Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0807107-180646 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0807107-180646
論文名稱
Title
提昇自動化控制器材通路商經營績效之研究
A study of enhancing the operational performance for automated control equipment distributors
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
88
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-09
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-08-07
關鍵字
Keywords
夥伴關係、再中間化、供應鏈管理
Partnership, Reintermediary, Supply chain management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5742 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5742 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
自動化控制,是結合機械、電機、電子、資訊等領域而發展出來的新興科技。綜觀台灣各產業無論是傳統製造業或新興高科技產業,從生產製造所必需的廠房、設備、生產器具以至管理經營等各方面之價值鏈中,無不需要自動化之應用。國科會報告中更指出自動化是支援各類產業發展極重要的通用性基盤技術之一,由此可看出自動化控制對產業發展具有相當大之影響力。然而,在該產業中,隨著經濟體系國際化與自由化,國內製造產業加速朝向高附加價值化方向發展之同時,傳統通路商因為受到工業品之標準化產出以及商業資訊透明化快速發展之影響,使其面臨相當大之威脅:上游供應來源由國內、外少數幾家大廠所掌控,而通路商對下游顧客而言,亦不具有獨特性,故在上下游廠商之兩方拉力下,通路商所能賺取之利潤逐漸被剝削,面臨「去中間化」之命運,更難以言論如何維持其競爭優勢能力,各家自動化控制器材通路商陷入一片紅海廝殺,彼此僅能藉由削價競爭來爭取下游顧客訂單。針對自動化控制器材通路商所面臨之困境,本研究將從供應鏈全方位的角度,探討提升自動化控制器材通路商經營績效之方法。

為探討自動化控制器材之通路商,在面臨如此激烈之競爭環境中,如何利用供應鏈管理來維持供應鏈的產銷秩序、建立供應鏈成員間之合作夥伴關係,甚至進一步地了解,在這樣的產銷秩序下,如何同步地提升自動化控制器材通路商的經營績效,本研究利用訪談法,以三家上游製造商、一家具規模之通路商以及三家下游客戶為樣本,透過個案公司之訪談稿,輔以國內相關文獻,歸納出重建自動化控制器材之產銷秩序、成員分工合作之關鍵因素。

  本研究發現,資訊科技與通訊科技的進步,讓上游製造商得以部分取代自動化控制器材通路商地位,再者,製造商與通路商在經營上的目標相同,需求卻相對立,造成兩方相互競爭的局面。其中,「無法信任彼此」與「產銷秩序不合諧」是造成供應鏈成員作惡性價格競爭之主要原因。面對這樣的局面,自動化控制器材通路商的「再中間化」策略需提升服務與專業能力,並與下游客戶建立信任關係。透過信任的合作關係,通路商不僅可提高與上游製造商的差異,也可減少產銷秩序失衡的可能性,最後透過顧客的滿意與回饋,更可累積深厚的顧客知識,增加本身的附加價值。對製造商而言,將在地服務交由各地自動化控制器材通路商,自己專注於研發製造與品牌經營的核心能力,將可達到更有效率的資源配置。換言之,整體供應鏈在這樣一個產銷秩序下運作,將可同時提高自動化控制器材通路商以及其他供應鏈成員的經營績效,增加彼此合作互惠的機會。
Abstract
Automation control is a new technology developed from a combination of mechanical, electrical, electronic and information. In Taiwan, regardless of the traditional manufacturing industries or the emerging high-technology industries, warehouses, equipments, production equipments required in the manufacturing aspects of value chain business are with the automation applications. However, in the industry, along with the internationalization and liberalization of the economy and the domestic manufacturing industry accelerating towards high value-added development, traditional distributors face considerable threats because of rapid development effect of the standardization of industrial products and more transparency of business information. The treats are: upstream supply sources are in the control of handful large domestic and foreign factories; the distributors are not unique to the downstream customers. Targeting at the hardship faced by the automated control equipment distributors, this study shall explore, from all angles of supply chain, ways in enhancing the operational performance of the automated control equipment distributors.
