Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0813112-200046 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0813112-200046
論文名稱
Title
善因促銷方式對消費者購買意願及品牌態度影響研究
The Impact of Cause-Related Promotion on Consumer`s Purchase Intention and Brand Attitudes
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
97
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-08-13
關鍵字
Keywords
購買意願、受益對象、品牌態度、促銷工具、善因行銷
donation, brand attitude, purchase intention, caused-related promotion, monetary and nonmonetary promotion
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5745 次,被下載 741
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5745 times, has been downloaded 741 times.
中文摘要
企業競爭激烈的環境中,消費者面對琳琅滿目的促銷活動,究竟是如何的促銷組合才能吸引消費者?本研究將以兩項主要的變數來研究消費者的行為,分別為促銷工具(金錢與非金錢),以及促銷活動中的受益對象(消費者本身與弱勢團體),看看不同的促銷組合如何影響促銷效果,本研究的促銷效果將以購買意願以及品牌態度來衡量,消費者是否會實際購買產品的確重要,但對於要永續經營的企業來說,品牌態度一樣不可以忽略。
依據上述的兩個變數,本研究以實驗設計法進行,將對於四種促銷組合進行討論與分析,分別為給消費者折扣、送消費者贈品、捐錢給弱勢團體以及送禮物給弱勢團體,透過平面廣告的設計建立四種不同的情境,觀察消費者在不同的情境下對促銷方式的購買意願以及品牌態度,在實際的生活中,這幾種促銷方式是較常見的促銷方法,再加入一些變化,但都不會脫離這樣的形式。
研究結果顯示,不管受益對象為消費者本身或是弱勢團體,金錢性的促銷不只能增加購買意願,也能改善品牌態度,這個結果推翻了以往學者認為:金錢性的促銷方式雖能增加購買意願,但會降低消費者的品牌態度。同時也發現,面對學生族群可能較難以引誘其捐獻,因為其支配所得較低,所以消費行為較偏向價格導向,故善因行銷可能較無法激起學生族群的購買欲望。
本研究主要探討「金錢」與「非金錢」兩種促銷工具,以及促銷活動中的受益對象-「消費者本身」與「慈善或弱勢團體」,以往的研究都只限於單一領域的促銷效果帶來的效果,本研究主要貢獻為將受益對象及促銷工具做各種配對,進行細項的兩兩促銷組合的比較,研究其促銷效果的不同。和本研究的發現,將可指出未來相關研究的後續發展方向以及限制。
Abstract
These days, consumers are living in a flood of frequent sales promotion practices. They encounter every day low price, seasonal price off, special price discount, free gift, buy one get one free, and other promotions in their daily lives(Promo Magazine,2010).Sales promotions have become more usual, more repetitive, and longer practices than before. Exploration of sales promotion effect has become one of the most popular issue to discuss in the study of marketing.
This study wants to examine what kind of promotion is the most effective. There were four kind of normal promotion: free gift for customer、discount、donation with cash and donation with gift. We found that no matter who get the benefit from the promotion, monetary promotion will be more effective than non-monetary promotion in purchase intention and brand attitude of consumers. And this conclusion is different to the past study which said that monetary promotion will determine the brand attitude.
