Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0810107-224340 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0810107-224340
論文名稱
Title
台灣企業人力資源功能委外調查研究
Human Resource Outsourcing Survey Report (Taiwan 2007)
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
108
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-08-10
關鍵字
Keywords
人力資源委外、外包商、核心能力
core competency, HR service provider, HR outsourcing
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5687 次,被下載 2419
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5687 times, has been downloaded 2419 times.
中文摘要
論文提要內容:
為因應全球化經濟快速變化與激烈的競爭環境,組織面臨降低成本與改善顧客服務的壓力。生存之道唯有將有限的資源集中於核心業務,並將核心業務以外的價值活動進行委外,致力於維持精簡彈性的組織結構,以降低成本及提高作業效率。因而委外儼然成為近年來企業界的重要趨勢。
本研究參考國內各家之長及佐以國外實務做法將人力資源功能詳細分類,欲藉此對於國內企業採行人力資源功能委外之現況資料加以蒐集,並針對此一分類作更進一步的探討。
本研究藉由敘述性統計及卡方檢定分析,對119家採行委外企業,及100家未採行委外企業進行研究,除企圖瞭解企業選擇了那些人力資源功能委外,也對企業委外的考量因素、企業的規模與行業別和年資與人力資源功能委外的關係、企業在人力資源功能委外過程所遇到的問題、企業選定外包商的標準及企業選擇不將人力資源功能委外的原因,做一合併性的探討。
研究結果發現現今台灣企業人力資源功能委外,仍以招募類及教育訓練類為主體;委外考量除經濟因素外,也加入了核心能力的發展;而企業的規模、成立年資、行業別與人力資源功能委外無明顯關聯;「缺乏足夠有資格可供遴選的外包商」、「不能有效地管理與外包商的關係」是企業在人力資源功能委外過程所遇到的主要問題;「外包商過去的績效與產業經驗」是企業選擇外包商的首要標準,顯示交易成本中的事前成本為企業所重視;「避免營業祕密或重大資訊外洩」及「服務品質難以掌控」,則是企業不願將人力資源功能委外的主因。
Abstract
In order to face the dramatic changes of global economy and survive under highly competitive environment, a lot of companies put efforts to decrease production costs and improve customer service in recent years. Many organizations, which will concentrate on their core business and outsource the others, are trying to create simple and flexible organization structure to lower costs and improve working efficiency. Those show that outsourcing, which more and more organizations pay attention to, has become an important issue in these years.
Based on current human resource function classification both in Taiwan and other countries, we would like to explore and discuss those HR functions which companies in Taiwan tend to outsource now.
We have surveyed 219 companies in Taiwan that included 119 companies which outsourced some HR functions and 100 companies which did not outsource HR functions. The analytical methods, descriptive analyses and Chi-square test, were adopted in this study to help us understand which HR functions those companies choose to outsource. Moreover, we will also discuss what factors they have concerned during the outsourcing decision making, the relationship among company size, industrial field, year of establishment, and HR outsourcing functions, the difficulty they met while HR function outsourcing, outsourcers selection, and the reasons why those companies choose not to outsource HR functions in this study.