To explore how the automated control equipment distributors, in the face of such severe competitive, use supply chain management to maintain the supply chain marketing order, establish partnership between the supply chain members, further understand that under this marketing order, how the operational performance of the automated control equipment distributors is improved. Through the interview records of the case companies, supplemented by the related domestic reference, the study sums up the constructive marketing order of automated control equipment and key factors of division of labor.
The results of the three studies are presented as follows:
1. The information technology and communications technology advancement have enabled the upstream manufacturer to replace part of the automated control equipment distributors.
2.“Not to trust each other” and “Not in harmonic marketing order” are the main reasons of vicious price competition of the distributors. Therefore, the distributors should pay attention to “Reintermediary” by enhancing the differences with the upstream manufacturers and reducing the possibility of unbalance in production order.
3. Through the customers’ satisfaction and feedback, they can accumulate customer knowledge and also increase the added value of themselves.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 1
第三節 研究目的 2
第四節 研究流程 3
第五節 研究範圍與限制 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 行銷通路與類型 5
第二節 通路商成員功能 7
第三節 工業材料與通路功能 8
第四節 供應鏈管理 9
第五節 夥伴關係 20
第六節 經營績效 27
第七節 顧客關係管理 31
第三章 自動化控制器材產業現況 32
第一節 產業定義 32
第二節 產業概況 32
第三節 詢價、報價模式 41
第四節 自動化控制器材通路模式 42
第四章 研究設計 44
第一節 研究架構 44
第二節 通路商經營績效研究之初步成長模式 44
第三節 研究方法 46
第四節 研究對象 47
第五節 研究工具 48
第六節 資料分析 49
第五章 自動化控制器材通路商之經營績效 50
第一節 通路商之供應鏈管理與績效指標 50
第二節 上游製造商之供應鏈夥伴關係管理 51
第三節 下游客戶之服務需求與滿意度 55
第四節 自動化控制器材通路商績效指標 59
第六章 結論與建議 61
第一節 結論與建議 61
第二節 管理意涵 66
第三節 後續研究方向建議 68
參考文獻 69
附錄 訪談問題大綱 73
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
1.ARC遠擎管理顧問公司編,1999,整合策略、科技與流 程執行-電子化顧客關係管理,電子化企業經理人報告。
2.方至民,2000,企業競爭優勢,台北:前程企業管理有限公司。
3.司徒達賢,2001,策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司
4.伍孟純,2001,高科技產業廠商經營績效關鍵成功因素之研究,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
5.江淑娟,1999,通路夥伴關係整合模型之研究-以中小企業為實證,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文。
6.吳金柱,2002,工業材料通路商供應鏈管理系統之規劃-以華立企業為例,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。
7.呂德宗,2001,通訊通路商選擇通路經營型態之比較分析--以個案公司為例,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。
8.李蕙如,2001,以代理理論與通路配合度探討製造商與通路商的關係,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
9.法蘭西斯.福山,1994,信任-社會德行與繁榮的創造,台北:立序出版社。
10.邱宏裕,2003,我國電線電纜業經營策略之研究-以個案公司為例,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士在職專班論文。
11.金岡善次郎,2005,瞭解供應鏈管理-提升現金流量的經營方法,台北:向上出版事業有限公司。
12.紀秋煌,通路控制力、通路類型與通路績效之研究—以兩岸台商工具機業供應鏈為研究對象,中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。
13.黃俊英,2003,行銷管理:策略性的觀點,三版,台北市:華泰文化事業公司。
14.經濟部工業局,2005,自動化技術服務業者交流會。
15.葉怡君,2002,製造商與通路商資訊分享動機配適度對其資訊流要素及製造商彈性績效之影響,東吳大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
16.劉素珍,進入策略、產業網路發展與經營績效關係之研究-以赴大陸投資被動元件產業之台商為研究對象,中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。
17.盧希鵬,2004,電子商務,初版,台北:雙葉書廊。
18.龔高輝,2002,運用供應鏈管理系統機制提昇國內代工型態資訊產業競爭優勢之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。
二、英文部份
1.Armistead, R. & Nanny, C. 1992. Customer service and support (1st ed.). London: Guildford and King’s Lynn.