The results indicate that monetary promotion can not only increase the purchase intention but also can improve the brand attitude. This study also compares two kind of promotion type one by one, so that company can choose the promotion type depend on which promotion activity the competitor use. And we found that it’s may probably harder to induce student to donation because of the limitation of disposable income. So we can’t use the cause-related promotion when our main customers are students.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定 I
謝誌 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 促銷活動 4
第二節 購買意願 18
第三節 品牌 20
第四節 展望理論-價值函數 24
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構 25
第二節 研究假設 26
第三節 研究變項之定義與衡量 31
第四節 實驗設計 33
第四章 資料分析與結果 37
第一節 樣本敘述 37
第二節 假說驗證 38
第三節 小結 55
第五章 研究結論與建議 57
第一節 研究結論 57
第二節 研究貢獻 59
第三節 研究限制 60
第四節 後續研究建議 61
參考文獻 62
附錄一 前測問卷 73
附錄二 正式問卷A 77
附錄三 正式問卷B 81
附錄四 正式問卷C 85
表目錄
表2-1 促銷活動定義 5
表2-2促銷活動的工具 7
表2-3 促銷工具性質分類表 9
表2-4 促銷工具金錢性與非金錢性之比較 12
表2-5 善因行銷的定義 15
表3-1 購買意願問項表 32
表3-2 品牌態度問項表 33
表4-1 抽樣樣本敘述 38
表4-2 促銷工具對於購買意願影響 39
表4-3 對於購買意願,促銷工具與受益對象的交互作用 40
表4-4 捐錢給弱勢團體 VS 給消費者折扣(變異數檢定) 40
表4-5捐錢給弱勢團體 VS 給消費者折扣(t檢定) 41
表4-6送贈品給消費者VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 41
表4-7 送贈品給消費者VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 42
表4-8 給消費者折扣VS送消費者贈品(變異數檢定) 42
表4-9 給消費者折扣VS送消費者贈品(t檢定) 43
表4-10 捐錢給弱勢團體VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 43
表4-11捐錢給弱勢團體VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 44
表4-12 給消費者折扣VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 44
表4-13給消費者折扣VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 45
表4-14 送消費者贈品VS捐錢給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 45
表4-15送消費者贈品VS捐錢給弱勢團體(t檢定) 46
表4-16促銷工具對於品牌態度影響 46
表4-17 促銷工具對品牌態度的影響 48
表4-18 捐錢給弱勢團體VS給消費者折扣(變異數檢定) 48
表4-19捐錢給弱勢團體VS給消費者折扣(t檢定) 49
表4-20 給消費者贈品VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 49
表4-21 給消費者贈品VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 50
表4-22 給消費者折扣VS給消費者贈品(變異數檢定) 50
表4-23給消費者折扣VS給消費者贈品(t檢定) 51
表4-24 捐錢給弱勢團體VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 51
表4-25捐錢給弱勢團體VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 52
表4-26 給消費者折扣VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 52
表4-27 給消費者折扣VS捐禮物給弱勢團體(t檢定) 53
表4-28 給消費者贈品VS捐錢給弱勢團體(變異數檢定) 54
表4-29 給消費者贈品VS捐錢給弱勢團體(t檢定) 54
表4-30 研究結果整理 55
表5-1 研究結果如下 58
圖目錄
圖1-1 本研究之研究流程 3
圖2-1 價值函數 25
圖3-1 本研究之研究架構 26
圖4-1促銷工具對於購買意願影響 39
圖4-2對於品牌態度,促銷工具與受益對象的交互作用 47
參考文獻 References
潘貝盈,(2003),「價格折扣型式、相對折扣幅度、消費態度與消費者期望
行為之關係」,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
方世榮,(1996),「行銷學」,台北:三民書局,初版。
林建文,(2004),”原品牌態度、知覺契合度與促銷活動形式對品牌延伸後
品牌態度與購買意願影響之研究”,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃俊英,(2000),「行銷研究概論」,台北:華泰書局,第三版。
胡迪凡,(2006),「正常性折扣和贈品促銷,祈雨品牌知名度間對網際網路
消費者購買意願之研究-以無線電話機為例」,國立交通大學管理學院國際
經貿碩士班未出版碩士論文。
王又鵬,(1993),「促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究」,國立政治大學
企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
王又鵬,(1996),「廠商價格促銷策略、消費者折扣認知與購買行為關係之
研究」,台北:華泰書局。
王怡民,(2002),消費者對於商店品牌態度與購買行為關聯之研究。國立高
雄第一科技大學未出版碩士論文。
徐心怡,(2000),「消費者促銷知覺價值與促銷偏好程度之研究-產品類別干
擾效果之探討」,元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳富美,(2003),「品牌權益、促銷方式及促銷效果關聯之研究-以運動鞋與
衛生紙為例」,朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳柏蓁,(2004),「百貨公司贈品促銷對消費者行為之影響-以台北市百貨公
司為例」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳士葦,(2007),「免費贈品促銷形式對消費者整體評價及知覺操作意圖之
影響」,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
陳怡君,(2007),「銀行業之善因行銷活動與消費者認知企業形象關係之研
究」,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
朱家賢,(2000),「促銷性廣告、產品品牌聯想形象、消費者屬性對廣告效
果影響之研究」,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
詹孟真,(1995),「理念相關行銷與涉入程度對品牌權益關係之研究」,中原
大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
吳昭賢,(2007),「自我一致性、品牌態度與品牌忠誠度關係之研究」,朝陽
科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
Andreasen, A.R.(1996),”Profits for Nonprofits: Find a Corporate
Partner,” Harvard Business Review,74(6),47-59.
