Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0809110-110725 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0809110-110725
論文名稱
Title
人力資源部門權力之實證研究
The Empirical Research on HR Departmental Power
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
73
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-05
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-08-09
關鍵字
Keywords
人力資源管理效能、高階主管支持、人力資源管理創新性、人力資源部門權力
HR Departmental Power, Top Management Support (TMS), HR Innovativeness, HR Effectiveness
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5675 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5675 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討人力資源部門在企業內權力大小之影響因子,藉由傳統上組織間權力
議題之文獻探討,試圖歸結出與人力資源部門直接相關之關鍵變項,並以問卷測量法求得
變項間與人力資源部門權力之相關性及因果性。
本研究採方便抽樣方式,針對國內各產業中之代表性企業,以公司為一組問卷單位,
含人力資源主管問卷一份及直線部門主管三份,進行施測,共發放出105 組,回收69 組,
有效問卷為45 組。其中,依變項之「人力部門權力指標」,係由各公司之人力資源部門主
管填答,問項總計10 題,全數為本研究自行開發;自變項之「人力資源管理效能」、「高
階主管支持」與「人力資源管理創新性」等三項,則由各公司之直線部門主管填答,問項
分別為15 題、5 題與5 題,皆採自學界既有之相關問卷變項。
經本研究之實證分析,得三項主要之研究結果如下:
一、人力資源部門之人力資源管理效能越高,則其具有之權力越大。
二、高階主管支持人力資源部門的程度越高,則其具有之權力越大。
三、人力資源部門之創新性程度越高,則其具有之權力越大。
Abstract
This research, based on literature discussion related to issues on intraorganizational power,
aims to discover the critical factors affecting the power of HR department within a firm and
measure their causal relation as well as correlation through questionnaires.
The questionnaires, being sent to any possible representative firms within each industry on
our lists, were distributed in a convenient way. They mainly contain two sets of items, one for
the HR department manager, another three for the line department manager. In the HR manager
one, the questionnaires has 10 questions on HR departmental power index as dependent variable
in our study; in the line manager one, it has 15, 5 and 5 questions on HR effectiveness, Top
Management Support and HR Innovativeness respectively as independent variable.
Based on our findings after statistical analysis, we conclude the followings:
1. As the HR effectiveness increases, the power of HR department does in the same.
2. As the Top Management Support increases, the power of HR department does in the same.
3. As the HR Innovativeness increases, the power of HR department does in the same.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄Ⅰ
表目錄Ⅱ
圖目錄Ⅲ
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景1
第二節 研究動機4
第三節 研究問題與目的5
第四節 研究流程與論文架構6
第二章 文獻回顧與討論7
第一節 HR 部門權力7
第二節 人力資源管理效能21
第三節 高階主管支持29
第四節 人力資源管理創新性31
第三章 研究方法32
第一節 研究架構32
第二節 研究變項之定義與衡量33
第三節 研究工具之設計37
第四節 回收樣本特性38
第五節 研究工具之分析42
第四章 研究結果50
第一節 樣本基本資料敘述50
第二節 各變項之相關性分析51
第三節 各變項對自變項迴歸分析53
第五章 結論與建議56
第一節 實證結果56
第二節 管理意涵57
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議58
參考文獻59
中文部份59
英文部份59
附錄問卷64
附錄一 部門主管問卷64
附錄二 人力資源主管問卷66
參考文獻 References
(一)中文部份
王湧水,2005,《從內部顧客與角色觀點探討人力資源部門效能:一項跨層次分析模式的
    檢驗》,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
何金銘,2006,《SPSS統計應用軟體分析》,高雄:復文出版社。
吳明隆,2006,《SPSS與統計應用分析》,台北:五南出版社。
黃英忠,2003,《人力資源管理》二版,台北:三民出局。
曾百薇,2008,《人力資源部門策略性參與影響因素之研究:中高階與人力資源主管觀
    點》,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
溫金豐,2009,《組織理論與管理》二版,台北:華泰出版社。

(二)英文部分
Astley, W. G. & Sachdeva, P. S. 1984. Structural Sources of Intraorganizational Power : A
Theoretical Synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 9(1): 104 – 113.
Butler, J. E., Ferris, G. R. & Napier, N. K. 1991. Strategy and human resources management.
Cincinnati, OH : South-Western Pub. Co.
Dahl, R. A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3): 201 – 215.
Dessler, G. 2008. Human resource management. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Prentice
Hall.
Drucker, P. 1954. The Practice of Management. New York, NY: Harper.
Emerson, R. M. 1962. Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1):
31 – 41.
Ferris, G. R., Perrewe, P. L., Ranft, A. L., Zinko, R., Stoner, J. S., Brouer, R. L. & Laird, M. D.
2007. Human Resource Reputation and Effectiveness. Human Resource Management
Review, 17(4): 117 – 130.
Ferris, G. R. & Rowland, K. M. 1990. Human resource management : perspectives and issues.
Ronald Buckley, Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Fombrun, C.J. 1984c. The External Context of Human Resource Management. In C. J.
Fombrun, N. M. Tichy & M. A. Devana (Eds.), Strategic Human Resource Management.
New York: Wiley.
