本研究旨在探討中學英語教師資訊融入英語教學之認知、資訊融入英語教學關注階層及資訊融入英語教學行為之現況，比較教師個人背景因素、學校整體環境、對資訊融入英語教學之認知及教學創新接受度在資訊融入英語教學關注階層及資訊融入英語教學行為的差異情形，及相關。
研究對象為任教於台北市及高雄市公立國、高中的332位英語教師，採用研究工具包含「學校整體環境量表」、「資訊融入英語教學量表」、「教學創新接受度量表」、「資訊融入英語教學關注階層量表」與「資訊融入英語教學行為量表」。使用統計有描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、多變量變異數分析與典型相關。
本研究重要發現如下：
一、學歷較低、接觸電腦時間較短、每週使用電腦時數較少、每週使用電腦網路於英語相關教學活動時間較少、資訊研習時數較少、資訊素養較低的英語教師，其資訊融入英語教學關注階層較低且較少利用資訊科技於英語教學。
二、不同的學校整體環境、資訊融入英語教學認知及教學創新接受度的中學英語教師在資訊融入英語教學關注階層與行為有差異：學校整體環境較佳、對資訊融入英語教學較認同及較有教學創新接受度的英語教師，其資訊融入英語教學關注階層較高且較會利用資訊科技於英語教學。
三、中學英語教師學校整體環境、對資訊融入教學的認知、教學創新接受度、資訊素養、資訊融入英語教學的關注階層與資訊融入英語教學行為有顯著的典型相關。
四、英語教師最常應用資訊科技於聽力教學，其次為英語會話教學活動。而最常運用的資訊科技是錄音帶，其次為VCD/DVD/CD-ROM，接下來為錄影帶。
五、影響英語教師資訊融入英語教學的障礙因素依次為：教師缺乏時間準備，其次為教師缺乏資訊融入的教學設計能力，排名第三的則為教師缺乏適當的研習訓練、欠缺他人提供指引與諮詢、欠缺資訊素養與能力及適當的教學軟體等。
基於上述研究發現，本研究提出幾項建議。

The aim of this study is to investigate junior and senior high school English teachers’ concerns and behaviors about integrating information technology into English instruction, then to observe the variance resulting from teachers having different backgrounds, and finally to explore the relationships among them.
The participations in this study are332 junior and senior high school English teachers from Taipei and Kaohsiung cities. “School environment scale,” “Innovative teaching behavior scale,” “Integrating information technology into English instruction cognition scale,” “Stages of concern questionnaire,” and “Integrating information technology into English instruction behavior scale” are adopted as instruments of analysis in this study. Data were analyzed in the use of mean, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multivariate analysis of variances, and canonical correlation.
The major findings of this study are as followed:
I. There are significant differences in junior and senior high school English teachers’ concerns and behaviors of integrating information technology into English instruction in term of the academic degrees, time of contacting computer, time of using computer each week, time of using computer in English instruction each week, time of taking computer related training, and information literacy.

II. For junior and senior high school English teachers, their school environment, cognition of integrating information technology into English instruction, innovation in teaching, and concern of integrating information technology into English instruction are significantly related to their behavior of integrating information technology into English instruction.

III. English teachers use information technology in listening instruction the most, next is in speaking instruction. The information technology English teachers use most is tapes, next are VCD/DVD/CD-ROM, and cassettes.

IV. The difficulties affecting information technology integrated into English instruction are lack of time, no ability to integrating information technology into English instruction, lack of trainings, and information literacy.
Based on the conclusion of this study, some suggestions are made for future study.

