Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0809102-101216 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0809102-101216
論文名稱
Title
員工對組織文化及組織學習的認知對其抗拒變革的態度之影響
The Influence of Employee’s Perception to Organizational Culture and Organizational Learning on their ttitudes of Resistance to Change
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
74
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2002-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2002-08-09
關鍵字
Keywords
組織文化、組織學習、抗拒變革
Organizational Culture, Resistance to Change, Organizational learning
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5697 次,被下載 7041
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5697 times, has been downloaded 7041 times.
中文摘要
當今由於全球化、顧客需求、技術創新、以及資訊取得之便利,組織變革已成為一個必然的趨勢,企業為了維持其高度競爭力及各種優勢,無不善用各種管理技術來改善作業流程、重新設計制度,以期自身立於不敗之地。經由文獻回顧,發現國內關於組織文化及組織學習對組織變革的影響相關文獻較少,本研究擬藉由實證研究了解企業員工對組織文化及組織學習的認知是否對組織變革有所影響。本研究透過四家企業共發放問卷400份,回收178份,有效問卷共103份,首先運用因素分析檢定量表的建構效度及Cronbach alpha值檢定量表信度,確定量表的信度及效度後,再運用變異數分析及複迴歸分析得到以下結論:

一、員工對組織文化的認知對抗拒變革的態度具有顯著性正向影響。
1. 員工對組織文化卓越創新認知的程度愈高,則抗拒變革的程度愈低,即
在「主觀接受」面程度愈高。
2. 員工對組織文化顧客取向認知的程度愈高,則抗拒變革的程度愈低,即
在「主觀接受」面程度愈高。
3. 員工對組織文化卓越創新認知的程度愈高,則抗拒變革的程度愈低,即
在「客觀認知」面程度愈高。
4. 員工對組織文化團隊精神認知的程度愈高,則抗拒變革的程度愈低,
在態度的「客觀認知」面程度愈高。
5. 員工對組織文化顧客取向認知的程度愈高,則抗拒變革的程度愈低,即
在態度「客觀認知」面程度愈高。

二、員工抗拒變革的程度會隨其服務部門的不同而有所差異。
1. 資訊電腦部門及業務行銷部門的員工相對於生產製造部門的員工,抗
拒變革的程度較低,即在態度的「主觀接受」面程度較高。
2. 資訊電腦部門及工程研發部門的員工相對於生產製造部門的員工,抗
拒變革的程度較低,即在態度的「客觀認知」面程度較高。
Abstract
Organizational Change has become a maintrend nowadays, due to the influence of globalization, customer need, technology innovations and the convenience of information acquisition. By reviewing relative literature extensively, it is found that the research on how organizational culture and organizational learning affect organizational change is very seldom, thus this research is intended to aim at this topic finding out if there is any relationship. The questionnaire is distributed to 400 employees from four companies, 178 pcs questionnaire is returned, and 103 pcs complete questionnaire is analysised. After examining the reliability and validy by cronbach alpha and factor analysis, this research do the analysis of variance and multiple regression, and finally finding out the following conclusions,

1. Employee’s perception to organizational culture “innovations” has a sigificant
positive effects on their resistance to change of “subjective acceptance.“
2. Employee’s perception to organizational culture “customer orientation” has a
sigificant positive effects on their resistance to change of “subjective
acceptance.“
3. Employee’s perception to organizational culture “innovations” has a
sigificant positive effects on their resistance to change of “objective identity.“
4. Employee’s perception to organizational culture “teamwork” has a
sigificant positive effects on their resistance to change of “objective identity.“
5. Employee’s perception to organizational culture “customer orientation” has
a sigificant positive effects on their resistance to change of “objective identity.“
6. Compare to employee’s attitude of production and manufacturing dept.,
employee’s attitude of information technology dept. and marketing & sales dept.
show low level resistance to change in “subjective acceptance.“
7. Compare to employee’s attitude of production and manufacturing dept.,
employee’s attitude of information technology dept. and research & development
dept. show low level resistance to change in “objective identity.“
目次 Table of Contents
致謝辭 I
中文摘要 II
English Abstract III
表次 IX
圖次 X
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的及內容 第1頁
第二節 研究流程 第3頁
第三節 論文結構 第4頁
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 組織文化 第5頁
第二節 組織學習 第12頁
第三節 組織變革 第20頁
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構 第32頁
第二節 研究變項之操作型定義及量表引用 第33頁
第三節 研究假設 第38頁
第四節 資料分析方法 第40頁
第四章 研究結果分析
第一節 樣本特性分析 第43頁
第二節 研究量表之信度及效度分析 第45頁
第三節 單因子變異數分析 第51頁
第四節 複迴歸分析 第55頁
第五章 結論及建議
第一節 研究結論 第61頁
第二節 對實務界的建議 第63頁
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議 第64頁
附錄 「員工對組織文化及組織學習認知對其抗拒變革的態度」問卷
參考文獻
個人簡歷