The result indicates that most companies tend to outsource their HR functions of recruitment and training. The reasons to outsource those HR functions are mainly on cost-effective concerns and organizational core competence development as well. Besides, no significant result shows on the relationship among company size, year of establishment, industrial field and HR outsourcing functions. The main difficulties which those companies meet are that there are not enough qualified outsourcers to choose and they can not keep a good relationship with those outsourcers. While considering the qualified outsourcers, their experience and performance in the past are the major concern which implies that the transaction cost is the important issue for those companies. The dissatisfied outsourcers’ service and the internal important information protection in the company are the main concerns for those who did not outsource their HR functions.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
第一章 緒 論 …………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機 …………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的 …………………………………………………………4
第三節 研究流程 …………………………………………………………5
第二章 文獻探討 ………………………………………………………6
第一節 人力資源管理概論 ………………………………………………6
第二節 主要委外之相關理論探討 ………………………………………16
第三節 人力資源管理活動的委外 ………………………………………25
第四節 小 結 …………………………………………………………37
第三章 研究方法 ………………………………………………………38
第一節 研究架構 …………………………………………………………38
第二節 問卷設計與內容 …………………………………………………39
第三節 研究對象 …………………………………………………………40
第四節 資料分析與整理方法 ……………………………………………41
第四章 研究結果 ………………………………………………………… 42
第一節 樣本背景資料分析 ……………………………………………… 42
第二節 人力資源管理功能委外項目分析 ……………………………… 42
第三節 人力資源管理功能委外的動機與收穫 …………………………54
第四節 選擇外包商的考慮因素與障礙 …………………………………58
第五節 人力資源管理功能委外的負面結果 ……………………………60
第六節 人力資源管理功能委外後的人力資源部門規模變化 …………61
第七節 企業人力資源委外的發展 ………………………………………62
第八節 企業拒絕HR委外的原因 ………………………………………66
第五章 結論及建議 ………………………………………………………67
第一節 研究結論 …………………………………………………………67
第二節 建 議 …………………………………………………………69
第三節 研究限制 …………………………………………………………71
參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………72
附錄一 問 卷 ……………………………………………………………83
附錄二 HR Functions That are Outsourced completely Partially or not at All ……...90
附錄三 Building HR Competency ………………………………………92
附錄四 A Skills-knowledge-trait Model ………………………………93
附錄五 人力資源管理功能委外情形統計一覽表 ………………………94
附錄六 企業將委外人力資源功能 ………………………………………96
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
毛治國,2003,決策,台北:天下。
成之約、鄭津津,2000,用別人的員工作自己的事業:派遣勞動及其發展與影響,SOHO,37期:76-85。
何永福、楊國安,1993,人力資源策略管理,台北:三民。
何清雅,2006,從組織文化探討人力資源活動外包與人力資源管理角色效能關聯性之研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
李芳齡譯(Ulrich, D., 1997, Human resource champions:the next agenda foradding value and delivering results, Boston:HBS.),2001,人力資源最佳實務,台北:商周。
李漢雄,2000,人力資源策略管理,台北:揚智文化。
李志祥,1999,企業人力資源管理活動外包之研究,國立中興大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。
李田樹 譯 (Davidow, W. H. & Malone, M. S., 1992, The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century, N.Y.:Harper Collins Publishers) ,1995,虛擬企業:歐美先進企業的重要教訓,台北:長河。
杜雯蓉 譯(Corbett, M. F., 2004, The Outsourcing Revolution, USA.),2006,委外革命:全世界都是你的生產力! !,台北:經濟新潮。
林淑惠,2002,夥伴關係、資訊分享、制度化與人力資源管理對教育訓練委外績效之探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林東清,2005,資訊管理:e化企業的核心競爭能力,台北:智勝。
邱志聖,2006,策略行銷分析-架構與實務應用,第二版,台北:智勝。
吳秉恩, 1999,分享式人力資源管理:理念、程序與實務,台北:翰蘆圖書。
金傳蓬,2003,知識特性與社會特性對於人力資源活動外製程度之影響,國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版之博士論文。
吳思華,1998,策略九說:策略思考的本質,台北:臉譜文化。
吳瓊恩,2002, 知識工作者的崛起與組織的知識基礎理論, 中國行政評論, 13(3):1-20.
高正興,2003,企業「財務長」外包的理論基礎及情境分析,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
徐聯恩 譯 (Lazear, E. P., 1998, Personal economics for managers, New Jersey: John Wiley.),2001,人力資源管理II:人力資源管理經濟分析,台北:五南。
唐慧文 譯,(Alan Simmonds & David Gilmour著),2005,管理委外合約的七大步驟 ,取自 http://taiwan.cnet.com/enterprise/topic/0,2000062938,20103250,00.htm
許妙穗,2001,我國人力派遣制度安排之探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
莊正民、方世杰,2001,企業跨國技術引進模式、影響因素與學習績效關係之研究-交易成本與知識基礎理論之觀點,管理評論,20(1):35-64.