目次
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景……………………………………….……………..1
第二節 研究動機……………………………………….……………..3
第三節 研究目的與待答問題………………………….……………..6
第四節 名詞解釋……………………………………….……………..7
第五節 研究範圍與限制……………………………….……………10
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………….…………….11
第一節 英語教學與資訊科技……………………………………….11
第二節 資訊科技融入教學相關理論……………………………….17
第三節 影響資訊科技融入教學之相關因素……………………….24
第四節 變革關注理論……………………………………………….33
第五節 資訊融入教學與變革關注相關研究……………………….38
第三章 研究方法與設計………………………………………….…………….46
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………….46
第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………….48
第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………….49
第四節 研究假設…………………………………………………….62
第五節 資料分析與處理…………………………………………….63
第四章 結果與討論……………………………………………….…………….66
第一節 中學英語教師資訊融入英語教學之現況………………….66
第二節 人口變項在資訊融入英語教學之關注階層與
資訊融入英語教學行為的差異……………………………..79
第三節 中學英語教師的學校環境、教學創新接受度、
資訊融入英語教學認知、資訊融入英語教學
關注階層與資訊融入英語教學
行為間的關係…………………………………………….113
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………132
第一節 主要研究發現………………………………….…………..132
第二節 結論…………………………………………….…………..143
第三節 建議…………………………………………….…………..146
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………150
壹、中文部分……………………………………………….………………145
貳、英文部分……………………………………………….………………153
附錄…………………………………………………………………………………163
附錄一 預試問卷………………………………………………………..163
附錄二 正式問卷………………………………………………………..167

參考文獻
中文部分
王千倖（1998）。Wed-based 網路教學管理系統。資訊與教育雙月刊，67，3-11。
王令宜、高熏芳（1995）。關切階層量表再教學科技創新推廣上的運用。視聽教育雙月刊，37（1），5-13。
王全世(2001)。資訊科技融入教學之實施與評鑑研究。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
王振鴻（2001）。國小教師對九年一貫課程之變革關注及其影響因素研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
王曉璿（1998）。資訊科技融入各科教學探究。菁莪季刊，10(4)，18-24。
尹玫君（1999）。網路科技對國小教育影響之個案研究－自老師教學的觀點探討。行政院國科會科資中心。（報告編號：NSC 87-2511-S-024-011-N），未出版。
尹玫君（2000）。國小老師的教育信念與網路融入教學間關係之研究。行政院國科會科資中心。（報告編號：NSC89-2413-H024-031），未出版。
尤禮慧（1997）。教師使用資訊設備於教學之研究。元智工學院電機暨資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
江羽慈、林珊如（出版中）。影響國小技師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究－以台北縣、桃園縣資訊種子國小為例。
呂正雄（1998）。FULLER教學關注理論與實證應用之研究。載於八十六學年度教育學術研討會論文集。花蓮：國立花蓮師範學院。
克里思托（2000）。英語帝國。（鄭佳美譯）。台北：貓頭鷹出版有限公司。(原著出版年﹕1997年)
吳子超（2001）。中小學網頁設計績優教師及其相關因素。國立政治大學教育學研究所碩士論文。
吳正己、吳秀宜（2002）。資訊融入教學實例及相關問題探討－以社會科為例。民國91年11月25日，取自：http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/csd/kao/kao8/6issues/1-2.htm
吳輝遠（2001）。國小教師應用網際網路於數學教學之個案研究。國立台灣示範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
吳振賢（2002）：教師網路融入教學態度、網路融入教學行為及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
周中天（1998）。認識新教材－設計精神與特色。敦煌英語教學雜誌，14，8-11。
李雪莉（2000）。教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌，2000年教育特刊，94-102。
何志中（1999）。台灣中部地區國民小學教師網路素養之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
何榮桂（2002）。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展－兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育雜誌，87，22-33。
林玉珮（2000）。台灣資訊教育總體檢。天下雜誌，特刊29，52-60。
林奇賢（1999）。網路學習環境的設計與應用。資訊與教育，67，34-49。
林依潔（2001）。技術與職業教育體系會計教師使用多媒體網際網路教學之研究。彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。