2.Beamon, B.M. 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. Inter-national Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(2): 54-60.
3.Bidault, F., Despres, C. and Butler, C. 1998. The drivers of cooperation between buyers and suppliers for product innovation. Research Policy, 26: 719-732.
4.Bowersox, D. J. & Closs, D. J. 1996. Logistic management : The integrated supply chain process. New York: McGraw Hill.
5.Bucklin, L. P. 1996. A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure. Berkeley, CA: IBER Special Publications.
6.Christopher, M. & Juttner, U. 2000. Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6: 117-127.
7.Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. 2000. Complementary, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1-21.
8.Clark, K.B. & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto Industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press,
9.Cooper, D. R., Emory, C. & William, R. D. 1995. Business research methods. NJ: Irwin.
10.Cooper, M.C., Lamber,D.M., & Pagh, J.D. 1997. Supply chain management more than a new name for logistics. The Internal Journal of Logistics Management, 1-14.
11.Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. 1998. Supply chain management: implementation issue & research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2): 1-19.
12.Cackowski, D., Najdawi, M. K. & Chung, Q. B. 2000. Object analysis in organizational design: A solution for matrix organizations. Project Management Journal, 31(3): 44-51.
13.David. T. 1993. Effective supply chain management. Sloan Management Review, 34(4): 35-45.
14.Fernie, J. 1995. International comparisons of supply chain management in grocery retailing. The Service Industries Journal, 15(4): 134-147.
15.Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-642.
16.Hertenstein, J. H. 2000. Performance measures and management control in new product development. Accounting Horizons, 14(3): 303-324.
17.Kalakota, R. & Robinson, M. 1999. E-Business: Roadmap for success (1st ed.). NJ: Mary T. O’Brien.
18.Kaufman, A., Wood, C. H. & Theyel, G. 2000. Collaboration and technology linkage : A strategic supplier typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(7): 649-663.
19.Kolter, P. 1994. Marketing management: analysis, planning implementing, control (10th ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
20.Lusch, R.F. & Brown, J.R. 1996. Interdependency, contracting and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60: 19-38.
21.Makino, S. & Beamish, P.W. 1999. Matching strategy with ownership structure in Japanese joint ventures. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4): 17-28.
22.Maloni & Benton. 1997. Supply chain partnerships: Opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3): 419-429.
23.Mohr, J. & Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes, communication behavior and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15:135-152.
24.Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes, communication behavior and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15:135-152.
25.O’Keeffe, M. 1998. Establishing supply chain partnerships: Lessons from Australian agribusiness. Supply Chain Management, 3(1):5-9.
26.Pelton, Strutton & Lumpkin 1997. Channels-A Relationship Management Approach, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Press.
27.Pérez, P.M. and Sánchez, A.M. 2001. Supplier relations and flexibility in Spanish automotive industry. Supply Chain Management, 6(1): 29-38.
28.Sebright, A.M., Levinthal, D.A., & Fichman, M. 1992. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of inter-organizational partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 122-160.
29.Simch-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Smith-Levi, E. 2004. Management the supply chain. NJ: McGraw-Hill.
30.Simch-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Smith-Levi, E. 2001. Designing & managing the supply chain: Concept, strategies and cases. NJ: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
31.Stank, T. P., Daugherty, P. J. and Autry, C. W. 1999. Collaborative planning: Supporting automatic replenishment programs. Supply Chain Management, 4(2): 75-83.
32.Steensma, H.K. and Corley, K.G. 2000. On the performance of technology- sourcing partnerships:The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1045- 1067.
33.Stern, L.W., & E1-Ansary, A.I. 1996. Marketing Channels. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
34.Takeishi, A. 2001. Bridging inter- and inter-firm boundaries:Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 403-433.
35.Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
36.Whybark, D. C., & Willian, J.G. 1976. Material requirement planning under uncertainty. Decision Science, 7(4): 595-606.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.128.200.216
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.128.200.216
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code