Ailawadi, Kusum, Bari Harlam, Jacques Cesar, and David Trounce
(2006),“Promotion Profitability for a Retailer: The Role of Pro-
motion, Brand, Category, and Store Characteristics,” Journal of
Marketing Research, 43 (November), 518–35.
Arora, Neeraj and Ty Henderson (2007), “Embedded Premium
Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective,”
Marketing Science, 26 (July/August), 514–31.
Aribarg, Anocha and Neeraj Arora (2008),“Brand Portfolio Pro-
motions,” Journal of Marketing Research,45 (August),391–402.
Bellenger,D.N., Steinberg, E., and Stanton, W. W.,(1976), The
Congruence of Store Image and Self Image, Journal of
Retailing,52(1),17-32.
Bawa, Kapil and Robert W. Shoemaker (1987), “The Coupon-Prone
Consumer: Some Findings Based on Purchase Behavior Across Product
Classes.” Journal of Marketing, 51, 4 (1987): 423-28.
Blattberg,Robert C.and Scott A. Nesliln(1990), Sales
Promotion-Concepts, Methods,and Strategies,Englewood
Cliffs,N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Batra, R. and Ahtola, O. T.,(1990), Measuring the Hedonic and
Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes, Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
Barnes, Nora Ganim and Debra A. Fitzgibbons(1991), Business-Charity
Links: Is Cause Related Marketing in Your Future? Business Forum, Fall: 20-23.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., and Griffin, M., (1994), Work and/or Fun:
Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-56.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product:
Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.
Buchanan, L., Simmons, C. J., & Bickart, B. A. (1999). Brand equity
dilution: Retailer dis-play and context brand effects. Journal of
Marketing Research, 36, 345–355.
Bennett, Rebakah and Sharyn R. Rundle-Thiele (2000) ,” Attitudinal
Brand Loyalty-Personality Triat or Brand Specific?” Australia New
Zealand Marketing Educators Conference, Griffith University, Gold
Coast, Queensland.
Bronn, P.S. & Vrioni, A.B. (2001),”Corporate Social Responsibility
and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview,” International Journal
of Advertising,20,207-222.
Barone, Tirthankar Roy (2010), “Does Exclusivity Always Pay
Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response,”
Journal of Marketing, 74 (March), 121–32.
Caesar and Patricia(1986), Cause-Related Marketing: The New Face of
Corporate Philanthropy, Business & Society Review,59,15-19.
Chernatony,L. De. And G. McWillam(1989), “Branding Terminology The
Real Debate,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning,
July/August,29-32
Cone,C.L.(2002), Cone Corporate Citizenship Study: The Role of Cause
Branding, Executive Sunmmary, Boston, MA.
Chun-Tuan Chang,(2008),“To Donate or Not to Donate? Product
Characteristics and Framing Effects of Cause-Related Marketing
on Consumer Purchase Behavior,”National Sun Yat-sen University,
Taiwan
Daniel Katz, ”The functional Approach to the study of Attitudes,”Public Opinion Quarterly 24(Summer 1960):163-204 ;
Richard J. Lut,”Changing Brand Attiitudes Through Modification
of Cognitive Structure,”(1975), Journal of Consumer Research,
1(4),49-59.
Doob, A., Carlsmith, J.M., Freedman, J.L., Landauer, T.K., & Tom, S.
(1969),” Effect of initial selling price on subsequent sales.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 11, 345-50.
Dodson,Joe A., Alice M. Tybout, and Brian Sternthal(1978),”Impact
of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching,”Journal of
Marketing Research,15(February),72-81.
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky,Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2. (Mar.,
1979), pp. 263-292.
Dickson, P.R. and Sawyer, A.G.(1990).The Price Knowledge and Search
of Supermarket Shoppers. Journal of Marketing,54(3):42-53.
Dodds, William B., Monroe, Kent B. and Grewal, Dhruv(1991), Effects
of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product
Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28, pp.307-319.
Dean, D.H.(2003),”Consumer Perception of Corporate Donations:
Effects of Company Reputation for Social Responsibility and Type
of Donation,” Journal of Advertising,32(4),91-102.
DelVecchio, D. (2005). Deal-prone consumers’ response to promotion:
The effects of relative and absolute promotions value. Psychology
& Marketing, 22, 373–391.