林珈夙（1997）。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林涵妮（1999）。影響國小教育人員接受創新態度與教學科技接受程度因素之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林煌凱（2002）。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究。國立師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
邱志忠（2002）。國校教師運用資訊科技融入學科教學之教學策略研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
邱貴發（1990）。電腦整合教學的概念與方法。台灣教育，479，1-8。
邱貴發（1995）。從知識學習的週邊問題看資訊科技在教學的應用。視聽教育，37(3)，1-6。
胡夢鯨（1998）。學習社會：世界變遷與教育大趨勢。成人教育，4，17-22。
洪瑛璘（2001）。高雄地區國小教師教學效能感與教育變革關注相關之研究－以「九年一貫新課程」為例。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
姜禮能（2002）。國小教師對於資訊融入教學之變革關注與相關因素研究。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文。
孫天光、林勇成、陳新豐、林守仁（2000）。資訊融入學科教學研究--以網際網路多媒體教材輔助國小英語教學為例。國教學報，12，229-265。
徐鶯娟（1994）。國民小學教師成就動機、參與決定與其工作投入關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
韋金龍（2001）：多媒體網路電腦在英語教學的應用。英語教學，25(3)，55-63。
教育部（1998）。邁向學習社會。教育部社教司。
陳桂津（2002）。國民小學教師網路教學意願與障礙因素之調查研究。台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳淑嬌（1989）。國民中學校長領導形式、教師工作投入與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張宏明（2001）。高雄市國小教師對資訊融入學科教學的實施企圖研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
張強仁（1998）。新編國中英語之特色、教法與可斟酌之種種。中等教育，49(4)，56-63。
張武昌（1997）。新編國中英語教材簡介－以必修第一冊為例。英語教學，85，18-28。
張國恩（1999）。資訊科技融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育，72，2-9。
張雅芳（2001）。資訊科技融入英語教學之模式與過程。菁莪季刊，13(3)，2-13。
張善培（1998）。課程實施程度的測量。教育學報，26(1)，149-170。
單文經、張碧玲（2001）。國民中學英語教師溝通教學觀之教學信念。教育研究，84，37-48。
溫明正（2000）。資訊科技融入各科教學之應用。教學科技與媒體，50，54-61。
溫嘉榮（2001）。資訊融入學科教學的省思與實踐。第15屆中小學電腦輔助教學會議論文。內湖高工。台北。
黃淑靜（2002）。高中職商科教師應用資訊科技於教學之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
黃曉婷（2000）。國民小學教師網路教學素養之調查研究。台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃嘉勝（1995）。九所師範學院美勞系(科)教師對使用教學媒體的創新觀念接受度、態度、及限制因素間之相關性研究。視聽教育學報，1，233-278。
莊育榕（2002）。應用網路資源於英語課程之現況研究：以台北市公立高中英語教師為例。淡江大學西洋語文研究所碩士論文。
楊坤原（1999）。電腦態度的意義與相關變項之探討。科學教育月刊，225，2-15。
楊叔卿（1998）。電腦網路推展至中小學：一個超媒體網路師生培訓的研究初探。第七屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集，476-483。
楊叔卿、周倩（1999）。中小學教師與網際網路教學推行之研究。遠距教育，10，41-46。
楊智先（2000）。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
詹麗馨（1998）。配對練習在國中教法的運用。敦煌英語教學雜誌，14，15-17。
劉世雄（2001）。教師運用電腦融入教學決定歷程之個案研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
劉顯親、楊中玉（2001）。E世代的英語教學。台北：敦煌。
鄭建良（1996）。師範院校學生的電腦網路使用現況及態度之調查研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
賴阿福（2000）。廿一世紀之資訊科技在教育上應用的新趨勢。八十八學年度國民中小學資訊科技融入各科教學研討會手冊。台北：教育部。
鍾佑民（1999）。國民小學電腦科教師教學信念、教師期望與教學行為之俗民誌研究。私立淡江大學教育資料科學研究所碩士論文。
鐘樹椽（1999）。教學科技應用於小班教學之探討。教師之友，40(1)，5-11。
蔡俊男（2000）。高雄市國小教師運用資訊設施教學意願之研究。高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
顏永進、何榮桂（2001）。資訊科技融入學習領域設計策略初探。載於國立台灣師範大學實習輔導處地方教育組主辦「新世紀課程教學－九年一貫課程議題教育研討會」資訊教育程序手冊，45-55。
顏龍源（2000）。主題化的電腦融入課程概念。資訊與教育雜誌，80，32-40。
韓慶揚（1998）。使用新教材教學原則與建議。敦煌英語教學雜誌，14，12-14。
簡茂發、劉湘川、游淑媚、蔡青青（1991）。師院學生動手操作學習過程技能對教導現行國小科學活動之焦慮與關心程度之影響。國科會專案研究計劃報告。國立台中師範學院。
蕭惠君(民88)。電腦網路在國民中小學教學應用之研究。台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
蘇怡安（2002）。國小教師網路使用經驗、使用動機即使用動機滿意度相關之調查研究。台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
葛德、勃菲（1999）。當代教育心裡學。（李素卿譯）。台北：五南。
英文部分
Anderson, G. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27 (3), 331-367.