陳吟旭,1999,台灣大型企業教育訓練外包之研究,國立中正大學勞工研究所出版之碩士論文。
陳麗琇,2003,高科技產業教育訓練功能委外之研究~以新竹科學園區為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳郁雯,2000,「外包」,再造競爭優勢,人力發展月刊,75期:39-42。
陳正沛 譯(Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich D., 2001, The HR scorecard. ,
Boston:HBS.),2004,人力資源計分卡,台北:臉譜。
張善湧,2003,人力資源活動外包之委外關係與委外績效相關性之研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
張筵儀,2002,不完全契約與政府外包-從代理人理論分析台北市政府拖吊業務,國立政治大學公共行政學系未出版之碩士論文。
張火燦,2000,策略性人力資源管理,第二版,台北:揚智文化。
黃英忠,1997,人力資源管理,台北:三民。
黃英忠,2001,現代管理學,第四版,台北:華泰。
黃郁婷,2004,人力資源功能依賴外包程度與外包效益影響因素之探討,國立成功大學國際企業研究所未出版之碩士論文。
趙寶珍,2001,策略性人力資源雇用構築之探索性研究:以某海運公司為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
劉瑞華 譯 (North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance, N. Y.:Cambridge University Press) ,1998,制度,制度變遷與經濟成就,台北:時報。
鄭丞庭,2006,委外策略選擇對組織效益之影響-企業與派遣服務業之觀點,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
賴文珍 譯(Ulrich, D. Losey, M. R. & Lake, G., editors, 1997, Tomorrow's HR management 48 thought leaders call for change, N.Y.:John Wiley),2002,人力資源管理的未來,台北:商周。
謝清佳、吳琮璠,1998,資訊管理,台北,智勝。
盧娜 譯(Gay, C. L. & Essinger, J., 2000, Inside outsourcing:the insider’s guide to managing strategic sourcing, Landon: Nicholas Brealey Publishing..),2001,企業外包模式:如何利用外部資源提昇競爭力,台北:商周。
魏梅金 譯(Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M., 1993, Competence at Work:Models for Superior Performance, N. Y.:Wiley) ,2002,才能評鑑法:建立卓越績效的模式,台北:商周。
二、英文部份
Anthony, W. P. Perrewe, P. L. & Kacmar, K. M., 1999. Human resource management: a strategic approach, 3rd edition. Orlando. F1: The Dryden Press.
Barney, J. B. & William G. O., eds. 1986. Organizational economics, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Barney, J. B., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of management, 17:99-120.
Buckley Peter J. & Casson, M., 1998, “A theory of cooperation in international Business”, Management international Review, Special Issue: 19-38.
Barney, J. B., 1999, “How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions”, Sloan Management Review, 40(3):137-144.
Burton-Jones, A., 1999, Knowledge Capitalism: Business work and learning in the New Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baron, J. N. & Kreps, D. M., 1999, Strategic Human Resources: Framework for General Managers, New Jersey: John Wiley.
Baker, K. & Christensen, K., 2000, Contingent work: American employment relations in transition, N. Y.: ILR Press.
Becker, B. E., huselid, M. A. & Ulrich, D., 2001, The HR scorecard: linking people, strategy and performance, Boston:HBS.
Coase, R. H., 1937, “The nature of the firm”, Economica, 4:386-405.
Cappelli, P., 1999, The New Deal at Work: Managing the market-driven workforce, Boston: HBS.
Devana, M. A. Fombrun, C. J. & Tichy, N. M., 1981, “Human resource management:a strategic perspective”, Organizational Dynamics, 9(3):51-64
Devana, M. A. Fombrun, C. J. & Tich, N. M., 1984, “A framework for Strategic human resource management”. In Devana, M. A. Fombrun, C. J. & Tich, N. M., (Eds.)” Strategic Human Resource Management. New York:Wiley.
Davis-Blake, A.& Uzzi, B., 1993, “Determinants of employment externalization: a study of temporary workers and independent contractors”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(32) :195-223.
Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H., 1996, “Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency and configuration performance predictions”, Academy of Management Journal, 39:802-835.
Dessler, G., 2000, Human Resource Management, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1988, “Agency and institutional-theory explanations: the case of retail sales compensation”, Academy of Management Journal, 31(3) :488-511.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989,”Agency theory: an assessment and review”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1) :57-74.