Galang, M. C. & Ferris, G. R. 1997. Human Resource Department Power and Influence
Through Symbolic Action. Human Relations, 50(11): 1403 – 1426.
Han, J., Chou, P., Chao, M. & Wright, P. M. 2006. The HR Competenties – HR Effectiveness
Link : A Study in Taiwanese High-Tech Companies. Human Resource Management, 45(3): 391 – 406.
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A, Schneck, R. E. & Pennings, J M. 1971. A Strategic
Contingencie’s Theory of Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly,
16(2): 216 – 229.
Hornsby, J. S. & Kuratko, D. F. 2005. Frontline HR : a handbook for the emerging manager.
Mason, Ohio : Thomson, c2005
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. 1997. Technical and Strategic Human Resource
Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 40(1): 171 – 188.
Kulik, C. T & Perry, E. L. 2008. When Less Is More : The Effectiveness of Devolution on HR’s
Strategic Role and Construed Image. Human Resource Management, 47(3): 541 – 558.
Kearns, P. 2007. HR strategy : business focused, individually centred. Amsterdam ; Boston :
Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003, 2007
Kossek, E. E. 1987. Human Resources Management Innovation. Human Resource
Management, 26(1): 71 – 92.
Lawler, E. E. & Boudreau, J. W. 2009. What Makes HR a Strategic Partner?. Human Resource
Planning, 32(1): 14 – 22.
Lawrence, P. R. 1985a. The HRM Futures colloquium: The Managerial Perspective. In P. R.
Lawrence (Eds.), HRM Trends & Challenges. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lemmergaard, J. 2009. From Administrative Expert to Strategic Partner. Employee Relations,
31(2): 182 – 196.
Lussier, R. N. 2008. Human relations in organizations : applications and skill building. Boston,
MA : McGraw-Hill/Irwin, c2008
March, J. G. 1962. The Business Firm as a Political Coalition. The Journal of Politics, 24(4):
662-678.
Mitsuhashi, H., Park, H. J., Wright, P. M. & Chua, R. S. 2000. Line and HR executives’
perceptions of HR effectiveness in firms in the People’s Republic of China. International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2): 197 – 216.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B. & Wright, P. 2006. Human resource management :
gaining a competitive advantage. New York : McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Petersen, D. J. & Malone, R. L. 1975. The Personnel Effectiveness Grid (PEG) : A New Tool
for Estimating Personnel Department Effectiveness. Human Resource Management,
Winter: 10 – 21.
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in organizations. Cambridge, Mass : Ballinger Pub. Co.
Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with power : politics and influence in organizations. Boston, Mass. :
Harvard Business School Press, c1992
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 2003. The external control of organizations : a resource
dependence perspective. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford Business Books
Ragu-Nathan, B. S., Apigian, C. H., Ragu-Nathan, T. S. & Tu, Q. 2004. A path analytic study
of the effect of top management support for information systems performance. The
International Journal of Management Science, 32 (1): 459, 471.
Saunders, C. S. 1981. Management Information Systems, Communications, and Departmental
Power: An Integrative Model. The Academy of Management Review, 6(3): 431-442.
Seperich, G. J. & McCalley, R. W. 2006. Managing power and people. Armonk, N.Y. : M.E.
Sharpe, Inc.
Som, A. What drives adoption of innovative SHRM practices in Indian organizations?.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(5): 808 – 828.
Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action : social science bases of administrative theory.
New York : McGraw-Hill.
Tsui, A. S. 1984. Personnel Department Effectiveness: A Tripartite Approach. Industrial
Relations, 23(2): 184 – 197.
Tsui, A. S. 1987. Defining the Activities and Effectiveness of the Human Resource Department:
A Multiple Constituency Approach. Human Resource Management, 26(1): 35 – 69.
Tsui, A. S. 1990. A Multiple-Constituency Model of Effectiveness : An Empirical Examination
at the Human Resource Subunit Level. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(5): 458 –
483.
Ulrich, D. 1997. Human resource champions : the next agenda for adding value and delivering
Results. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
Uirich, D. & Brockbank,W. 2009. The HR Business-Partner Model : Past Learnings and Future
Challenges. Human Resource Planning, 32(2): 5 – 7.
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W. & Johnson D. 2009. The Role of Strategy Architect in the Strategic HR
Organization. Human Resource Planning, 32(1): 24 – 31.
Walker, J. W. 1992. Human resource strategy. New York : McGraw-Hill, c1992
Weiss, D. S. 2000. High Performance HR : Leveraging Human Resources for Competitive
Advantage. Etobicoke, Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada Limited.
Welbourne, T. M. & Trevor, C. O. 2000. The Roles of Departmental and Position Power in Job
Evaluation. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 761 – 771.
Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., McCormick, B. & Sherman, W. S. 1998. Strategy, Core
Competence, and HR Involvement as Determinants of HR Effectivenss and Refinery
Performance. Human Resource Management, 37(1): 17-29.
Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., Snell, S. A. & Gerhart, B. 2001. Comparing Line and HR
Executive’s Perceptions of HR Effectiveness : Services, Roles, and Contributions. Human
Resource Management, 40(2): 111 – 123.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.130.31
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.145.130.31
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code