Atkin, N., & Vasu, E. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279-302.
Bailey, D. B., & Palsha, S. A. (1992). Qualities of the stages of concern questionnaires and implications for educational innovations. The Journal of Educational Research, 85 (4), 226-232.
Beauvois, M. H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177-190.
Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291-321.
Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teacher: conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved September 25, 2002, from WWW: http://www.crito.uci.edu/ TLC/findings /Internet-Use /startpage. htm
Berson, M. J. (1996). Effectiveness of computer technology in social studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 486-499.
Bicknall, J. (1999) Promoting writing and computer literacy skills through student-authored web pages. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 20-26.
Bly, C., & Johnson, K. (1999). Working with people undergoing change concerns based adoption model. Retrieved December 19, 2001, from WWW: http:// tusd.tracy.k12.ca.us/NECC1999
Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: A qualitative study of teachers’ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95-126.
Boyer, E. L. (1988). School reform: Completing the course. NASSP Bulletin,72(504), 61-68.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, S. (2000). The 21century classroom. Techniques: Connecting Education & Career, 75(7), 22-26.
Bulter-Williams, L. A., & Kpo, W. (1990). A study of teachers’ attitude toward school reform. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324774).
Carr, G. E. (1985). Characteristics of Florida vocational educators and their receptivity to and attitude toward eductional change and innovation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266299).
Chapelle, C., Jamieson, J., & Park, Y. (1996). Second language classroom research traditions: How does call fit? In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.33-53). Houston: Athelstan.
Chen, K. K. (1997a). Factors that influence use of computers in accounting instruction in Minnesota’s Community Colleges, technical colleges, and four- year colleges and universities.第十二屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文輯。
Chen, N. S., & Lee, Y. H. (2000). Group composition methods for cooperative learning in web-based instructional system. ICCE/ICCAI 2000.
Chen, N. S., & Lin, K.M. (2001). Exploring learning problems of cyber university. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
Chen, N. S., & Shih, Y. C. (2001). Stream-based lecturing system and its instructional design. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
Chiero, R. T. (1997). Teachers’ perspectives on factors that affect computer use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 133-146.
Chiquita, A., Meskill, C., & Renjilian-Burgy, J. (1997). Multiple, mixed, malleable media. In M. Bush (ed.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 47-76). National Textbook Company.
Chiu, M. H. (1998). Increasing interactions via electronic mail. In M. S. Lin, P.H. Chen, Y. N. Leung, & J. Katchen (eds.). The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 339-348). Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquistion of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-33.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp.151-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
Clarke, A. M., Ellett, C. D., & Bateman, J. M., Rugutt, J. K. (1996). Faculty receptivity/resistance to change, personal and organizational efficacy, decision deprivation and effectiveness in research I university. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408846).
Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language/culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 527-534.
Cuban, L. (1999). The technology puzzle: Why is greater access not translating into better classroom use？ Education Week 18(43), 68,47.
Debski, R. (2000). Exploring the re-creation of a CALL innovation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4/5), 307-332.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology: Some things you should know. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27 (3), 10-13.
Dusick D. M.(1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members' use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 31(2). p123-132.
Dusick, D. M., & Yildirim, I. S. (1998). Faculty computer use and training needs: Identifying distinct needs for differing populations of community college faculty. Community College Review, 27(4),33-48.
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45-52.
Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamici, Y. (2002). The impact of call instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Johnson, D. (1996). Computer skills for information problem-solving: Learning technology in context. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 463).
Ellis, A. B. (1974). The Use and Misuse of Computers in Education. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Ely, D. P. (1996). Trends in educational technology. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
Fabry, D. L. & Higgs, J. R. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: current status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 385-395.
Finnemann, M. D. (1996). The World Wide Web and Foreign Language Teaching. ERIC/CLL News Bulletin, 20(1).
Fisher, T. (1999). A new professionalism? Teacher use of multimedia portable computers with Internet capability. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 432268)
Flowerdew, J. (1996). Concordancing in language learning. In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.97-113). Houston: Athelstan.