表 次

表1-1-1 管理思潮的演進
表2-1-1 文化理論及組織理論的交集
表2-1-3 表現組織文化的層次
表2-1-4 組織文化價值觀之實證研究
表2-2-1 組織學習定義之比較
表2-2-2 組織學習的類型
表2-2-3 組織學習的程序
表2-2-4 學習導向的組織學習量表
表2-3-1 抗拒變革之成因及策略
表4-1-1 個案公司之問卷發放份數
表4-1-2 研究樣本描述性分析表
表4-2-1 組織文化量表的信度及效度分析
表4-2-2 組織學習量表的信度及效度分析
表4-2-3-a 員工抗拒變革態度量表的信度及效度分析
表4-2-3-b 因素間的相關係數矩陣
表4-2-3-c 員工面對組織變革態度量表的二階因素分析
表4-2-4 研究量表之信度係數彙整表
表4-3-1 員工個人變項對於其面對組織變革態度「主觀接受」構面差異分析
表4-3-2 員工個人變項對於其面對組織變革態度「客觀認知」構面差異分析
表4-4-1-a 員工對組織文化及組織學習的認知及員工個人變項對其抗拒變革的態度「主觀接受」構面的複迴歸分析
表4-4-1-b 員工對組織文化及組織學習的認知及員工個人變項對其抗拒變革的態度「客觀認知」構面的複迴歸分析

圖 次

圖1-2-1 研究流程圖
圖2-1-3 文化由淺至深的層次顯現
圖3-1-1 研究架構
圖3-3-1 研究架構中的假設關係
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
鄭伯壎,「組織文化價值觀的數量衡鑑」,中華心理月刊,民七十九,卷32,第31-49頁。

任金剛,「組織文化、組織人力資源氣候、及員工效能:一項微觀的探討」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民八十五年。

林義屏,「市場導向、組織學習、組織創新、與組織績效關係之研究—以科學園區資訊電子產業為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所博士論文,民八十九年。

黃昌宏,「公營事業員工面臨民營化變革態度之研究」,中國行政,民八十四年,第89-114頁。

張峻源,「組織文化、組織承諾與組織變革態度之研究—以中央信託局為例」,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民八十九年。

溫金豐,「人力資源系統構形與組織績效關係之研究: 以高科技廠商為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文,民八十七年。

范維翔,「顧客知識管理、市場導向與行銷績效之關係研究」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文,民九十年。

陳樹,「領導風格與組織文化關聯性之研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民八十七年。

陳惠芳,「組織正當性、組織學習、與組織同形之關係研究—制度理論整合觀點」,
國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民八十七年。

洪昆裕,「知識管理機制與企業創新能力關係之研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民九十年。

林俊欽,「組織環境、結構、文化、學習與核心能力關係之研究—以國內製造業為例」,國立成功大學國際企業研究所博士論文,民八十九年。

方仁華,「制度變革對組織文化與績效的影響—以行政院衛生署所屬醫院為例」,雲林科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民八十九年。

顏中宏,「變革對組織文化價值觀之影響—納貝斯克可口公司個案研究」,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文,民八十七年。

蔡調舜,「中華電信組織變革與員工態度之研究」,國立臺灣科技大學管理技術研究所碩士論文,民八十六年。

伍國雄,鄭燕祥,「教師對學校變革態度之研究」,香港中文大學教育學報,1993,卷21,第1期,第3-14頁。

繆敏志,林少龍,「企業外在環境、組織變項與組織變革策略關係之研究」,亞太管理評論,民八十九,第五卷,第四期,第487-501頁。

二、英文部份
Argris, C. & Schon, D.(1977), Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective, MA.

Arthur Anderson & The American Productivity and Quality Center.(1996), “Konowlege management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version,” Winter

Barney, J. B. (1986), “Organizational Culture: can it be a sustained competitive advantage?” Academy of Management Review,, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.656-665.

Bassi, L. J. and Buren, M. E. V.(1999), “Valuing investments in intellectual capital,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 18, nos. 5/6/7/8, pp.414-432.

Bent, Paauwe & Williams(1999), “Organizational Learning: an exploration of organizational memory and its role in organizational change process,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 377-404.

Blackler, Frank(1995), “Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation,” Organizational Studies, Berlin, vol. 6, iss. 6, pp.159-190.

Boisot, M.(1994), “Information and Organizations,” Harper Collins, London.