Ferris, G. R. Authur, M. M. Berkson, H. M. Kaplan, D. M. Harrell-Cook, G., & Frink, D. D., 1998, “Toward a social context theory of the human resource management-organization effectiveness relationship”, Human resource Management review, 8(3):235-264.
Furubotn, E. G. & Richter, R., 2000, Institutions and Economic Theory, USA: Michigan Press.
Grant, R. M., 1996, “Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration”, Organization Science, 7(4):375-387.
Greer, C. R. S. A. Youngblood, & Gray, D. A., 1999,”Human resource management outsourcing: The make or buy decision”, Academy of Management Executive, 13(3):85-96.
Gay, C. L. & Essinger, J., 2000, Inside outsourcing: the insider’s guide to management strategic sourcing, Landon: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Gilley, K. M. & Rasheed, A., 2000, “Making more by doing less: an analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance”, Journal of Management, 26(4):63-790.
Gilley, K. M. Greer, C. R. & Rasheed, A., 2004, “Human resource outsourcing and performance in manufacturing firms”, Journal of Business Research, 57(3):232-240.
Hamel, G., 1991, “Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliance”, Strategic Management Journal, 12( S1):83-103.
Hirschman, C., 2000,” For PEOs, business is booming”, HRMagazine, 45(2):42-46.
HR Focus, 1997, “Outsourcing of HR continues”, HR Focus, 74(3):2.
HR Focus, 2000, “More employers outsourcing their core HR functions”, HR Focus, 77(8):8.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H., 1976, “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4):305-360.
Jackson, & Schuler, 2000, Managing Human Resources: A Partnership Perspective, South-Western College Publishing.
Jamrog, J. J. & Overholt, M. H., 2004, “Measure HR and organizational effectiveness”, Employment Relations Today, 31(2):33-44.
Khanna, T. Gulati, R. & Nohira, N., 1998, “The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3):193-210.
Klaas, B. S., McClendon, J. A. & Gainey, T. W., 1999, “HR outsourcing and its impact: the role of transaction costs”, Personnel Psychology, 52(1):113-136.
Knoke, D. & Janowiec-Kurle, L., 1999, “Make or Buy: The Externalization of Company Job Training”, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16:85-106.
Klaas, B. S. McClendon, J. A. & Gainey, T. W., 2000, “Managing HR in the small and medium enterprise: the impact of professional employer organizations”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(1):107-124.
Klaas, B. S. McClendon, J. A. & Gainey, T. W., 2001, “Outsourcing HR: the impact of organizational characteristics”, Human Resource Management, 40(2):125-138.
Klaas, B. S., 2003, “Professional employer organizations and their role in small and medium enterprises: the impact of HR outsourcing”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1):43-61.
Klaas, B. S. Gainey, T. W. McClendon, J. A. & Yang, H., 2005, “Professional employer organizations and their impact on client satisfaction with human resource outcomes: a field study of human resource outsourcing in small and medium enterprises”, Journal of Management, 31(2):234-254.
Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M., 1993, Competence at Work:Models for Superior Performance.
Labbs, J. J., 1993, “Successful Outsourcing Depend on Critical Factors”, Personal Journal, October 1993:51-61.
Lacity, M. C. & Hirschheim, R., 1993, “The Information System Outsourcing Bandwagon”, Sloan Management Review, Fall: 73-85.
Lever, S., 1997,” An analysis of managerial motivations behind outsourcing practices in human resource”, Human Resource Planning, 20(2):37-47.
Lepak, D. P. and Snell, S. A., 1998, “Virtual HR: strategic human resource management in the 21st Century”, Human Resource Management Review, 8(3):215-234.
Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M., 1998, “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(5):461-477.
Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A., 1999, “The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1):31-48.
Logan, M. S., 2000, “Using agency theory to design successful outsourcing relationships”, The international Journal of Logistics Management, 11(2):21-32
Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C., 1984,” Designing strategic human resource system”, Organizational Dynamics, 13(1):36-52.
Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C., 1992, “Organizations: New concepts for new forms”, California Management Review, 28(3): 62-73.
Minoli, D., 1995, Analyzing Outsourcing: Reengineering Information And Communication Systems. McGraw-Hill Inc.
McFarlan, E. W. & Nolan, R. L., 1995, “How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance”, Sloan Management Review, Winter: 9-23.
McFarlan, E. W. & Nolan, R. L., 1995, “How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance”, Sloan Management Review, Winter: 9-23.
Makhija, M. V. & Ganesh, U., 1997, “The relationship between control and partner in learning-related joint venture”, Organization Science, 8(5):508-527.
Makhija, M. V. & Ganesh, U., 1997, “The relationship between Control and Partner Learning in learning-related Joint Venture”, Organization science, 8(5):508-527.
Moon, C. H., 1998, “Technological capacity as a determinant of governance from in international strategic combinations”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 9(1):35-53.
McMahan, G. C. Virick, M. & Wright, P. M, 1999, “Alternative theoretical perspective for strategic human resource management revisited: Progress, problems, and prospects”, In P. M. Wright, L. D. Dyer, J. W. Boudreau, and G. T. Milkovich (Eds.). Strategic Human Resource management in the Twenty-First Century, Stamford, CN. : JAI Press Inc.,: 99-122.
Mobley, N., 2000, “What you need to know about outsourcing HR functions”, HR Focus; 77(10):7-10.
Mary S. Logan, 2000, “Using Agency Theory to Design Successful Outsourcing Relationships”, The international Journal of Logistics Management, 11(2):21-32.
Mirian, M. Graddick-Weir, 2005, “Life after outsourcing : lessons learned and the role of human resources as a strategic business partner”, In Michael Losey, Sue Meisinger, & Ulrich, D. (Eds.), The Future of Human Resource Management, New Jersey: John Wiley.
Osterman, P., 1987, “Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets”, Industrial Relations, 26(1):47-67.
Pfeffer, J. & Cohen, Y., 1984, “Determinants of internal labor markets in organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2):550-572.
Pfeffer, J. & Baron, J. N., 1988, “Taking the workers back out:recent trends in the structuring of employment”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CN. : JAI Press, 10:257-303.
Pfeffer, J., 1994, Competitive advantage through people: unleashing the power of the workforce. Boston: HBS.
Pfeffer, J., 1997, New directions for organization theory: problems and prospects. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.
Pfeffer, J., 1998, “Seven practices of successful organizations”, California Management Review, 40(2):96-124.
Robert, M. G., 1996,” Toward a knowledge-ased theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17:109-122.
Christensen, R., 2006, Roadmap to strategic HR, N. Y.:AMA.
Scott, W.R., 1995, Institutions and organizations, CA: Sage Publications.
Steensma, H. K., 1996, “Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational learning perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(4):267-286.
Stewart, T., 1997, Intellectual Capital, N. Y.k: Doubleday.
Tidd, J.& Trewhella, M. J., 1997, “Organization and technological antecedents of knowledge acquisition and learning”, R & D Management, 27(4):359-375.
Ulrich, D. & Barney, J. B., 1984, “Perspectives in organizations:resource dependence efficiency and population”, The Academy of Management Review, 9(3):471-481.
Ulrich, D., 1996, Human Resource Champions, Boston:HBS.
Ulrich, D. & Brockbank, W., 2005, The HR value proposition, Boston:HBS.
Verne Esen, 2004, Human Resource Outsourcing Survey Report, Alexandria, Virginia:SHRM.
Williamson, O.E., 1975, “Analysis and antitrust Implications:A study in the Economics of Internal organization”, Markets and Hierarchies, N. Y.:Free Press.
Williamson, O.E., 1979, “Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2):233-261.
Williamson, O.E., 1981, “The economics of organization: transaction cost approach”, American Journal of Sociology, 87(3):548-577.
Walker, Gordon & David Weber, 1984, “ A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3): 373-391.
Williamson, O.E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: firms, Markets Relational Contracting, N.Y.: Free Press.
Williamson, O.E., 1991, “Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete Structural alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2):269~296.
Williamson, O.E., 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code