Ehrenberg , A.S.C. and P. Charlton( 1991),”An Analysis of Simulated
Brand Choice.”, Journal of Advertising Research, 13,
No.1,pp.145-59.
Fishbein M.(1963).”An investigation of the relationships between
beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that
object. ”Human Relations,16(2),233-240.
Fishbein M.,& Ajzen,I.(1975).”Belief,attitude,intention and
behavior.” An Introduction to Theory and Research.
MA:Addson-Wesley.
Frankel, Bud and J. W. Phillips(1986),”Escaping the Parity
Trap”,Marketing Communications, November,pp.93-100.
Gupta, Sunil (1988), “Impact of Sales Promotion on When, What,
and How Much to Buy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25
(November), 342–55.
Gary, McCain(1991), Managing Atmospheric Effects on Consumers and
RetailWorks, Journal of Business and Economic Perspectives,
Vol.17,No.2,00.45-54.
Gedenk, Karen and Scott Neslin (1996), “The Effects of Price versus
Sampling Promotions on Short-Term Sales and Brand Loyalty,” the
Association of Consumer Research's 1996 Conference, October
10-13.
Grewal, D., Krisnan, R., Baker, J. and Borin, N.(1998), The effect
of store name, brand name and price discount on consumers’
evaluations and purchase intention, Journal of retailing,
74(3),pp.331-334.
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). A taxonomy of cause-related marketing
research: Current findings and future research directions.
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,15, 25–43.
Grau, S.L. & Garretson, J.A.(2007),”Cause-Related Marketing: The
Influence of Donation Proximity and Message-Framing Cues on the
Less-Involved Consumer,” Journal of Advertising,36(4),19-33.
Hirschman, E. and Holbrook, M. G. "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging
Concepts, Methods and Propositions," Journal of Marketing, (46)
Summer (1982),pp. 92-101.
Hirschman, E. "Experience Seeking: A Subjectivist Perspective of
Consumption," Journal of Business Research, (12) March (1984),
pp. 115-136.
Hunt, K. A., & Keaveney, S. M. (1994). A process model of the effects
of price promotions on brand image. Psychology & Marketing, 11,
511–532.
Henderson, Ty and Neeraj Arora (2010), “Promoting Brands
Across Categories with a Social Cause: Implementing Effective
Embedded Premium Programs,” Journal of Marketing, 74
(November), 41–60.
IEG (2009), “Sponsorship Spending on Causes to Total $1.55 Bil-
lion in 2009,” (accessed January 27, 2010), [available http://
www.sponsorship.com/IEGSR/2009/07/27/Sponsorship-Spending-
Kahn, B. E., & Louie, T. A. (1990). Effects of retraction of price
promotions on brand choice behavior for variety-seeking and
last-purchase-loyal consumers. Journal of Marketing Research, 27,279–289.
Krishna, A., Currim, I. S., & Shoemaker, R. W. (1991). Consumer
attitudes of promotional activity. Journal of Marketing, 55, 4–
16.
Kolter,P.(1994).Marketing management: Analysis, Planning,
Implementation, and Control 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
International, Inc.
Kotler, P (2005), FAQ’s marketing, Marshall Cavendish Business,
Singapore.
Kotler,P. & Keller,K.L.(2005),Marketing Management,12th edition,
New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
Krishna, Aradhna and Uday Rajan (2009), “Spillover Effects of
Cause-Related Products in a Product Portfolio,” Management
Science, 55 (9), 1469–85.
Lutz, R.J.,S.B. MacKenzie, and G.E. Belch, The Role of Attitude toward
the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of
Competing Explanations, Journal of Marketing Research,
8(1),(1986),130-143.
Lattin,James M. and Randolf E. Bucklin(1989),”Reference Effects of
Price and Promotion on Brand Choice Behavior,”Journal of
Marketing Research,26(August),299-310.
Lafferty, B.A. & Goldsmith, R.E. (2003),”Cause-Brand Alliances:
Does the Cause Help the Brand or Does the Brand Help the Cause?”
Journal of Business Research,58(4),423-429.
Mason(1992),”Corporate Sponsorships Help Target the Right
Audience”,Management Review,81(11),58-61.
Morwitz, Vicki G and Schmittlein, David(1992), Using Segmentation to
Improve Sales Forecsts Based on Purchase Intent: Which
“Intenders” Actually Buy? Journal of Marketing Research, Nov,
pp.391-400.
