由於現代人渴望住在綠園道及公園綠地的附近，造成都市綠地面積減少及叢林化現象，其中伴隨著著人類所造成的環境污染，公園綠地開始無法滿足人們的需求，不僅讓都市當中的綠地空間逐漸減少，且生活品質也逐年下降。因此，現今運用有限土地資源設置廢棄物掩埋場為土地資源暫時使用觀念及重建土地資源永續有效利用。而廢棄物掩埋場封閉復育，應妥善做好二次污染危害及植生綠化，來降低周圍環境的污染，並扭轉民眾對廢棄物衛生掩埋場完全祇有負面觀感。植生復育以運用科學及人為技術使封閉後之掩埋場盡速恢復開發前之生態環境，植物選擇應以本地或原生植物為原則，並具固土護坡及生態保育功能，將封閉之掩埋場復育成符合自然生態林相。本研究先前針對環境基本資料調查及完善規劃設計，可使封閉之廢棄物掩埋場成為良好的休閒遊憩場所，選擇以實場案例來探討廢棄物掩埋場封閉復育相關工程內容，其主要探討的復育工程主要包括：整地工程、阻水設施工程、集排水設施及植生綠化工程等內容，其中，針對復育後掩埋場進行環境品質監測，由此結果可知，場址於封場復育期間噪音與振動值皆低於管制標準值(人體可感受閥值<55 dB)，因此對於封場復育期間噪音與振動亦符合管制之標準。而針對不同監測點位地下水之重金屬濃度皆為未檢出，此外封場復育期間A2(下風處)空氣中總懸浮微粒濃度雖略高於A1(上風處)，但仍符合空氣品質標準(TSP<205 μg/m3)，對於封場復育期間對於周邊環境空氣品質影響乃有限。有鑑於此，本研究針對廢棄物掩埋場植生綠化復育具有改善景觀及降低二次污染之可行性。本研究另針對掩埋場封場後土地再利用的成效影響因素，及國內外再利用成功案例分析不同再利用型態的成功關鍵。不論是衛生掩埋場發展成環保公園、並利用沼氣發電、或鋪設太陽能光電板，或者是掩埋場全資源回收再利用暨土地活化，都是台灣關心環保的產官學界擘劃出的掩埋場重新活化的新方向，並重新去檢視過去以掩埋方式處理垃圾或廢棄物所產生的環境問題，及目前和未來要如何去解決和面對它們，才能留給下一個世代美麗清淨的空間。

Due to human is eager to live near green lands and green parks, resulting in urban green area reduction and jungle phenomenon, which accompanied environmental pollution caused by human, the green lands and green parks are gradually unable to meet human’s needs. With the decreasing urban green lands, the quality of life has declined year by year. Therefore, waste landfill construction is temporary use for land resources, and then it can be reconstructed for sustainable use. When the waste landfill ends the operation and starts restoration, in order to lower the pollution to the surroundings, and to reverse the negative perception for waste landfill, the plant greening process and secondary pollution control should be done properly. To make the closed waste landfill site restore to its original ecosystem, the application of science and technology for plantation is important. When plantation, the principle is to choose local or origin plant, which can also be slope protection and ecological conservation, to meet the natural ecological forest phase. In this study, the investigation and design of the basic environmental data have made the closed waste landfill a good recreational space. We choose real cases to discuss the related restoration engineering, including: land preparation engineering, water blocking facilities engineering, drainage facilities and plant greening engineering, etc. After the restoration, we have the environmental quality monitoring. The results show that the noise and vibration values are lower than the control standard value (the human body can tolerate the threshold value <55 dB) during the restoration period, so the noise and vibration values are also in line with regulatory standards. And the concentration of heavy metals in groundwater for different monitoring sites is not detected. In addition, the concentration of total suspended particulates in A2 (leeward) is slightly higher than that in A1 (windward), but still meet the air quality standard TSP <205 μg / m3), and the impact on the ambient air quality during the restoration period is limited. In view of this, this study is focus on the closed waste landfill greening and reforestation, which has the feasibility of improving the landscape and reducing the secondary pollution. This study is also aimed at discussing the influencing factors of land reuse after landfill closure and analyzing point for different successful re-use cases in domestic and foreign countries. No matter closed waste landfill is developed into an environmental park, biogas power generation, solar photovoltaic panels, or the old waste landfill reclamation and recycling and land activation, they are Taiwan’s environmental protection industry for the renew way for closed waste landfill. Reviewing the environmental problem caused by the old waste landfill, and to face and solve the current problem, then we can leave a beautiful clean earth to our next generation.