Bontis, N(1998), “Intellectual Capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models,” Management Decision, vol. 36, no. 2, pp.63-76.

Bontis, N(1999), “Managing Organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 18, nos. 5/6/7/8, pp.433-462.

Buckley, P. J. & Csrter, M. J.(2000), “Knowledge Management in global technology markets,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, pp. 55-71.

Bukowitz, W. R. and Petrah, G. P.(1997), “ Visualizing, measuring and managing knowledge,” Research Technology Management, July-Aug., pp. 24-31.

Berrio(1999), “Organizational culture and organizational learning in public, non-profit instituations: A profile of Ohio State University Extension,” The Ohio State Uinversity, PhD Disseration.

Dixon, N. M.(1994), The Organizational Learning Cycle. How we can learn collectively, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Deshpande, J. U. R. Farley and F. E. Jr. Webster(1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese firms,” A Quarard Analysis, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, pp.23-37.

Dent & Goldberg (1999), “Challenging Resistance to Change,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 35, no. 1, March, pp. 25-41.

Eisler, Riane(1995), “From domination to partnership: The hidden subtext for organization change,” Training and Development, vol. 49, issue 2, pp. 32-49.

Gardner, Dunham, Cummings, and Pierce, “Employee Focus of Attention and Reactions to Organizational Change,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1987, pp. 351-371.

Garvin, D. A.(1998), “Building a learning organization,” Harvard Business Review, pp.47-80.

Hedberg(1981), “How organizations learn and unlearn,” in Nystrom P. and Starbuck, W.(Eds), Handbook of Organizational Design, vol. 1, Oxford University press, Oxford, pp. 3-27.

Hofstede, Neuijen, Ohayv, and Sanders, “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study across Twenty Cases,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, pp.286-316.

Huber, G.P.(1991), “Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 88-115.

Iacovini, John(1993), “The human side of organizational change,” Training and Development, vol. 47, issue 1, pp. 65-82.

Jones, E. E. & harris, V. A.(1967), “The attribution of attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 1-24.
Janssen, O., de Vries, T., & Cozijnsen, A. J. (1998), “Voicing by adapting and innovating employees: An empirical study on how personality and enviroment interact to affect voice behavior,” Human Relations, vol. 51, pp. 945-966.

Kramlinger(1998), “How to deliver a change message,” Training & Development Journal, vo. 52, issue 4, pp.44-47.

Lawrence, P. R.(1954), “How to deal with resistance to change,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 32(3), pp. 49-57.

Lok & Crawford(1999), “The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Bradford, 1999.

Lebron(2000), “Organizational Culture and continuous quality improvement strategies as interventions for organizational learning in an American Indian non-profit organization,”, California school of professional Psychology- Berkeley/Alameda, PhD Disseration.

Levitt, B and March, J.G.(1988), “Organizational learning,” Annual Review Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319-403.

Lawson, Robert B; Ventriss, Curtis L, (1992), “Organizational Change: The Role of Organizational Culture and Organizational Learning,” The Journal of Psychological Record, spring, vol. 42, issue 2, pp.205-215.

Mills(1997), “A stochastic model of emergent organizational learning: Organizational culture as a distributed self-representation,” , California school of professional Psychology- Berkeley/Alameda, PhD Disseration.

Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C.(1999), “Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change,” Academy of management Journal, vol. 42, pp. 403-419.

Piderit (2000), “Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change,” Academy of Management review, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 783-794.

Senge, P.M.(1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the learning Organization, Doubleday, New York, NY.

Smircich, Linda, “Concepts of Culture and Organization Analysis”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, September, vol. 28, pp. 339-358.

Ulrich Dave, Mary Ann Von Glinow, Todd Jick, “High-impact Learning: Building and diffusing Learning Capability,” Organizational Dynamics, 1993, pp. 52-66
Vince, R & Broussine, M(1996), “Paradox, defense, and atachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change,” Organizational Studies, vol. 17, pp. 1-21.

Warner(2002), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge/Handbook of Organizational Culture, Journal of General Management, vol. 27, issue 2, pp.9-95.

Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R.(1991), “Organizational memory,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57-91.

Whitney(1998), “Let’s change the subject and change our organization: an appreciative inquiry approach to organization change,” Career Development International Journal, vol. 3, issue 7, pp.314-332.

Weidner(1999), “It’s ten o’clock—do you know where your sponsors are? Securing and sustaining sponsorship for organization change,” Organization Development Journal, spring, vol. 17, issue 1, pp.85-102.

Withey, M. J. & Cooper, W. H.(1989), “Predicting exit, voice, loyalty and neglect,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 34, pp. 21-539.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code