Francis, L. J. (1994). The relationship between computer related attitudes and gender stereotyping of computer use. Computers and Education, 22(4), 283-289.
Freeman, D. C., & Freeman, Y. S. (1994). Between worlds: Access to second language acquistion. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fullan, M. (1993). Innovation, Reform and Restructuring Stategies. In G. Cawelti (Ed.). Challenges and Achievements of American Education
Gibson, S., & Oberg, D. (1999). Two Studies of Teacher Learning about Internet Use. International Electronic Journal For Leadership in Learning, 3(3), 1-15.
Goldman-Segall, R., & Maxwell, J. W. (2002). Computers, the internet, and new media for learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.). Handbook of psychology. Vol.7: Educational psychnology (pp. 393-427). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gorard, S. (2001). E-stablishing a learning society: The use of the internet to attract adults to lifelong learning in wales. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 38(3), 205-219.
Gorard, S., & Selwyn, N. (1999). Switching on the learning society? Questioning the role of technology in widening participation in lifelong learning. Journal of Education Policy, 14(5), 523-534.
Gratton, W. (1998). The development of computer technology in ELT. In J. Kahny & M. James (Eds.). Perspectives on secondary school EFL education (pp. 44-49). Odawara, Japan: Language Institude of Japan.
Green, A. (1997). A beginner's guide to the internet in the foreign language classroom with a focus on the world wide web. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 253-264.
Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation：A manual for use of the SOC questionnaire.( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 147342).
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Hargrave, C., & Hsu, Y. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 303-314.
Harris, J. B. (1995, February). Organizing and facilitating telecollaborative projects. The Computing Teacher Journal, 22(5), 66-69.
Hoffman, R. (1994). The warm network, electronic mail, ESL learners, and the personal touch. On-CALL: The Australian Journal of Computers and Education, 8(2), 10-13.
Hoffman, B. (1997). Integrating technology into schools. Education Digest, 62(5),51-55.
Hope, W. C. (1996). Factors facilitating teachers’ use of computer technology. Clearing House, 70(2), 106-107.
Hruskocy, C., Cennamo, K. S., Ertmer, P. A., & Johnson, T. (2000). Creating a community of technology users: Students become technology experts for teachers and peers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1), 69-84.
Huang, S. Y. (1998). The value of networked computers in teaching EFL writing. In M. S. Lin, P. H. Chen, Y. N. Leung, & J. Katchen (Eds.). The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (Vol. II). (pp. 339-348). Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Huberman, M. (1988). Teacher careers and School improvement. Curriculum Studies, 20(2), 119-132.
Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C.D. (1997). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
Jaber, W. E., & Moore, D. M. (1999). A survey of factors which influence teachers’ use of computer-based technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 253-266.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Jones, C. A. (2001). Teacher support: Preparing teachers to use technology. Principal Leadership, 1(9), 35-39.
Judith, H. S., Cathy, R., & David, C. D. (1996). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teacher College Press.
Kagan, D. H. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
Kataoka, Ko. (2000). Computers for English Learning in Japanese Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 439600)
Kennedy, C., & Kennedy, J. (1996). Teacher attitudes and change implementation. System, 24(3), 351-360.
Kenning, M. J., & Kenning, M.M. (1983). An Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Kerry, M. (2000). The time in now for technology training in our schools. Business Journal, 18(12), 55.
Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophbia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 389-420.
Lan, J. (2001). Web-based instruction for education faculty: A needs Assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33(4). 385-399.
Langone, C., Wissick, C., Langone, J., & Ross, G. (1998). A study of graduates of a technology teacher preparation program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(4), 283-302.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principals in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, K. W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. Retrieved October 7, 2002 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leh, A. S. (1995). The reformation in foreign instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383320)
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Liao, X. (1997). A brief introduction to the communicative language teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404863)
Liou, H. C. (1994). Practical considerations for multimedia courseware development: An EFL IVD experience. The CALICO Journal, 11(3), 47-74.
Lunde, K. (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. CALICO Journal, 7, 68-78.
Marianne, M., Barbara, G., & Tiffany, K. (1998). Web-based instruction and learning: Analysis and needs assessment summary. Retrieved Noverber 20, 2002, from WWW: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/ DTRS/
McCoy, L. P. (1996). Computer-based mathematics learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 438-460.
