries/china/arms_trading1.htm , Asian Library, Moscow Research center, 1999, pp. 3-4.

(91) Матвелашвили, Дмитрий. Доклад ИТАР-ТАС "Россия на 2 месте по продаже оружия", The report of ITAR-TASS (RUSSIAN GLOBAL MEDIA)
”Russia on the second place in the world on sales of the weapon”, http://www.rb.ru/topstory/business/2007/07/18/105706.html, Matvelashvili, Dmitry, 18.07.2007.

(92) "Новый уровень отношений между Россией и Китаем", Москва, РИА Новости, (“Russia, China takes relations to new level,”) http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050803/41081967.html, Moscow, RIA Novosti, Aug. 3, 2005.

(93) “О списке потенциальных угроз Родайонова по-разному сообщают в ведущих газетах. Китай - среди тех стран, перечисленных в сообщении, напечатанном в "Ежедневном Комерсанте" (Rodionov’s list of potential threats is variously reported in the leading newspapers. China is among those countries listed in the report printed in Kommersant-Daily), December 26, 1996, pp. 1.

(94) Печорин, Александр. “Китайцы на Росскийском Дальнем Востоке: от "угрозы" до содействующего фактора для "стабильного развития экономики Дальнего Востока” (“Chinese in the Russian Far East: From a Threat to a Contributory Factor of the Stable Development of the Economics of the Far East”). By Pechorin, Alexandr, via http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/coe21/publish/no6/yin1.pdf.

(95) "Росский взгляд о Китае и Российско-Китвйских отношениях", Восточная Азия: Международный Ежеквартальник (“Russia's image of China and Russian-Chinese relations”),
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/comsite5/bin/pdinventory.pl?pdlanding=1&referid=2930&purchase, East Asia: An International Quarterly, 22-MAR-2005.

(96) "Российско-Китайские отношения: на правильном пути", Москва, РИА Новости, (“Russian-Chinese relations: on right track”) http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20060911/53751975.html , Moscow, RIA Novosti (Russian News & Information Agency), Sept. 11, 2006.

(97) "Хронология Китайско-Русских двусторонних отношений 1999 - середина 2002", Московский Государственный Университет (“Chronology of Chinese-Russian Bilateral Relations 1999-mid 2002”), Publication by “Pasific Affairs,” http://goliath.ecnext.com/comsite5/bin/pdinventory.pl?pdlanding=1&referid=2750&item_id=0199-4646892 , Moscow State University, 26 Aug., 2005.

(98) “Что происходит с китайской экспансией в России?” Ежедневный Народный Обозреватель (“What Is Going On With the Chinese Expansion Into Russia?” Demoscop Weekly), Number 161-162, 7-20 Jun 2006, pp. 1, http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2004/0161/lisa01.php .

Chinese resourses

(99) 《中華人民共和國和俄羅斯聯邦聯合聲明,》新华网, 北京, 2006年3月21日 ("The People's Republic of China And Russian federation Joint statement"), New Huanet, Beijing, on March 21, 2006 via http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/pjfh/1161092.htm.

(100) 濱海邊疆區 (Primorskiy border area), from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia via http://baike.baidu.com/view/200676.htm.

(101) “未來誰是中國最可怕的敵人” - 社會雜談[深水區- 鐵血雜談論壇, (”Who will be the Chinese most fearful enemy in future?” – Society chat [ deep water’s district ] – “The blood and iron chat forum”); BBS.TIEXUE.NET, 16 April, 2007 via http://bbs.tiexue.net/post2_1934633_1.html

(102) 俄刊文章: “俄羅斯人怎麼看中國移民”, 新華網, 責任編輯:趙艷萍, 2005年09月27日(Russia publication article: “How does the Russian look at the Chinese immigrants”, New China net, chief-editor: Zhao Yanping), 5 Sept 2006 via http://world.people.com.cn/BIG5/3729679.html.

(103) 俄刊文章: “俄羅斯人怎麼看中國移民”, 新華網, 責任編輯:趙艷萍, 2005年09月27日(Russia publication article: “How does the Russian look at the Chinese immigrants”, New China net, chief-editor: Zhao Yanping), 5 Sept 2006 via http://world.people.com.cn/BIG5/3729679.html.

(104) 哈巴羅夫斯克邊疆區, (Khabarovsk border area), from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia via http://baike.baidu.com/view/200767.htm.

(105) 中蘇珍寶島事件圖片回放 , (“The Sino-Soviet Zhenbao Island event pictures’s chart article”), Muzi.com, July 23, 2007 via http://club.6park.com/military/messages/gvk21964.html.

(106) 中國不必擔心印度俄羅斯軍備合作- 《海事大觀》論壇 (“China needs to worry the Indian Russia armament cooperation” - the "Maritime affair Big View" forum), Feb. 2, 2007, http://club.qikan.com/AddPost.aspx?PostID=1746&Quote=True.

(107) 濱海邊疆區 (Primorskiy border area), from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia via http://baike.baidu.com/view/200676.htm.

(108) 中華人民共和國外交部, “中国和平发展道路” 新华网 (People's Republic of China Ministry of Foreign Affairs: China and Peaceful development,” Xinhua.net), 24 Aug., 2006 via http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/wjdt/wjzc/t24780.htm.

(109) ”我們還要買多少俄羅斯武器” - 陸軍論壇- 鐵血軍事論壇- 鐵血社區, (“How many Russian weapon must we buy?”) - “Army forum- blood and iron military forum” - “Blood and iron community,” BBS.TIEXUE.NET, 5 Nov, 2006, p. 3 via http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_1595337_1.html.

(110) 王義桅:”中國,美國外交"始發站," 责任: 殷楠, 中国网, (Wang Yiwei: " China, the American diplomacy "initial stands" chief-editor: Yin Nan, Zhongguo.net), Oct. 12, 2007, http://www.china.com.cn/review/txt/2007-10/12/content_9039111.htm

(111) 俄羅斯與中國政策剖析, 新华网, (“Russian and the Chinese policy analysis,” Xinhua.net), May 2, 2005, http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/2/5/n805094.htm.

(112) 軍事第一播報-->全面曝光中國軍隊先進武器進口內幕, 淘宝网,北京, (“The military broadcasts newspaper -- comprehensively to expose the Chinese army advanced weapon import’s inside story!”), Taobao.com, Beijing, 27 March 2007 via http://cq.netsh.com/bbs/754480/html/tree_19948209.html.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code