論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
第一章 前言 1
1.1研究緣起 1
1.2研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
2.1 廢棄物的特性與減積過程 3
2.2廢棄物之處理方法 5
2.3廢棄物掩埋場之空間概況 7
2.4國內廢棄物處理之設施概況 10
2.4.1廢棄物處理量與設施概況 10
2.4.2廢棄物處理量現況 13
2.5廢棄物掩埋場設置之需求性、合理性及必要性 14
2.6掩埋場之種類及設置規範 17
2.6.1掩埋場之種類 17
2.6.2掩埋場之設置規範 23
2.7廢棄物處理流程 26
第三章 研究方法 36
3.1研究架構 36
3.2掩埋場封場工程規劃及景觀復育研究 37
3.2.1封場工程規劃探討 38
3.2.2景觀生態復育研究 40
3.3掩埋場土地再利用 42
3.3.1廢棄物掩埋場土地再利用原則 42
3.3.2土地再利用探討 46
3.4環境監測分析方法 48
第四章 結果與討論 52
4.1封場復育工程之營運及規劃 52
4.1.1場址基本資料 52
4.1.2 掩埋場復育工程之設計 53
4.1.3掩埋場復育工程之施作 70
4.1.4成本效益評估 74
4.2掩埋場及擋土牆沉陷、位移監測分析 79
4.3掩埋場復育之監測結果分析 84
4.3.1噪音及振動 85
4.3.2空氣品質 85
4.3.3地下水 87
4.3.4地面水體 89
4.3.5土壤分析 91
4.4掩埋場再利用成效影響因素 92
4-5封閉掩埋場再利用案例分析 94
第五章 結論與建議 113
5.1結論 113
5.2建議 114
參考文獻 116

Agovino, M., Ferrara, M., and Garofalo, A. (2016). “An exploratory analysis on waste management in Italy: A focus on waste disposed in landfill”, Land Use Policy, 57, 669-681.
Amritha, P.K. and Anilkumar, P.P. (2016). “Development of Landscaped Landfills Using Organic Waste for Sustainable Urban Waste Management”, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 368-376.
Asefi, H. and Lim, S. (2017). “A novel multi-dimensional modeling approach to integrated municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production”, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.061
Beylot, A., Villeneuve, J., and Bellenfant, G. (2013). “Life Cycle Assessment of landfill biogas management: sensitivity to diffuse and combustion air emissions”, Waste management, 33(2), 401-411.
Danthurebandara, M., Van Passel, S., Vanderreydt, I. and Van Acker, K., (2015). “Assessment of environmental and economic feasibility of Enhanced Landfill Mining”, Waste Management, 45, 434-447.
Gao, W., Xu, W., Bian, X. and Chen, Y. (2017). “A practical approach for calculating the settlement and storage capacity of landfills based on the space and time discretization of the landfilling process”, Waste Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.048
Ghosh, P. and Thakur, I.S. (2017). “An integrated approach to study the risk from landfill soil of Delhi: Chemical analyses, in vitro assays and human risk assessment”, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 143, 120-128.
Gupta, N., Yadav, K.K. and Kumar, V. (2015). “A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India”, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 37, 206-217.
Henneberger, R., Chiri, E., Bodelier, P. E., Frenzel, P., Lüke, C. and Schroth, M. H. (2015). “Field‐scale tracking of active methane‐oxidizing communities in a landfill cover soil reveals spatial and seasonal variability”, Environmental microbiology, 17(5), 1721-1737.
Hettiaratchi, P., Jayasinghe, P., H Tay, J. and Yadav, S. (2015). “Recent advances of biomass waste to gas using landfill bioreactor technology-a review”, Current Organic Chemistry, 19(5), 413-422.
Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M.A., Rooker, A.P., Baun, A., Ledin, A. and Christensen, T.H., (2002). “Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review”, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 297-336.
Lee, U., Han, J. and Wang, M. (2017). “Evaluation of landfill gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills for the life-cycle analysis of waste-to-energy pathways”, Journal of Cleaner Production, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.016
Majdinasab, A. and Yuan, Q. (2017). “Performance of the biotic systems for reducing methane emissions from landfill sites: A review”, Ecological Engineering, 104, 116-130.
Mor, S., Ravindra, K., Dahiya, R.P. and Chandra, A., (2006). “Leachate characterization and assessment of groundwater pollution near municipal solid waste landfill site”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118, 435-456.
Mora, J.C., Baeza, A., Robles, B. and Sanz, J., (2016). “Assessment for the management of NORM wastes in conventional hazardous and nonhazardous waste landfills”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 310, 161-169.
Niskanen, A., Värri, H., Havukainen, J., Uusitalo, V. and Horttanainen, M. (2013). “Enhancing landfill gas recovery”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 67-71.
Öncel, M.S., Bektaş, N., Bayar, S., Engin, G., Çalışkan, Y., Salar, L. and Yetiş, Ü. (2017). “Hazardous wastes and waste generation factors for plastic products manufacturing industries in Turkey”, Sustainable Environment Research, 27, 188-194.
Pecorini, I., Baldi, F., Bacchi, D., Carnevale, E.A. and Corti, A. (2017). “Leaching behaviour of hazardous waste under the impact of different ambient conditions”, Waste Management, 63, 96-106.
Renou, S., Givaudan, J.G., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F. and Moulin, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150, 468-493.
Rong, L., Zhang, C., Jin, D. and Dai, Z. (2017). “Assessment of the potential utilization of municipal solid waste from a closed irregular landfill”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 413-419.
Scarlat, N., Motola, V., Dallemand, J.F., Monforti-Ferrario, F. and Mofor, L. (2015). “Evaluation of energy potential of municipal solid waste from African urban areas”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1269-1286.
Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G. and Trivedi, R.C. (2008). “Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities-A review”, Waste Management, 28, 459-467.
Slack, R.J., Gronow, J.R. and Voulvoulis, N. (2005). “Household hazardous waste in municipal landfills: contaminants in leachate”, Science of the Total Environment, 337, 119-137.
Turner, D.A., Beaven, R.P. and Woodman, N.D. (2017). “Evaluating landfill aftercare strategies: A life cycle assessment approach”, Waste Management, 63, 417-431.
Weng, Y.C., Fujiwara, T., Houng, H.J., Sun, C.H., Li, W.Y. and Kuo, Y.W. (2015). “Management of landfill reclamation with regard to biodiversity preservation, global warming mitigation and landfill mining: experiences from the Asia-Pacific region”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 364-373.
大寧股份有限公司乙級廢棄物處理場同意設置文件申請計畫書(定稿本)，105年2月。
可寧衛企業股份有限公司乙級廢棄物處理機構處理許可證申請書(定稿本)，99年9月。
行政院環保署事業廢棄物最終處置資訊網，http://fdiw.epa.gov.tw/np.aspx
行政院環境保護署，(2017)，https://www.epa.gov.tw/
行政院環境保護署，「環境白皮書」，105年版。
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物申報及管理資訊系統，(2017) 「廢棄物清理法」，106年06月14日修正。
行政院環境保護署環境資源資料庫，https://erdb.epa.gov.tw/ERDBIndex.aspx
林健三、林健榮，(2016)，「固體廢棄物處理」，高立出版有限公司出版。
高雄市議會，「正視事業廢棄物處理處置的問題」公聽會，105年6月4日。
鄭顯榮，(2007)，「環境設施-規劃設計與操作管理(二版)」，高立出版有限公司出版。
環境保護人員訓練所，(2017)，「廢棄物處理專業技術人員(甲級)教材第11冊-廢棄物最終處置技術」。