Mellencamp, A. V. (1992). Making connections through Voice：Teacher receptivity to change. Department of Special Education, Unversity of Verment.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365030).
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation: A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
Mohammed,(1994).
Moore, Z. (1999). Technology and teaching culture in the L2 classroom: An introduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(1), 1-9.
Moore, Z., Morales, B., & Carel, S. (1998). Technology and Teaching Culture: Results of a state survey of foreign language teachers. CALICO Journal, 5(1- 3), 109-128.
Morawa, E. C., & Sheathelm, H. H. (1984). Teachers’ perceptions of need fulfillment and self-esteem and their attitudes toward change. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 243843).
Norhayati, L (2000). Computer technology in Malaysia: Teachers’ background characteristics, attitudes and concerns. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 3(8), 1-13.
Norum, K., Grabinger, R. S., & Duffield, J. A. (1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: Teacher’s views on integrating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 187-203.
Ommagio, A. (1986). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Osuna, M. M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 71-92.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
Parr, J. (1999). Extending educational computing: A case of extensive teacher development and support. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 280-291.
Parra, C., & Eduardo, G. (2000). Learning English through online discussion group. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 44(1). 36-38.
Pennington, M.C. (1996). The power of the computer in language education. In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.1-14). Houston: Athelstan.
Pennington, M.C., & Esling, J. H. (1997). Computer-assisted development of spoken language skills. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.153-189). Houston: Athelstan.
Penny, A. R.（1998）. Characteristics of early adopters using educational internet networks. Unpublished master’s thesis, Pepperdine University.
Phinney, M. (1996). Exploring the virtual world: Computers in the second language writing Classroom. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.137-152). Houston: Athelstan.
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, D. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 737-758.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100, 354-395.
Reed, W. M. (1996). Assessing the importane of computer-based writing instructin. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 418-437.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teaching. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.). (pp. 102-119). New York: Association of Teacher Educations.
Richards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowand, C. (1999). Teacher use of computer and the internet in public schools. Education Statistics Quarterly, National Center for Education Statistics.
Rutherford, W. L. (1986). Teachers’ contributions to school improvement: Reflections on fiffteen years of research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 276104).
Saint-Leon, C. (1988). The case for authentic materials on videodisk. CALICO Journal. 6(2), 27-40.
Sara, L. D., Ronald, E. A., & Henry, J. B.（1999）. Teachers’views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 221-239.
Schneider, E. W. (1982). Considerations on the use of technology in the learning of foreign languages. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 236910)
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship-A reflective practice perspective (3th ed.). Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College, Center for Technology in Education.
Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Smith, D. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 197-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spodark, E. (2002). Fostering technology use among second-wave foreign language faculty. IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 34(1), 19-31.
Sprague, D., & Dede, C. (1999). If I teach this way, am I doing my job? Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(1), 6-9.
Steers, R. M. (1994). Organizational Behavior (5th ed.). New York : Harpercollins College Pub.
Tanguay, E. (1997). English teachers, prepare yourselves for the digital age. Retrieved November 7, 2002 from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~tanguay/english-teachers.htm.
Thrush, J. A., & Thrush, R. (1984). Microcomputers in foreign language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 68(1), 21-26.
VanFossen, P. J. (1999). Teachers would have to be crazy not to use the internet: A preliminary analysis of the use of the internet/www by secondary social studies teachers in Indiana. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies.
Wangen, N. R., Sederberg, C. H., & Hendrix, V. L. (1982). Receptivity to change in small schools: A study of teachers' willingness to accept the risks of innovation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242082).
Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English Teaching. TESOL Inc.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481.
Warschauer, M. (1998). Electronic literacies: language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.
Weller, H. G. (1996). Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 461-485.
Williams, D. M. (2000). Internet Access in Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994- 99. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wiskle, M. (1988). How technology affects teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED296 706).
Woodrow, J. (1991). A comparison of four computer attitude scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 165-187.
Yan, S. C. (1998). The world wide web as an EFL writing tool. In M. S. Lin, P.H. Chen, Y. N. Leung, & J. Katchen (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (Vol. II), (pp. 339-348). Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5-30.