Mackenize, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How Does Motivation Moderate
the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand
Attitudes and Intentions? Journal of Consumer Research, 6,
pp.519-529.
McGlone, C. & Martin N.(2006),”Nike’s Corporate Interest Lives
Strong: A Case of Cause-Related Marketing and Leveraging, ”Sport
Marketing Quarterly,15,184-189.
Nan,X. & Heo,K.(2007),”Consumer Responses to Corporate Social
Responsibility Initiatives,” Journal of
Advertising,36(2),63-74.
Papatla, P., & Krishnamurthi, L. (1996). Measuring dynamic effects
of promotions on brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 33,
20–35.
Pringle,H.,and Marjorie,T.(1999),Brand Spirit, West Sussex,
England:John Wiley and Sons.
Polonsky, M.J.,and Wood, G.(2001),”Can the Overcommercialization of
Cause-Related Marketing Harm Social?”Journal of
Macromarketing,21(1),8-22.
Pauwels, P., Hanssens, D. M., & Siddarth, S. (2002). The long-term
effects of price promotions on category incidence, brand choice,
and purchase quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 424–
439.
Promo Magazine. (2010). 5 Trends to watch in 2011. Retrieved December
21, 2010, from
http://enews.penton.com/enews/promo/pmo_xtra_new/current#5_trends_watch_in_2011.
Ross,J.K., Patterson, L.T. & Stutts, M.A.(1992),”Consumer
Perceptions of Organizations That Use Cause-Related Marketing,”
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,20(1),93-98.
Raghubir, P., Inman, J. J., & Grande, H. (2004). The three faces of
consumer promotions.California Management Review, 46, 23–41.
Strang, R. A.(1976),”Sales Promotion: Fast Growth, Faulty
Management,”Harvard Business Review,pp.1114-1124.
Schiller(1988), Doing Well By Doing Good, Business Week, Dec.5,53-57.
Sen, S., and Morwitz, V.G.(1996), “Consumer Reactions to a
Provider’s Position on Social Issues: Te Effect of Varying
Frames of Reference,”Journal of Consumer
Psychology,5(1),27-48.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as
purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you
are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 434–446.
Solomon, R.M.(1999). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and
Being,Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L.L.(2000), Consumer Behavior, 7th ed.,
Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Sengupta, J., and G.J. Fitzzsimons, The Effects of Analyzing Reasons
for Brand Preferences: Disruption or Reinforcement?, Journal of
Marketing Research,Vol.37,No.3,(2000),pp.1061-1086.
Sen,S.,Bhattacharya,C.B., and Korschun, D.(2006),”The Role of
Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple
Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment ,”Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science,34(2),158-166.
Swaminathan, Vanitha, Karen L. Page, and Zeynep Gurhan-Canli
(2007), “‘My’ Brand or ‘Our’ Brand: The Effects of Brand
Relationship Dimensions and Self-Construal on Brand
Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (August), 248–
59.
Shen, Y., Chi, C. and Chen,J.(2007), “A new perspective on the
effects of price promotions in Taiwan: a longitudinal study of
a Chinese society.” International Journal of Consumer Studies,
31, No.4,pp.385-390.
Solomon M.R. ,(2007) , “Consumer Behavior-buying,having,and
Being.”Person Prentice Hall TM7th.
Tauber, M.(1972), Why Do People shop?, Journal of Marketing, 36(4),
pp.46-49.
Tellis, G.J. (1990), “Do Deals Increase, Decrease or Hare No Effect
on Brand Repurchase,”Working paper,University of Southern
California.
Varadarajan, P.R.(1986),”Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion: A
Framework for Classification and Additional
Perspectives”,Journal of Marketing,50,61-73.
Varadarajan,P.Rajan & Anil Menon(1988),Cause-Related Marketing: A
Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,
Journal of Marketing,52,58-74.
Vakratsas, Demetrios and Tim Ambler (1999), “How Advertising Works:
What Do We Really Know?” Journal of Marketing, 63 (1).
Zeithaml, Valarie A.(1988), Consumer Perceptions of price, quality,
and value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence, Journal
of Marketing, Vol.52,pp.2-22.
Zhang, Yinlong and L.J. Shrum (2009), “The Influence of Self-
Construal on Impulsive Consumption,” Journal of Consumer
Research, 35 (February), 838–50.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code